A new Google Chrome extension has been released that will automatically change the words “pro-life” to “anti-choice” in the browsers of users who add it. The extension’s “creator” wishes to remain anonymous, according to the liberal website ThinkProgress.org. She has partnered with the National Institute for Reproductive Health Action Fund in order to release the extension to the public.
“We thought it was a really interesting and creative idea,” Andrea Miller, the president of NIRH, told ThinkProgress. “We agreed with her that the language in this discussion really matters.” So much so, apparently, that they have to change it.
“Those who stand against a woman’s right to decide what is best for her own body prop themselves up as righteous saviors using a problematic framework of rhetoric and religion,” the extension’s own website states. “The term ‘pro-life’ is inaccurate in this argument — although it is a powerful tool in the fight against women’s health rights — as it serves to demonize individuals who are pro-choice by suggesting that in their support of a woman’s right to choose what is best for her own life, they also advocate for death in some way.”
It is truly astounding that a “free” society would put up with the suppression of thought and language now occurring. The lefts’ attempt to limit or eliminate free speech by hi-jacking the language is a breathtakingly bold reminder of how ignorant of history a majority of Americans are. Almost every sentence, phrase, and word comprising Miller’s and the extension’s website quotes is demonstrably opposite of the truth, devoid of any self-awareness, and would be laughably hypocritical save for the stupefying self-importance and casual affirmation of the slaughter of innocents.
“The term ‘pro-life’ is inaccurate in this argument?” How is the attempt to stop babies from being killed not pro-life? “The fight against women’s health rights?” That’s absurd. Unfortunately, many abortions can be “problematic” for women’s health, as complications can ensue. Mental as well as physical complications. And how is aborting baby girls considered a woman’s health right?
Women do not have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies. Neither do men. Murder is illegal. For that matter, so is drinking and driving. Or walking around a public place nude. Or smoking a cigarette in most public spaces. You can’t even take your damn body and jay-walk across the street. For a time in New York City, you couldn’t legally purchase and slake your thirst with a 32-ounce soda, sister. No matter how badly you have to go, you can’t just relieve yourself on a public sidewalk, “excretory health” rights be damned. The idea that women- or men- have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies is patently absurd. And most of the examples listed here don’t even involve the taking of someone else’s life.
When you rationalize your mistreatment of others based solely on your own unaccountability and selfishness, you are a scumbag of the highest order.
Progressives shameless use of euphemisms would make the NAZI’s blush.( Vielleicht “Arbeit macht’s du frei” Fraulein Miller?). The left is terrified of the truth and therefore must gain control of the language. It alone has to have the authority to define what words mean, or it would not wield anything like the power it currently enjoys.
Progressives are not “pro-choice” when it comes to abortion. They are not pro-choice when it comes to our freedoms. They certainly aren’t pro-choice in terms of language. Using technology to automatically change words and phrases into what they want them to be obviously, tyrannically, strips away the choice the user of those words and phrases had already made.
I myself have a new browser extension coming out. It automatically changes the title “National Institute for Reproductive Health” to “National Institute for Killing Babies and not Being Made to Feel Guilty About it.” Moreover, it will take all entries of “ThinkProgress” and change them to “ThinkChaosandInsanity.” Also, it will change all references to “pro-choice” into “pro-murder” or “AdvocatingforDeathinSomeWay.” Finally it morphs all usage of the term “progressive” into the more truthful “repressive.”
Interesting and creative, no? The language in this discussion really does matter.
The socialist-progressives know that society’s fate likely hinges on a War of Words. Shame on the rest of us if we don’t find a way to prevail in this bloodless battle.