Monday, October 31, 2022

An Interview With President Biden


MSNBC Studios

Thursday, November 3, 2022


Nicolle Wallace: “Mr. President, thank you so much for joining us tonight. We would love to get your thoughts on the upcoming election, now just 5 days out.”

President Biden: “No problem, Chris, um, Nicolle. It’s, uh…I’m a pleasure to be here.”

Wallace: “Mr. President, with all due respect, what would you tell those who are…I’m just going to say it…a little concerned about your son Hunter’s alleged actions as, sort of, indicated on his alleged laptop?”

Biden: “Look, that question is dirty pool. Like the pool I was in once when I was defending the kids who were rubbing my leg hair from Corn Pop. Who was a bad dude. But, anyway, Hunter never had a laptop dance—ever—so I don’t know what these people are talking about. And that’s the gospel truth!”

Wallace: “Okay, sir, let’s pivot to your record. Which of your many accomplishments would you say you are most proud of?”

Biden: “That’s a better question, you lying, dog-faced pony-soldier. Nah, look, I’m just kiddin’. You do a great job, Rachel. Anyway, it’s hard to choose, right? I mean we have the best economy we’ve ever had. When I took over, millions were dying of COVID, gasoline was over $5 a gallon, inflation was rampant, interest rates were rising, Putin was in Ukraine. And now the pandemic is over, gas is down to $3.39, there is zero inflation…zero…interest rates are falling quickly, and Putin is in retreat. Right? Beat that, Republican fascists! By-the-way, where’s Jackie?”

Wallace: “All excellent points, sir. But, you must know, some of your radical, right wing critics say you are maybe too old to stay in office much longer. What do you say to them?”

Biden: “To hell with them, they don’t know what they are talking about! I flew more than 100 missions, sorties I think they’re called, over Viet Nam, so I don’t need them calling me names or saying that I can’t perform any longer. Just ask Jill. Who has been a great president, I might add.”

Wallace: “Any thoughts on your family, or on what you want your legacy to be?”

Biden: “Well…my grandfather once struck out Babe Ruth three times in the same inning, uh, game, the year he won the Cy Young award. And my great grandfather invented denim jeans. Dr. Jill—we still play doctor-patient (laughs)-- makes the best Reuben sandwiches on the planet, Jack. For real. She’s won awards. As for…what’d you call it, my jealousy, um, galaxy—”

Wallace: “Legacy, Mr. President.”

Biden: “Oh. (Nods off.)”

Wallace (gently, but a bit alarmed): “Mr. President?”

Wallace (a bit louder): “Mr. President?!”

Biden (wakes with a start): “Yes, dear?”

Wallace: “What would you tell people about the upcoming election?”

Biden: “I’d tell people in all 54 states that Republicans love inflation, so don’t elect ‘em. And they would drain our strategic oil reserve and get us into a war with Russia. And China, too. And maybe Iran and South Korea. I mean North Korea. I think. So…uh… vote for me and Kamala instead. Especially you Black folks, the ones that are authentically Black. You know who you are. Who else you gonna vote for…the thing?”

Wallace: “Final thoughts?”

Biden: “Yes. Two of them, in fact. First, we need to heal and unify this country, treat each other with respect. Second, don’t get serious about a guy, Rachel, until you’re at least 30. Third, Republicans are evil, so don’t vote for the bastards. And fourthly, uh, lastly, uhh…(chin drops, eyes close, long uncomfortable silence ensues)…

Wallace (with barely concealed panic): “Mr. President? Mr. President?!”

Biden (wakes with a start): “Yes, Chris…I was just resting my eyes. Now where was I (stares ahead, squinting a bit)? Oh, yeah. Don’t read the following words off the teleprompter: ‘the exit is to your left.’”

Wallace (slightly flushed): “Thank you, Mr. President. Nice job.”





Sunday, October 30, 2022

U.N. Claims Climate Catastrophe Now Almost Unavoidable


Three—count ‘em, three-- new reports from the United Nations claim the planet is in dire, imminent danger because the nations of the world are not adequately mobilizing against climate change. According to the reports, countries are neither creating sufficient plans to reduce warming, nor acting on them quickly enough, even as global greenhouse gas emissions are on the rise, thus putting the planet on track to experience nearly 3 degrees Celsius of warming within less than 80 years. 

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stated, "Loss and damage from the climate emergency is getting worse by the day and global and national climate commitments are falling pitifully short. Under current policies, the world is headed for 2.8 degrees of global heating by the end of the century. In other words, we are headed for a global catastrophe." Guterres added that the only way to change this tragic trajectory is with "urgent system-wide transformation.” (Translation: “Wealthy, Western, free-market nations must sacrifice themselves for the good of posterity because no one else will.) Naturally. Most of the countries comprising the United Nations want the U.S., in particular, to stop exhibiting “ableism” and to shut down its previously highly productive and efficient extraction and manufacturing industries.

The Democrats welcomed these reports, as they interpret them as lending support to their virulently anti-American agenda. They, and the media (sorry, I repeat myself), are pulling out all the stops now, just days before the midterm elections. This is evidenced by ever more extreme, panicked, and preposterous headlines, such as “New reports warn of untold human suffering as climate goals fall short,” “Republicans would deliberately crash the economy if elected,” “Republicans to end democracy if elected,” and Salon’s, “Study: Republican policies are killing Americans.” Etc., etc. I fully expect MSNBC or Salon to soon state unequivocally: “We are all going to die on November 9th if Democrats don’t retain the House and Senate.”

 I Can’t wait for the inexplicable 2-4 AM ballot dumps. Sometimes democracy really does die in darkness.



Ableism: The Next Taboo


 John Fetterman, the current lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania, recently sat down for an interview with Dasha Burns of NBC News. During the interview, Fetterman used closed captioning on a computer screen so that he could better understand the questions he was asked, an accommodation made necessary due to the serious stroke he suffered approximately five months ago. Yet he still appeared to struggle to interpret the questions and communicate his thoughts during the interview, though he insisted doctors have told him he has "no cognitive damage."

Following their discussion, Burns noted: "[I]n small talk before the interview, without captioning, it wasn’t clear he was understanding our conversation.” She added, “Myself, my producer and our crew did find that small talk before that captioning was difficult because of those auditory processing issues."

This prompted Gisele Fetterman, John’s wife, to embark on a verbal rampage. She joined Molly Jong-Fast on the cleverly named podcast Fast Politics Pod to discuss her reaction to Burns’ interview with her hubby, during which she implied that Burns should face professional "consequences" for her "ablest" comments.

She stated: "I don’t know how there were not consequences, right? I mean, there are consequences for folks in these positions who are any of the -isms. I mean, she was ablest and that’s what she was in her interview. It was appalling to the entire disability community and, I think, to journalism.”

She went on to excoriate NBC News, saying that it should "have to take accountability" for instances of ableism…which she pronounced "ably-ism." She also suggested that NBC and/or Burns should offer her family-- and the entire "disability community"-- an apology.

“Ablest,” huh? Ableism. Whereas I truly feel for Mr. Fetterman and everyone who has suffered through trauma and/or disabilities, to some degree we all have. And, if we are going to universally smear and perhaps even cancel the able, the competent, and the talented, the result should be too obvious to require elaboration-- to paraphrase Paul Harvey.

Is ableism as regards, say, doctors, soldiers, students, athletes, business leaders, astronauts, auto mechanics, etc., etc., a bad thing? Would you rather others accused your surgeon of “ableism” or of malpractice? Misgendering someone?

If we regard ability as something to be wary of, and tolerance as the greatest virtue, we will be unable to maintain a civil society, functioning economy…or any semblance of freedom.



Friday, October 28, 2022

MSNBC Guest Implies Republicans Are Nazis For Wanting Lower Inflation


There is “crazy” and there is “bat-shit crazy.” And then there is “off-the-charts, beyond delusional, holy-bleeping-cow insanity.” The latter was recently on display when MSNBC host Joy Reid and guest Matthew Dowd spoke about Republicans and the economy.

First, Reid accused Donald Trump of “fascism in the open” for saying he may challenge the 2022 midterm elections, starting in Philadelphia. (Why would he do that? The Democrats, though they rabidly challenged the results of the 2000, 2004, and 2016 elections, claimed the 2008 and 2012 elections were spot on, and that the 2020 election was the single most secure and uncorrupted in all of recorded history. It is, of course, utterly immaterial—mere coincidence—that they lost in 2000, 2004, and 2016, and won in 2008, 2012, and allegedly in 2020.)

And then Dowd cut in to say: “I’m not calling, I’m not going to say that the GOP are Nazis at this point, or whatever, but it certainly sounds very familiar to what happened in Germany, which is a bunch of citizens, Adolf Hitler gets a third of the vote, nobody thought it could happen there, they kinda went along because he said he would solve the economy and fix inflation.” He added, “And then, lo and behold, a few years later they lost their democracy and they’re all like ‘how’d that happen here.’”

That’s right, you let somebody try to improve the economy and lower inflation, and—POOF!-- next thing you know,  the Jews have all been rounded up and you’re saying “Heil Hitler” to everyone you meet. You’ll recall how that is exactly what transpired when Ronald Reagan succeeded Jimmy Carter. The inflation rate was 13.91% in 1980, the year Reagan was first elected, and a mere 1.46% by 1987 near the end of his presidency. Sure, this rescued countless millions of people from economic privation, but was it really worth it considering the fact that opposition parties were banned, Marshall law was declared, and millions of gays, Semites, and non-whites were captured and placed in concentration camps, many to be gassed or otherwise put to death?   

If comparing Republicans to Nazis for wanting to improve the economy and tame inflation isn’t “hate speech” and “fake news,” nothing is. And it is every kind of crazy. Ironically, because conservatives don’t believe in impinging on free speech—or treating political opponents as a fascist would—none are calling for the investigation, prosecution, or arrest of either Reid or Dowd.

If Reid and Dowd weren’t so blindly and inanely partisan, they would recognize and admit as much.  



Thursday, October 27, 2022

Professor Says Latinos Can "Achieve Whiteness," Become Racist


According to the Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles City Council President Nury Martinez, a Latina Democrat, recently referred to a councilman’s Black son as a “monkey”-- and also said in reference to liberal Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon, “he’s with the Blacks.”


This prompted MSNBC host Tiffany Cross to ask Fordham University law professor Tanya Hernández if making racist comments made a Latino white or just a racist racial minority. Hernández, a self-proclaimed “race law expert” with an interest in Critical Race Theory, replied: “Well, I actually think that there is another layer to this. Some people within the Latino community do achieve whiteness, one, because they are white appearing, they favor more our European ancestors, and depending on their accent, their educational level, whether they actually have a recognizable Hispanic surname, that all those things that enable a person to, I wouldn’t call it passing, but seemingly—just-- and seamlessly being able to pass into whiteness, or white Anglo-whiteness, just as they have whiteness within Latin America and the Caribbean. Um, so, I guess what I want to say is that despite this idea of all Latinos being brown, you know, some browns are browner than others and some whites are whiter than others. There are Latinos who are white, whether they have that personal identity or not, that’s their socially ascribed race from others outside, and they get to move in that privilege as well.”

Latinos are incapable of exhibiting racist behavior unless and until they “achieve” whiteness? Say what?! Hernández sounded like a cross between Kamala Harris and Dr. Seuss. Some browns are browner than other browns and some whites are whiter than white?!

And “achieve” sounds like a good thing, or at least it used to. Perhaps it’s now a bad thing because many white people do it. But isn’t it appropriation if non-whites want to claim—or are afforded-- whiteness? And what of whites who don’t achieve, are poor and wear their pants down around their knees? What of those that are unemployed and can’t figure out how to get an I.D.? Are they then “achieving Blackness,” or engaging in cultural appropriation, as well? Is that idea not preposterously racist, too? And yet it isn’t a notion trafficked in by white people. How can this be?

Concepts such as identity politics, intersectionality, and Critical Race Theory are tearing this nation apart. Unless and until there is nearly universal recognition and admission that all lives matter, be they Black, white, brown, yellow, red, indigenous, BIPOC, or that of the as yet unborn, we will never again “achieve” anything approaching racial harmony or societal cohesion. Which means we will forever be sentenced to suffer violence and chaos in our streets, a faltering economy, and a resultant sense of fear, despair, and hopelessness. And anger born of the knowledge that it didn’t have to be like this.

The character of the individual must once again be recognized as more important than the monolithic, lazy and rigid stereotypical view of a given racial group. So screw this “it’s Black and white” bullsh*t. To hell with the false dichotomy the racist Marxist tyrant-wannabees are rabidly attempting to thrust upon us. Let’s vote these vile charlatans and America Lasters out of office, chase them from every square inch of their vast and fetid swamp, evict them from their lofty perches in academia. Let’s refuse to pay attention to the virtue signaling leftist clowns in the media and Hollywood. Let’s boycott the tragically-- and pathetically-- woke moralizers in Big Tech, Big Banking, and Big Business.

Let us rid ourselves, once and for all, of those who advocate for unfettered abortion and assisted suicide, lockdowns, mask and vaccine mandates, punitive taxes and endless regulation. Let us rededicate ourselves to the celebration of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as granted to us by our Founders and our Creator.

Let us so conduct ourselves that, after November 8th, freedom may ring for all of us, of any race or color.

That would be a legitimate—and wondrous-- “achievement.” One in which all sane people, regardless of color—or shades thereof-- could rejoice.




Wednesday, October 26, 2022

New Zealand To Tax Cattle Burps, Pee


As part of a plan to address climate change, New Zealand's government recently proposed taxing the greenhouse gases that farm animals allegedly release into the atmosphere when burping and peeing.  


The Kiwi government proudly boasts that the proposed farm levy would be a world first. But wouldn’t this adversely affect the farmers, you ask?  Not at all, says the government! Au contraire! All the farmers would have to do to recoup the cost of the punitive taxes is charge more for their produce and products. Duh! Simple! I mean, hello, right? Never mind that this would, at minimum, contribute to already astronomical inflation rates by increasing the cost of food, a necessity.

As you might expect, the nation’s farmers quickly condemned the plan. Federated Farmers, the industry's main lobby group, said the plan would "rip the guts out of small-town New Zealand" and result in farms being replaced by trees…which is exactly the outcome desired by elite globalists, Great Re-setters, green terrorists, and assorted other environmentalist whackos.

Andrew Hoggard, Federated Farmers president, said farmers had been trying to work with the government for more than two years to come up with an emissions reduction plan that wouldn't decrease food production. To no avail.

"Our plan was to keep farmers farming," Hoggard said. He added that, under the new proposal, farmers would be selling their farms "so fast you won’t even hear the dogs barking on the back of the ute (pickup truck) as they drive off."

Opposition lawmakers from the conservative ACT Party claim the plan would actually increase worldwide emissions by moving farming to other countries that are less efficient at making food. (The same could be said of the Biden administration’s bizarre decision to greatly restrict oil and gas drilling in the United States…and then go begging nations like Venezuela and Saudi Arabia to produce more to sell to the U.S.)

New Zealand is not a large country, and its farming industry is vital to its economy. Dairy products are the nation’s largest export earner. Tragically, if this proposal is enacted, they won’t be for long, as farmers would have to start paying for emissions in 2025.

Does it seem like a good plan to make farmers pay more to produce the food that we all must have to survive? Is it logical to punish them for methane released when their cattle burp, or for the nitrous oxide in their urine? Should governments (almost literally) tax the crap out of them?

Ironically, if they do that, we will all soon be in deep doo-doo.


Tuesday, October 25, 2022

Demon-Attired Drag Queen Berates Church Doctrine, Aspires To Be Ordained By Same Church


On October 2, Allendale United Methodist Church in St. Petersburg, Florida, hosted a drag queen during its Sunday service, allowing him/her to deliver a sermon on “acceptance” and join the ministers at the altar to assist during the service. Isaac Simmons, the drag queen, who was dressed like a demon, preached the importance of defeating “systems of oppression” in society and Christianity in order to truly “love one’s neighbor as oneself.”  

Simmons stated: “We are here to learn and to grow and to deconstruct and to reimagine what church can be, who church can be for, and how church can feel together.” It is obvious that Simmons wants church to be “for” him—and cringeworthy that he talks about how it “can feel together.”

The demon drag queen added: “[Church] can be a place unafraid to denounce queerphobia, a place unafraid to name the sin of racism, and to call for an end to white supremacy. A place where all have equal and equitable access not just to the pulpit itself, to the sanctuary, but to God themself, and all that it represents within the community.” Of course. Church is a place to denounce “queerphobia,” but also to welcome a homosexual drag queen dressed as a demon sermonizing about acceptance while referring to God as “themself.”

In other words, we must embrace the hostile takeover fundamental transformation of the Christian church and religion or be smeared as bigots.

Incredibly, Simmons, who when dressed in drag goes by the name of “Ms. Penny Cost” – a blasphemous allusion to Pentecost and the Holy Spirit –  is currently in the process of seeking ordination in the United Methodist Church. He/she/they is a first-year seminary student enrolled in the Boston University School of Theology. He/she/they laughingly noted: “That’s right. They’re going to give me a church one day!”  

Allow me to preach for a moment, please:

Acceptance, tolerance, and inclusion are not always good things. Period. Full stop.

Should we accept high rates of murder? Should we tolerate violent crime? Should we be inclusive of rape and incest?

Should we welcome the presence of demon-attired drag queens in our churches telling us that our religion is sinful and can only be redeemed by their blessed presence?

What might God themself say?




Monday, October 24, 2022

How Quickly The First World Can Become The Third


How quickly the “First World” can become the Third. How fast people can pivot from sanctimonious, virtue signaling hypocrites into realists trying to survive. How ironic it is that this occurs concurrently with the assault on free market capitalism and the abundance of wealth, food, comfort and infrastructure that only it can provide. And the simultaneous abandonment of standards and abasement of history, tradition, and culture that has led to chaos and destruction in too many of our cities.

We are seeing the tragic onset of all of these phenomena now, in Europe, America, and most Western nations. Ironically—or perhaps not—it seems that extended periods of unprecedented prosperity sow the seeds of eventual decadence, decay, and diminution—if not outright destruction—by making people soft, lazy, and entitled. This seems to be a historical pattern, one exacerbated by today’s technology and social media. To paraphrase Churchill, if the free world dispenses with capitalism and the Western Canon, the world “will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.” (And we have seen far too much perverted science recently, especially as regards the plandemic, climate change, and the supposed existence of a virtually limitless number of genders.)

Another well-known Englishman, the Rolling Stones’ Mick Jagger, wrote a song titled “Under My Thumb.” Sadly, the vast majority of the world’s citizens are now under the thumb of elites who could not care less about them-- could not, in fact, disdain them more.

Alexander Fraser Tytler was yet another resident of the United Kingdom. He was a Scottish judge, writer and historian who was a Professor of Universal History and Greek and Roman Antiquities at the University of Edinburgh in the second half of the Eighteenth Century. Tytler famously stated: “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years.”

Tytler added, “These nations have progressed through this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From great courage to liberty; From liberty to abundance; From abundance to selfishness; From selfishness to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage.”

We are at step seven now. Let’s hope we don’t take the next step…into bondage…no matter how frequently and aggressively Democrats bid us to do just that.

Ronald Reagan noted that “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.” Some of us doubted that statement then, deeming it too pessimistic. Now we’ve seen what can happen in under two years, from 2020 to 2022, and realize Reagan was an optimist.




Sunday, October 23, 2022

London's Globe Theater Presents A Trans-Positive Version Of Joan Of Arc, I Joan


Comedy or tragedy? What would The Bard think?

The Globe Theatre in London, a purportedly faithful reconstruction of the Elizabethan Era playhouse where William Shakespeare’s plays were first presented, recently tweeted a video clip from its current production of the trans positive play I, Joan. The play is essentially a counterfactual, propagandistic transgender version of Joan of Arc. The Globe quickly deleted the tweet after it was rightfully subjected to much ridicule but did not take down a YouTube clip of the prologue from I, Joan.

If you watch the YouTube clip, you will see that the play opens with actress Isabel Thom (who specifies her pronouns as “they/them” on her Twitter page) stating: “Trans people are sacred. We are the divine. We are practicing our divinity by expressing authenticity. By enjoying our multiplicity. Elevating our humanity, finding the unity hidden inside community, remembering our collective connectivity fuels courageous creativity, unlocking the blessed spirituality that we all seek. Yeah, this s**t’s about to get spiritual.”

“Finding the unity hidden inside community, remembering our collective connectivity?” Did Thom (they/them) attend the Kamala Harris School of Public Speaking? The narcissism of the more militant members of the LGBTQIIA+ community is breathtaking. And off-putting to say the very least.

Rejecting and defacing God’s design is anything but divine. Engaging in chemical castration, the lopping off of body parts, and causing or celebrating the permanent sterilization of young people is neither “spiritual” nor “divine.”

Holding oneself/theyselves up to be special, somehow above the rest of us boringly heterosexual mere mortals is disingenuous, depraved, and despicable.

As happens so often with the tragically woke, Thom’s alleged attempt to get serious or “spiritual” is completely derailed by use of inappropriate, derogatory, or profane language. “This s**t’s about to get spiritual?” Really? (Methinks “they” dost profess too much.)

If I were to take a page from the Playbook of the Perpetually Oppressed, I would say, as a non-trans person, Thom comes off as The Merchant of Menace. I don’t feel safe when I hear the words she/they spoke. In my opinion, she/they is one/or more shrew/or shrews that should be tamed.  

If I, Joan, the play, never saw a "Twelfth Night," I would say: "All’s Well That Ends Well."





Democrat Labels National Right To Life Committee An "Extremist Group"


Nevada Democratic Senator Catherine Cortez Masto labeled the National Right to Life Committee an "extremist group" in a recent campaign ad attacking the group's endorsement of her Republican opponent, Adam Laxalt. The ad brands National Right to Life a "powerful extremist group" because it is urging Congress to pass what the ad terms a "national abortion ban."

In response, the organization issued a statement to TheBlaze in which it said: “National Right to Life does not want babies to die and supports measures to support the lives of mothers and their unborn children. Catherine Cortez Masto is the extremist who wants unlimited abortion even late in pregnancy and paid for by taxpayer dollars.” Just so.

The ad also prompted Nick Freitas, a Republican state representative from Virginia, to tweet: “NRTL is an extremist group? OMG. Were they founded by an unrepentant racist who advocated targeting minority communities with eugenics and abortion!? Oh wait… that was Planned Parenthood.”

Democrats now attack anything and everything that is—or was— an integral part of America. They have altered or erased our history, supported the abasement, destruction and removal of historical figures and their likenesses, cheered on the looting of our cities, demonized Christopher Columbus and our Founders, eviscerated our southern border, and denigrated free markets and capitalism. They sneeringly mock those of us that live in what they call “fly-over country.” They are going after automobiles, the internal combustion engine, the First and Second Amendments to the Constitution, and Christianity.  

And now they are even demeaning motherhood.

Soon they will be telling us that baseball and apple pie are nothing but the diseased products of our heinously bigoted, white, patriarchal society…and must be fundamentally transformed or abolished outright.

Ponder this: Democrats now claim that belief in the right to life and the idea that “all lives matter” are “extremist” positions! Mind-blowing. The Declaration of Independence states that we were endowed by our Creator with the unalienable right to Life, Liberty and Happiness.

Imagine anyone, Democrats included, calling belief in the right to life and the idea that all lives matter “extremist” positions 50 years ago—or more. (Or five years ago, for that matter.) Can you picture JFK uttering such repugnant nonsense? Harry Truman? Rosa Parks? Martin Luther King? Of course not.

Have Republican positions fundamentally changed in the past few years? Not in that regard. Pretty sure most in the GOP believed then as they do now, that there is a right to life and that all lives matter.

For that matter, while the Democratic Party has over the past several decades pivoted from wanting the best for America to wanting to effectively destroy it, most Republicans still basically believe in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the concept of federalism, somewhat more limited government, somewhat less spending, making sure tax rates aren’t excessively punitive, and defending the country’s sovereignty. And Democrats routinely call the Republicans’ agenda extreme!

Belief in the right to life, that all lives matter (even white ones), and the desire to make America great again are extremist positions?!

Today’s Democrats clearly put the dem in demonic.



Friday, October 21, 2022

It's A Drag Queen World, We Just Live In It


Denver Public Schools recently recruited a “celebrity” drag queen to serve as a crossing guard for the day. According to the district’s social media post, Dixie Krystals, a drag entertainer for over 20 years, was brought on by the school district to take part in “Walk and Roll to School” day. Krystals, who has previously appeared on the Discovery+ show “Generation Drag,” was one of the celebrities enlisted to assist with crossing guard duties in honor of Pedestrian Safety Month. Superintendent “Dr.” Alex Marrero and Democratic Colorado Senator John Hickenlooper also were present for the event.

I have a hard time believing there are this many drag-queens. They are now ubiquitous, omnipresent, everywhere. Parades, schools, libraries, churches, restaurants, grand-openings, ribbon-cuttings, bars, bar mitzvahs…everywhere one looks, there is a drag-queen.

Unbeknownst to me, are there academies somewhere that crank out drag-queens like a LGBTQ Pez-dispenser on steroids? Because, if there are not, they must be sorely overworked!

They should unionize-- and demand a cap to the number of hours and days they work, and a limit to the number of events they attend and shows they put on in a day.

And why are there so many drag-queens and virtually no drag-kings?

Thursday, October 20, 2022

"The View" Host Joy Behar Finds Voters' Priorities "Sad And Depressing"


"The View" host Joy Behar recently intimated that she finds the economic concerns of voters "sad and depressing” when compared to the threat to democracy she believes Republicans pose. The ditzy one added that people simply don't know "what the stakes are" ahead of the midterm elections. 


When ABC News political director Rick Klein stated that he believes Republicans were likely going to take the House in the upcoming election, Behar sneeringly asked him, "When your reporters say, you know, you tell me they’re [voters] worried about gas, they’re worried about this, they’re worried about that, do the reporters follow up and say, ‘Do you think the Republicans will be able to fix these things?’" 

Well, Joy, voters probably do think that, or else they wouldn’t ne planning to vote for them. And perhaps they’ve paid attention to recent events, compared the quality of their lives currently to what they experienced when Trump was in office, or even have some basic knowledge of, oh, say, all of recorded history.

Think of what “Joy” is effectively saying: ”If you all don’t vote the way I, Joy Behar, want you to, it is the end of our democracy.”

Ms. Behar is far too dumb to understand that kind of thinking is what may end our democracy (which is actually a representative republic). Talk about the (self-considered) elite and important being out of touch! If Behar had to cut corners and scrounge for food, if she lived near the southern border or had family members assaulted by illegal immigrants or killed by fentanyl, she would likely be singing a very different tune.

In one sense it is sad and depressing that voters are so concerned with the economy. It is tragic what has happened to so many…so quickly. And so inexplicably—and unnecessarily-- as we are only now emerging from a plandemic and extended lockdown after which a “V-shaped” economic recovery was a virtual certainty…had Biden administration policies not been explicitly designed to prevent that outcome.


Wednesday, October 19, 2022

Psychologist Claims Many Fetuses Know Their Preferred Gender Identity While In The Womb


According to the Daily Mail, Boston Children’s Hospital, purportedly one of America’s finest, recently posted a video on its YouTube channel in which psychologist Dr. Kerry McGregor explains that “a good portion” of children she sees at the hospital’s Gender MultiSpecialty Service (GeMS) clinic know their gender identity “from the womb.” In said video, Dr. McGregor goes on to say that some children express their gender identity as soon as they can talk. “They may say phrases like ‘I’m a girl’ or ‘I’m a boy,'” she states.

Right. “Mama” or “dada” might have been kids’ first words in the dusty old past, but today infants are much more likely to effectively state, “Even though I have been arbitrarily assigned a sex at birth by medical personnel trafficking in the biases of the white Christian patriarchy—and have genitalia classically associated with binary gender, I must, in the strongest possible terms, assert that I am, in fact, a free agent when it comes to gender and sexuality.”

Consider this: our leaders can no longer define what a woman is, or when a pregnancy occurs. And the Democratic Party wants to enshrine the “right” to abortion up until the moment of birth—or slightly after. Yet, as evidenced by those like Dr. McGregor, some progressives think the unborn know what gender they wish to be while still a “fetus” in their “birthing parents” womb!

Here’s a question demanding to be asked: do Democrats/progressives really want to champion the unfettered abortion of babies who might immediately become part of the LGBTQ community if they were “allowed” to be born?!

Tuesday, October 18, 2022

Gas Prices Rising Again, Biden's Accountability, Credibility Falling Again


President Joe Biden has taken every opportunity lately to take credit for the fact that gasoline prices fell for 99 days in a recent stretch. That he did this by releasing millions of gallons of oil from our Strategic Oil Reserve, thereby endangering our future security, and ridiculously—if relentlessly—badgering oil companies for being profitable, was, of course, immaterial.

As long as prices at the pump were going down, it was all duckies and bunnies…and all due to Biden. But now that prices are rising again — by as much as 60 cents a gallon in some areas last week alone — the president will not take the blame.

Biden was at fault for the rapidly rising gas prices shortly after he took office. And he is at fault for high prices now. When Trump was in office, gas prices were historically low, and America was energy independent. Because of his policies.

On his first day in office, Biden cancelled the Keystone Pipeline, and every day since, he has slandered, harassed, and vilified virtually every sector of the American energy industry. All in chimerical, needless, fruitless, and impossible pursuit of slowing or ending “climate change.”

Moreover, his Executive Order 13990 dramatically increased the costs and red tape involved in the exploration, extraction, and refining of so-called fossil fuels…for any company dumb enough to engage in these endeavors.

Energy companies are rightly asking why they would invest tens of billions of dollars in new supplies geared towards the future production of energy here at home when the Biden administration has pledged to phase out all fossil fuels within 10 years.   

So, here’s how the president might defend his actions to someone with the temerity to question them:

 “Look, look…look. That’s not how it works, Jack! Come on, man! You gotta understand—it ain’t rocket séance, um, science. When things go good…that’s me! That’s me! When they go bad, I don’t have any control over it. Period. Understand now? Kapisch? I mean, even a dog-faced pony soldier can get it, right? Anyway, where’s Jackie? Jackie?”




Monday, October 17, 2022

Young Women Increasingly Identify As Liberal


Young women are more likely to identify as liberal now than at any other time in recent history, while young men are not. Thus, we have the largest gender gap in this regard in at least a quarter of a century. According to Gallup poll data, roughly 44% of women ages 18-29 identified as liberal in 2021 compared to only 25% of men. Those numbers exhibit a sharp increase for women over just the past three years, as just 35% of women identified as liberal leaning in 2018. The 19-point difference between men and women who identify as liberal is the largest polling gap the survey has found since it began tracking the issue in 1998. And this is an ongoing trend, as only 29% of women identified as liberal leaning at the end of the 1990s.

A clear binary! Proof of the distinct difference between the sexes!

“Experts” surmise that several issues are behind this gap and these trends, including the #MeToo movement and the inauguration of President Donald Trump. Moreover, experts claim changes in abortion policy in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent Roe v. Wade decision have made more young women militantly liberal. As usual, experts are wrong. It has been mostly liberal Hollywood types and politicians that have been implicated in the more extreme cases of harassment. Unemployment among women was at a historic low while Trump was president. After Bill Clinton was impeached for lying about his sexual relations with the young intern Monica Lewinsky, his approval ratings soared, so any relatively minor and unsupported allegations against Trump should not have held water. As for abortion, it is true that many young women tragically believe they have the unfettered “right” to kill their unborn babies for their convenience. However, many also believe this notion couldn’t be farther from the truth and is anathema to a civilized society.

What’s really driving the continuing radicalization of young women is the simple fact that more of them are going to college than ever before. There are more women on campus today than men. And many take pseudo-educational “classes” in “disciplines” like “women’s studies” or “genderqueer history.” Those who have been subjected to years of unrelenting Marxist indoctrination on campus are, of course, far more likely to identify as liberal-- and far less likely to get married. They are also far more likely to tell others how to live. And far less likely to be happy.

How odd that this difference in political identification persists even as many women appear to exhibit more masculine traits and many men more feminine ones-- and the lines get even more blurred by the rapid rise of transgenderism.

College education has devolved to the point that it is now just a vehicle for statist indoctrination. Since young women still tend to be more accepting and naive than young men, they are more receptive (i.e. easier marks) to the hackneyed dogma incessantly thrust upon them. Once again, a clear indication of the binary nature of the sexes.

It is surpassingly strange that so many progressives claim to be non-binary in their gender and sexuality, but are simultaneously absolutely inflexible and unyielding in their belief that only one correct point of view exists as regards abortion, climate change, mask and vaccination mandates, transgender rights, and a host of other issues. How bizarre is a belief that there are an infinite number of genders but only one point of view?!

These delusions, if widespread, eventually lead to the opposite of a classically liberal society, where both truth and free thinking are valued.



Sunday, October 16, 2022

Jan. 6 Panel Is Our Democracy...According To Jan. 6 Panel


The January 6 Show Committee, starring with Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, and Adam Schiff, returned to television on Thursday, October 13th to mixed reviews. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), a somewhat more obscure panel member, used an earlier, virtual, People for the American Way event to drum up excitement for the new episode of baseless, mindless, orgiastic Trump bashing, projection, and gaslighting.

Raskin stated, “Tune in for our discussion of Trump’s clear and present danger presented to democracy and freedom in America by a movement that he’s galvanized.” That’s an interesting way to characterize a movement specifically intended to defend the democratic republic from the clear and present danger that today’s Democrats pose to it. Moreover, “People for the American Way” is akin to the “People’s Republic of China,” in that neither are for the people…and both disdain the American way.

During this episode hearing, the panel, all of whom are suffering from stage 4 Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), focused on supposed evidence that Trump has trafficked in rhetoric “that we knew caused violence on Jan. 6,” as Rep. Cheney recently told reporters.

The Jan. 6 panel believes that at least 74 million Americans, nearly half of all those voting in the 2020 election, are a “clear and present danger to democracy and freedom?” That notion is, self-evidently, idiotic. As are they.

Those 74 million—or more, possibly much more—Americans are only a threat to the power of Democrats and pathetic, spineless RINOs such as those comprising the ridiculous Jan. 6 committee.

They consider themselves to be “our democracy,” much like Dr. Fauci considers himself to be science. Therefore, to their fevered minds, anyone who doesn’t support them is, self-evidently, a threat to democracy. Even as they lie and cheat, weaponize entire departments of the federal government they currently control against the opposition party, threaten to pack the court and eliminate the filibuster, and openly discuss dispensing with the Electoral College.