How Much Democrat Fraud And Corruption Will Be Enough For Republicans?

 

Democrats are to corruption as Republicans are to spinelessness. The two just naturally go together. And the latter twinning contributes to the former.

Sanctuary cities (and states) allow for almost unending corruption and election malfeasance, which is why the Democrats are so fond of them. But do blue states have so many sanctuary cities because they are blue states, or are states with many sanctuary cities blue because they are states with many sanctuary cities? This chicken or egg question is sadly moot, because the chickens are corrupt and the eggs are rotten. Instead of instituting sanctuaries for illegals, we should be providing them for the law abiding. Instead of coddling criminals and stealing from citizen taxpayers, governments should be punishing crime and protecting the citizens and taxpayers. If instead they tolerate, subsidize, or reward sloth, license, and even crime, while they discourage or effectively punish lawful and productive behavior, there can be only one result: societal disaster. Which is a feature not a bug to members of today’s far-left Democrat Party. They believe if they trash the United States, the majority of the electorate will look to them to set things right. Especially if a significant percentage of that electorate “owes them a favor.”

Consider that reports indicate that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) documented nearly $700 million in cash, carried in passengers’ luggage, departing Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport over the past two years, according to Homeland Security officials. I’m sure you will not be shocked upon learning (learing?) that the cash was mainly transported by a small group of Somali couriers on flights to the Middle East, Dubai in particular. Individual suitcases sometimes contained as much as $1 million. TSA agents allegedly flagged the movements to Customs and Border Protection and Homeland Security Investigations early on, but the Biden administration declined to act. Gee, I wonder why? Maybe for the same reason “Tampon” Timmy Walz and Jacob “Get the eff out of Minneapolis” Frey allowed industrial scale fraud and corruption to continue to take place right under their insurrectionist, treasonous noses.   

 Ultimately, encouraging mass illegal immigration and turning a blind eye to this Mother-of-All-Crimes—and so much other fraud-- was intended by Democrats to permanently change the demographics of the nation to dramatically favor the election of Democrats. It’s a good gig if you can get it. Let’s see how Republicans treat that gig/crime now. I wish I could say I was confident that justice will be served. But “progressives” and other assorted radicals embarked on their “long march through the institutions” more than 50 years ago, making this the longest ongoing insurrection in history, and non-MAGA Republicans have done almost nothing to oppose them.

Conservatives and patriots need a sanctuary. And so do our wallets. Call, text, email, and snail mail your Representatives and Senators. Tell them you’re as mad as hell. Tell them enough is enough. Tell them the time is now to finally do the right thing.

Blue States Suing The Federal Government For Enforcing Federal Law

 

“Minnesota Nice” has morphed into “Minnesota No Ice,” as we have all seen on our screens. The Loony State’s Democrat officials have sued the federal government for enforcing federal immigration law. Not wanting to be left out of the madness, Illinois, the Land of Lincoln, has followed suit. How’s that for irony?! (Think about it.) Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul recently announced that his office has filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Customs and Border Protection, accusing federal agents of “unlawful” enforcement actions in Illinois. One question for Kwame: “How is it that federal agents enforcing federal law as regards illegal aliens is “unlawful?!”

AG Raoul at a press conference: “The repeated invasions of private property, wrongful arrests, illegal interrogations, and violent confrontations have not made our city or state safer.” The repeated invasions by illegal aliens and their often criminal and violent actions have not made your city or state safer, either, pal. And neither have the actions-- or inactions-- of the Illinois or Minnesota state governments led by the bluest of the blue, politically speaking. By contrast, ICE is in your cities and states trying to make them safer for actual citizens.

In effect, Walz, Pritzker and company are saying to ICE, “How dare you do your jobs and protect American citizens! We don’t!” But, of course, with these clowns, performative virtue signaling trumps effective action.

To make matters even worse, Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., heartily agreed with MS NOW's "Morning Joe" contributor Mike Barnicle recently, when he suggested flying Democratic senators and members of the NYPD to Minneapolis to confront ICE officers. Do Democrats really want another crack at a civil war? It sure seems like they do.

It also seems like they are bizarrely unfamiliar with the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2), which declares federal law to be the supreme law of the land, binding state courts and superseding conflicting state laws. In other words, federal law takes precedence over state laws should there be a conflict.

Democrats almost never oppose federal law when they are in power but often do when they are not. Yet many Democrats did filibuster the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In 1957, President Eisenhower sent federal troops to Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce a federal court order for school integration, much to Democrats’ dismay.

And, of course, there was April 12, 1861, when the Democrat South fired on Fort Sumter to start the Civil War. How’d that go for the country? Are these criminal-loving asshats soon going to fire on ICE?

Talk about chaos! I’m a dedicated Federalist, but if states can choose whether or not they want to obey federal (Constitutional) law, the union is in existential peril. And anywhere from 620,000 to 851,000 people would have died in vain. Would it be better for all—or even possible—for the likes of Minnesota and Illinois to secede from the union, or to be thrown out of same?

As Lincoln noted, “A house divided cannot stand.” Therefore, the actions he took were not an attack on federalism or state’s rights, but a desperate attempt to save the union. It is impossible at this point to know the ramifications had he not been successful in doing so, whether regarding slavery, World War I, World War II, or several other crucially important historical institutions and events.

What would Lincoln do now? It’s hard to say with certainty and conviction.

But he wouldn’t send senators and policemen to needlessly confront federal troops in Minneapolis—or anywhere else.

 

 

My Person Of The Year For 2025

 

Okay, so maybe I was a little late picking a “Person of the Year” for 2025, but it is always such a subjective matter, rather than an objective one. There are more than 8 billion of us on the planet today, so narrowing it down to one is not always easy. This year was no exception.

There were great folks who achieved extraordinary accomplishments, such as Charlie Kirk, Elon Musk, or President Trump.

On the other hand, Charlie Kirk was assassinated, President Trump lives with constant threats, and Elon Musk had his cars keyed. Many took to social media to celebrate Kirk’s death. Could Satan be a “Person of the Year” contender, in a, well, Satanic way?

Moreover, it seemed like the more disgusting and hate-filled a candidate, the more likely they were to get elected. Look no further than Virginia Democrat Jay Jones, who is now the state’s attorney general, even though texts surfaced prior to the election in which he wished for the death of his political opponent, Todd Gilbert…and fantasized about Gilbert’s children dying, as well.

Then there is the burgeoning—and almost unbelievable-- Somali fraud scandal, in which untold billions of American citizens’ tax dollars have been handed over to fraudulent Somali shell companies. Hell, it seems like nearly every NGO, charitable organization, and government program is riddled with fraud. In truth, it seems like most governments are entirely corrupt and fraudulent, the bigger the more so. Could/should Beelzubub get the “honor?” I know it’s a stretch to call the Antichrist a person, but many of us refer to Rashida Tlaib, Adam Schiff, and Tim Walz as “persons,” so…

But, no. My Person of the Year for 2025 is one we hear so much about, but that I have never encountered. Leftist politicians and their media sycophants rant and rave about them, implying that they may be a majority, but their existence is apocryphal at best, as far as I can tell. I am talking about the “Islamophobe.” Muslims are everywhere where I live, yet everyone I know smiles and says “hi” when they pass by one in the hall or on the street. People cater to them and are, in fact, loathe to criticize their behavior or even report fraudulent activity involving them for fear of being called “racist.” Which has led to the staggering and poorly disguised fraud being uncovered in Minnesota. And Ohio. And Maine. And…well you get the picture.

It does not make one an “Islamophobe” if one gets upset at 9/11 or a mass shooting in which the perpetrator shouted “Allahu Akhbar!” Or many such shootings. It just shows one isn’t a heartless monster.

I have encountered many anti-Semites in the U.S., some quite open about it, but no true “Islamophobes.”

Therefore, if there is one, that person is astonishingly gifted at concealing his or her whereabouts. So, congratulations “Islamophobe,” you are my Person of the Year.”

 

 

 

 

ICE Protests And Riots-- Rallying To Aid And Abet Evil

 

Riots are taking place across the country in support of a person who was an inveterate obstructor of law enforcement and a Trump hater. Just as massive and violent riots took place after George Floyd, a career criminal, druggie, ne’er-do-well, and thug died in police custody several years ago after attempting to use a counterfeit bill to purchase a pack of cigarettes.

Yet there were no massive protests after 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska, a Ukrainian refugee, was murdered by a black man while riding in a light rail car in Charlotte, North Carolina. The assailant, Decarlos Brown, had previously been arrested—and released—14 times.

Zarutska, who “loved America” according to her family, worked at a senior citizen center and took care of animals in the neighborhood. Maybe if she wasn’t white and had an extensive criminal record many would have protested her death. In fact, I’m certain they would have. It’s too bad America didn’t love her back.

But this has become a pattern in the U.S. Law enforcement is reviled and attacked, while criminals are given “sanctuary,” and are released with little or no time served if they are ever apprehended. And then, if they accost and threaten law enforcement officers and are subsequently killed, they are treated as beloved martyrs, heroic symbols of “resistance” against the white patriarchy, capitalism, fascism, and xenophobia. But it gets worse than that. Competence, personal discipline, success, manners, hygiene, intelligence, logic, the traditional family and traditional mores-- and what used to be considered simple human decency are all mocked, libeled, and slandered as tools of “white supremacy.” Mostly by white people, especially the truly awful “AWFULs.”

Enter pop star Zara Larsson, a Swedish national, who recently used social media, in the form of an Instagram post, to state: “I love immigrants. I love criminals. I love trans people. I love abortions. I love queers. I love slutty women. I love contraception. I love welfare. I love socialism. I fucking hate ICE”

Larsson is a multi-platinum recording artist who boasts nearly 10 million Instagram followers. And she loves everything that destroys individual lives in specific and society in general. There isn’t a better definition of evil than that.

So, this sickness afflicts the West in general, though that doesn't make it any easier to watch what has been happening to the (formerly) United States.

So it happens that if a mountain lion attacks a human, more “GoFundMe” money is pledged to the mountain lion than the human, a Christian priest is punished for reciting Bible passages while Muslim call to prayers ring out five times a day in several of our major cities, abortion is called “women’s health care,” people are arrested for silently praying outside of “women’s health care” centers, and Somali Learing Centers dot the landscape. You can’t misgender kids, but you must be in favor of mutilating or removing their genitalia.

All prior knowledge, wisdom, lived experience, and traditions are wrong. Sloth, crime , entitlement, bitterness, anti-racism racism, lies, and big government are good, everything that has heretofore been considered good is bad. This is, in effect, what so many people across the West are saying and why they are rioting. Choosing crime and chaos over decency-- and overtly choosing evil over good is sick. It is tragic. And it is an immediate and existential danger to our republic and others.

Forget NATO. The fate of Western nations—and indeed the world-- hinges on this battle between good and evil. A battle that is currently being fought almost entirely by one side.

Pray for our deliverance, as only the Lord GOD can save us if we refuse to save ourselves.

 

"The View" Host Wonders Why NATO Hasn't Intervened To Save The U.S. From Trump

 

On a recent episode of “The View,” co-host Whoopi Goldberg apparently wondered why the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has not intervened to save America from Donald Trump, the duly elected President of the United States.

Goldberg stated, “Let me just say this, here’s my question! Where is everybody?! Where is everybody else?! We come to everybody’s aid.” She added of the alleged Trump menace, “We help everybody. NATO, they came and helped us after 9/11. Where is everybody?”

Coming further unglued, she bellowed: “Where is the government?! Do you realize we don’t have a government?!” And she then opined that this “should be our biggest bitch right now.”

We don’t have a government? That’s not true! Weren’t you guys just super upset at Trump’s actions, so much so that many of you went around with childish signs proclaiming, “NO KINGS?” We might rightfully note that we have an abundance of bitches at the moment, such as Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Jasmine Crockett, an astounding number of relatively affluent white women, and Goldberg herself, but one of them isn’t that we have too small a government.

She was right about one thing: the United States does help everybody. NATO? We prevented Europe from being the Kaiser’s bitch with our entry into World War I and from becoming Hitler’s bitch with our entry into World War II. There are thousands upon thousands of crosses gracing cemeteries in France and elsewhere bearing the names of American soldiers that attest to that fact.

What was Whoopi implying? That Denmark or Turkey should have a crack at capturing Trump and putting him on trial? Or that, say, Albania, Portugal, or Canada should attack the U.S. and rid it of its duly elected leader? Would such an action be an attempt at “freeing” the likes of the ultra-wealthy Whoopi Goldberg, or an act of pathetic virtue signaling the desire to go back to the bad Old World Order, where the planet was run by the likes of Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Pol Pot? The aforementioned ruthless dictators deliberately slaughtered hundreds of millions of innocent people, whereas Bad Orange Man hasn’t been responsible for deliberately killing a single innocent soul. (Unlike, say, Hillary Clinton.)

Where is everybody else, meaning all other nations? Buehler? Buehler? Anyone? I’ll tell you where they are: dealing with their own problems. Most of which, at least in Western European nations, stem from an utterly unsustainable influx of immigrants with views antithetical to the majority of those in the nations they have chosen to invade.

The U.S. defeated Britain twice…and then subsequently saved it-- and Europe—twice. Three times, so far, if you count the Cold War that Reagan won without firing a shot. And many Europeans mocked him.

The United States doesn’t need the other NATO countries to come to its aid-- or to attack it. They are simply incapable of effectively doing the latter. And not much better at doing the former.

No, we will keep dealing with murderous fanatical dictators while Europe continues its long, mythical wet dream. We will continue trying to show it how to save itself, even as it keeps importing ever more Muslims.

Many European leaders take every opportunity to attack President Trump in specific and the U.S. in general. I would caution them that they are engaged in the most existential war they have ever faced…even if most of them don’t yet know it.

It would behoove them to remember that when the U.S. conquered Germany and Japan, we gave those countries back to their citizens within a few years, after spending billions of dollars to help them become viable again.

Today we have captured Maduro, a murderous narco-terrorist thug, and are attempting to aid the people in Mexico, Cuba, and Iran, by helping to bring them out from under the thumb of cartel, Marxist, and Mullah tyranny…and into the broad, sunlit uplands of a free and prosperous society. We are also trying to prevent the Russians and Chinese from having a death grip on vital arctic lanes and resources.

So, do you really want to possibly take up arms against us, as Whoopi suggested may be the case? I hope not, for your sake and ours. We have to deal with the likes of Ilhan Omar, AOC, Adam Schiff…and Whoopi Goldberg. And you have to quickly recognize the existential danger that threatens your existence today.

Or else, soon will come a day in which America will have to fend off Marxism, Wokeism, Communism, radical Islam, and insane suicidal empathy at the same time. And decide whether or not to expend precious American treasure to save Europe for the fourth time.

Immigration And Values-- Then And Now

 

Nearly all early immigrants to the United States of America came from Europe. More to the point, earlier immigrants came to America to become Americans. They came because they wanted an opportunity and they shared America's founding values. It appears the majority of latter-day immigrants, particularly from North Africa and the Middle East, do not wish to become Americans, do not wish to assimilate, and do not share our values. In fact, in many cases, they detest them. They do not want just an opportunity. They want cash. They want to live off the American taxpayer. Perhaps permanently. In the case of Somalis in Minnesota, statistics prove this to be the case, as 81% are on one or more forms of American taxpayer-funded welfare. Similar dependency (or fraud) is likely taking place in numerous other states.

In fact, many-- if not most-- Muslim immigrants want to change our values to suit theirs. Several surveys show that the majority of Muslims, not just “radical Islamists,” prefer Sharia Law to the American Constitution and other founding documents, protections, and principles.

Make no mistake, Sharia Law is utterly, inarguably, and irrevocably incompatible with a free society and a free market capitalist system, not to mention the Bill of Rights.

Do we really want to change our values to those of a society that encourages or tolerates clitoridectomies for girls as young as 4-- and allows men to treat their women as property, marry pre-pubescent girls, rape infidels, and stone homosexuals?

Only mad men, a society hell-bent on its own destruction, would allow this to happen. (And It is certain that such a society will be hell-bent.) Memo to Karens: all cultures are not the same. All beliefs are not equally valid.

We are on the proverbial highway to hell, pedal to the metal. And no one seems in a particular hurry to find an exit ramp.

If we do not soon do so, it will be lights out for America.

At which point all a rational person could say to those possessed by a bizarrely suicidal empathy would be, “Enjoy your Sharia law.”

“And say ‘hi’ to China.”

Fraud And Corruption Rampant, Systemic

 

Moneyapolis, Fraudesota, where I used to spend much time, has been very welcoming to Somali fraudsters. But, to be fair, it appears that nearly every government agency-- whether national, state, or local—as well as every NGO and nearly every alleged “charity,” is utterly corrupt and riddled with fraud. How much of the money you gave to that NGO or charity actually ended up where you intended it to? Zero %? One or two%? Perhaps as much as 30% or 40%?! Well, you don’t know, and neither do I, but in the vast majority of cases it is probably not even the latter. Is there any government agency-- or charitable organization, entity, or person receiving aid-- that isn’t fraudulent? Anyone? Buehler?

In truth, it likely would have done a lot more good—and a lot less bad-- had you and I just spent those dollars at a retail store. Or any private enterprise that employs people, pays them their salaries, and provides other benefits. Because those companies do pay the salaries of their employees, a significant percentage of which goes to purchasing goods and services, allowing other companies to employ a workforce and pay their employees’ salaries. Salaries with which they will, in turn, do the same. Moreover, all of these folks pay taxes, often exorbitant, that go to the government to provide for the common defense, a social safety net, and a myriad other things, some arguably good, others not so much. As do the companies themselves. Some of whom take out loans from financial institutions that subsequently spread that money around in the community. Others have checking and/or savings accounts with financial institutions, which allows those institutions to make those loans…to businesses and individuals alike.

We must pay our taxes under threat of incarceration, regardless of our will, whether that money is stolen and ultimately used to fund terror groups like al-Shabab, or is cycled through an NGO to enrich entitled bastards heading up groups like BLM, Antifa, or the Democrat party.

Then we find out that the majority of “charitable” programs and groups are only charitable to their leaders or to the almost invariably left-wing causes they support. Many are actually working to bring about the mother of all welfare states rather than trying to help people get off assistance.

Tim Walz’ Minnesota, already awash in fraud, is embarking on yet another program that is begging to be taken advantage of. The Paid Family and Medical Leave Law will allow people to take up to 20 weeks a year off to care for a loved one…and still receive benefits from their employer. There are no known effective guardrails to prevent rampant fraud. Wife suffering from depression? Uncle has a bum leg? Just get a doctor to sign off on the maladies and need for assistance and take 12 to 20 weeks off with compensation! The beer is cold and the fish are biting! Now that is Minnesota nice! And Walz’ Department of Human Services not only mismanaged money but fabricated documents to cover its malfeasance!

And then we have union dues, which often end up going to line the pockets of those with whom many unionized employees fervently disagree.

So it is better that we spend our money purchasing something at a store, restaurant, or other service outlet, that likely does everything it can to provide us with the best products and services at the lowest possible price, because that is what free markets, competition, entrepreneurship, and the Capitalist system generally encourage private, for-profit companies to do.

For those who understand economics, the point at which the supply and demand curves intersect is not only the irrefutably logical price for any given product or service, it is the next closest thing to absolute truth. As the late, great “investigative humorist” P.J. O’Rourke noted, “How can anything be worth other than what people are willing to pay for it.” But, to governments, them is fightin’ words. They want to fix the prices as well as the tax rates, to level the playing field for the “marginalized.” And most of us know how that turns out. (Hint: very, very badly. For everyone.)

And yet we have many wanting socialism. Progressives excuse crime and blame victims. And instead of cheering ICE for taking countless rapists, thugs, and thieves off our streets, nearly all of whom are illegal aliens to begin with, Karens and other leftists are protecting the criminals and accosting the members of federal law enforcement. It seems many prefer chaos, side with evil, and demand no standards whatsoever, perhaps in a pathetic attempt to excuse their own behavior. Where does that leave us?

If even the Trump administration can’t substantively reduce the fraud and corruption endemic in our government, and if it is not allowed to deport the vast majority of illegals, we are permanently screwed. Because when Democrats take the reins again, it will be game…set…match, cheaters and hoodlums. Forever.

 

 

Minnesota Gov. Walz Invokes "Gettysburg" When Speaking Of Ice-Protester Clashes

 

Increasingly psychotic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz recently stated of the attacks made on ICE by protesters in Minneapolis, “When things looked really bleak it was Minnesota's First that held that line for the nation on that, uh, July 3rd 1863, um, and I think now we may be in that moment that the nation's looking to us to hold the line on democracy.”

What the bleep?! Gettysburg? There were over 50,000 casualties suffered in that 3-day battle. While it is regrettable that one woman was shot and killed in Minneapolis, she had deliberately blocked traffic, ignored repeated orders, and, ultimately, apparently tried to commit vehicular homicide.

The truly sad and scary thing is that Walz wants the confrontation between ICE and deranged rioters to be seen as a great and pivotal battle in American history so that it will deflect from his mind-blowing incompetence and corruption…and, maybe, just maybe, get many to see him as some sort of hero or freedom fighter. He and the equally disturbed mayor of Minneapolis, Jacob Frey, have been-- and still are-- trying to gin up as much hatred and division as possible to foment clashes between protesters and federal law enforcement. They believe that the images transported via the liberal lap dog media will eventually make the majority of people weary and sympathetic to the ragtag group of local hoodlums.

Democrats proclaim “No Kings!” as a way of denouncing their own duly-elected president, yet they rally in support of Nicolás Maduro, a vicious narco-terrorist dictator. They purport to revile “hate speech” yet are perfectly fine libeling and slandering conservatives with any and all possible invective, including calls for violence. They are “pro-choice,” except if that choice isn’t theirs. They decry as an “insurrection” a group of unarmed people protesting what they legitimately believed to be a stolen election by strolling through the Capitol Building, and yet tell local police to stand down and threaten to order the Minnesota National Guard to confront federal law enforcement. Hypocrisy, gaslighting and projection are the tainted tools of their repulsive trade.

Say it with me now, for the umpteenth time, “Democrats will do literally anything to keep and enhance their own power, citizens be damned.”

In his Gettysburg Address, Lincoln said, “Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.” If madmen like Walz have their way, we may actually end up in another American civil war. More than 600,000 Americans died in the first one. Tampon Tim has delusions of grandeur adequacy.

Can this nation long endure? Not if the likes of Walz, Frey, Newsome, Pritzker, Omar, and Mamdani are allowed to continuously undermine it.

There is a burgeoning insurrection. It is led by Democrats. And it seeks to overthrow the United States, its Constitution, laws, history, traditions, and values.

The men who died at Gettysburg gave the last full measure of devotion. Did they die in vain?

Democrats hope to make it so.

{Update: Seva Gunitsky, an associate professor of political science at the University of Toronto and a U.S. citizen, has decided that a reference to Gettysburg was entirely inadequate. He believes that abolishing ICE would be the moderate position. He took to Bluesky to say, [W]hichever candidate promises to Nuremberg the [ICE] agents has my vote at this point.” Meaning he wants federal law enforcement officers put on trial like Nazi war criminals and Holocaust enablers after World War II. Why is it that about 90% of college professors are insane and insanely ignorant?}

 

 

Mamdani's New "Tenant Director" Detests Private Property, Ownership

 

Cea Weaver, Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s new “Tenant Director,” really, really hates other white folks. And capitalism. And private property. And wealth. And, well, she once tweeted out her belief system, just a few short years ago, as captured by the prolific and superb writer Daniel Greenfield of Front Page magazine. The following are some of her observations and assertions:

“Private property is a weapon of white supremacy.”

“Homeownership is racist.”

“People like home ownership because they like control, which is rooted in a racist and classist society.”

“We’ll transition from treating property as an individual good to a collective good. Whites especially will be impacted.”

“Private property is theft.”

“I wish I believed in god so I could believe that all men who take credit for women’s work and all white men who take credit for the work of women of color would one day burn.”

“Came across a mob of 11-year-old white boy children… i dunno why we keep procreating.”

She also opined that we should “Impoverish the *white* middle class.”

She’s quite a gal, isn’t she? Even if her mother owns a $1.6 million home in Tennessee. (I’m sure she is housing dozens of undocumented immigrants there, right?)

And now, some of my observations: In truth, taking private property is theft. By definition. You can’t “steal” something nobody owns. And don’t tell me we all own that tree, that car, that home…and everything else everywhere. If that were to be so decreed, there would be constant chaos and fighting, not to mention no functioning economy. We would all be forced to scavenge for our sustenance…by eating things that belong to…all of us. Except, can animals actually “belong” to anybody? Isn’t that wrong? So, then who gets to decide who gets to eat how much of the communal berries and mushrooms, for example? Or who gets to use the communal bathroom when?

If liking to be in control is racist and classist, is being out of control somehow a good thing? And no one likes to be in control more than a leftist. All of history has inarguably made that clear.

The Obama and Biden administrations have already impoverished the white middle class. We, too, wish she would abstain from procreating. And we also fervently wish she did believe in God, as then maybe she wouldn’t be such an insufferable Communist twat.

Cea should be institutionalized. For her own good and ours.

 

Money And Fraud And Government! Oh, My!

 

There are four ways money can be sent. You can spend your own money on yourself, or you can spend your own money on others (think: buying Christmas gifts).

Alternatively, government can take a percentage of your money, through force of penalty, and spend it on you. At least sort of. You may not be thrilled with what you get in return but, hey, don’t be a spoilsport.     

Or, government can take your money and spend it on other people. This is the least effective and efficient, because nobody really cares how other people’s money is spent on other people, least of all those in government. But that’s what government does… in incomprehensible amounts and ways. And most of those in government certainly don’t care where this—your--  money goes, except in so far as they can try to get as much of it for themselves as possible. If they can use it to bribe folks to vote for them and keep/enhance their power, or line their own pockets with it, then they care. If not, not so much.

This is a long-standing truism. The question is will we the people finally demand accountability. And, if we don’t, why the hell not? What does it say about us if we don’t care if our “public servants” ignore our will and rob us blind? Nothing good, obviously.

I’ve had more than enough of bribes, kickbacks, payola, slush funds, bought-and-paid-for politicians, corrupt government, and fraudulent businesses and charities.

And there is an even more sinister development: whether it is COVID-19 lockdowns and fraud, Jan. 6 Committee deceit, Crossfire-Hurricane attempts to destroy a political opponent, or staggeringly rampant Somali fraud…no one has yet been held accountable. How can this be? How?!! Why are our “leaders” ignoring or rewarding evil? Scarier still, they’re not really even trying hard to hide this anymore!

Are they really more afraid of being labeled “racist,” “bigoted,” or “heartless” than they are opposed to screwing the American citizens they are supposedly sworn to serve? Are they more afraid of, say, Somalis then the wrath of those American citizens? Or do they simply believe long-term demographic trends favor them to the point that they don’t care what Mr. and Mrs. Middle America think about…anything?  

If so, we have to change their minds if we are to “save our representative republic” and prevent government of the people, by the people, for the people from perishing from the earth.

Are we up to the task?

Truthfully, at this point, it doesn’t seem likely.