A recent P.J. Media post noted that Newsweek's Marni Rose
McFall penned a 2,000-word article denigrating SNL’s Sydney Sweeney for being a
“conservative hot girl.” The nerve!
McFall
sniffed, "Sweeney appears to have kicked off the latest wave of conservative
hot girls at a time when conventional beauty standards have been adopted as a
purported antidote to 'wokeness.'"
McFall
also seems to place RNC national spokeswoman Elizabeth Pipko and Republican
Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna into the same made-up category.
And
her preposterously petty disdain for attractive conservative women is shared by
others, including Bournemouth University's Amy Tatum, who added: "This
focus on 'hot girls' is a way for the right in the U.S. to fight back against
perceptions of 'wokeness.’” Or it could be simple appreciation for femininity
and beauty.
Which
doesn’t sit well with so-called progressives in any case. The post noted that “diversity,
equity, and inclusion advocates have discouraged admiration of beauty due to
its exclusivity, implying that exclusion equates to hate.”
Which
might explain why Luna’s primary opponent threatened to have Luna assassinated via a Russian-Ukrainian hit squad.
There is such a thing as a “Russian-Ukrainian hit squad?” Though the two
nations are engaged in a lengthy and brutal war, they can get together every
now and then to take out an American politician or two? Really? Maybe that
explains the two attempted assassinations of Trump.
Anyway,
according to a recording obtained by Politico, Luna’s primary opponent, an
establishment Republican of the RINO variety, said in part: “I really don’t
want to have to end anybody’s life for the good of the people of the United
States of America. That will break my heart. But if it needs to be done, it
needs to be done.” That sounds remarkably like what so many
Democrats/Progressives/TDS sufferers have said about Donald Trump.
The
Left seeks to deface and destroy everything: buildings, sports, language, art,
education, dialogue, the media, movies, music, history, the economy, dignity,
security. Among other things. It hates tradition, hates excellence, hates
achievement, hates beauty, and fears and despises the truth. Todays supposed
‘progressives’ would take us back to the Dark Ages. They are the
opposite of the Founders, they are the destroyers. They are the opposite of Howard Roark. They don’t want to build beautiful
buildings, they want to burn them down. They don’t value independence of mind,
they praise group think and the herd mentality. They deface statues, buildings,
and people. They don’t want to contribute to society, they want to sow
division, hatred, and chaos.
They
don’t want to Make America Great Again, they want to destroy her.
Beauty,
like excellence and integrity, irks them…because these are standards they
cannot-- or do not wish to-- attain.
Beauty
and competence? It’s Easier to tout ugliness and sloth.