Sunday, September 27, 2020

Education, Minority Rule, And Civil War

 

Recently, someone asked me: “How do we end systematic educational institutional propaganda and lying?” To which I replied, “We must defund them. Entirely. And abolish the NEA. Privatize, etc.” However, I added that “No one has the cojones to do that. And, if they did, more cities would burn, of course.”

The unacknowledged fact is that is how the left manages to rule the country as a minority. That’s right, we currently, effectively, have minority rule in the United States of America. Believe there are only two genders? Get ready to be mocked, ridiculed, fired from your job. Don’t want to bake a cake for a gay wedding? Say good-bye to your private business. Publicly say “All Lives Matter?” I’ll pray for you. The left simply threatens violence to get what it wants…and if anyone dares to defend themselves or fight back, they are promptly deemed radical right-wing extremists who are prone to violence. The left routinely threatens to burn down cities, rough people up in restaurants, or shut down major highways to keep the majority cowed. And it works much more often than not. That is inarguable at this point. “Vote for Biden or there will be no peace.” Reza Aslan, formerly of CNN, tweets: “If they even try to replace RBG we burn the entire f-cking thing down.” That is the mother of all quid pro quos “We offer you the possibility of normalcy, peace, and safety…if you vote the way we want you to.”

Universities are literally churning out cadres of America-hating morons who think they know better than the Founders what kind of government is best but who can’t name the three branches of their own government, let alone explain the significance of, say, the Magna Carta, John Locke, or Adam Smith. All they can do is tear down. They have no clue how to build anything. Nor any desire to do so. The universities now act as if they were the pods in the movie “Invasion of the Body Snatchers,” except they only replicate minds, not bodies. Everyone must think the same. Diversity of race, ethnicity, sex and gender is all well and good, but not of free will and independent thought, the very things that make us human. The very things universities were instituted to engender.

The non-never-Trumpers among us need to channel our inner Founder. Or act in accordance with the heroes on Flight 93. Because it is becoming increasingly clear that our choice will soon be between permanent servility and hopelessness or Civil War. We must stand our ground now, whatever the cost, or risk ceding the country forever.

Sadly, those are our only choices.

 

Saturday, September 26, 2020

First Biden-Trump Debate: Hear It Here First, Now!

 

First Biden-Trump Debate

Tuesday, September 29, 2020

9-10:30 PM ET

Cleveland, Ohio

Case Western Reserve University

Chris Wallace Moderator

 

Wallace: Good evening all, and welcome to the first 2020 presidential debate between the incumbent and current President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, and the Democratic nominee-- and former Vice-President of the United States-- Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Welcome gentlemen.

Trump: Yes. And you know I only ‘sort of’ prepared for this debate, Chris. And even that was probably too much.

Biden: Thank you Chris, and might I say I’ve always liked your show, ‘180 degrees with Brian Stelter.’ MSNBC is a great network!

Wallace: Actually, that’s neither my show nor my network. Anyway, let’s get started. Mr. Trump, how do you pronounce ‘Thailand?’ (Stifles a giggle.)

Trump: Really? What the hell? Thighland? That’s my first question? Thighland? I’m done here. (Starts walking off stage.)

Wallace: No! Mr. president, please don’t leave! We haven’t even started yet!

Trump: (Comes back.) All right. I’ll be bigger than you are, Mr. Poopy Pants. Shouldn’t be hard to do.

Wallace: Mr. Biden, it is so good of you to appear here with us tonight, given the fact that so many members of the vast right-wing conspiracy have wrongly questioned your cognitive abilities. What would you like to say to those people tonight, sir?

Biden: Come on, man! Are you on crack? I mean, are those idiots junkies? There’s nothing wrong with my…you know…I’m…my mental fill, uh..bidness, I mean fitness. It’s my opponent, President…uh…Lincoln Project…Bush…Trump that’s got the old bats in the belfry issue, right? (Smiles broadly, proudly showing off white teeth.) Hell, I’ve recently been endorsed by the Satanic Temple, for God’s sake!

Wallace: Mr. president, what would you tell all the Democratic mayors and governors whose cities and states have been decimated by your incompetence in dealing with the coronavirus and are now burning do to the division you have sown?

Trump: Are you kidding me? Frankly, I should be added to Mount Rushmore just from dealing with the likes of you! FAKE NEWS! Democrats have had control of these places for years—decades mostly. And then they want to blame me. Incredible. I would tell them to get tough with these criminals that are destroying their cities and—

Wallace: So anyway, Mr. Biden…back to you, sir. I know that you are in favor of protecting our planet…the only one we have and that we all live on. If you were to become president, would you enact some version of the ‘Green New Deal?’ And would you re-commit the U.S. to the Paris Climate Accord that your opponent here…Mr. Trump…reneged on?

Biden: I would, yes. I’m getting a hell of a lot of pressure from the young broads in the party…I think they call them the squids or the squad or something… so I’d better promise to do just that if I want to be the next Senator from…excuse me, president of the United States of America. ‘Black Lives Matter!’ (Extends his arm and fist in a Black Pride Salute.)

Wallace (looking mildly puzzled): President Trump, given that the economy is in the tank and that the coronavirus rages on, how afraid are you that even some of your most racist and sexist supporters might say ‘enough is enough’ and vote for former Vice-President Biden?

Trump:  I engineered the greatest economy in the history of the world—no one had ever seen anything like it—before the Chinese Virus was unleashed upon us. I was responsible for the lowest black…and female…unemployment rates ever recorded in our universe. And, if elected, I will be the first person in history to do it all again! On top of all that, I saved the entire auto industry and made the U.S. energy independent for the very first time ever. EVER! Dumb question, Chris. Very dumb. Even for you.

Wallace: Yeah, sure, Mr. President. (Smirks knowingly.) Explain to the American people, if indeed you can, why you are abandoning NATO, bailing out of Syria, disrespecting Iran, and yet are kissing up to North Korea and Russia, while needlessly provoking China.

Trump: Wallace, you are a pathetic has-been. And your network is going to hell in a handbasket…not all of them, mind you, there are some very good people like Hannity on there… but you, you’re a vicious little non-viable tissue mass who shouldn’t be allowed near a microphone, frankly.

Wallace: Alrighty then. Mr. Biden, if you are elected, what will you do about global warming and climate change. I assume, unlike the president, you will do something?

Biden: Absolutely, Brian! A Harris-Biden administration will see to fewer fires, floods and hurricanes! If Harris-Biden is elected, the seas will stop rising! The arctic will stop melting! And, uh…I mean…you know…it’s like…the kids, you know, the kids! It’s all about the kids, Jim. And that’s all I’m gonna say on that.

Wallace: President Trump, you recently nominated Amy Coney Barrett to replace the legendary ‘RBG’ as Supreme Court Justice. Many are saying that she is a hyper-religious wacko who wants to erase the boundary between church and state. How would you answer those charges?

Trump: That’s just a flat-out lie, Chris. And, by the way, it’s the people who worship in the church of progressivism—or ‘wokeism’—that are the most biased and intolerant and who are demanding that secularism/leftism/socialism…whatever you want to call it… become the official religion of the United States.

Wallace: Okay, Mr. Biden, your thoughts on the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, sir?

Biden: Well, she’s only been a congresswoman for a short time, but I think she’ll do fine. She’s certainly helped challenge me and advise me on what positions I should take. And she’s young and has nice hair.

Wallace: I think you’re thinking of Democratic New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, sir, not Amy Coney Barrett.

Biden: Don’t you think I know that? C’mon man!

Wallace: This will be the last question of the night. Trumpty-Dumpty, will you leave office peacefully when you lose to Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. on November 3rd…or in the weeks to follow?

                                                              [fade]

 

 

Friday, September 25, 2020

MSNBC Interviews 10-Year-Old About Ruth Bader Ginsburg

              MSNBC recently interviewed a 10-year-old girl named Alana to get her thoughts on the legacy of the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The MSNBC reporter asked Alana how she felt about the death of the longtime Supreme Court Justice. She replied, “This is going to be the beginning of an absolute nightmare because she is no longer here to help the world.” To help the world. Lord help us. Can you say “brainwashed?”

              The intrepid journalist, who had previously asked Alana’s 13-year-old brother basically the same question, thanked them both for their time and noted that he had been talking to people paying tribute to Ginsburg all morning “as a trailblazer, an icon, a defender of human rights, women’s rights, and a defender of liberal ideals, a protector of progressive policies.” What about “champion of the oppressed and defender of truth, justice, and the American way?”

              MSNBC loves interviewing young girls to get their opinions on matters of great import and/or interest to progressives. Whether it’s Greta Thunberg lecturing on the Earth’s climate or Alana expounding on the virtues of a now-deceased Supreme Court justice, the channel is all in on the opinions of precocious and even pre-pubescent girls. In fact, according to an unimpeachable anonymous source, the channel is planning a first-of-its-kind series of interviews of this type in the near future. The source tells me that MSNBC will soon query a four-year-old girl as to her thoughts on the Electoral College, a five-year-old on the pros and cons of a bicameral legislature, a six-year-old on the advantages of proportional representation, a seven-year-old on the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, an eight-year-old on the Lincoln-Douglas debates, and a nine-year-old on the intricacies of the Kama Sutra.

 

Thursday, September 24, 2020

Flip, Flop And Lie

 

Both Democrats and Republicans have clearly flip-flopped as regards their position on trying to fill a Supreme Court vacancy in the few weeks or months prior to a presidential election. Neither appears chagrinned at the obvious hypocrisy. Here are some quotes illustrating other, lesser known issues on which they have recently changed sides.

 

Republicans in 2012: “Great taste…but filling as hell!”

Democrats in 2012: “Less filling…but the taste sucks!”

Republicans in 2020: “Less filling…but the taste sucks!”

Democrats in 2020: “Great taste…but filling as hell!”

 

Republicans in 2012: “Two plus two…could theoretically equal five.”

Democrats in 2012: “Two plus two equals four. Period.”

Republicans in 2020: “Two plus two equals four. Period.”

Democrats in 2020: “Two plus two…could theoretically equal five.”

 

Democrats in 2016: “The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only. There is no stopping in a red zone.”

Republicans in 2016: “The red zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only. There is no stopping in a white zone.”

Democrats in 2020: “The red zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only. There is no stopping in a white zone.”

Republicans in 2020: “The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only. There is no stopping in a red zone.”

 

Democrats in 2016: “Mary Ann was clearly more attractive than Ginger.”

Republicans in 2016: “Ginger was clearly more attractive than Mary Ann.”

Democrats in 2020: “Ginger was clearly more attractive than Mary Ann.”

Republicans in 2020: “Mary Ann was clearly more attractive than Ginger.”

 

 

Wednesday, September 23, 2020

StudyFinds Study Finds Studies Usually Wrong

 

               A shocking new StudyFinds.org study found that most studies are…wrong. The study, conducted of a staggering 31,987 previous studies from various sources and on various topics, found that fully 96% of studies yield inaccurate, incorrect or outright false results and conclusions. Another 3% yielded results that were inconclusive, confusing or unprovable one way or the other. Less than 1 % were found to be “largely on the up and up and accurate.” Seven produced no results whatsoever, probably due to the fact all seven lacked a title, abstract, introduction, review, and were utterly devoid of methodology, discussion, acknowledgement or references.

              A StudyFinds.org spokesperson stated, on the condition of anonymity, “Frankly, in this era of hyper-politicization, most studies are funded by special interest groups…or George Soros. And they will lavish money—or 'special' favors-- on those conducting the studies. So, for example, if they want to 'prove' that El Nino is caused by white privilege, then that is what their studies will find. So-called 'scientists' and 'experts' are just as fond of money, drugs and getting laid as anyone else. So, realistically, we shouldn’t be too surprised at what this study found.”

Tuesday, September 22, 2020

Signs Of The Times

 

We are far along on our March to Madness. This can be seen in the ubiquity of meaningless gestures and vapid platitudes permeating our once great republic.

This may have all started with “Visualize World Peace” bumper stickers. Eventually there was nary a Prius, Volvo or Honda Element that wasn’t proudly and urgently imploring us all to “COEXIST.” With who and/or what exactly? Rapists? Arsonists? COVID-19? Hemorrhoids? Ironically, it turns out that the drivers of these vehicles are many times more likely to scream in the face of those with whom they disagree than are the drivers of, say, a bare-bumpered Ford Explorer or Chevy Silverado. But I digress.

The most ridiculous message I’ve ever seen on a bumper sticker was one that was fairly common a number of years ago: “YOU CAN’T HUG YOUR KIDS WITH NUCLEAR ARMS.” Really? You don’t say?! This sticker implies that most who read it either don’t actually realize that they can’t hug their kids with nuclear weapons or that they don’t care about kids as much as the owner of the car bearing the sticker does. Else there would be no need for their “wisdom” to be so broadly shared in this manner. And this to try to make themselves look and feel superior? Talk about a non-sequitur! In my opinion, the only proper response to “YOU CAN’T HUG YOUR KIDS WITH NUCLEAR ARMS” would be “YOU CAN’T CHANGE YOUR KID’S DIAPER WITH A FIRE HYDRANT EITHER, BUT THAT DOESN’T MEAN THEY AREN’T VITALLY IMPORTANT, EINSTEIN!”

Today, in many areas of the country, we are subject to a dismayingly large number of house or lawn signs condescendingly proclaiming: "IN THIS HOUSE, WE BELIEVE: BLACK LIVES MATTER; WOMEN'S RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS; NO HUMAN IS ILLEGAL; SCIENCE IS REAL; LOVE IS LOVE; KINDNESS IS EVERYTHING." This takes inanity and hollow virtue-signaling to a new and disturbing level. These signs are easily translated: “WE BELIEVE WE ARE BETTER THAN OTHERS OR AT LEAST WISH TO APPEAR S0.” They are the opposite of inclusive, welcoming and egalitarian. They are, in a sense, “hate speech,” marginalizing and filled with imbecilic microaggressions. They insult and denigrate the reader on several levels, in a childishly moronic attempt to make the purveyor of the messages feel holier-than-thou. What is the person reading these signs supposed to think? “That’s funny, I don’t care for people of color or women…or any humans, really. Science isn’t real, love is hate and kindness sucks.” Or perhaps, “You know what, now that I’ve seen this sign, I fervently believe all those things, too! I have seen the light!”  

This proliferation of empty virtue-signaling has paralleled the proliferation of multiculturalism, identity politics and intersectionalism, all of which have tended to divide us from one another, black from white, women from men, etc., etc. And now, progressive proselytizers seek to demonize the rest of us. This has dire ramifications, for, as Lincoln said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”

What is a patriot to do?

Oh well.

“MAKE LOVE NOT WAR.”

“SAVE THE WHALES!”

Monday, September 21, 2020

CNN Fact Checks FDR's First Inaugural Speech

 

CNN Fact Checks FDR’s First Inaugural Speech (Given March 4, 1933)

”The only thing we have to fear…is fear itself”—FALSE.

The president was clearly lying to the American people. He was hiding the truth so as not to sow panic and depression among the citizens. This showed a lack of trust in those he represented and could well have led Americans to doubt anything he ever said thereafter. The nation he led was in the throes of the Great Depression and between two world wars at the time. Apart from all that, we have, in fact, a great many other things to fear, including, but not limited to: death, disease, racism, sexism, homophobia, irritable bowel syndrome, poverty, addiction, tornadoes, floods, hurricanes, acne, tooth decay, cancer, heart disease, high blood pressure, low blood sugar, anemia, polio, uncontrolled flatulence, terrorism, large hail and damaging winds, crop disease, erectile disfunction, drought, scurvy, plane crashes, stock market crashes, unemployment, high interest rates, saturated fats, getting into an accident while wearing dirty underwear, bee stings, male pattern baldness, vaginal dryness, irregular heartbeat, climate change, blizzards, tsunamis, earthquakes, the heartbreak of psoriasis, asteroids, premature aging, Deng fever, arthritis, asthma, termites, spina bifida, bloating, sudden infant death syndrome, habitat loss, sleep apnea, and Dutch elm disease. We must give the president four full Pinocchios for this absurd claim.

Sunday, September 20, 2020

Attacks On Trump To Increase As Election Nears

 

President Trump has been the victim of numerous unhinged and unverified attacks recently, each one more preposterous and less vetted than the one before. “Anonymous sources” say he secretly loathes the military and thinks those who serve are “pathetic” and “losers.” His deeply troubled, publicity-seeking niece claims he is “fundamentally a racist” and unfit for office. Joe Biden hilariously claimed that Trump was a danger to Israel…during the same week that the president negotiated a historic peace agreement between Israel and Bahrain and days after he negotiated a similar deal between the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.) and Israel…for which he was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. And the mainstream media hurls smears and lies at the president like a berserk Pez dispenser.

Yet I’m here to tell you: you ain’t seen nothing yet. As we get ever nearer to Election Day, anti-Trumpers will pull out all the stops and accusations will fly with breathtaking rapidity and frequency. What follows is a short list of what you can expect in the coming weeks.

*September 21st: CNN will site anonymous sources in a report claiming Trump once ran while carrying scissors in a fifth-grade art class, needlessly and recklessly endangering lives. Eventually, the anonymous sources will admit that he wasn’t truly running, but proceeding at a slow trot, while emphasizing that his behavior was “inexcusable none-the-less.”

*September 24th: The New York Times will site anonymous sources in a front-page story alleging that Trump once looked only one way before crossing a street, not both ways, in direct contravention of his mother’s express wishes and direction. Days later, another source will surface on Fox News, noting that there was no traffic coming from the other direction because the road was closed, but the rest of the legacy media will refuse to acknowledge the new information.

*September 30th: MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, hands trembling, breathlessly recounts a story an “anonymous insider close to the Trump family” gave her. Maddow says, “Apparently, when younger, Trump once called a drugstore and asked the clerk who answered if the store had Prince Albert in a can. The clerk said that, yes, the store did have the then popular tobacco product, to which Trump replied, ‘Well, you’d better let him out then, hadn’t you,’ and promptly hung up.

*October 5th: Salon sites highly placed, “unimpeachable” (though anonymous) sources in a story alleging that the president recently killed and ate his son Barron.

*October 13th: The Daily Beast runs a story claiming that, though Trump is a known misogynist, he has a “micro-penis,” and notes how the latter may explain (but not justify) the former.

*October 21st: The Drudge Report harbors a story purporting to show that Trump is secretly a proud, card-carrying member of the Church of Satan.

*October 26th: The Huffington Post runs a story alleging that, while in college, Trump liked to go to restaurants and loosen caps on salt shakers. He found that “funny” according to the report, obtained from anonymous sources.

*November 2nd: The Washington Post runs a front page, above-the-fold story claiming that Trump abuses animals “for kicks.” The story’s anonymous sources allege that a young Trump used to take a magnifying glass outside on hot summer days and burn up ants on the sidewalk. The same sources say he now prefers to pluck individual hairs from the hides of black labs.

*November 3rd: On the morning of election day, NBC breaks the explosive—and damaging-- news that a member of Trump’s cabinet says Trump does not particularly care for the television show “This is Us.” NBC’s president, Noah Oppenheim, says this is clear evidence of Trump’s “hatred for humanity” and his “general unfitness for office,” and notes that Joe Biden claims to be a big fan of the emotional and unifying drama.

 

Saturday, September 19, 2020

Now Elites Worried A COVID-19 Vaccine Coming Too Quickly

 

              The lockdown must remain in place until we can be sure hospitals won’t be overwhelmed, “they” told us. Then they said it must remain in place until we flatten the curve. Then they said it might need to stay in force until we can achieve herd immunity. But, of course, there is no way to achieve hard immunity when we are all locked down. So, they told us the lockdown would have to stay in place until a vaccine is found, a process that historically takes anywhere from 18 months to two plus years. And most of us continued to believe “them.”

              Well, the jig is up and the mask is off for any sentient being now. When President Trump said he believed a vaccine will be available in the near future, possibly before the November election, “they” did not jump for joy or express gratitude, amazement or elation. They claimed the announcement was just a political ploy, and that any vaccine that might become available in the near future would be untested, unsafe and ineffective. Trump recently stated that “three vaccines are already in the final stage,” and vowed that a vaccine would be distributed within 24 hours of completion of phase 3 trials and FDA approval. He vowed that all Americans would have access to the vaccine by April and noted that the vaccines “are going through the gold standard of clinical trials” and that “very heavy emphasis” is “being placed on safety.” Moreover, Dr. Scott Atlas, a member of the White House coronavirus task force, backed up the president’s timeline while noting that it will be up to each individual American to decide if they wish to be vaccinated or not, flatly stating “it’s not a forced vaccination.”

Yet, far from calming the fears of those in power such as big city mayors and state governors, news of an imminent vaccine seems to have frightened them even more. Why? Because they are afraid an effective, readily available vaccine would soon lead Americans to demand the removal of the “extra-Constitutional” (meaning unconstitutional) power they have wielded over them for the past six months. And that they are loath to do. Additionally, Democrats-- and their sycophants and co-conspirators in Big Tech, Big Media and Big Academia-- are scared excrementless that a viable vaccine prior to Election Day would pave the way for The Bad Orange Man to be reelected, thereby at least temporarily foiling their plans to turn the United States into a Marxist utopia like Venezuela, Cuba or North Korea.

Friday, September 18, 2020

The Burger King And Ronald McDonald Share A Kiss

 

              Burger King Finland has launched an ad campaign depicting the Burger King and long-time rival Ronald McDonald sharing a passionate kiss in a Pride-themed ad titled “Love Conquers All” honoring Finland’s Pride Week. The fast food giant’s Finland brand manager, Kaisa Kasila, recently told Adweek, “Burger King has always stood for equality, love, and everyone’s right to be just the way they are. The only instance where it might not seem so is when we’re bantering with our competition. We thought, what better way to convey our values than by portraying an all-encompassing kiss between Burger King and McDonald. We wanted to show that in the end, love always wins. And we know McDonald’s stands for the values we stand for, too.”

              I’m not sure how they know that, nor am I sure I want to know.

              The ad prompted Fernando Machado, global chief marketing officer for Restaurant Brands International (RBI)— Burger King’s parent/holding company—to post a now-viral tweet stating: “Proud to see Burger King Finland as the official partner of The Helsinki Pride. Even more proud of our 100% Corporate Equality Index. Congrats to Kaisa from the BK Finland team for such a beautiful execution.” Machado also told Adweek that the “Impossible Kiss” was an illustration that love does, indeed, conquer all, saying: “Our brand is always bold, edgy, and fun. So showcasing this ‘impossible kiss’ is a way to demonstrate that love conquers all. And we hope that ‘the other guys’ understand that it is actually a celebration of love rather than a competitive statement.”

              So “bold!” So “edgy!” So “fun!” So Proud! Get the reference to the “Impossible Kiss?” If a burger can be made out of vegetable matter, than surely the long-time representatives of two behemoth, if rival, fast food chains can suck face. Since we all share the same values, what could be better than an “all-encompassing kiss” between two same-sex rival mascots? I know, what if Tony the Tiger, Toucan Sam, and Count Chocula got it on in a series of sexy three-way cereal ads? How awesome and inclusive would that be?! Love is love! Or maybe Colonel Sanders and the Hamburglar could give each other “Impossible Hand-Jobs” while an appreciative and tolerant nation watched with growing Pride…and hunger!