Sunday, April 30, 2023

SpaceX And The Final Frontier

 

The most powerful rocket ever built blasted off from its launchpad in Boca Chica, Texas, recently. News reports generally dismissed the endeavor as a failure since the rocket blew up several minutes after takeoff, even though the launch was a test and deemed at least partially successful by those who made it possible. Reports were also quick to note that the launch “rocked the earth and kicked up a billowing cloud of dust and debris, shaking homes and raining down brown grime for miles.”

One report chronicled the experience of Sharon Almaguer, who, at the time of the launch, was at home with her 80-year-old mother. Ms. Almaguer purportedly said of the launch: “It was truly terrifying.”  Really? You knew the launch was imminent. How do you fare in a thunderstorm?

Another report breathlessly stated: “In Port Isabel, a city about six miles northwest where at least one window shattered, residents were alarmed.” One window in one home near the launch site shattered? Oh, the humanity! At least the window wasn’t broken in the traditional way-- by a baseball launched from a kid’s baseball bat. Funny, I don’t recall the media obsessing over the consequences of the launch of Apollo 11. (“One giant leap for mankind, one incredibly small price to pay.”)

 And I’m sure Elon would pay to replace the window, if asked.

A dnyuz.com article worried that companies like SpaceX, Virgin Galactic, and Blue Origin are planning to increase the number of rocket launches in the future, while noting that “new research” has “shown just how damaging this trend is to the environment.”

Dr. Eloise Marais, an Associate Professor in Physical Geography, said of the study she and Research Fellow Dr. Robert Ryan conducted: "We calculated air pollutant emissions from rocket launches in 2019 and extrapolated what we think a potential future space tourism industry will look like based on the companies that launched missions last year. Then we incorporated these emissions in a 3D model that represents the complex physical and chemical processes taking place in the atmosphere so that we could calculate their effects on climate."

Their conclusion? That the climate effect of soot from rocket launches is hundreds of times more damaging than earthbound sources.

Meaning? To paraphrase an old Nike slogan: “Just Don’t Do It.”

This kind of thinking is why we can’t— or won’t-- accomplish great things anymore. And why China will soon leave us in the dust, atmospheric or otherwise. To the detriment of the freedom-loving world.

Reach for the stars?

No. Reach for your facemask and stay inside. The only space we care to explore anymore is our safe one.

For centuries Americans longed for the “frontier.” Millions risked everything to get there, going west by covered wagon, all of there earthly belongings with them. Now too many long for a permanent vacation, universal basic income, and someone from the government to promise them cradle-to-grave care. And tuck them into bed at night.

Turn out the lights. The party’s over.

“The final frontier?” If “progressives” have their way, it likely won’t be space.

Unless it’s the space under our beds.

 

 

Saturday, April 29, 2023

Twitter Nut Says Concept Of "Men" And "Women" Rooted In "White Supremacy"

 

Recently, a radical non-binary clown tweeted out his/her/Xe/Xir/they/whatever assertion that the idea of men and women is rooted in colonialism, white supremacy, and capitalism. (That’s right, the “idea” of “men” and “women” was created out of whole cloth by colonial, capitalist, white supremacists!) Libs of TikTok highlighted the tweet from a person (apparently) going by the moniker “ykhong.”

No, moron, it long preceded all of these. In fact, the “idea” goes back to creation itself…which you had no say in. (Deal with it.) Genesis: “Male and female He created them.”

Men and women are not an idea, they are living, breathing biological facts. On that, at least, the science is settled. Or used to be. Good thing, too, or the radical non-binary Twitter clown wouldn’t be here.

The radical non-binary clown went so far as to state that those in the trans community can even point out the “ludicrousness” of anyone who doesn’t believe him/her/they.

How about the ludicrousness of a man with a beard, scrotum, and penis claiming to be a woman-- with full natural rights to women’s bath and locker-rooms—even if he donned a dress or a string of pearls?

The idea reality of men and women has existed from the beginning of time and throughout all ages…until now. Don’t know if Adam and Eve were White Supremacists, but I know they weren’t colonialists. Karl Marx disdained capitalism, but he recognized the idea existence of men and women. As does the Chinese Communist party. Ugandans, Kenyans, and other Africans clearly recognize the idea and existence of men and women. Respect and cherish it, even. And I, for one, doubt that most of them are white supremacists.

The facts is: men and women existed for thousands of years before the advent of colonialism or capitalism. That is inarguable. Nor does “white supremacy” have anything whatsoever to do with the foundational reality of men and women.

Thank God.

The idea that the idea of men and women stems from colonialism, white supremacy, and capitalism is rooted in entitlement, ignorance, atheism, a god complex…and insanity.

 

 

 

Friday, April 28, 2023

Bodies Born, Gender Culturally Constructed Says University Of Arizona Class

 

A recent Campus Reform report chronicled a University of Arizona anthropology class offered this semester. ANTH 1501C: Humanity: a How-To Guide, is apparently taught by Dr. Ruth Burgett Jolie, an Associate Professor of Anthropology at the school. CR, which obtained copies of the course syllabus, the assigned reading, and an essay question, notes that Jolie’s research involves "how material culture is used by individuals to create and reinforce gender roles."

The assigned reading included such gems as an article titled “The Gender of Brazilian Transgendered Prostitutes.” The article was part of a class topic called “Sexual Identities.” Its very first line boldly states, “Males who enjoy being anally penetrated by other males are, in many places in the world, an object of special cultural elaboration.” Say what? “Special cultural elaboration?” What does that even mean? Could Dr. Jolie elaborate on that? The article goes on to assert that sex between Latin American males does not necessarily correlate to both parties being perceived as homosexual. In fact, it states that, in this part of the world, “A male who anally penetrates another male is generally not considered to be homosexual,” but simply a “man.” Huh? Moreover, according to the class reading, some communities even consider it to be a demonstration of one’s masculinity to engage in gay sex. 

Campus Reform acquired a PDF copy of instructions for a required response paper Dr. Jolie's students were to write on a topic (of their choice) relating to gender as a social construct. The instructions read: “For this 300-400-word response paper, you will reflect on the social construction of gender in the United States today by bringing in your own experiences.” The instructions continue: "Bodies are born, but culture makes us women, men, or other genders."

“Bodies” are born? Without any helpful hint as to their sex/gender? Are you effing kidding me? If so, it is a very sick joke. Then why are ultrasounds performed? I guess there is no need for gender-reveal parties until each “body” is, say, 12 to 15-years-old. “Congratulations, it’s a…we can’t tell…and don’t want to project our own preconceived notions of gender onto our precious little body. So, yes, it’s a body! Yay!”

What is it with “Dr. Ruths?” and sex/gender?

Anthropology: the study of human biological and physiological characteristics and their evolution

Physiology: relating to the branch of biology that deals with the normal functions of living organisms and their parts.

If biology and physiology have no set, objective meaning or definition, then it is settled: “science” has none, either.

Thursday, April 27, 2023

Transportation Secretary Buttigieg Proposes Spending $20 Million On "Female" Crash Test Dummies

 

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has proposed that the Department of Transportation include  $20 million for female crash-test dummies in its 2024 fiscal budget. That Buttigieg-- famous for his love of females though he may be-- wants to spend vast sums of taxpayer dollars on feminine crash dummies seems odd in the current cultural climate in which we salute all things non-binary.

Nonetheless, Mayor Pete’s proposal has already garnered support from several House Democrats. For example, Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut praised Buttigieg’s plan during a recent House Appropriations Subcommittee meeting. DeLauro stated that the use of female crash dummies would be a major step forward in the fight against “gender inequity”.

Say what? Unlike humans, who are either one sex or another, crash dummies can’t be gendered…as they are not living beings. But, in today’s world, nothing can stand in the way of insanity.

How will manufacturers make crash dummies “female?” Will they be shorter and lighter? Have big breasts and wear lipstick? Carry a purse? Will they tell the “male” crash dummies to slow down and ask for directions? This would seem kind of stereotypical and/or misogynistic in this day and age, wouldn’t it?

How can we even have female crash test dummies if we don’t even know what an actual woman is?

And who’s to say “female” crash dummies don’t identify as male? Particularly since they are arbitrarily “assigned” their gender at birth when they are made.

In the interest of fairness, diversity, equity, and inclusion, if we are to spend millions on “female” crash test dummies we should also utilize taxpayer cash to make anogender, two-spirited, bisexual, and polysexual dummies, right?

Oh, wait, crash test dummies are already—and immutably-- non-binary and non-sexual because they aren’t flesh and blood. Or alive.

Who are the dummies now?

 

 

Wednesday, April 26, 2023

Cows Killed, Tongues Removed-- Authorities Have No Answers


Recent reports say that six cattle died mysteriously in Texas, all with their tongues removed, the hide around one side of their mouths gone, and without any apparent bloodshed. The Madison County Sheriff’s Office released a statement saying that the cause—and time-- of death was as yet unknown.

The cattle were found along Texas State Highway in three different counties, with each animal part of a different herd and in a different pasture, according to the sheriff’s office. Five were adults, one a yearling.

Stranger still, in two cases, the animals’ genitalia and anuses had been removed with a circular cut that the sheriff’s office said had been made with the “same precision as the cuts noted around the jaw lines of each cow.” Moreover, the grass around the bodies of all six animals was undisturbed, and there was no sign of struggle surrounding any of the carcasses. Nor were any footprints or tire tracks found.

And then there was this, according to the sheriff’s office: “Ranchers also reported that no predators or birds would scavenge the remains of the cow, leaving it to decay untouched for several weeks.” Hmm. Bizarre. Where is Rod Serling when you need him?

The sheriff's office also noted that similar incidents have been reported across the United States. Really? And this on top of the recent “explosion” that killed 18,000 cows in the Texas panhandle. Apparently, someone-- or something—has it in for cows. Could the cow killings be the handiwork of crazed progressive greenies who believe the animals’ burps and farts are a key contributor to global warming/climate change?

Reports claim that an FBI agent who investigated previous mysterious cattle deaths told The Associated Press that there was no indication that anything other than common predators were responsible for the demise of the bovines.

“Common predators” are certainly not behind the slaughter of the half-dozen unlucky cattle chronicled here. No signs of struggle. No blood. No teeth marks or other visible injuries.

Unless one believes that, say, a coyote became proficient in the use of tranquilizer guns and scalpels, “common predators” can be ruled out. And even Wile E Coyote wasn’t proficient with tools and explosives.

And does anyone seriously believe that a predator would decline to eat the vast amounts of prime rib, beef, and sirloin that a cow offers in favor of tongues and anuses?

If even scavengers and carrion eaters refused to touch the deceased cattle, we can reasonably assume something is awry.

What that may be, I don’t claim to know.

But it would behoove us to find out.    

Tuesday, April 25, 2023

CNN's Don Lemon Shamelessly Tries To Demean Republican Presidential Hopeful

 

CNN’s remarkably arrogant Don Lemon recently interviewed Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy.

Lemon quickly took issue with Ramaswamy’s accurate assertion that southern Democrats tried to prevent Black Americans from owning guns prior to—and even after-- the Civil War.

The serially disgraced CNN host attempted to deceive his handful of viewers into believing Ramaswamy said the Civil War was fought primarily to give Black people gun rights.

Transcript:

Lemon: “I don’t really see what one has to do with the other — and using the Civil War to talk about Black Americans — that war was not fought for Black people to have guns.”

Ramaswamy: “That war was fought for Black people to have freedoms in this country. Actually, that’s why the Civil War was fought. Actually, a funny fact is — Black people did not get to enjoy the other freedoms until their Second Amendment rights were secured.” Bingo.

Lemon: “But Black people still aren’t allowed to enjoy the freedoms as well in this country.”

Ramaswamy: “I disagree with you on that Don. I think you’re doing a disservice to this country by failing to recognize the fact that we have equality before the laws here.” (Well, those who are still being held-- without charge-- for strolling through the Capitol Building on Jan. 6 might disagree.)

Lemon: “Well, OK. When you are in Black skin and you live in this country, then you can disagree with me.”

Note to Lemon: Ramaswamy does live in this country. And he is not white. Lemon believes no one has the right to disagree with him unless they are Black? Or “are in Black skin?” He is clearly a Black Supremacist, a racist of the highest order.

Lemon then verbally accosted The Indian-American Ramaswamy, stating: “I think it’s insulting that you’re sitting here — whatever ethnicity you are — ‘splaining to me about what it’s like to be Black in America.” Lemon was insulted that Ramaswamy was sitting near him, “whatever ethnicity” Ramaswamy may be? Lemon thought Ramaswamy was “‘splaining” to him “about what it’s like to be Black in America?” Ramaswamy did no such thing. And Lemon knows it.

Arguably the two worst personality traits are stupefying ignorance and overarching arrogance. When combined—as they are in people like AOC, Rashida Tlaib, Eric Swalwell, and Adam Schiff—they are truly repulsive…and dangerous.

What would Lemon say if Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, or Donald Trump condescendingly said to him, “When you are in white skin, then you can disagree with me?”

 

Shameless.

And now unemployed.

 

Monday, April 24, 2023

FBI Targets Internet Slang

 

Recently released documents showed that the FBI is now associating common internet slang with "Violent Extremism.” The Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project used a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) request to obtain the documents that include glossaries illustrating that certain words and phrases have been flagged as indicators of "Involuntary Celibate Violent Extremism" or "Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremism."

One document refers specifically to "incels," or those "involuntary celibate," whom the "threat overview" describes as possibly seeking to "commit violence in support of their beliefs that society unjustly denies them sexual or romantic attention, to which they believe they are entitled." The assessment admits that “most incels do not engage in violence," but adds that they have been involved in "at least five lethal attacks in the United States and Canada." (You’d be a little on edge, too, if you weren’t getting any. Just kidding.)

 

The list of problematic terms includes “based,” which the FBI characterizes as a word used to “refer to someone who has been converted to racist ideology, or as a way of indicating ideological agreement.” “Based” was coined by the rapper Lil B and is typically used to refer to something that is “agreeable” and “cool,” or “anti-woke.”

“LARPing,” a term I’ve never encountered before, also made the list. It refers to people engaged in live-action roleplay, particularly as characters in high-fantasy settings.

“Looksmaxxing,” which the documents defined as the “process of self-improvement with the intent to become more attractive,” was on the list, as well. Conversely, several terms connected to self-pity adorn the list, among them “heightcel” and “baldcel,” which apparently refer to short people and bald people, respectively. “It’s over,” often used to convey “the hopelessness of being an incel,” will also attract the attention of The Bureau.

But wait, there’s more.

The glossary defines the term “Chad” as a “Race -specific term used to describe the idealized version of a male, who is very successful at getting sexual and romantic attention from women.”

 

“Stacy”-- Chad’s counterpart—has also been smeared by the FBI, and is defined as an “idealized version of a female, who is very successful at gaining sexual and romantic attention from men. Chooses Chad over incels.” She chooses Chad over incels? What a bitch! Actually, Stacy is probably just pragmatic.    

And, of course, “Red Pill” made the cut, too. The term became popular after it was instrumental to the 1999 movie The Matrix, and refers to a process by which a person’s perspective is dramatically transformed. The FBI defines it as “a belief shared by many online communities that society is corrupt, and that the believer is a victim of this corruption.”

In truth, the movie presents the red pill as the pathway to discovering the truth behind the lies that our rulers are telling us, thereby affording us the opportunity to escape the mental prison in which their prevarication seeks to place us…permanently.

On the other hand, to take the blue pill is to choose a life of ignorance, a refusal to shatter the oddly comfortable illusion in which one is living.

Democrats desperately want us all to keep taking the blue pills…so that they can retain and enhance their power.

But the red pill is the only way forward if a society wishes to retain, enhance, or regain its freedoms.

                                                  ******************************************

(Bonus writing for FBI perusal: “In my opinion, based on what I’ve observed, Chad and Stacey have been engaging in looksmaxxing. Chad is fighting baldcel and heightcel and Stacey has apparently been red-pilled. Their larping looks increasingly strained and mirthless. In short, I think it’s over.”) 

 

Sunday, April 23, 2023

Four That Won't Bore

Four That Won’t Bore

*The Public Health Agency of Canada recently released a report about climate change and the alleged dangers it poses to Canucks. According to The Post Millennial, the report stated that white supremacy, capitalism, colonialism, and racism were all “systemic drivers of negative health outcomes and climate change,” and that therefore we must embark on a plan focused on “decolonizing, justice, and equity.” White Supremacy is a systemic driver of climate change? How can this be? Do Black people absorb more sunlight, thereby keeping the planet cooler?

*President Biden invited Tennessee Democratic state Reps. Justin Jones, Justin Pearson, and Gloria Johnson to the White House. The infamous Tennessee Three will visit on April 24th. The president thanked them for their leadership regarding gun control-- and for standing up for democratic values. The three recently led a near riot/insurrection at the Tennessee Capitol in an effort to take Americans’ Second Amendment rights away from them. Democratic values? Biden did not invite the families of the victims of the Covenant School massacre to meet with him at the White House. Values.

*John Sopko, Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, recently informed Congress that taxpayer dollars are finding their way into the Taliban's pockets. Sopko made the allegation during a House Oversight Committee hearing regarding the Biden administration's disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021. He went on to note that the Taliban are likely diverting money intended for “the poor Afghan people” for their own nefarious uses. Even more shockingly, Sopko testified that the State Department and the United States Agency for International Development have been guilty of “unprecedented” obstruction and have demonstrated an “abject refusal to allow oversight” of the more than $8 billion that America has sent to Afghanistan since the bungled withdrawal less than two years ago. So our money is almost certainly being used by the Taliban to oppress women and harm gay people. Way to go Biden administration! Values. Democrats are frauds and inveterate liars.

*Seven sorority sisters have sued the University of Wyoming for admitting a transgender woman into their house over claims “she” voyeuristically peeped at them while visibly aroused. The actual women also sued Artemis Langford, their 6’2”, 260 lb. transgender sorority “sister,” who joined their chapter in September 2022. Langford was scheduled to move into the Kappa Kappa Gamma (KKG) house alongside 50 other women. The 21-year-old currently lives outside of the home, but the girls say she is often in their sorority house watching them-- and that they have caught her sporting an erection on at least one occasion. So? I mean, can’t a woman have an erection now and again? Jeez! Let’s show a little tolerance, girls!

 

 

Saturday, April 22, 2023

FBI Planned To Infiltrate The Catholic Church, Media Yawns

 

Recent reports indicate that the FBI planned to recruit leaders in both a Richmond, Virginia, diocese and the Society of St. Pius X to spy on their fellow faithful Catholic brethren. You read that correctly. 

The Bureau provided limited information to U.S. Congressman Jim Jordan, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, admitting that it had sought information “derived from at least one undercover employee” seeking to infiltrate religious organizations as “new avenues for tripwire and source development.” The meager 18 pages of heavily redacted documents provided in response to Congressman Jordan’s initial request triggered the House Judiciary Committee to initiate an additional subpoena for further information from the FBI.

According to the FBI’s initial response to Jordan, the Bureau wanted to “develop news sources” to report on what it alleges to be “suspicious activity.” (Which now usually means activity involving conservative, religious, or patriotic people.) The organization apparently put out a document or memo outlining this desire.

Jordan noted that, despite the FBI’s initial reply, “[w]e know that the FBI distributed this document to field offices across the country,” adding that it was “unclear” how many FBI employees have accessed Catholic houses of worship across the nation.

Congressman Jordan recently wrote to FBI Director Christopher Wray, telling him that “the FBI proposed that its agents engage in outreach to Catholic parishes to develop sources among the clergy and church leadership to inform on Americans practicing their faith.”

Jordan has called the FBI’s move “outrageous” and “chilling.” But neither the media nor the Biden administration seem at all concerned.

Whatever happened to the concept of separation of church and state?! Liberals heretofore claimed to be strongly in favor it.

Apparently, they don’t want the church to “infect” the state, but are okay with the state infiltrating the church.

Somewhere, Jefferson weeps.

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, April 21, 2023

Teacher Tells Students They Must Agree With Him...Or Else

 

A teacher at the Stationers’ Crown Woods Academy, a secondary school (and sixth form) in the Greenwich area outside London, England, recently told his students: “Let me make this very clear. You don’t have a choice whether or not you learn about LGBT+ in this school. You don’t have a choice. It’s one of our values, and if you refuse to do it, that will be dealt with severely. Why would I not? Why would I care if anyone in this room wants to love somebody, whether it be a man or a woman? Why would I care if someone wants to say: ‘Do you know what? I don’t know if I’m more male or more female. I’m exploring.’ Why does that matter to me?” 

It matters a great deal to him, apparently, otherwise he wouldn’t threaten to deal with his students so “severely.”

You know the “educator” is “pro-choice” when it comes to abortion, but he is clearly anti-choice when it comes to whether or not to worship the LGBT+ community. And, like many “teachers” today, he will not tolerate diversity of thought. More and more, teachers tell their students what to think, rather than helping them in how to think. Indoctrination continues to replace education.

Imagine the uproar from Democrats/”progressives”/leftists/Marxists/Fascists/academia/the media (all synonymous) if the teacher had said: “Let me make this very clear. You don’t have a choice whether or not you learn about Christianity in this school. You don’t have a choice. It’s one of our values, and if you refuse to do it, that will be dealt with severely.”

The irony is that “wokeism” is itself a religion-- albeit a twisted one— many of whose disciples are truly fanatical in their belief. And in their disdain for agnostics and infidels.

 

 

 

Thursday, April 20, 2023

Democrats To Ignore The Constitution Again

 

A federal judge in Texas recently ruled that the Food and Drug Administration’s initial authorization of the abortion pill Mifepristone was improper and has therefore suspended the pill’s approval.

This caused unhinged leftists like Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to clutch their pearls—and beg “The Big Guy” to once again ignore the Constitution.

After the Texas judge issued his decision, Wyden tweeted: “…the Biden administration can and must ignore the judge and keep mifepristone on the market and this medication available for every woman in America.”

AOC parroted much the same notion to CNN’s Anderson Cooper, flatly telling him: “the Biden Administration should ignore this ruling,” after which she appeared on Dana Bash’s CNN program and said the same thing.

Bash feigned surprise, stating: “That’s a pretty stunning position! If you think about it, in the, in the abstract, about the notion of just ignoring a judge’s position. So my question is, when this case is resolved by the Supreme Court, should the administration follow that decision, if that decision ends up banning this abortion drug?

To which leftists would probably reply: “Of course not. That decision, like the Texas judge’s, would be evil and put birthing people in harm’s way. It would not be a legitimate decision and therefore should not-- and could not-- be honored by people of decency and good faith.”

You see, if a Democrat is president, his or her will super-cedes that of Congress and the judiciary, whereas if a Republican is president and the Congress Democratic and/or the judiciary is comprised of more liberal judges, the dictates of Congress and the judiciary must override the president’s positions. It’s just common sense, right?

Wyden tweeted that the abortion pill is “medication,” clearly illustrating that many Democrats see pregnancy as an illness.

That is sick. It is, in fact, an Illness that no pill can cure.

A sickness of the soul has descended on America. A pandemic that is truly scary…and could be fatal.

 

 

Wednesday, April 19, 2023

Study Claims Melting Ice Could Cause Sea Levels To Rise More Rapidly Than Originally Expected

 

According to a recently released study, at the end of the last ice age, parts of an enormous ice sheet covering Eurasia retreated up to 2,000 feet per day. That rate is the fastest measured to date, far exceeding what scientists previously believed to be the upper limits for ice sheet retreat.

In the new study, lead author Christine Batchelor and her colleagues analyzed former beds of two major ice streams across the Norwegian continental ice shelf dating back 15,000 to 19,000 years ago. Using ship-borne imagery, the team then calculated the rates of retreat by studying patterns of wavelike ridges along the seafloor. They hypothesized that the “orderly” ridge patterns they observed may have been created as the front of the glacier bounced on the seafloor from daily tides.

Call me a skeptic, but this doesn’t sound to me like “settled science.”

Nonetheless, Batchelor and crew think the finding may shed light on how quickly ice in Greenland and Antarctica might melt-- and raise global sea levels-- in a warming world.

Batchelor stated: “If temperatures continue to rise, then we might have the ice being melted and thinned from above as well as from below, so that could kind of end up with a scenario that looks more similar to what we had [off] Norway after the last glaciation.”

According to a story in The Washington Post, Eric Rignot, a glaciologist who was not involved in the study, opined on it anyway, stating via email: “This is not a model. This is real observation. And it is frankly scary. Even to me.” (Cue the voice of Elmer Fudd. “Yes, it is vewy, vewy, scawy, Rignot.” Not.

The only thing the study proves is that the Earth warmed quickly and dramatically eons ago-- without any possible help from man. Inconvenient truth: there were no factories, gas stoves, air conditioners, lawn mowers, automobiles, cattle ranches, or any other possible “man-caused” greenhouse gas generators 15,000 to 19,000 years ago.

Any other interpretation of this “study”—and its alleged “findings”—would constitute anti-science bias…and qualify as “fake news.”

 

 

Tuesday, April 18, 2023

When "Diversity" Trumps Merit, Everyone Loses

 

Just weeks after a train derailment and “controlled” burn of the toxic spill poisoned the air and water in East Palatine, Ohio, a truck carrying the toxic soil away from the site overturned, dumping its contents just four miles away. Authorities are claiming that the spill was contained. Of course, they claimed the original spill was contained and essentially harmless, which was demonstrably untrue.

The commercial tractor-trailer, carrying 40,000 pounds of contaminated soil, was involved in a collision causing it to tip over and dump roughly 20,000 pounds of the toxic soil into the environment. Again. Déjà vu. Department of Redundancy Department.

The truck’s driver reportedly suffered minor injuries and was cited for operating a vehicle without reasonable control. Say what?!

In other news:

*Reports indicate that 18,000 cows recently perished in an explosion on a ranch in the Texas panhandle. Say what?!

*Highly sensitive leaked documents, potentially damaging to the U.S. and its interests, have apparently been circulating on social media and message boards for months without the Biden administration being aware of this. And the Bidenites don’t even know how this occurred.

*Top-secret security documents containing information about President Biden’s recent trip to Northern Ireland were found on a Belfast street according to the Police Service of Northern Ireland. A local man, who identified as “Bill,” called into the BBC's "The Nolan Show” to report that he had found security documents lying on a street near his home. The Biden administration had no explanation for this embarrassment, either.

Abandoning Afghanistan, military first and civilians later, and leaving behind billions of dollars of high-tech weaponry for the Taliban. The Chinese spy balloon debacle. Top-secret documents strewn around the country—and world. Trains derailing nearly every day. Flight delays. Airplanes nearly colliding on a routine basis. Food-processing plants burning down. Homeless encampments going up.

This is what happens when you value diversity over merit. Inevitably.

And, tragically, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

 

Monday, April 17, 2023

"Explosion Kills 18,000 Cows" Reports Say, And No Questions Asked

 

Recently, news broke regarding an explosion at a dairy farm in the Texas Panhandle, in which approximately 18,000 cows were killed (and one person critically injured). The Castro County Sheriff’s Office confirmed the explosion to Fox News Digital and stated that the cows were in a holding area before being brought in for milking when the blast occurred at the Southfork Dairy Farm in Dimmitt. The Texas State Fire Marshal’s Office is investigating the cause of the fire.

 

Castro County Sheriff Sal Rivera spoke to local media outlet KSAT-TV about the explosion and subsequent fire, saying that speculation centered around “what they call a honey badger, which is a vacuum that sucks the manure and water out and possibly that it got overheated and probably the methane and things like that ignited and spread out and exploded and the fire.”

 

Um, sure. Not.

 

I mean, what the hell?! What kind of explosion could possibly cause the death of 18,000 cattle?! This is a bovine Hiroshima or Nagasaki! I’m not buying the theory that a vacuum exploded, killing 18,000 dairy cows, whose average weight is over 1,500 pounds. Over how vast an area were the cows dispersed, even if in a pen? At 8 feet long and like 5 feet wide, even if they were all standing nearly nose-to-tail and shoulder-to-shoulder they would cover an area of roughly 26 football fields. And this was on essentially open prairie, with not much fuel for a fire.

 

Did North Korea hit the farm with a nuke? Were the cattle done in by an asteroid or large meteorite? And why the hell is every food processing plant, dairy farm and chicken coop in America blowing up, burning up, or otherwise being destroyed? Is it for the same reason our leaders are abandoning the use of fossil fuels? Do they want us to be immobile and reliant on a bug-heavy diet A.S.A.P.?

 

And why is the media udderly utterly sanguine and uninterested in any of this? Shouldn’t inquiring minds want to know?

 

 

Sunday, April 16, 2023

First Annual Fundraiser For Ending Appropriation-- And Discrimination Against The Transgendered

First Avenue Nightclub and Danceteria

Minneapolis, MN.

April 20, 2023

 

(A heavily pierced and tatted person with multicolored hair stands in front of a large crowd of similarly adorned people, holding a microphone. He/she/they begins to speak)

“Welcome to the first annual fundraiser to Help End Appropriation-- and Discrimination Against the Transgendered, or HEADAT. If somebody asks you, ‘Where’s your head at?’ you can honestly tell them ‘it’s right here!’ (Giggles.) Anyway, we are going to have sooo much fun tonight, and will hopefully raise a lot of money for two great causes! (Mild applause.)  

“First, let me talk about the scourge of ‘appropriation.’ It is deeply hurtful to take aspects of another person’s or group’s culture, appearance-- or immutable characteristics—and try to make them yours! I mean, that should be obvious, right? Common sense. So, if I wear a sombrero, speak in Black slang, or eat a chalupa…I am appropriating them, in essence stealing them from their rightful owners, right? This can be demeaning to, in this case, Mexicans and Black people. Taken to an extreme, this is literally violence against them. (Applause.)

“Speaking of violence, transphobia can literally kill people! If we deny the natural right of a person to choose which sex and gender they wish to be, how are we better than Hitler? Those who would seek to prevent someone from getting puberty blockers, hormone treatments, and/or adding or lopping off body parts, are no better than those who seek to prevent pregnant people from having abortions. (Loud applause.) If someone—anyone—wishes to be a member of the ‘opposite sex,’ who are we to say they don’t have that right? If a man wants to have boobs and female genitalia…or just wants to dress in ‘women’s’ clothing, what is wrong with that? Conversely, if a woman wants a sack and a penis, or simply likes to dress like the ‘Marlboro Man’ (giggles), everyone should have to support her desires! (Louder applause.) I mean, who cares how anyone else acts, dresses, or looks like, right?! (Wild applause.)

“I am proud to announce that half of the cover charge you all paid to get in tonight will go to the newly created HEADAT fund! Also, more money will be raised by a raffle and a silent auction! Just 5 bucks each will get you raffle tickets and a chance to win…ready for it? (crowd replies ‘Yes!’)…an all expenses paid trip to the 2023 New York City Pride Parade (crowd gasps)…and the entire series of Harry Potter books that you can incinerate or destroy in any way you like! (More applause.) And, a silent auction will be held in the ‘Two-Spirit’ room from 8 until 8:30 P.M. this evening. You can place bids on items such as sex toys, modern art, a lifetime supply of CBD products, and tickets to ‘The View.’

“Now feel free to avail yourselves of the gluten-free, non-GMO, vegan food on the banquet tables at the back of this hall while we breathlessly await tonight’s featured entertainment. That’s right, the ‘Patrick Fitzmichael-Michael Fitzpatrick Band’ will take the stage at 9 P.M.!

“And, remember: appropriation is not appropriate. Now let’s have an awesome non-binary night! Thank you all for coming!”


 

Saturday, April 15, 2023

Musk's Twitter Declares NPR To Be "State-Affiliated Media"

 

Elon Musk’s Twitter recently officially branded NPR “state-affiliated media.” The label is not only undeniably true, but probably an understatement. Nonetheless, the designation predictably caused John Lansing, National Public Radio’s CEO, to clutch his pearls and attempt to un-bunch his panties.

By way of reply, Lansing issued this laughably preposterous statement: “NPR and our Member stations are supported by millions of listeners who depend on us for the independent, fact-based journalism we provide. NPR stands for freedom of speech and holding the powerful accountable.” Now tell us the one about the three bears, John. Sometimes Babylon Bee articles almost write themselves.

While the mainstream media has leaned liberal since Moby Dick was a minnow, it has recently gone full-on Marxist in lockstep with the Democratic Party. Nearly every outlet uses virtually the same phrases to denounce conservatives and further its agenda.

Guns bad. Abortion rights good. “Toxic masculinity” bad. “Trans women” good. Appropriation bad. Biological men in women’s locker-rooms and bathrooms good. Climate change bad. Fundamentally transforming the United States good. And on and on, ad infinitum.

The mainstream media will vociferously proclaim any conspiracy theory to be true, and any truth to be a conspiracy theory. Doubt that? They aggressively and shamelessly promoted the “Russian-Collusion” fallacy for well-nigh two years but told us that the Hunter Biden laptop story “had all the earmarks of Russian disinformation.” Then came their reporting on the coronavirus pandemic, and the subsequent mask, social-distancing and vaccine mandates. Etc., etc., etc.

ABC recently went so far as to blur out the front of the podium at which Donald Trump was delivering his post-indictment speech, so those watching couldn’t see the number that was placed there for them to text if they wanted to receive official campaign notifications and updates. Yet no network has ever deigned to prevent people from reading any message on any podium at which Joe Biden was speaking, before or after he became president.

If the Democratic Party were to proclaim—tomorrow—that the Earth was flat, within minutes MSNBC would solemnly aver, “The Earth is flat.” CNN would breathlessly announce: “The Earth is flat.” NBC would report, “The Earth is, indeed, flat.” CBS would cry, “Turns out, the Earth is flat.” ABC would declare: “The science is now settled. The Earth is flat.”

The New York Times would run a front-page banner headline, above the fold, stating unequivocally, “Experts Say Earth Is Flat, Far-Right Flat-Earth Deniers A Danger To Humanity.” The Washington Post would run with, “Far-Right Flat-Earth Deniers A Danger To Humanity, Experts Say.”

If former President Trump—and his roughly 75 million supporters-- disagreed with the now conventional wisdom that the Earth is flat, the media would haughtily sniff: “Trump’s baseless claim that the Earth is not flat is part of ‘The Big Lie’ which he and his radical-right supporters traffic in and expound.

Mainstream journalists would report that “far-right Republicans cling to their long-debunked belief that the Earth is round.”  

The “ladies” on The View would say something like, “Whacko conspiracy theorists on the right claim that the Earth isn’t flat. But that ship has long since sailed. It is an irrefutable fact that it is as flat as a pancake that Donald Trump sat on.” (The ladies would then smirk and giggle.)

The mainstream media is indeed “state-affiliated” when Democrats reign. It would more properly be termed “Deep-state-affiliated” when they don’t.

Unfortunately, “fake news” is all too real.

Mainstream media outlets have made themselves a joke.

Albeit a bad one.