Wednesday, May 18, 2022

Earth's Oceans Losing Their "Memories," Study Finds

 

Earth's oceans are feeling the wrath of human-induced climate change. Glaciers are melting, sea levels are rising and reefs are dying – and now, according to a new study published in Science Advances, the sea is losing its memory altogether.” Or so states a recent article on msn.com.

The post also noted that, “Unlike weather, which can change wildly and rapidly, Earth's oceans usually only have slight changes throughout the week. This persistence is called ‘memory’ and is related to the thickness of the ocean's top mixed layer. Similar to how a thicker mattress provides better cushioning, a thicker sea surface layer allows for a better memory because of the thermal inertia at play.” The article also avers that, “As global warming increases and the ocean temperature rises, that top layer thins out. And like a thinning mattress, the support, or in this case the year-to-year ‘memory,’ weakens.”

A few points to be made here: 1) The article as much as admits that climate change is natural and can occur rapidly! (“Unlike weather, which can change wildly and rapidly…”) 2) The ocean’s “memory” is not really a memory…in that it doesn’t have a brain, mind, or any cognitive ability whatsoever. Ergo, it doesn’t remember anything. 3) I have always been told that, the warmer the temperatures, the thicker the top layer of a body of water becomes, not thinner. The thicker the warmer (mixed) top layer becomes, the further down it pushes the thermocline, the narrow band of water with rapidly changing temperatures. Below that is the cold-water layer. (The ocean is heated from above by the sun and warm air.)

In any case, this so-called “memory,” scientists say, helps them predict ocean conditions, and therefore its decline will make it harder for them to keep up with changes. The study’s co-author, Fei-Fei Jin, a professor at the University of Hawaii-Mānoa, said that the results of the study "suggest intrinsic changes in the system and new challenges in prediction under warming." 

The study’s lead author, Hui Shi, opined that "It's almost as if the ocean is developing amnesia.” (Hui Shi and Fei-Fei? The former was an ancient Chinese philosopher famous for his “ten paradoxes.” The latter sounds like someone Eric Swalwell would date. Must not be the same people.)

 The article notes researchers “project” that the ocean's memory will likely continue to decrease throughout most of the world, until, by the end of the 21st century, “some regions will have ocean memory reductions of up to 100%.” 100% you say? If I remember correctly, that’s a lot.

And, of course, the researchers found that man-caused global warming/climate change is primarily responsible for the degradation of the ocean’s memory.

It’s always something. And now the bleeping ocean has lost its memory. Experts expect that by the year 2100 it won’t be able to remember a damn thing.

“Where the hell did I put the Marianas Trench?” it will ask itself. And, “What are these funny looking things with eight appendages that squirt ink? Which way does the Gulf Stream flow? Am I rising or falling? Oh, crap, I am soo hosed!”

What’s next? On second thought, I don’t want to know. Are we to see our mountains ravaged with Alzheimer’s, and our volcanoes contend with autism? Will our prairies be beset by bipolar disorder, our forests burdened with schizophrenia?   

What’s worse than an ocean losing its memory?

Scientists losing their minds.

 

 

Tuesday, May 17, 2022

Biden White House Tweets Disinformation

 

Where is the Government Disinformation Board when you need it? The official White House Twitter account recently claimed that there was no COVID-19 vaccine available when President Joe Biden took office in January 2021.

"When President Biden took office, millions were unemployed and there was no vaccine available," the White House falsely stated on Twitter.

Biden took office on January 20th, 2021. He himself was vaccinated against COVID-19 on December 21st, 2020, though no one expects him to remember that.

This White House might contain more serial prevaricators than did the Clinton White House. And that is shocking. And scary. For the nation. And the world.

Look for more official White House tweets in the coming days, with messages informing people that-- before Biden took office-- there was no polio vaccine, smart phones, color televisions, or running water.

But Biden and crew don’t just flat-out lie on Twitter, they also tweet out non-sequiturs. As Biden did recently when he suggested that, if corporations were made to pay their “fair share” of taxes, inflation could be brought under control. Raising taxes on businesses does not reduce inflation. Asserting that it does is like saying, “We need to excuse student loan debt to protect our groundwater reservoirs!” Or, “We must ban fracking to boost cryptocurrency prices.” Nonsensical.

“Progressive” (i.e. leftist authoritarian) governments, like Biden’s and Trudeau’s, are the source of most “disinformation.” And the most preposterous examples of same. To the extent that, if and when a Government Disinformation Board is up and running, we will know that whatever it deems to be disinformation is actually factual, and whatever it proclaims to be false is the unvarnished truth.

 

 

Monday, May 16, 2022

Biden Official Warns Another COVID Wave Is Coming This Fall

 

It’s an oldie but a goodie: the Biden Regime is telling us to brace ourselves for a new wave of Covid coming this fall… just in time for the midterm elections. When something proves successful, you’d be a fool not to try it again, right? COVID fears led to mail-in balloting…which in turn allowed Biden to be “elected” president of the United States. Therefore, Democrats and their sycophants believe that reintroducing those fears can keep Congressional Democrats in power-- against all odds. Perhaps lightning can strike twice. (Mules on your marks…get set…go!)

Without offering up any information to support the claim, a senior Biden Administration official recently projected that up to 100 million Americans – nearly 1/3 of the population – could get infected with COVID-19 COVID-20 COVID-21 COVID-22 this fall and early winter if Congress doesn’t provide more funding for vaccines and other treatments. And if they are allowed to vote in person, of course.

Given the staggeringly high rate of new cases among the fully vaccinated, that might not be too far-fetched. Several so-called “experts” agreed that another major Covid wave could be around the corner due to the waning efficacy of the various COVID vaccines.

A report in The Washington Post noted the warning by “a senior administration official” during a background briefing. The report stated: “In forecasting 100 million potential infections during a cold-weather wave later this year and early next, the official did not present new data or make a formal projection. Instead, he described the fall and winter wave as a scenario based on a range of outside models of the pandemic. Those projections assume that omicron and its subvariants will continue to dominate community spread, and there will not be a dramatically different strain of the virus, the official said, acknowledging the pandemic’s course could be altered by many factors.”

100 million, huh? Oddly enough, that’s just about the number of mail-in votes Democrats will likely receive in the mid-term elections. Weird how that works.

But, hey, gotta do anything it takes to stop a red wave, right? Even if it takes talk of a COVID wave to do it.

 

Sunday, May 15, 2022

Cancelling Women

 

The University of Arkansas recently announced that it will change the name of the campus’s Pat Walker Health Center “Women’s Clinic” to the “GYN Clinic.”

An email by Registered Health Information Administrator (RHIA) Director of Medical Services A.J. Olsen stated: “This name change is important, as the Pat Walker Health Center affirms diversity and aims to create a welcoming environment for all patients.” Removing reference to one of the two sexes affirms diversity?!

This is just part and parcel of a growing movement to eliminate females and cancel womanhood.

Last year, the inanely named “Student Alliance for Reproductive Justice” at the University of Wisconsin-Madison petitioned the school to change the name of the campus Women’s Health Clinic to the “Reproductive Health Clinic.” The group claimed using the word “women” in the title of the clinic was “gendered language” that adversely affected students’ decision to seek health care. In an interview with The Badger Herald, SARJ President Maya Cherins said, “I think there are lots of students who need reproductive healthcare and don’t choose to get it from University Health Services because of their gendered language. I think it will foster a much more inclusive and welcoming space.” So, “Women’s Health Clinic” was sent down a memory hole and the “Gynecology Clinic” was born. So to speak.

In related news, Democrats’ latest pro-abortion bill is called the Women’s Health Protection Act, but does not include the words “woman,” “women,” or “female.” Instead, the bill substitutes the word “person” to refer to those who have fallopian tubes and a uterus—and therefore the ability to give birth to children. The proposed bill would not only codify Roe v. Wade into permanent law but would remove all limits on abortion across all 50 states. (Even laws that have been in place for decades, like the Roe v. Wade decision.)

The United States already has some of the most permissive abortion laws in the world. Were this bill to pass, it would stand alone as the peerless champion of sanctioning the mass slaughter of innocents for one’s own convenience. (The Senate bill is not expected to pass, due to a lack of bipartisan support.)

 

The bill reads in part, “Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize any government to interfere with a person’s ability to terminate a pregnancy,” or “to diminish or in any way negatively affect a person’s constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy, or to displace any other remedy for violations of the constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy.” Yes, I believe it was Madison who wrote: “A person’s right to extinguish the life of their child in their womb shall not be abridged.”

 

By contrast, the 2021 version of the bill had the word “women” in its text 13 times. 

 

The times, they are a-changin’. And quickly.

 

The Democratic Party has “progressed” from being staunch advocates of slavery to being staunch advocates of cancelling women…and babies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

National Park Names Offensive, Researchers Say

 

It should come as no surprise that a group of professors and researchers recently identified 960 places within 16 of America’s 62 national parks that contain “racist” names that promote “white supremacy,” “racism,” “settler colonialism” or “anti-Indigenous ideologies,” according to an article in the online journal People and Nature.

The article states that the research team “examined the origins of over 2,200 place names in 16 national parks in the United States” and found all of the locations “have place names that tacitly endorse racist or, more specifically, anti-Indigenous ideologies.” 

The team helpfully split the offensive place names into categories, including those that allegedly support white supremacy, those that were the work of white urban power elites, those that appropriate indigenous language, those that replace an indigenous place name with a colonizer name, and, of course, those heinously offensive “neutral-seeming” names, such as “Crater Peak.”

Of the 960 “offensive” names, 254 supposedly supported white supremacy, while 214 were accused of appropriating indigenous language. On the other hand, researchers claimed that 205 of the names were offensive because they replaced an Indigenous place name with a colonizer name. So, if a place was named using an indigenous term it is was considered offensive appropriation, and if an indigenous term was replaced by a non-indigenous term it was offensive substitution? Talk about damned if you do and damned if you don’t!

Incredibly, the researchers determined that 324 place names were offensive due to their “neutral-seeming” names. Huh? The study stated: “Seemingly innocuous names, and names of forgotten or obscure individuals are perhaps just as pernicious as names for outright racist or violent individuals. Neutral-seeming settler names build a white-normative culture in the place.” The article noted that these names “perpetuate the invisibility of Indigenous people on landscapes” and also “demonstrate that settlers have the power to suppress deep Indigenous knowledge with relatively shallow Eurocentric names.” Indigenous people are “deep” whereas the newer (Eurocentric) migrants are “relatively shallow?” That’s funny, as it’s just the opposite of what progressives/academics think today, which is that most long-time American citizens, particularly in flyover country, are ignorant cultureless rubes while immigrants, legal and illegal, enrich us beyond measure.

“Roy’s Peak,” in Texas’ Big Bend National park, was deemed to support white supremacy, and was cited as an example of names that somehow “erase Indigenous knowledge.”

              The obviously offensive “Yellowstone National Park” was determined to be “the work of white urban power elites,” including Teddy Roosevelt. This is ironic, as the former progressive president is widely considered to be the original champion of the National Park Service. Moreover, he greatly expanded the national parks and loved nothing more than to be out in the wilds.

 

The researchers noted that “white hegemonic symbols embedded in parks can contribute to a perception that white people are the primary stewards and knowledge keepers of nature” and, as a result, can make racial minorities feel uncomfortable and excluded. They added, “Black people are 13% of the US population yet they are only 1% of US national park visitors, while white people are 76% of the US population and 96% of visitors.” And racism and white supremacy are the only possible reasons for that, right?

The silly study concludes that, if the aforementioned places were renamed, supposedly marginalized groups would magically become empowered, and would flock to the national parks in droves.

Sounds logical. So let’s rename “Yellowstone Park.” Let’s rename “Crater Peak.” And let’s rename “Roy’s Peak.” (Surely “LeRoy’s Peak” would be a better draw for Black folks.) In fact, let’s rename every place in the United States.

And then rename the nation, as well, since we are “united” no longer.

 

Friday, May 13, 2022

Democratic Rep. Says Military Should Facilitate Abortions

 

Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) recently told MSNBC that he thinks the military should be called on to help provide abortions if the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) overturns Roe v. Wade in the coming months.

Crow stated: “I was looking at the Department of Defense and our military bases and the extent that they can help provide assistance, uh, reproductive rights and abortion services, uh, I think that's something we should look at.” His remarks raise the age-old question: WTF?!

Our military is charged with defending our nation and its people. Primarily by preventing war. Unfortunately, if deterrence doesn’t work, it must sometimes kill the enemy’s soldiers and destroy its things. Progressives have tasked the military with woke causes recently and turned it into a vast petri dish for social experiments. They are attempting to purge the greatest military that has ever been of its masculinity, patriotism, hyper-competence, and belief in a higher power…all the things that made it so effective.

And now they want it to propagate and perform abortions?

How? The “fetus” is inside the potential “birthing person,” so a soldier can’t just gun it down or lob a grenade at it. Can’t call in an airstrike. Can’t go old school and use a musket…nor use modern technology and detonate a nuclear weapon in the pursuit of the God-given right to kill your child.

So, what would Rep. Jim Jason Crow have soldiers do? Perform the abortions themselves utilizing their bare hands?  A coat hanger?

Memo to Crow: a nation’s military exists to protect its citizens from death by external threats, not to kill its most vulnerable internally by its own hands.

What’s next? Should we have the FBI cut hair? The CIA get into bicycle repair?

Come to think of it, that might be better then what they have been doing recently.

 

 

 

 

Thursday, May 12, 2022

Taco Bell To Hold "Drag Brunch" Events

 

Taco Bell recently announced that it plans to hold "Drag Brunch" events at several of its restaurant locations around the United States.

The company’s global chief brand officer, Sean Tresvant, issued a press release proudly proclaiming: “We understand the importance of creating safe spaces for the LGBTQIA+ community and are thrilled to provide a unique experience that spotlights and celebrates the wonderful art form of drag and its influence in culture with their chosen families. Taco Bell Drag Brunch was concepted by Live Más Pride, Taco Bell’s LGBTQIA+ Employee Resource Group, which has played a major role in driving awareness of and meaningfully supporting LGBTQIA+ communities both within Taco Bell and the communities we serve and operate in.”

A Taco Bell press release further stated: "Each show will be hosted by the fabulous drag performer and taco extraordinaire, Kay Sedia, and feature performances from local queens and kings that will transform any morning from Mild to Fire! As a brand that brings people together, the Taco Bell Drag Brunch experience is rooted in celebrating the LGBTQIA+ community and creating safe and welcoming spaces for all."

The first event has already taken place, and was held on May 1st in Las Vegas, fittingly enough. There are also events scheduled this month for Chicago and, oddly, Nashville, Tennessee. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and New York City will host events in June, which is LGBTQ Pride Month. Still other events may follow.

It seems almost certain that other fast-food purveyors will follow in Taco Bell’s fabulous footsteps. Perhaps McDonald’s will soon host “Pansexual Pride Parties.” I can already hear the marketing slogan: “We’ll put a Big Mac ™ in your hands…and in your mouth. Because we love to see you smile. McDonald’s, I’m lovin’ it!”

Surely, Burger King will soon be hosting “Big Love Banquets” for polyamorous people. “Married to more than one person?” the advertising will query. “If so, you need a Whopper™! Have it your way, at Burger King!”

Kentucky Fried Chicken will soon introduce “KFC for LGBTQIA Days,” during which it will give folks an incredible 69% off of its regular prices if they are queer, bisexual or transgender. The company will promote the events, rumored to be held on the last Wednesday of every month, with the slogan: “We are finger lickin’ good…and so are members of the LGBTQ Community!” Asked how KFC will absorb the loss of revenue, an anonymous source close to the giant fried chicken vendor suggested that the company might decide to charge straight, white, Christian males more to make up the difference.

An industry insider says that Wendy’s is considering hosting special Gay Pride events utilizing the slogan, “Where’s the beef? Right here!”  

The insider also noted that Wendy’s may be in competition with Arby’s, who he said is likely to launch its own Gay Pride events, proclaiming: “We have the meats! Wink, wink!”

Suddenly, I’m not hungry.

 

Wednesday, May 11, 2022

Reporter Wishes Pro-Lifers Misery, Death

 

Wisconsin Family Action, a group staunchly opposed to abortion, was attacked Sunday morning when someone lobbed a Molotov cocktail into its Madison office and spray-painted a message outside reading, "If abortions aren’t safe then you aren’t either." 

This prompted Caroline Reilly, a leftist reporter who frequently writes about abortion for something called Rewire News Group, to tweet: "More of this. May these people never know a moment of peace or safety until they rot in the ground.” Reilly was apparently celebrating the vandalism to WFA’s headquarters as described in a report by The New York Times. She seems to have subsequently deleted the tweet—and apparently has even aborted her Twitter account-- following backlash from those repulsed by her sentiments.

Calling for intimidation, violence-- and the death of others-- is a hallmark of those in today’s “pro-choice” movement.

As is coming up with insane non-sequiturs like, "If abortions aren’t safe then you aren’t either." 

How about, “If guns/vaccines/land mines aren’t safe then you aren’t either,” Ms. Reilly?

Today’s pro-choicers do have one redeeming trait: they are living proof that Darwin was wrong.

Tuesday, May 10, 2022

Abortion Restrictions Could Damage Economy Says Member Of Biden Administration

 

Politico recently published what other media outlets have called a “bombshell leak,” that being Justice Alito’s draft opinion indicating that the Supreme Court may be about to overturn Roe v. Wade as soon as this summer.

Much has been made of both the leak and the opinion, which have sent leftists and “progressives” into paroxysms of despair, anger, violence and insanity. Including vows to protest at Catholic churches on Mother’s Day. Just the kind of class and dignity you can depend on from them.

Even those at the head of our government have offered desperate and inane opinions on the possibility of letting the states decide whether to allow the unfettered mass slaughter of babies.

The ironically titled Secretary of Labor, Mary Walsh, recently told the online media company Insider Inc. that she has “serious concerns about the economic impacts of Roe potentially being overturned.” She stated, "This will impact women individually, but also is going to impact our economy as a whole.”

A recent article in the Business Insider, a far left “financial and business” website that makes the original Pravda seem like a “MAGA” mouthpiece, cited a “study” by the University of California-San Francisco purporting to show that “women being denied an abortion dealt with significant financial blows — but having access to one ‘does not harm the health and wellbeing of women.’” The study somehow didn’t mention that access to abortion is fatal to “the health and wellbeing” of babies. Probably just an inadvertent oversight. The same study claimed that when women had no choice but to give birth, they "experienced an increase in household poverty lasting at least four years relative to those who received an abortion” and that getting turned away from an abortion meant women's credit scores went down, and their debt went up. Moreover, the study averred that "Years after an abortion denial, women were more likely to not have enough money to cover basic living expenses like food, housing and transportation.” Well, when they were flush with cash prior to their pregnancy, perhaps they should have shelled out the nominal amount of cash needed to purchase birth control. Or, dare I say it, perhaps they should have even considered self-control.

And the article sadly asserts that children who are born because their mothers were tragically denied an abortion "are more likely to live below the federal poverty level than children born from a subsequent pregnancy to women who received the abortion." Huh? So, kids who weren’t aborted are less well off than those who were aborted? Or are less well off than those who were born after their mother had previously offed his or her potential big brother or sister?

What’s more, according to the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, if state-level abortion restrictions were lifted, 505,000 more women would join the labor force — and cumulatively earn over $3 billion every year.

And more than one outlet has claimed that, “Since 1973, Americans have had a constitutional right to an abortion.” The Constitution was written and ratified in the 1700s. How did justices suddenly discover a “right” to abortion nearly two centuries later?

We all know that entities such as the Institute for Women’s Policy Research are totally unbiased, especially as regards issues pertaining to women/birthing persons. Yes, individual women who give birth and keep their child have less discretionary income to spend on other things. The same is true of fathers that stick around to help the mother and child. In days of yore this was called parenting or “doing the right thing.” On the other hand, Secretary of Labor Mary Walsh’s assertion that overturning Roe v. Wade would adversely affect “our economy as a whole” is preposterous on its face. Mass abortion seriously-- and negatively-- impacts the sale of diapers and formula. And onesies, teething rings, baby powder, cribs, changing tables, children’s books, children’s car seats, strollers, etc., etc., etc.

“Pro-choicers” have serious concerns about the economic impact of doing away with murder?! Well then, how about the economic impact of banning the sale and manufacture of firearms? Or of banning oil pipelines, drilling, fracking, nuclear plants, coal, etc.?

What of the economic impact of the Biden administration’s economic policies?

It is ironic that progressives, who typically rely on emotional appeals-- and despise business and capitalism-- casually and callously dismiss the impact of slaughtering a powerless minority of innocents in favor of economic arguments.

But these are not the brightest of people. Some of them protesting yesterday on/in front of property owned by Supreme Court justices held crudely made signs saying, “My Body, My Choice,” “I Am A Person,” and “No Forced Pregnancies.” Let me take these in order. “My Body My Choice” had been a long-time staple of so-called “pro-choicers” until the pandemic. At which point progressives loudly demanded that everybody must get fully vaccinated and boosted, against their will if necessary, regardless of religious belief, health history, or assertion of bodily autonomy. Coming out of the pandemic, the “My Body, My Choice” sentiment—and placards—have been dusted off and redeployed. “No Forced Pregnancies?” No one, MAGA supporter or not, is forcing you to get pregnant. No one is holding a gun to your head and saying, “Do it! Now!” It is your own risky behavior, for which you don’t wish to be accountable, that leads to pregnancy. Lastly, “I Am A Person.” Really? That’s what you’ve got? No one is denying that. In fact, you would not be a person had your mother decided to abort you. What pro-life people are concerned about is that you-- as a person-- wish to extinguish the life of another person inside of your person.

This is not rocket science.

It is a matter of the heart and soul. And life and death.

 

Monday, May 9, 2022

NASA To Beam Nude Human Figures Into Space To Attract Aliens

 

NASA is planning on launching nude images into outer space as part of its renewed attempt to make contact with other intelligent life in the universe, according to a study recently released by the space agency. (“Other” intelligent life? I would submit that, as evidenced by the Democratic Party, we have a critical dearth of intelligence here on Earth.)

The transmitted messages will also include a simple representation of a world map and a diagram about how Earth's gravity works. Scientists say the message will be written in binary code, which they believe could be most easily understood by extraterrestrials, according to the study’s notes. (Oh, oh.)

The study reads: "Though the concept of mathematics in human terms is potentially unrecognizable to ETI, binary is likely universal across all intelligence. Binary is the simplest form of mathematics as it involves only two opposing states: zero and one, yes or no, black or white, mass or empty space." (So they are sending out nude images of males and females and nary an image of a non-binary person. Naughty scientists! Binary is bad!)

In actuality, what is being sent out in hopes of attracting aliens are essentially just basic anatomical drawings of a man and a woman. The figures will be shown waving to make them appear more welcoming—and will be accompanied by a depiction of DNA.

It’s a damn good thing NASA didn’t decide to send out actual nude photos of, say, Nancy Pelosi, Jerry Nadler, Joy Behar, or Brian Stelter. Because, if there were intelligent life out there somewhere, that would eternally guarantee it would never contact us.

                                                          

Sunday, May 8, 2022

"Transition Closets"

 

A nonprofit group called “The Transition Closet” is pushing for middle schools and high schools across the United States to provide safe spaces where students can find clothing and accessories that correspond to their preferred gender identity. And some schools are allowing teachers to create and maintain these “secret gender transition closets” that allow kids to change clothes-- and genders-- without their parents’ knowledge.

Students are told that they may change into their preferred clothing when they arrive at school and then change back to the apparel they arrived in before going home, in order to hide their gender-bending from their families.

Thomas Martin-Edwards is a transgender California teacher and the founder of the “Queer Teacher Fellowship.” He runs a trans closet in his school. In a recent TikTok video he explained the need for these secret areas: “The goal of the transition closet is for our students to wear the clothes that their parents approve of, come to school and then swap out into the clothes that fit who they truly are.” Martin-Edwards often wears stilettos to school and has posted videos of himself in the classroom showing them off.

The Transition Closet’s founder, Amare Roush, told The Epoch Times: “We do provide a safe space for kids whose parents are not accepting, because it’s known to help lower the suicide rate. These kids are going to do it anyway, we just want a way to provide them with a way to do it safely to where they’re not wearing clothes that are too small for them or doing so in a way that’s going to get them hurt by their parents.” If a school just wants to facilitate behavior that its “kids” are going to engage in anyway, why doesn’t it provide rooms where kids can play on their smart phones all day, spend hours on video games, and take “selfies?” Why doesn’t it have closets where girls can look in mirrors and play with their hair or guys can sit on couches and play with themselves? What are schools for, anyway?

That some schools are just letting this happen—if not actually encouraging the practice—is yet another sad sign of the times.

The intermingling of the radical LGBTQ agenda and the public school system continues apace, much to the detriment of both.

In the past, schools had dress codes. Many required that all students wear uniforms. And would not have sanctioned the wearing of stilettos by teachers, be they female or male. If a student didn’t comply, he or she was sent home, with a note to his or her parents. Today schools are engaged in indoctrinating students with radical leftist anti-American propaganda and encouraging them to experiment with any and all of the nearly infinite number of genders, in between their attendance at “Drag Queen Story Hours” and the like.

They provide the closets for their students to enter and come out of, unbeknownst to the parents that made them.

 

 

Politico, SCOTUS, Abortion...And The Fate Of A Nation

 

Disclosure in Politico of Justice Alito’s draft opinion that could potentially overturn Roe v. Wade likely marks the beginning of the end of the sanctity of the highest court in the land. Left-leaning individuals project politics into every aspect of life. There is nothing they won’t do to get their own way, to retain or seize power. Literally nothing. So someone leaked this draft opinion knowing that it would throw the mob into a crazed frenzy, deflect attention from numerous progressive policy failures, and possibly even aid Democrats in the upcoming mid-term elections, especially as they know the mainstream media will bend over backwards to frame the issue so as to benefit them.

Abortion is a sacrament in the Left’s anti-religion religion. Democrats are as protective of abortion now as they were of slavery and segregation a century and a half ago. Pro-lifers are engaged in what is nothing short of a second abolitionist movement. Roe v. Wade is a simple case of good v. evil. Both slavery and abortion deny the intrinsic dignity and worth of humans.  Both deprive human beings of their life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Both measure the worth of other human’s lives by what they can do for their owners/mothers. Both see others as nothing more than property. Ergo we have the terms “ni**er” or “non-viable tissue mass.”

Many are those who aide and abet evil. Amazon announced that it would reimburse employees $4,000 if they crossed state lines to get an abortion. It’s a federal violation if you cross a state line while stalking or harassing someone, but apparently not if you do so to kill your baby. In fact, you get paid for it!

And, incredibly, President Biden told the press that "Roe says what all basic mainstream religions have historically concluded, that the existence of a human life and being is a question. Is it at the moment of conception? Is it six months? Is it six weeks? Is it quickening, like Aquinas argued?" Huh? And then he added, "So, the idea that we’re going to make a judgment that is going to say that no one can make the judgment to choose to abort a child based on a decision by the Supreme Court, I think goes way overboard." Really? What else could the human forms with beating hearts and functioning brain waves in their mothers wombs possibly be?

Biden also released a statement saying: “At the federal level, we will need more pro-choice senators and a pro-choice majority in the House to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law.”

Biden, who purports to be Catholic, once supported overturning Roe v. Wade, but now sees political advantage to advocating for the mass slaughter of the most innocent and defenseless among us. He is to Catholicism as Jefferson Davis was to the abolitionist movement.

CNN Legal Analyst Laura Coates (not to be confused with CNN Legal Analyst Jeffrey “Hands On” Toobin) warned viewers of a “fundamental right” that could be taken away from us “with the stroke of a pen,” saying: "There are a lot of things now on the chopping block. And, Steve, you spoke about an earthquake. Well, a familiar phrase is ‘the slippery slope’ in the Supreme Court. That which you do in one area could extend to others. Well, fundamental rights include interstate travel, include the idea of same sex marriage, include same sex relationships, just to name a few. Now this is essentially gone. What’s next?"

Ironically enough Laura, President Biden has eschewed Constitutional directives and simply decreed laws “with the stroke of a pen” more than any other president in American history to this point in his tenure. And nowhere in the Constitution—or anywhere else for that matter—can a “fundamental right” to kill babies for one’s own convenience be found. Nor is there a “fundamental right” to same sex marriage, but don’t worry, SCOTUS is not going to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges. Neither will it ban “interstate travel.” Or put the kibosh on eating, drinking, scratching, farting, card-playing, or breathing.

I am sick and tired of hearing about “reproductive justice” and “a woman’s right to choose.” Real reproductive justice would be “allowing” the child you brought into being through your own actions/desire for sexual gratification to live. A woman doesn’t have “the right to choose” to club a baby seal to death (that would be so, like, cruel and “wrong!”). Nor does she have the “right” to drink and drive, pee on AOC’s shoes, buy a pack of smokes at 14-years-of-age, drive 80 miles-per-hour in a 40 miles-per-hour zone, etc., etc., etc. Neither does a man.

“Protect” abortion? How about we protect babies? Should we protect the “right” to kill-- or protect the right to life? How that question is answered will go a long way towards determining how long our society can last.

 

 

Saturday, May 7, 2022

Nobody Can Take A Joke Anymore

 

The (ostensibly) free world was shocked when Will Smith assaulted Chris Rock onstage at the Oscars in March. For telling a joke. And then, just days ago, Dave Chapelle was assaulted by an armed man who rushed the stage during his Hollywood Bowl set at the “Netflix Is a Joke” comedy festival. Apparently because the assailant didn’t like the tone or topic of some of Chapelle’s humor.

This has understandably caused other comedians to fear for their own safety. Howie Mandel recently told E! News that the Oscars incident may have “opened the floodgates” to preposterous and violent actions like these. Mandel said, “We’re already, as comedians, being attacked as far as being canceled for something that you don’t like, something that you find offensive, something that you think is too soon. You saw what happened at the Academy Awards, and I thought violence triggers violence.”

He added, “I think this is the beginning of the end for comedy.”

 And that truly isn’t funny.

Thursday, May 5, 2022

MSNBC Analyst Claims Democrats Are Saviors Of The American People

 

MSNBC political analyst-- and renowned clown car driver-- Fernand Amandi recently claimed that the Democratic Party is the savior of the American people. Amandi Told MSNBC host Tiffany Cross, while on The Cross Connection, “If the Department of Justice, and the attorney general, Merrick Garland, do not start issuing indictments-- not to the frontline of Proud Boys and picnickers of January 6 that led an insurrection-- but to the perpetrators of the crime: the members of Congress who we now know through text messages were plotters, the ringleaders at the top echelon of the Republican Party, up into including the Republican president, Donald Trump, voters are not going to believe that, they're gonna just think that it's political back-and-forth.” Huh? FBI plants and Capitol Police officers aided and abetted the walk-through of the Capitol Building by a few hundred misguided, but unarmed, folks upset at the direction of the county and the lack of input they had in the supposedly Democratic process. And yes, like many, they believed the election was essentially stolen from them. Possibly because it was. Speaking of crime, a number of them are still imprisoned in crappy conditions against their will and without charge or bail. The Department of “Justice” was weaponized and perverted by the Obama-Biden administration just as the FBI and CIA were.

Amandi opined that Democrats need a consolidated message to sell voters if they want to retain control of Congress after the 2022 midterm elections. That message, according to Amandi, should essentially be: Democrats are your saviors. Rings true, right? Yes, and “If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.” Oh, and always remember, “Arbeit Macht Frei.” Most Democrats don’t believe in the actual Savior-- or the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit for that matter. Reeks of the patriarchy and misogyny you see. And they would be insanely jealous of anyone who possessed such power. So they arrogate it to themselves.

After urging Attorney General Merrick Garland to help Democrats, Amandi stated: "The Democrats have a wonderful story to tell, and I think it could be distilled to something as simple as: The Democrats saved your life. They saved your job. They saved the economy. And now they're trying to save democracy from a Republican Party that no longer believes [in] it.” Later on he claimed the singular choice this November 8th would be between Democracy and fascism, remarking, "If these Republicans gain control, they will not give it back.” (Yeah, right. See also Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, et. al.)

The only “story” the Democrats tell is a fictional one. It is disinformation, their specialty. They stole our liberty, bodily autonomy, health, and life in many cases, via their lockdowns and mandates. They stole our livelihoods-- and hindered our pursuit of happiness by denying us the ability to visit family members, travel freely, and attend weddings and funerals. They stole our breath, money and assets, votes, confidence in our institutions/media/elected and unelected officials, and our safety, security, and sanity. They have attempted to alter or erase our history, destroy our economy, and the notion of sexual complementarity. They have assaulted our children’s bodily integrity…as a last resort when they didn’t actually succeed in aborting them. They have promoted and subsidized violent (i.e. “mostly peaceful”) protests that burned down parts of our major cities, and labeled concerned parents and conservatives in general “terrorists,” even while importing illegal aliens and shuttling them around the country under cover of darkness on the taxpayers dime.

And they lied about all of it-- and called us racists, bigots—and fascists-- if we challenged them.

The truth is that everything Democrats/radical leftists (and there is sadly no longer any substantive difference between them) do shows their hatred of representative republics/democracy. And non-elitists.

As Reagan once said, this is “a time for choosing.” The time for losing is over. If we want to preserve “the last, best hope” we can no longer care what so-called “progressives” say about us. In fact, having tyrannical, entitled, baby-killing serial-liars slander and libel us should be a badge of honor. It is time to fight back. It is time to teach them a lesson. And save our democratic representative republic from destruction at the hands of these evil, hypocritical, projecting asshats.

 

 

 

 

 

Wednesday, May 4, 2022

Who Else Should Serve On The Government Disinformation Board?

 

The Department of Homeland Security has decided to create a “Disinformation Governance Board” Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas stated in congressional hearings held last week. Though Mayorkas attempted to link it to efforts to combat misinformation from human smugglers and to counter Russian cyber and election misinformation, no one really knows the extent of the board’s mission. Mayorkas said, “We have just established a mis- and disinformation governance board in the Department of Homeland Security to more effectively combat this threat, not only to election security but to our homeland security.”

 

The name of the new government entity reeks of various totalitarian nations’ attempts to control speech…as well as thought and behavior…and is mindful of George Orwell’s fictional “Ministry of Truth” as depicted in his seminal book “1984.”

 

The administration’s choice of an executive director to head the board, Nina Jankowicz, has not inspired confidence in the integrity of the DGB, either. Jankowicz has historically been a staunch supporter of Democrats. And she believed the shocking Hunter Biden laptop story was fabricated, part of a Kremlin influence operation. She has been wrong about numerous other things, as well, while seemingly labeling anything with which she disagrees as “disinformation.”

 

A younger Jankowicz was also apparently ridden with sexual fantasies about Harry Potter, as evidenced by songs she apparently wrote and sung with another young woman while in a two-person “musical group” called the “Moaning Myrtles.”

 

So, the question of the day is: who else should be on the Disinformation Governance Board under the peerless Jankowicz?

 

Perhaps Bill & Hillary Clinton? Adam Schiff? James Clapper? James Comey? Hunter Biden? Jussie Smollett? Pinocchio? Beelzebub?

 

Send in your recommendations now!

 

Tuesday, May 3, 2022

Democrats Blame Others For Inflation, Sun Sets In West

 

Preposterously, Congressional Democrats are blaming oil companies for high gasoline prices and are consequently considering legislation that would target "price gouging" in an attempt to bamboozle low-information voters prior to this November’s mid-term election. To that end, Bloomberg News reported that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer recently met to discuss ways in which Congress might address rising prices at the pump.

Nearly every policy action the Biden administration has taken since taking office has made hyper-inflation a certainty. Government can’t ban fracking, rescind leasing rights, cancel oil pipelines, punish all so-called “fossil fuel” industries, increase regulation, and print and spend money like never before and honestly expect any other outcome. However, it is politically necessary for Democrats to obfuscate this fact in the lead up to an election, particularly if they aren’t certain they can rig it in their favor. Plus, it’s in their blood. It’s what they do.

It is especially rich that Democrats continue to blame oil companies for high gas prices and “price gouging” when their policies necessarily drive up the price of petroleum-- and they keep increasing gasoline taxes. California, for instance, already has the nation's highest gas tax at 51 cents per gallon, and it will almost certainly increase it to 53.9 cents per gallon effective come the first of July. This despite the fact that California state Republicans recently introduced a bill that would have immediately suspended the gas tax in response to the surging prices. (The bill also would have provided for the backfilling of any projects as necessary from the state's $45 billion budget surplus.) Predictably, however, a sane proposal that would have helped out the state’s rapidly dwindling middle class stood no chance in the formerly Golden State. The proposal failed to secure enough votes, and is now almost as dead as many of California’s voters.

Incredibly, Gov. Newsom's office has also raised the possibility of issuing a rebate that could go towards partially offsetting the price increases afflicting the state’s residents. So, government would take your money via taxes, raise your taxes, and then spend your money to return some of it through a government-issued rebate. Not particularly efficient, but it does make perfect nonsense! I’m just surprised the state hasn’t yet offered free gas to illegal aliens.

To recap, Democrats accuse others of price gouging, but believe they have more right to your money than you do. Amazing.

And they are in control of both the legislative and executive branches of our government, though that may change after November 8th of this year.

Unless they engage in “vote gouging.”