Thursday, October 17, 2019

CNN Equality Town Hall: Misgendering Is "Violence"

 Apparently, it is now considered “violence” to alter the name of a trans person or to misgender someone. During CNN’s tragi-comic “Equality Town Hall,” singer Shea Diamond, a trans “woman,” approached the microphone to ask a question. At that time, the network’s Nia-Malika Henderson mispronounced her name, calling her “Shay,” and then asked, “What’s your question?” This prompted Diamond, who supports Mayor Pete Buttigieg, to reply: “Uh, it’s ‘Shia’ Diamond. Put that on record. Yes, honey, it’s violence to misgender or to alter a name of a trans person, so let’s always get that right first.”
Diamond wants to be called “She-a,” get it, honey? What a fraud. So, it’s violence to misgender someone, but “women’s health care” when you want to kill your own baby? The left seems to believe that it should be illegal to state the truth about someone’s gender, but that there is a natural right to assault Trump supporters…and fetuses. Beam me up, Scotty.
It has been de rigueur for years now to take the Lord’s name in vain on most television shows and in nearly every movie. “G** D**nit!” and “Jesus C****t!” and their derivatives are ubiquitous. But don’t take the name of a trans person in vain! That would be inexcusable and, well, sacrilegious.
During this same Equality Town Hall, Cory Booker (of Spartacus fame) asserted that the United States is facing a “national emergency” due to violence against the LGBT community. This is patently absurd, fake news. Quite the opposite is occurring. The roughly 90 percent of us that are not in the LGBT community have acceded to its every demand. Gays earn more on average than straight people do. Gay marriage has been legalized. Transgenders have won the right to use whatever locker room or bathroom they feel like in many states. We are blasé when people tout their bisexuality. In fact, we have openly bisexual representatives in Congress. Yet Booker believes discrimination against everyone who isn’t a cis-gendered, straight, white person is so rampant as to constitute a crisis. In fact, he said if he were elected president, he would institute a “White House Office on Hate Crimes and White Supremacist Violence.” He added he would also require the FBI and the DOJ to allocate the same amount of resources to white supremacist-inspired violence as they devote to international terrorism. Would that office be located next to the White House Offices on Black Violence, Antifa Violence, Islamic Violence and Illegal Immigrant Violence? Oh, wait, sorry, there are no offices like that.
We in the West are all “transitioning.” From hard-working, relatively stable communities that held themselves—and others—accountable and believed in a higher power……to weak, entitled, amoral entities who’ve lost their history, sense of self…and sense of purpose.

If this transitioning isn’t stopped, we will soon lose our culture, values-- and our countries.


Wednesday, October 16, 2019

Genesis Incompatible With Human Dignity British Court Says

A British court recently ruled against Dr. David Mackereth, a disability assessor who was fired from the United Kingdom’s Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) last year for refusing to use transgender pronouns. The DWP had asked Dr. Mackereth, “What would you do if you were to assess someone who is obviously a man but asks to be referred to as ‘she’ or ‘Missis’ in the report?” Mackereth replied that, as a Christian, he wouldn’t comply with the request. He was summarily sacked.
Dr. Mackereth then hired the Christian Legal Centre (CLC) to represent him in a lawsuit filed against the DWP for religious discrimination. An employment tribunal ruled that the DWP was within its rights to terminate Mackereth. The ruling declared: “Belief in Genesis 1:27, lack of belief in transgenderism and conscientious objection to transgenderism in our judgement are incompatible with human dignity and conflict with the fundamental rights of others, specifically here, transgender individuals.” The panel also categorized the bible as “mere opinion.”
Belief in the Bible is “incompatible with human dignity?” Belief in Genesis is “incompatible with human dignity?” Really? Where does the DWP and the employment tribunal think human dignity comes from? From whence does it originate? In Whose image are we created? Adam Schiff’s? Dignity cannot be granted, bestowed—or denied-- by a government. The court’s declaration is—as most things leftist are—exactly wrong. Look at the places where people, or more commonly their governments, don’t or haven’t believed in Biblical principles. Places like North Korea, the Sudan, Hitler’s Germany or Pol Pot’s Cambodia. These aren’t and weren’t exemplars of human dignity. (Neither an individual nor a government needs to be Christian or particularly religious to believe in many Biblical principles).
And what about the human dignity of the those forced to share locker rooms or bathrooms with transgenders? What of the human dignity of Dr. Mackereth?
I know what is incompatible with human dignity. Socialism and radical secularism. Look at, say, all of history for example. Leftists want to rewrite a book that cannot be rewritten. They wish to change things that cannot be changed. There is such a thing as immutability.
Only the politically correct could view the Biblical acknowledgment of two sexes--and the cleaving of one man and one woman in a marriage that could naturally lead to procreation-- as incompatible with human dignity while simultaneously believing abortion is compatible with human dignity.
Andrea Williams, CLC’s chief executive, noted in a press release: “It is deeply disturbing that this is the first time in the history of English law that a judge has ruled that free citizens must engage in compelled speech.” She added: “It also excludes foundational Christian beliefs from the protection of human rights and anti-discrimination law. The ruling itself puts a belief in the Bible on a par with the racist and neo-Nazi ideologies which have been held to be ‘not worthy of respect in democratic society’ in earlier judicial decisions.”
Genesis 1:27 reads: “So God created mankind in His own image, in the image of God He created them; male and female He created them. Agender, demifluid, hydrogender and pangender He created them. Also, trigender, two-spirited and venngender, among others.” (Okay, I might have added the last 15 or 16 words).
Saying that the Bible is incompatible with human dignity is like saying the Bill of Rights is incompatible with human freedom. It’s self-evidently absurd. What can be said is that the DWP and the employment panel are incompatible with human sanity.
In 1996, Robert Bork wrote a book about the decline of Western culture titled, “Slouching Towards Gomorrah.” In my “mere opinion,” we are racing towards it now. 

Tuesday, October 15, 2019

Portland Bans Urinals In Its Municipal Services Building

                The city of Portland has banned urinals in its self-titled Portland Building, the home of the city’s administrative offices, even though they use less water than toilets. What’s more, the many existing urinals will be removed from the building, as part of its extensive and expensive remodel-- to be completed in 2020-- and a spokeswoman told NBC affiliate KGW News that she could not provide an estimate of how much the removal will cost.
                Chief Administrative Officer Tom Rinehart attempted to justify the urinal ban in an email to employees. Rinehart stated: "We will continue to have gender-specific (male and female) multi-stall restrooms that are readily available to any employee that prefers to use one. But there will be no urinals in any restroom in the building. This will give us the flexibility we need for any future changes in signage.” So, removing all the urinals in the building and capping the plumbing, etc., will be less expensive than changing some signage?
                The building will have multiple gender-neutral, multi-stall bathrooms for the simultaneous use of men and women, and every floor will have at least one bathroom open to “any gender.” There will be a total of 42 “all-user stalls.”
                Rinehart also said in his email that: "I am convinced that this is the right way to ensure success as your employer, remove arbitrary barriers in our community, and provide leadership that is reflective of our shared values." And shared bathrooms. We’ve got to remove arbitrary barriers-- like those between men and women who are urinating and defecating! The right to shared bowel movements is one of the great civil rights…um, movements… of our time!
                Numerous men have already utilized Target store’s gender-neutral bathroom and changing room policy to perv on girls and women in various states of undress, but, apparently, that’s as nothing compared to the heinous bigotry of someone refusing to call a man a woman…or vice-versa.
                So, good-bye urinals, you are nothing more than white, porcelain relics of a bygone era when men and women were considered biologically different, and each was afforded respect and privacy. At least when going to the bathroom.

Monday, October 14, 2019

Air Canada Bans "Ladies And Gentlemen"

                Air Canada employees will no longer use the phrase “ladies and gentlemen” when greeting guests or in boarding announcements. In an effort to be respectful of gender fluidity, flight attendants, pilots, and other staff will now be instructed to use only neutral words such as “everybody” to refer to the company’s guests.
                A media spokesperson for Air Canada noted that the company was named one of Canada’s Best Diversity Employers for 2019 and stated: "We will be amending our onboard announcements to modernize them and remove specific references to gender. We work hard to make sure all employees feel like valued members of the Air Canada family, while ensuring our customers are comfortable and respected when they choose to travel with us." The Great White North goes to great lengths to accommodate all forms of gender expression and identity, even protecting them under its criminal code.
                Examples of approved words and phrases include, “Attention all Homo Sapiens (and your support animals), flight 331 for Copenhagen is now boarding at Gate 22,” “one and all,” “all and sundry,” “Peoples of the Earth, welcome aboard,” “whosoever,” and “Yo, bitches and mofos, how ya’ all been?”

                The spokesperson said the company has not yet decided whether to amend “Fly The Flag,” its long-time slogan, to “Fly The LGBTQ Flag.” 

Sunday, October 13, 2019

San Diego City College Hosts White Supremacy Seminar

                San Diego City College recently hosted a white supremacist seminar, during which it handed out various “educational” materials to attendees, including “white supremacist pyramids.” The festive extravaganza was titled, “Confronting White Supremacy Through the Arts,” and was hosted by Michelle Chan and Dr. María José Zeledón-Perez, co-directors of the World Cultures program at SDCC. Campus Reform photographed a promotional flyer for the event, which read: “Come join us in confronting White Supremacy through students’ performances. Prior to the performances, guest speakers will set the stage and contextualize what white supremacy is, its areas of activity, and how rampant it is in our society, curriculum, mindsets, and media.”
                I don’t know about you, but I’m going to make my reservations early for next years seminar! I can’t wait to hear the instructors say, “Now please reach under your seats and pull out your white supremacy pyramids.”
                The afore-mentioned white supremacy pyramids (not to be confused with the government’s “food pyramids”) rank Caucasian command on scales of “Overt White Supremacy” and “Covert White Supremacy.” The pyramids helpfully show that the Ku Klux Klan, Neo-Nazis and use of the n-word are to be considered overt supremacy and therefore utterly unacceptable.
                Examples of the somewhat less heinous covert supremacy, per the pyramids, include cultural appropriation, racist mascots, Columbus Day celebrations, paternalism, and brandishing the slogan “Make America Great Again.” “Euro-centric curriculum,” “claiming reverse racism,” and “funding schools locally” are also listed as tools of white supremacists. Believing we are somehow “post racial” is another example of white supremacy, as is the belief in pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps, aka the “bootstrap theory.” And anyone uttering the phrases, “Don’t blame me, I never owned slaves” or “we’re just one human family” is worthy of naught but our most strenuous condemnation. Yet another example of white supremacy, the pyramids make clear, is saying-- of something you said— “It’s just a joke.”
                “Confronting White Supremacy Through the Arts?” That is a joke. And it’s on progressives, whether they wish to confront that fact or not.

Saturday, October 12, 2019

PETA Sends Live Traps To White House

                A mouse recently fell from the ceiling of the White House Press Room onto a reporter’s lap, prompting People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) to send a “humane mousetrap” to the Capitol Building. PETA’s president, Ingrid Newkirk, said in a statement: “The White House is this mouse’s house, too, but we’d rather that she be evicted than eviscerated, so we’re providing a humane trap that allows her to be put outdoors safely. Effective rodent-control measures are those that keep smart, gentle mice out of glue traps and reporters’ laps without harming them.”
   “The White House is this mouse’s house, too?” Quite. “She” has just as much right to it as the duly elected President of the United States, right PETA? Same for cockroaches, millipedes and silverfish, I suppose? “Smart” and “gentle” creatures all, I’m sure. Unlike reporters.
               PETA apparently also sent the White House a copy of a tip sheet called “Living in Harmony with House Mice and Rats.” She noted that PETA is “willing to provide many more humane traps, if needed.”

              There are a great many rats in the Press Room, most of them human.

  I’m sure Trump would love to trap and evict these “journalists” and “reporters,” but he would need much bigger traps than PETA is sending him.
              And, speaking of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, where are the organizations called “People for the Ethical Treatment of Republicans,” or PETR? “People for the Ethical Treatment of Conservatives,” or PETC? “People for the Ethical Treatment of Straight White Christian Males,” or PETSWCM?

  And how about “People for the Ethical Treatment of ‘Fetuses,’” or PETF?

Friday, October 11, 2019

Sesame Street Adds New Character

                “Sesame Street,” the timeless children’s public television program, has once again proven its wokeness. It recently introduced the kiddies to “Karli,” a new character whose fictional mother is a recovering drug-addict who regularly attends meetings to help her get and stay sober. In a recent episode, Karli talked with Elmo about her opioid-addled mother, telling him, “My mom needs help learning to take better care of herself, so she talks to people with the same problem.” The show has previously flirted with gay characters on several occasions.
                Anonymous sources tell me this is just the beginning of the show’s commitment to progressive ideals. These sources, near the top of the PBS hierarchy, say that future episodes will feature many progressive themes. The following is a brief outline of what my unimpeachable—if anonymous—sources informed me will be upcoming story lines:

*Guy Smiley will be killed when a gay three-way goes tragically awry and a jealous Mr. Snuffleupagus shoots him in the head with an AR-15.

*Miss Piggy will be found to have an illegitimate son-- conceived with Oscar the Grouch-- who will question his gender identity from the age of three.

*Julia will become pregnant and have an abortion at a local Planned Parenthood office, repeatedly touting her “right to choose” what to do with “her own body.”

*Mr. Johnson will die in an auto-erotica accident when he is asphyxiated while role-playing with Murray Monster.

*Abby Cadabby and Zoe will be kidnapped and sexually abused by “radical right-wing” Trump supporters.

*Bert and Ernie will both identify as cis-gender straight females on the same day, saying they are not gay and can’t understand why some folks assume they are.

*Barkley will attend an anti-Trump rally!

*Big Bird will lobby for the legalization of marijuana and “magic mushrooms”

*Kermit will attend an antifa rally in one episode and escort illegals over the border from Mexico into the U.S. in another

*Elmo will teach his peers the most pleasurable masturbation techniques

*Natasha will expound on the evils of capitalism and why socialism is “like, humane and cool”

*Cookie Monster will plead with viewers to give “more and larger” donations to Public Television “to support great television like this”

*Grover will appear in drag and read books to little kids during “Drag Queen Story Hour”

*Rosita will educate kids on the separation of church and state—and then lobby them to join her in the Church of Satan

*Don Music will sing his new song, “We Are the Rainbow World”

*Sherlock Hemlock will try to get to the bottom of the Trump-Russia collusion scandal

*Count von Count will list all the reasons that straight, white, Christian males are bad

*The Two-headed Monster will explain why, due to climate change, we will all be extinct within 12 years

*Grundgetta will talk about the BDS movement

                How exciting! And, remember kiddies: “You’re watching PBS!”

Thursday, October 10, 2019

California Issues Ban On Travel To Iowa

            Xavier Becerra, California’s Democratic Attorney General, recently banned state-funded travel to the state of Iowa in response to a new Iowa law that prohibits Medicaid from covering gender transition surgeries.
The website of the California Office of the Attorney General states that with bill AB 1887, enacted in 2016, the California Legislature determined that “California must take action to avoid supporting or financing discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people.” It also decrees: “To that end, AB 1887 prohibits a state agency, department, board, or commission from requiring any state employees, officers, or members to travel to a state that, after June 26, 2015, has enacted a law that (1) has the effect of voiding or repealing existing state or local protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. In addition, the law prohibits California from approving a request for state-funded or state-sponsored travel to such a state.” (Italics mine).
Incredibly, Iowa is just one of at least 11 states to which California bans state-sanctioned travel. It is one thing to refuse to discriminate on the basis of gender identity, of which there are two. Neither men nor women should be the victim or beneficiary of discriminatory laws or labor practices. Gender “expression,” however, is in no way a biological or immutable fact. In fact, it is the obverse of race or sex, in that it is totally fungible. A man can claim to be a woman, but that doesn’t make it so-- just as a “honkey” can claim to be an African-American, albeit with no basis in reality. I can claim to be a gerbil or a giraffe, but that simply does not make it so. If a woman with ovaries and a vagina says she is a he, that claim has no more veracity than if Oprah Winfrey attempted to identify as Abraham Lincoln.
When states, nations or societies begin to take these preposterous claims seriously—and sanctimoniously sanctify and sanction them—they are saying that nothing matters, truth is only in the eye of the beholder, there are no absolutes, no constants, nothing real. They are denying physical reality as well as logic and reasoning. They are stripping words—and life—of meaning.
Moreover, if every state acted as California has, the concept and practice of republicanism would be irreparably harmed. I could see Alabama banning state-sponsored travel to California because it is hostile to rednecks. Who could then blame Georgia if it prohibited travel to New York because it is insufficiently welcoming of evangelical Christians? Decent, God-fearing, pro-life states should long ago have put the kibosh on travel to those that have permissive abortion laws. And why should Montana, Wyoming, Texas or even Kentucky put up with the discriminatory—and probably unconstitutional—gun restrictions in place in Washington, D.C., Chicago, and other hotbeds of violent crime? Those states should ban government-sponsored travel to any other state or municipality that infringes on the rights of its citizens in that manner.

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights guarantee Americans freedom of speech and the right to self-defense. They do not guarantee the “right” to pick your own gender.

And the right to life is granted by the same Creator who determines one’s sex. 

California's Attorney General can ban his state's public employees from state-funded travel to other states. Ironically, if California doesn't soon dramatically change course, no one from the other 49 states will want to travel to California. 

Wednesday, October 9, 2019

Ms. Monopoly

                “Monopoly” is arguably the most iconic board game of all time. But, combine a game about—gasp!-- making money with the supposed income gap between men and women and you knew something had to give to appease the politically correct mob. And it has: introducing “Ms. Monopoly.” Hasbro says the new game focuses on “female empowerment,” adding that the company is changing the rules of the game so that “this time women get an advantage at the start.” (Get it)?
                In this version, the banker gives $1,900 to each female player but only $1,500 to each male participant. Females get $240 every time they pass “go,” whilst males only collect the standard $200. And, instead of stuffy old real estate, players invest in “inventions and innovations made by women, including chocolate chip cookies, bulletproof vests, solar heating, and ladies’ modern shapewear.” There are new tokens, too, including a white hat, a watch, a barbell, a glass and a jet plane. Hasbro states the white hat symbolizes Mr. Monopoly passing his top hat to his niece, whereas the watch represents the fact that it is “about time for some changes.” I’m guessing the barbell indicates that women are strong, the glass represents women’s love for wine, and the plane represents their desire to get away from the patriarchy that has so oppressed them since well-nigh the beginning of time. There are other updates, as well. For instance, rideshares replace railroads and Wi-Fi supplants water works.
                “Ms. Monopoly” went on sale late last month for the bargain price of $19.99 and can be found on the shelves of retailers across the fruited plain. It can also be ordered at
                If Hasbro was really serious about its social justice warring, it would have changed its company name for the new release to Hassis. It won’t be long until many more “woke” versions of the old classic are introduced to the brave new world. “Monopoly for Socialists” is sure to arrive soon, though I think a more accurate name would be “Monopoly for Morons.” It’s only a matter of time until “LGBTQ Monopoly” arrives on the scene. Gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgenders will be handed far more money to start than will be given to either cis males or cis females, who will not be allowed to pass “go” until all members of the LGBTQ Community have safely gone past.
                “Ms. Monopoly” will surely trigger the release of a vast array of classic board games updated for modernity. “Ms. Scrabble” will award double letter and word points to females. “Trivial Pursuit” will allow women to only answer “entertainment” questions in the interest of fairness. (Easy, ladies, that was only a joke). “Ms. Operation” will allow girls to touch the sides of the patient while removing various organs without losing their turn.  The new “Ms. Battleship” rules will stipulate that a female only has to sink two ships to win the game if she is competing against a male. “Ms. Yahtzee” will allow girls to roll 7 dice when playing against boys, who will be required to roll just 4. Other new games aimed at females will be: “No Risk,” “No Clue,” “Candy (Ass) Land” and “Twister, the #MeToo Version.”
                I would like to see Mattel introduce an updated version of “Pictionary” requiring opposing teams to draw and guess events recently depicted in the mainstream news. This spin-off game would be called “Fictionary.” I’m also hoping Hasbro introduces a brand-new game in honor of the BDSM/Kink Community, a game perfectly suited to this progressive era. Who wouldn’t want to play “Poop Chutes and Bladders?”

Tuesday, October 8, 2019

Gender The New Race In Canada

            Whoa, Canada!
The Ontario Provincial Police force recently announced that it will no longer release the gender of either perpetrators or victims of crimes, so as to “be progressive in the change of times.” The OPP says it will no longer need driver’s licenses or other documentation to specify a person’s gender, as it will not be assuming gender at all. Everyone will be referred to in a gender-neutral manner. The force will use more generic terms such as “the individual,” “the accused,” or “a person of interest” to comply with its self-imposed wokeness.
A review of legislation found that the Police Services Act does not require information regarding a person’s gender to be made public. The police will retain the option to release a suspect’s gender, but even in that case the information will subsequently be expunged from news releases.
I can’t wait for news releases stating: “An individual has been accused of raping a person outside of a building in Manhattan a New York borough.”
The disease of Political-Correctness has made it harder and harder to convey accurate information. We have allowed this mania to make us pretend, obfuscate and obscure. And then pretend this is a good thing. Reality must be hidden. The truth be damned. We can’t use race to describe a criminal. Now we are dispensing with gender, as well. How can we get even vaguer and less useful? We must prohibit the release of a perpetrator’s or victim’s age, height, weight, attire and other identifying characteristics! Perhaps we can ban the assumption of species, too. But remember to use their correct pronouns!
“The being of interest in the recent rape of a highly-developed mammal outside of a building in a New York borough has pleaded not guilty by reason of ‘an unjust society made me do it.’ Xir is requesting that xir be compensated in the amount of $100 million—American-- for the ‘mental anguish a deeply unjust society has inflicted upon Xirself.’”

Monday, October 7, 2019

Rep. Rashida Tlaib Approves Of Coup, Kidnapping

At a recent town hall meeting with constituents in Michigan, Democratic Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib ran with a suggestion from an attendee that Democrats “hunt down” and forcibly remove Trump administration officials from office if they don’t comply with their wishes. Tlaib quickly stated that her fellow Democrats have already been involved in discussions pertaining to who could arrest administration officials, Trump presumably included, if they refuse to leave power in a timely manner.
The ‘Squad’ member, who called for Trump’s impeachment (“we’re gonna go in there and we’re gonna impeach the motherf**ker”) immediately after she was elected in 2018, told her audience: "This is the last caucus conversation we've had. Did you know this is really unprecedented? This is the first time we've ever had a situation like this. They're trying to figure out, no joke, is it the DC police that goes and gets them? Where do we hold them? Like, I'm not in those kinds of conversations, but I'm asking, what happens?" She added, “I will tell them they can hold all those people right here in Detroit.”
Maybe they will “hold all those people” they’ve captured at Ford Field. Sounds like there will be a lot of them. Whoever “goes and gets them” will have to figure out where to detain their hostages. Presumption of innocence? Rule of law? Due process? Trial? Don’t be quaint. Look what they did to Brett Kavanaugh, Roger Stone, Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort, for example. Today’s Democrats are fond of wee-hour raids and drive-by lynchings, aided and abetted by their accomplices in the mainstream media.
Tlaib was right about one thing: this ‘situation’ is unprecedented in America. Never before have we had one party so set on impeaching an opposition party’s president because they don’t like his personality or his policies… high crimes and misdemeanors be damned. No democratic republic can survive such treachery and treason.
Make no mistake, what Tlaib and her collaborationists are attempting isn’t an “impeachment,” it is a coup d’ état, worthy of Burkina Faso, Burundi, Sudan, Thailand, Argentina and Panama, et. al.  Can you say banana republic?
Oh well, who doesn’t like a good junta now and then?

Sunday, October 6, 2019

Students: Impeach Trump...For Some Reason

                Today’s college students are not noted for their awareness of-- and intellectual competency as regards-- current events, a fact continuously made clear whenever they are interviewed regarding same. To wit, Campus Reform’s Editor-in-Chief Cabot Phillips recently visited the campus of Marymount University in Arlington, Virginia, asking students if they thought President Trump should be impeached, and, if they did, why. Turns out, every single student he interviewed did believe trump should be impeached. Also turns out, not a single one of them could cogently explain why.

                Here is a smattering of the “answers” he received:

*”Um, I’m sure there’s reasons that I don’t know of.” (Dude, I’m like sooo high).

*”Um, I don’t know if I can say any specific type of event or specific action.” (Dude, I’m like sooo high).

*”Um, well, I’m not that into politics. I don’t really pay that much attention to it.” (I play video games 13-hours a day).

*”Um, honestly, well, I think it’s a lot of, um, just how unpopular he is.” (Great point, Einstein)!

Here are additional reasons for impeaching Trump Phillips would have heard had he interviewed even more young scholars:

*”Um, he hates women and minorities…and clean air and water and, well, the Earth.”

*”Well, when the Moon is in the Seventh House and Jupiter aligns with Mars, then peace will guide the planets and love will steer the stars! So, I say…impeach the motherf**ker!!”

*”I mean, we have to, like, impeach him for his ‘thigh crimes and pissy demeanor,’ right?”

*”I don’t like his policies.”

*”I don’t like him.”

*”I don’t like his hair.”

*”A Democrat probably won’t win the upcoming election unless we impeach him. So, right or wrong, to save the democracy we have to do it.”

Saturday, October 5, 2019

Female Walrus Sinks Russian Naval Vessel

                The Altai, a tugboat attached to the Russian navy’s Northern Fleet, recently transported researchers from the Russian Geographical Society into waters near Franz Josef Land in the Arctic Sea. The Altai sent out a smaller inflatable landing craft to bring the researchers to the shores of Wilczek Island. However, before the boat could reach the beach, it was attacked-- and sunk-- by a female walrus. A Russian Geographical Society press release claimed that the walrus was likely “fearing for her cubs,” though the cow may just not be a fan of the Russian navy.
                The press release noted: “The boat sank, but a tragedy was avoided thanks to the prompt action by the squad leader. All landing participants safely reached the shore.” The Russian navy confirmed the “attack,” though it predictably omitted the part about the boat sinking. The Red (faced) Navy’s Northern Fleet wrote: “During the landing at Cape Heller, a group of researchers had to flee from a female walrus who attacked an expedition boat when protecting her cub. Serious troubles were avoided thanks to the clear and well-coordinated actions of the Northern Fleet servicemen, who were able to take the boat away from the animals without harming them.”
                I’m surprised the release didn’t read: “Dastardly surprise attack by U.S.-trained imperialist walrus was repulsed by valiant efforts of glorious Russian navy!”
    In related news, two Russian destroyers and a submarine sank to the bottom of the Barents Sea recently when remoras aggressively attached themselves to the ship’s hulls.

Friday, October 4, 2019

Time Sheds "MAGA" From Magazine Label

October 7, 2019
News Services

(New York City)-- President Trump’s 2016 campaign slogan was “Make America Great Again.” “MAGA” caps (and merchandise) have long-since been deemed controversial—or worse—by many progressives, who see them as barely-disguised dog-whistles for misogynists and white-supremacists.

                The “MAGA” acronym has become so toxic in the eyes of the particularly politically correct that certain magazines are now rebranding themselves as simply “zines,” or almanacs, compendiums, and the like. There are webzines, e-zines, and even “paper-zines,” but fewer and fewer magazines. Time was the first publication to eschew the “magazine” designation.
    A spokesperson for the publication formerly known as Time Magazine said, on the condition of anonymity, “we just felt that the time was right to jettison the first four letters of the second word of our publication’s erstwhile name. We are leaving ‘Time Magazine’ in the past—where it belongs—and introducing ‘Time Zine.’ The spokesperson added, “The first half of ‘magazine’ had become problematic at best, offensive and abusive at worst, so we decided to shit-can it. Plus, state legislators have introduced a bill mandating the removal of ‘maga’ from the covers of all magazines  zines manufactured and/or sold here. It was, simply put, Time we ‘woke’ up, so to speak.”
  Since Time’s proclamation, Newsweek, The New Yorker, Mother Jones, The Nation, Vox, The Atlantic, Wired, Vox and Foreign Affairs have all pledged to liberate themselves from the “maga” albatross around their publication’s figurative necks.
  Several candidates for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination applauded Time’s bold, progressive leadership. Elizabeth Warren, now the presumptive front-runner, told reporters: “’MAGA,’ in any form, has no place in today’s world. It speaks of the patriarchy, the Klu Klux Klan, and evangelical Christianity. It fairly reeks of misogyny, homophobia and trans hatred. I’m so glad Time showed us all the way forward.” 

Thursday, October 3, 2019

"Illegal" Now Illegal In New York

                Incredibly, the term “illegal”… is now illegal in New York City, at least when it is used to refer to an “illegal alien,” a term that is also now illegal, in a less than positive light. Doing so would be considered “unlawful discrimination” according to the New York City Commission on Human Rights. (Apparently, it is also illegal to use the term “illegal discrimination”).
                Those who violate the law would be subject to fines up to $250,000. Would those who refer to the actions of those who break this law as “illegal” be subject to the same penalties and fines? Hmm? Inquiring minds want to know.
                The NYCCHR released 29 pages of new, politically-correct guidelines recently, guidelines which also include prohibitions against discriminatory behavior towards “someone because of their accent, English proficiency, or use of another language.” Or threatening to call ICE on someone. In other words, threatening to call ICE on an illegal alien undocumented immigrant would be illegal. Cough up the quarter million dollar fine, Beelzebub.
                New York’s Deputy Mayor Phil Thompson released a statement saying in part: “This new legal enforcement guidance will help ensure that no New Yorker is discriminated against based on their immigration status.” Bravo! We can’t afford to discriminate against someone just because they broke the law! Where would we as a society be if we did that?
                I don’t think this new guidance goes far enough. I think terms like “unlawful,” “criminal,” “illegitimate,” and “unauthorized” should be verboten, as well.
                Progressives like to say that “No human being is illegal.” We can choose to engage in their non-sequitur fest and say that no human being is immoral, either, but this is just wrong. While no human being can be described in their totality by an adjective, there are plenty of illegals in America. And an ever-growing number of folks who are immoral. (For proof, look no further than the Democratic Party).

                Then there is this definition of illegal:

                “Illegal (noun): a person present in a country without official authorization.”

                This is, apparently, a concept alien to progressives.

Wednesday, October 2, 2019

Angry Young Swedish Girl The New Savior?

                As the world knows all too well by now, Greta Thunberg is an angry young Swedish girl who lives to hector adults about climate change. The preternaturally annoying 16-year-old activist recently harangued the world at the United Nations Climate Action Summit, bellowing at the assembled world leaders. “How dare you!” she shouted. “You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words.” Little Miss Thunberg choked back tears as she exclaimed: “People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of economic growth.” She added, vaguely and creepily, “We will be watching you.”
                Little Miss Can’t Be Wrong is apparently unaware that economic growth, driven by greater personal freedom and capitalist, free market systems, is the very reason for the dramatic decrease in poverty around the world, and the concurrent increase in life expectancy.
                To be fair to her, the real tragedy is that leftist adults are using her like a Shake ’n Bake bag to advance their own interests while appearing oh-so-woke. When progressives aren’t trying to abort kids, they love using them to further their agendas, whether they involve climate change, cigarette smoking, illegal immigration, pollution, transgenderism, or a host of other topics. This is, literally and figuratively, child abuse-- and should be dealt with as such. Harshly.
                Unfortunately, the opposite is occurring. The Loony Left is showering praise on Greta, and those like her, while successfully—and completely—intimidating those who may disagree with them. 
                Incredibly, as the Washington Examiner reported, “The Church of Sweden declared teen star climate activist Greta Thunberg to be an appointed successor to Jesus Christ in a December 1, 2018, tweet that resurfaced in the wake of her speech before the United Nations.” A few Catholic missionaries have compared her to the Virgin Mary. Still others see her as a child prophet and praise her “moral clarity.”
All of which is proof of the moral confusion, Biblical ignorance and debased nature of the modern West.
In truth, Greta is a child of entitlement, a spoiled brat who is ironically unaware that she is being exploited for profit by those around her.

Tuesday, October 1, 2019

New Poll Shows Young People Believe Humans Could Be Extinct Within Ten Years

                 A new Rasmussen poll shows that half of voters under 35-years-old believe it is at least somewhat likely that humanity will cease to exist within ten years, due to climate change. This despite the fact that non-viable tissue masses like Al Gore and Michael Moore have been predicting global catastrophe/planetary immolation for well over 20 years now. What the survey really reveals is the extent of the brainwashing being conducted in our schools-- by, of, and for—angry, entitled, anti-capitalist radicals bent on the destruction of Western civilization.
                According to the same poll, 53 percent of those between the ages of 18 and 34 believe combatting climate change will require more effort and sacrifice than fighting World War II. (Of course, 53% of those 18-34 think World War II is the title of a video game released in 2014). This dovetails nicely—by design—with progressives push for socialism and socialist policies to rule the day. In fact, a staggering 28% of the young people surveyed said capitalism must be eliminated in order to prevent an environmental apocalypse.
                Climate activists-- and now mainstream Democratic politicians, as well as the mainstream media-- have increasingly suggested that it is problematic if not immoral to have children given the world-wide climate crisis. And, sure enough, 33% of those 18-34, says the survey, favor limits on the number of children a government “allows” a family to have. Nothing frightening about that, is there? It should be government’s, i.e. other people’s, decision as to how many kids you can have, right? What was that about “my body, my choice?”
                Hell, maybe the child limit should be made retroactive. You have five kids in your family, but your government now says you can have only two? No problem! Sorry Bob, Melissa and Alice, but it’s assisted suicide (after-birth abortion) for the three of you.
                There are limits on the number of fish anglers can keep, why not on the number of kids they can have? Moreover, I think there should be slot limits on babies, too. If they are between 18 and 21 inches at the time of birth you are allowed to keep them, if not, throw them back…so to speak.
                Remember, the government knows what’s best for the fish, your kids……and you.

Monday, September 30, 2019

Yale University Launches "Law, Ethics & Animals Program"

                Yale University’s law school is launching a new Law, Ethics & Animals Program (LEAP) to address what it calls America’s “outdated” and “insufficient” animal rights policies. The program will be headed by law professor Doug Kysar, in conjunction with Jonathan Lovvorn, Humane Society chief counsel for animal protection litigation, and an associate research scholar.
                Kysar claims that recent changes in what we know of—and how we view-- animal intelligence are helping to “overturn past beliefs about human exceptionalism,” though “our laws regarding animals” are often “outdated” or “nonexistent.” (It’s good to debunk that silly old “human exceptionalism” claim again. As if we are somehow more intelligent, aware, feeling or competent than a jellyfish, beetle or Wildebeast)! Kysar notes that: “At the same time, our power over animals has been amplified exponentially by industry and technology.” He is teaching an “Animal Law” course this fall in which students can earn three credits as they “examine the application of the law to non-human animals.”
   This coming spring semester, Lovvorn will teach a Climate, Animal[s], Food and Environmental Law & Policy Lab (CAFE Lab), with the hope of developing “innovative law and policy initiatives to bring systemic change to the global food industry, which is one of the top contributors to climate change, animal suffering, human exploitation, and environmental degradation worldwide.” (Bringing “systematic change” to the global food industry means banning it, just as the left wants to do with oil, coal, natural gas and nuclear energy. And how does the global food industry exploit humans)? Lovvorn opined via news release: “The damage wrought by industrial agriculture is staggering and rapidly expanding.” He added that he believes “the CAFE Lab presents a unique opportunity to develop new strategies to understand, respect, and protect those who have been left behind by the current legal system.” Like aborted babies? Conservative Republicans? Probably not.
               According to the course description, students will discuss the “problems of litigating on behalf of animals,” rethink animals’ classification as property, and debate the merits of recognizing “legal rights” for animals. Make no mistake, the Animal Rights Movement (ARM) is one of the primary civil rights issues of our time, even though, by definition, it can’t be one. Per Merriam-Webster, the definition of civil rights is: “the rights of personal liberty guaranteed to U.S. citizens by the 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution and by acts of Congress.”  
               Manny Rutinel, Yale Animal Law Society Co-Chair, remarked that “The topic of animals and the law quickly reaches some of the deepest questions of what it means to be a good human.” Leftists believe a “good human” is a leftist that desperately tries to limit the amount of other humans in existence.
               So, what of animal rights? Should a hyena be allowed to sit at the front of a bus? Should vultures not be kicked out of restaurants? Do maggots have the same right to your salmon filet as you do? Do mosquitoes have an equal right to your daughter’s blood? If you believe they do, what does that say about you? Tolerant or callous and insane?

  And what of transgender animal rights?

Sunday, September 29, 2019

China Banning Christian Churches From Displaying The Ten Commandments

                China’s increasingly authoritarian Communist regime has ordered many Christian churches to replace the Ten Commandments with quotes from President Xi Jinping, according to an online magazine that reports on religious liberty—or the lack thereof—and human rights in the world’s most populous country. Barnabas Aid, an international Christian assistance agency, has also chronicled the Chicom’s ever more intensive campaign to “Sinicize” Christianity. (Emphasis on “Sin”).
                The United States has already prohibited the Ten Commandments—the foundational moral code of Christians everywhere and of the United States itself-- from being displayed in many public and governmental spaces. The way things are trending now, it is literally no stretch to believe that the Ten Commandments will soon be banned throughout the land, to be replaced by quotes from the likes of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, Saul Alinsky and Chairman Mao. Here is one version of what I suspect an updated, secular Ten Commandments might look like:

1)      We progressives know best. You shall not listen to anyone with dissenting viewpoints. Man-caused global warming, er, climate change, is settled science. We have spoken.

2)      You shall not make for yourself a parody of us, nor criticize, question or doubt us in any way. Those who deny us will be summarily destroyed, but those who glory in us will receive lots of free things.

3)      As for Trump, “You shall “impeach the motherf*cker!”

4)      Remember not to work on Sunday, the Sabbath day. Also, don’t work on any of the other days. We will pay you a living wage for doing nothing, as long as you vote for us.

5)      Honor your father and your mother. Or your two mommies. Or three sugar daddies. Or two moms, three dads, a transgender, pangender and a goat. It’s all good. Remember, “Love is Love.”

6)      You shall not murder. But abortion is okay.

7)      You shall not commit adultery. Hahaha, just kidding. Let your freak flags fly.

8)      Stealing is okay if a rich person has something you covet. But cultural appropriation is strictly forbidden.

9)      You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor…unless he is a straight, white, Republican male.

10)   You are encouraged to covet your neighbor’s house, wife, male servant, car, cash, ox, donkey, dog, young daughter or son, sexual or gender identity, kink or other perversion.

Saturday, September 28, 2019

Burger King South Africa Drops "Ham" From "Hamburger" Menu Items

                There is woke and then there is a joke. That is what Burger King in South Africa has become. The global fast food behemoth recently announced it is dropping the word “ham” from its menu in its South African restaurants. The chain is removing the first three letters of the word “hamburger” from menu listings in its South African outlets “to be more respectful” of Muslims and their halal diets which forbid the consumption of pork. Even though hamburgers contain no pork whatsoever and the word “ham” is not banned under Sharia Law. For example, the “Double Spicy Hamburger” will now be listed as the “Double Spicy Burger.” I don’t know about you, but I feel better already. Let’s all join hands and sing “Kumbaya” now, shall we?
                Seriously, how dumb does BK think Muslims are? Or maybe I’m mistaken. Perhaps most Muslims in South Africa are so easily offended, that simply seeing the letters “h” “a” and “m” strung together will cause them to boycott an eatery…or worse.
                Maybe we should strike the word “hammock” from the English language too, in proactive solidarity with our Muslim brothers and sisters. Henceforth any suspended bed of canvas or rope mesh used for repose should be referred to only as a “mock.” If any of you have a pet hamster you might want to consider calling it a “ster” instead. At least if you wish to be seen as progressive enough in the eyes of the urban, coastal elites that determine these things for all of us. “Hammer,” “hamstring,” and “hamper” should all be expunged from the English language so that we may not inadvertently offend someone of the Muslim persuasion.
                I must admit, however, that when I started thinking about “Hamas,” the Palestinian Islamic movement founded with the goal of establishing a Palestinian state incorporating present day Israel, I became confused and conflicted. Hamas is, apparently, an acronym for Harakat al-Muqãwama al-Islãmiyya’Islamic Resistance Movement. (I don’t know, either). So, if an Islamic organization brands itself “Hamas,” who are we to judge?
                Upon reasoned reflection, Burger King South Africa’s actions were utterly unnecessary. I would even say they were…ham-handed.

Democrats Arriving At The House Of Representatives

                Actual pictures of Democrats arriving at the House of Representatives, September 27th, 2019, approximately 9:00 a.m.


Friday, September 27, 2019

The War On Truth

It is extremely hard for sane people to understand how we arrived where we are today…culturally and politically. We have men claiming to be women allowed in women’s bathrooms and locker rooms. We are informed that there are 60, 70— or 112 different genders-- but that men and women are virtually the same. For years there have been gay pride parades across the country that are, in many cases, sanctioned by cities, businesses and even police forces, among other entities. Yet, recently, the only “straight pride” parade of which I’m aware was the subject of great controversy, with a few progressives labeling it “obscene.” Christian religious organizations are being designated as “hate groups” by leftist bodies such as the Southern Poverty Law Center. In a few cases, priests and pastors have been threatened with jail time for citing Bible verses. “Misgendering” someone can cost you your job. Denver has legalized the use of “magic,” or psychedelic mushrooms.
And now we have “serious” Democratic presidential candidates proposing truly crazy socialist plans that would bankrupt their own country, collapse the world’s economy, and subject U.S. citizens to ever more government control. “1984” couldn’t happen then. Ronald Reagan was in office. But, ironically, it could arrive in 2020, or shortly after, albeit nearly four decades late.
The saddest irony—and real tragedy-- is that the left’s arguments are so easily defeated, if only conservatives and classical liberals would stand up and fight. To wit:

*Men and women aren’t the same. If there were no differences between men and women…there would be no men or women.

*“Women can do whatever they like with their own body.” No they can’t. Neither can men. First of all, abortion is taking the life of a different person. But, leaving that aside, a woman can’t drive 75-miles-an-hour in a 30-mile-per-hour zone. Neither can a man. No one has the right to crap on Nancy Pelosi’s shoes, club baby seals over the head, drive drunk or rob a convenience store. Speaking of which, a 15-year-old girl can’t buy a pack of cigarettes from said convenience store but can abort her child. In the first instance, her parents may well be called, in the latter…not so much. Priorities.

*Progressives say that trans folks aren’t “comfortable” and “don’t feel safe” if they can’t use the bathrooms and locker rooms of the sex with which they purport to identify. So it’s okay to make the other 99% of people uncomfortable and concerned for their safety?

*Repealing the Second Amendment and/or enacting stricter gun control laws does nothing but ensure that law-abiding citizens are disarmed and unable to defend themselves and their loved ones, and that criminals, who by definition don’t obey laws, are safe, comfortable, and unopposed. Baltimore, Washington, D.C. and Chicago have some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, yet are at or near the top of cities with the highest rates of violent crime and homicide. Period. End of story. The government couldn’t make a moral person shoot someone without reason, nor can it prevent a bad or mentally ill person from doing so. Disarming the former strips them of their natural right to life-- as granted by their Creator-- while encouraging the latter in their unjust pursuits.

             How the times have changed! Many things that were only a short time ago considered bad are now celebrated and vice-versa.

Bad-                                                                                 Good-
*Smoking cigarettes                                                        *Smoking pot

*HIV/Aids                                                                       *Homosexuality

*Christopher Columbus                                                  *Elizabeth Warren (aka ‘Pocahontas)

*Bigger people                                                                *Bigger government

*Making money                                                              *Taking money/taxation of the wealthy

*Loss of glaciers                                                             *Loss of Character

*Intolerance                                                                    *Intolerance…of those deemed intolerant by the left

*Discrimination of minorities                                       *Discrimination of majorities

*Invasive species                                                            *Illegal aliens

            I honestly expect Beto O’Rourke or another one of the Democrat’s Insane Clown Posse to simply propose that everything that was illegal in, say, 1970 should now be made legal and everything that was legal should now be made illegal. As The Kinks once stated, “It’s a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world.”
            The truth doesn’t care about our feelings. Some things just are. The universe is not a random collection of things that don’t matter. We can’t render truth illegal without sentencing ourselves to a Second Dark Age.