Sunday, July 31, 2022

Canadian Lender Ordered Blacklist Of Customers Who Supported The Freedom Convoy

 

As if the freezing of the Freedom Convoy trucker’s bank accounts wasn’t a heinous enough breach of their freedoms, Canada’s largest government-run agricultural lender, Farm Credit Canada, ordered a blacklist of customers who supported the convoy. Incredibly, according to Blacklock’s Reporter, internal documents show that Farm Credit Canada, a crown corporation based in Regina, Saskatchewan, told its employees to secretly make records of customers who supported the Freedom Convoy. Customers didn’t know they were being surveilled.

In revealed emails, Sophie Perreault, FCC’s chief operating officer, told staff: “If you become aware of a customer’s involvement report it immediately.” She decreed that, if the staff should “become aware of potential customer involvement in blockades, occupations and other support of activity related to the ‘Freedom Convoy,’” they must “submit a tip to the customer diligence centre.”

Customer Diligence Centre? Sounds a bit Orwellian.

The email also noted that the customer’s “name, stated involvement, date and any other pertinent details” should be included in the report, and added, “Please do not complete any investigative work yourself or communicate any information about FCC’s approach to customers who voluntarily disclose their involvement.”

The emails reveal that FCC staff did indeed keep a list of its freedom-loving clients’ names-- even after the Dominion’s Emergencies Act (EA) was revoked on February 23 after protesters had been cleared out of Ottawa.

Nothing to worry about here! Go on about your business, eh? The bacon is on the Coleman. Nice toque, by-the-way!

This, sadly, appears to be the future. Henceforth, it will not be surprising to learn that Bank of America is secretly making records of customers who donated to the Republican National Committee, or that U.S. Bank is compiling a blacklist of customers who have purchased My Pillow products. Perhaps The Royal Bank of Canada will close the accounts of those who question the Transgender Movement, or the Toronto-Dominion Bank will turn in the names of any borrowers overheard to make a disparaging remark about Justin Trudeau.

All of this proves the need for another Freedom Convoy, a much bigger one that refuses to be stopped, with Canadian and American truckers joining together to protest the rising tyranny in both of their formerly free nations.

As C.W. McCall might say, “Let them truckers roll, 10-4.”

 

 

 

Saturday, July 30, 2022

University Of North Carolina Interactive Map Promotes Historic LGBTQ Sites

 

The University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill recently hosted an online history exhibition titled “Queerolina” (get it?) that covers LGBTQ history at and around the school’s campus. 

The exhibition’s signature feature is an interactive map that allows visitors to click on pins representing locations on and around the UNC-Chapel Hill campus where LGBTQ students’ “Queer histories” took place. Text and/or audio helps, ahem, flesh out what historic event occurred at each place.

In one audio clip, a UNC alumnus describes the basement of Wilson Library as a well-known meeting spot for gay men. He notes that the library’s basement had a “very large men's room,” and adds that “the activities that went on in that men's room were actually pretty unsavory at times, frankly.” Good to know! Now that’s education!

So…statues, busts, and pictures of straight white men have to go, but we must now mark the spot where Chaz once suckcessfully successfully stuck his member thru a hole in a bathroom stall? And what about memorializing the spot in back of Fetzer Hall where Chad Erickson deflowered Betsy Smith in 1982? How come statues of famous predecessors get the boot-- and Erickson and Smith are passed over-- but Michael Fitzpatrick and Patrick Fitzmichael are honored for doing it in a library?

Reverse discrimination is still discrimination, is it not? Or is it now the case, that, similar to racial discrimination, every single heterosexual on Earth is deemed to be helplessly bigoted, but no member of the LGBTQ community can be?

 

Democrats Hilariously Claim To Be "The Party Of Freedom"

 

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), angered by the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, recently laid out his vision for a sweeping Democratic campaign pitch, tweeting: “We are the party of freedom. Freedom to make your own health-care choices. Freedom from your fear of gun violence. Freedom to have your vote counted. Our message is our values. Freedom for all.” (Please suppress your laughter until later in this post.)

The Chinese honey-trap dupe and profligate gasbag forgot to mention the Democrats’ favorite freedom, the freedom for them to lie, as granted by their Protector, the mainstream media, a.k.a. “The enemy of the people.”

Not to be outdone, the Democratic governor of Swalwell’s home state, Gavin Newsome, recently aired an ad aimed at Florida’s popular Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, that warned Floridians: “Freedom, it’s under attack in your state.” (Again, please hold your guffawing until later in this article.)

Neither the California Beholden Boy nor the slick, French-Laundry-loving hypocrite are the brightest bulbs in the pack, or they would’ve realized how ridiculous their claims are. Freedom from your fear of gun violence? Yes, we are all aware of the safe urban paradises such as Oakland, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Compton, California. Other cities such as Seattle, Portland, Detroit, Baltimore, New York, Milwaukee, Gary, Chicago-- and our nation’s capital, Washington, D.C.-- have been run entirely by Democrats for decades…and are among the most dangerous and violent in the nation.

Democrats do believe in the freedom to count all votes (and then some)……if they were cast for Democratic candidates. The others? Well, they believe in the freedom to suppress abort them.

Today’s Democrats saying they are “the party of freedom” because they are pro-abortion would be like if Nazis had said, “See, we are the party of freedom because we believe people should have the freedom to choose to kill Jews. We’re pro-choice!”

Yes, Democrats believe in the freedom to kill babies, burn and loot cities, take illicit drugs, change genders, pack the court, end the filibuster-- and force other people to act and believe like they do. The particularly intelligent and nuanced reader will discern that that is quite different from the freedom of speech, assembly, religion, etc., that the Founders granted us.

If Democrats were honest, they would say: “We’re not big on life. Or liberty. But we do think you have the right to pursue happiness…through spontaneous unprotected sex, psychedelic drug use, and the destruction of property—all without accountability or consequence! Vote for us!”

 

 

Thursday, July 28, 2022

Letter From A Progressive

 

I woke up depressed this morning because I realize our democracy is threatened by the Republican Party. It seems like everybody in the Democratic Party and in the free press and unbiased media realize this, too. Even the Big Tech companies seem to be aware of this fact.

I mean, when some Republicans don’t even want to pass strict gun control laws, how much longer can democracy last? And do you know that many of those same, far-right extremists want to aggressively prosecute crime and keep criminals in jail for a long time? And not defund the police! How fair is that to the marginalized communities that the police routinely terrorize…or to the criminals themselves, who probably have no other option? I think this shows the non-inclusiveness and the mean-spiritedness of Republicans in general. And their hypocrisy!

How can our democracy survive when conservatives don’t even want to teach our youngest kids about masturbation, anal sex, dental dams, and polyamory? And can anyone tell me how our democracy will prevail if jerks like Ron DeSantis put restrictions on kids joining the transgender community or deny trans women their fundamental right to compete on women’s sports teams?

Isn’t it enough that Putin’s War has caused a tampon shortage here in this country, making our menstruators search far and wide and leading to some tampons being taken out of men’s bathrooms? Why the War on Trans Persons?

But MAGA bullies don’t care about other people. They wanted to keep calling COVID-19 the “Wuhan Flu.” How racist is that?! I mean, if anything, the next pandemic-- that President Biden has just spoken of-- will probably come from Russia. It’ll be the Vladivostok Virus! Ha, ha, I bet that would make the MAGAs mad!

Lots of the Hitlerites refused to get vaccinated against the coronavirus. How patriotic is that? When the government tells you to do something, you do it, right? Don’t question it, “just do it” as Nike says. Who are we to disagree?

And, of course, many Republicans want to place restrictions on abortion. Um, hello! “Our bodies, our choice!” Ever heard of that mantra, dummies? Or how about “Keep your religion out of our uteruses!”

So mad! And if I hear one more person claim that “men can’t get pregnant” I’ll scream! Yet, crazy white-supremacists like Larry Elder don’t believe that rapid, man-caused climate change will soon flood the world’s coastal cities and small islands!

I can’t take any more of their baseless claims, their false accusations and misinformation! And then there is The Big Lie, the absolutely preposterous and thoroughly debunked claim that there was fraud in the 2020 presidential election, when all sane people know that election was the most secure and fair in history!

The radical right insurrectionists want to prevent history from being taught in our public schools, too. They want to strip classrooms of crucially important courses like Critical Race Theory (CRT) and The 1619 Project. This is an existential threat to our democracy!

For all these reasons and more, these tyrants need to be re-educated or removed from society…for all our sakes.

Sometimes I think that the people can’t be trusted to choose democracy-- or even to uphold its principles. So, it’s up to liberals like us to force them to do so.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

France To Turn Off Lights At Night

 

French President Emmanuel Macron recently remarked that “the summer, early autumn will be very hard” for French people due to the war in Ukraine, as he believes a total cutoff of Russian gas is likely to occur. Macron is telling French citizens to engage in energy “sobriety” and to prepare for even higher food prices.

Macron added, “From now on, I will ask public bodies, and all companies that can, to consume less. We will create a program and try to use lighting less in the evenings. We are launching a load reduction and sobriety program. We have to prepare for a scenario in which we have to give up Russian gas completely.”

Ironically, the French President noted that public lighting will be turned off at night in some places during a televised interview to commemorate Bastille Day, July 14th. The taking of the Bastille signaled the beginning of the French Revolution, and thus became a symbol of the end of the Old Régime.

Choosing to go dark by turning off the lights at night is an unmistakable symbol of the coming end of the current regime.

And France is by no means alone. California, the erstwhile Golden State, the Land of Milk and Honey—and Hollywood—says it expects periodic blackouts this summer as the power runs low. In fact, California has struggled to keep the power on the past two summers, due to progressive policies that range from the nonsensical to the insane.

France is not engaged in war with Russia but is using the war as an excuse to demand energy “sobriety” from her citizens. California is not fighting Russia either.

As the sun literally and metaphorically rises in the East, the lights flicker and grow dim in the West.

Should the West go dark, it will be of its own making, and the whole world will be cast into an inky, despotic abyss-- from which it is unlikely ever to ascend again.

The “Great Reset” will likely also be a permanent one.

 

Tuesday, July 26, 2022

Western Rulers Assisting In Suicide Of Their Own Nations

 

Dutch police recently shot at tractor-riding farmers who were protesting a preposterous government climate proposal in a northern area of the Netherlands. The Dutch government purportedly plans to cut in half so-called greenhouse gas emissions from bovine farts and belches, farm animal manure, and the use of ammonia in fertilizer-- by 2030. Government officials say the plan is necessary to reduce these "harmful" pollutants, but the farmers say the government's new standards would destroy their livelihoods. So, in recent weeks, they have organized a nationwide protest against the despotic plans.

If the proposal is approved, to meet the government's emissions target, farmers would be forced to reduce the number of livestock they own. Moreover, farmers whose animals produce large amounts of ammonia would have their farms purchased by the government. To that end, a government representative recently stated: “The honest message… is that not all farmers can continue their business.”

“Not all farmers can continue their business?” Because the government won’t let them. Wow. I guess it’s no longer just COVID that governments use to determine if you can keep your business.

Understandably, the threats of these draconian measures led to approximately 40,000 farmers forming a tractor convoy that travelled around the relatively small nation, in some cases blocking traffic and grocery distribution centers. Other farmers have demonstrated in town and city halls or set hay bales ablaze on the sides of highways. Farmers say they are being unfairly targeted by the government while other industries are polluting more but aren't facing crippling regulations.

Is it really a good idea, particularly in this time of high inflation, supply chain issues-- and food shortages-- to deliberately attempt to reduce the number of folks who produce our food? Rather than reducing manure, would it not be better to reduce the amount of crap coming from the minds and mouths of the elites who rule over us with ever-increasing arrogance and insolence? (See also Trudeau, Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Newsome, Hochul, et. al.)

Bizarrely, food processing plants appear to be spontaneously combusting around the U.S. Worse yet, China (and certain Big Tech oligarchs) are buying up American farmland. The Russia-Ukraine war has disrupted and reduced supplies of corn, wheat, and seed oils, among other things. And now this?

Not to be outdone, President Biden (a.k.a. “Chairman Brow”) has released millions of barrels of oil from the United States’ Strategic Petroleum Reserve…and, in a borderline treasonous move, sent some of it to China. (In fact, nearly 1,000,000 barrels of U.S. oil was sold to a Chinese state-owned gas company that-- get this-- has financial ties to a private equity firm that was co-founded by Biden’s son Hunter, according to reports.)

 This leads one to ask an obvious question: “Why are Western governments assisting in their own suicide? Why are they attacking farms and the people who feed us all? Why are we sending oil to China when we are desperately trying to buy it from the likes of Russia, Iran, and Venezuela? This is mind-boggling. It can’t be for the sake of the climate.

The Great Reset is a Colossal Mistake. It pointlessly punishes citizens of western nations while strengthening and emboldening their actual and potential adversaries. Worse still, like COVID-1984, it is being used to excuse previously unimaginable tyranny in these erstwhile largely free nations, making them more like existing authoritarian regimes.

How long do these leaders think their nations’ citizens will put up with the stripping away of their rights and freedoms? Perhaps forever? It appears they believe we no longer have an alternative.

And that may be why a 16-year-old farm boy is shot at and taken into custody.

 

 

Monday, July 25, 2022

The Devil Is On A Roll

 

Several recent news items seem to indicate that the Devil is on a roll. To wit:

First off, in an article recently published on msn.com, Nicole Pomarico (apparently from wehavekids.com) espoused the joys of little kids and open love.

She wrote: “In the case of one toddler on TikTok, we get a glimpse into how sweet and open their little minds can be. According to her dad, the little girl wanted to know why so many dragonflies were flying around. From there, the conversation went in an unexpected direction. Dad explained that they were looking for mates so that they could have babies, and when she asked if the boys were looking for girls, he said yes... which prompted her to wonder if the girls could look for girls and the boys could look for boys to be their partner, to which Dad replied that he didn't know if they knew they could do that.”

Dumb dragonflies. Probably homophobic Trump supporters-- or at least Rethuglicans!

Pomarico glowingly continued: “This sweet kiddo proceeded to go looking for dragonflies in the backyard to let them know that they ‘can fall in love with whoever they want.’” I wonder how many dragonfly genders there are today.

Pomarico added: “This little girl gets it on the most basic level: It's okay to love who you love, whether you're a person or a dragonfly.” (Pardon me while I reach for my barf bag.)

One problem, Nicole: If boy dragonflies looked for other boy dragonflies and girl dragonflies only wanted to hook up with other girl dragonflies…there soon wouldn’t be any more dragonflies. (And you think the mosquitoes are bad now!)

Secondly, something called “The Next Generation of Non-Monogamy study purportedly revealed a growth in interest of non-monogamous relationships, particularly amongst women. Another article published on msn.com stated: “26% of women compared to 13% of men in the study have some sort of non-monogamous relationship with their partner. In fact, 65% of women don’t even believe in the construct of monogamy, with 56% of them realizing this in the past year.”

If any of that is to be believed, it is depressing. Moreover, if 56% of the allegedly 65% of women that don’t believe in monogamy just came to that realization “in the past year,” that means that 36.4% of women decided that they dislike “the construct of monogamy” in the past 12 months or so. If true, what the hell happened in the past year to make over one-third of American women hunger for polygamy?

Third, celebrities, “progressive” politicians, mainstream media outlets-- and hordes of soulless, heartless, and brainless young vagina-possessors with far too much time on their hands (and fake blood on the crotches of their pants)—have joined forces to protest the Supreme Court’s ruling to abide by the Constitution (for a change) and return the decision on the legality of abortion to the states and the people. This return to the principles of a democratic republic is “threatening our democracy” they claim absurdly. Nothing could be further from the truth.

What’s more, and contrary to progressives’ claims, a recent report released by Republicans on the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) shows that, even aside from the moral issues, abortion has a long-term negative impact on the country’s economy.

The report notes: “Applying standard valuation methods used by government agencies to assess the costs and benefits of policy actions that affect mortality risks, we estimate that the economic cost of abortion to unborn babies in the U.S. was $6.9 trillion in 2019, 32 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) that year. This cost is 425 times larger than the $16.2 billion loss in earnings that new mothers would be expected to incur over the first six years of the child’s life.”

Lastly, The Satanic Temple was also appalled by the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

The Devil in action, indeed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sunday, July 24, 2022

Democrats Shoot Down Amendment Banning Oil Sales From U.S. Strategic Reserve To China

 

In a July 20th vote, House Democrats voted down a GOP-led amendment that would have banned the Biden administration and the U.S. Department of Energy from selling oil kept in the United States’ Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China. That’s right, the hell with future emergencies and current record-high gasoline prices here in America, let’s sell our oil to our biggest geopolitical adversary.

That should tell you all you need to know about Democrats’ priorities. They want to Make America Prostrate Again. Each and every one of the 219 House Democrats that voted to block the amendment should be thrown in jail for treason. Preferably exchanged for the January 6 protesters who are still being imprisoned for no valid reason.

 Democrats are determined to quickly "transition" the U.S. from fossil fuels to solar and wind-powered energy, etc., no matter the cost to Americans. They are equally determined to “transition” the U.S. from its founding principles and values of limited government of, by, and for the people, equal justice under the rule of law, and the recognition of inalienable individual rights granted by the Creator…to a deflated Marxist state ruled by a handful of elites and riven by intersectionality. No matter the cost to Americans.

It's a good thing today’s “Democrats” weren’t in power during World War II. They might have voted to sell oil and military hardware to Japan and Germany. Were those of their ilk in the Continental Congress during the War for Independence, they probably would have blocked any motion to provide coats and boots to Washington’s soldiers at Valley Forge.

There is no sane reason for Democrats’ refusal to utilize our own fossil fuels here at home…while they simultaneously approve the sale of it to rival nations who do not have nearly as strict pollution-control standards. More mindboggling still, in spite of all this, the Biden administration goes hat-in-hand to the likes of Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela to beg them to sell us their oil. So, to recap: we won’t use our oil, but we will sell it to adversaries; and we will purchase oil from other countries for use back home.

To say this is insane doesn’t do it justice. It can only be viewed as an attack on our domestic fuel producers…and America herself.

Saturday, July 23, 2022

Gender Activists Urging Archaeologists Not To Assign Gender To Human Remains

 

One of the things archaeologists typically do shortly after excavating human skeletons—or parts thereof—is to determine the sex of the person whose bones they have just uncovered. It is easily possible to ascertain whether a skeleton is from a biological male or female using objective observations based on criteria such as the size and shape of the bones. (Criminal forensic detectives also do this as a matter of course.)

However, a new school of thought within archaeology is urging scientists to abandon the practice of assigning gender to ancient human remains. This school of thought is itself being pushed by gender activists who are arguing that scientists cannot know how an ancient individual identified themselves. Really.

For example, Canadian Master’s degree candidate Emma Palladino recently tweeted: “You might know the argument that the archaeologists who find your bones one day will assign you the same gender as you had at birth, so regardless of whether you transition, you can’t escape your assigned sex.” (At least the last part of that statement is true: you can’t escape your assigned sex. No matter what you do or how hard you try.)

Further proving her scientific bona fides, Palladino characterized assigning gender to an ancient human as “bullshit.” 

I am sure a large percentage of cave persons and ancient peoples “identified” as other than the sex they were “assigned” at birth. I’m guessing many Viking couples, for example, probably switched genders after a few years of marriage or cohabitation. I bet many a “Hagar the Horrible” became “Helga the Horribles.” And vice-versa. Just kidding. And I fervently wish Emma Palladino was, too.

The relatively small but effective woke mob is now poised to usurp archaeology. Archaeology! It has already partially annexed mathematics and is simultaneously working to take over engineering. Far too late do sane people realize and react to these facts.

The Left must have everything, everywhere, all the time, forevermore…with no exceptions. And they will stop at nothing to achieve their goal of absolute domination. The Democratic Party and its public relations arm, the mainstream media, are the far-left’s main vehicle for making this happen. JFK be damned, today’s Democrats will go anywhere and pay any price in defense of tyranny.

Make no bones about it.

 

Friday, July 22, 2022

Media Now Openly Hostile To Republicans

 

Mainstream media bloviators have increasingly begun to state that Republicans do not deserve equal coverage alongside their Democratic counterparts. These figures often falsely claim that Republicans seek to “end our democracy” and that they routinely traffic in falsehoods. Ergo, there’s no need to be fair and balanced.

For example, on a recent edition of MSNBC's "The ReidOut,” Joy Reid and her guest, left-wing political analyst Mathew Dowd, preposterously asserted that media outlets in general were too neutral in their reporting on the Republican Party and should instead ramp up the hostility. Reid also urged fellow reporters to "tell voters" the GOP was a "threat" to freedom. 

Remarkably, Reid queried Dowd on how the media might "get out" of this ill-advised "‘both sides’ trajectory.” Dowd replied that the media should start acting like they were living in a society that wasn't free-- and treat Republicans accordingly. Like state-run mouthpieces in Russia, China, and North Korea? Great idea!

A week prior to the Reid-Dowd fiasco, CNN primetime host Don Lemon stated that journalists no longer live in a "Walter Cronkite society” and that he should therefore be able to “state [his] truth.”

During a recent discussion with Los Angeles Times columnist Jackie Calmes (on her piece condemning "both-siderism”), fellow CNN host Brian Stelter also questioned whether Republicans should be given the same coverage as Democrats. He asked, "Is it that we’re treating Democrats and Republicans equally and ignoring GOP radicalism? Is that the heart of the problem?" No, quite the opposite, Brian. Hence your networks plummeting ratings. By way of illustration, one Harvard study found that CNN’s coverage of President Trump during his first 100 days in office was 93% negative versus just 7% positive. The same study found that CBS’ coverage was 91% negative and The New York Times’ 87%. By contrast, mainstream media outlets slobbered all over themselves in incessantly praising Barack Obama. That is not treating Democrats and Republicans too “equally.” And that cannot be good for our representative republic.

And, last March, NBC News anchor Lester Holt actually said, "I think it’s become clear that fairness is overrated... the idea that we should always give two sides equal weight and merit does not reflect the world we find ourselves in.” It certainly doesn’t Lester. Why give your news audience both sides of the story when you can just tell them what the “truth” is?

This acknowledgement—and encouragement—of the end of an objective “mainstream” media/free and fair press is unprecedented and surreal, at least in the modern era.

 Is it a good idea for those in the media to tell everyone that they are no longer even going to pretend to treat the two parties equally, while they otherwise blather on about “inclusion,” “fairness,” “justice,” and “saving our democracy?”

Yet this has not stopped them from blasting Fox News and the few other right of center media outlets as being “biased.” In fact, they will probably double-down now and increasingly label them as “far-right extremist” organizations. Henceforth it will be considered fair and objective to blast any entity that doesn’t share your views…as long as you are “progressive,” and they are not.

And those in the media wonder why so few people trust them now?

Journalism isn’t what it used to be. Maybe it never was.

And that’s the way it is, Friday, July 22nd, 2022.  

 

 

 

Thursday, July 21, 2022

Canada To Add Mental Illness To Medical Assistance In Dying Law

 

Canada’s medical assistance in dying (MAiD) law is already the most permissive euthanasia and assisted-suicide legislation in the world. 

Understandably controversial in itself, there are many horror stories surrounding its implementation. For example, as lifesitenews.com recently reported, “A 71-year-old widower was admitted to a Southwestern Ontario hospital after a fall. His family says during his admission he contracted an infectious diarrheal illness. He was humiliated by staff for the smell of his room, his family said. He developed a new shortness of breath that was not comprehensively assessed. In this context, a hospital team member suggested he would qualify for MAiD. The team said he had end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and it was terminal. The patient was surprised by the diagnosis but trusted the team. Within 48 hours of his first assessment, he received a medically assisted death. Post-mortem testing showed he did not have end-stage COPD. His family doctor, when notified of his death, also stated he did not have end-stage COPD, but the team had failed to contact her when they were assessing his history.”

Oops. Sorry.

First, do no harm? Respect for life? Canadian nice?

Nonetheless, the Great White North’s federal “expert” panel on MAiD has recommended mental illness be added to the list of maladies making one eligible for MAiD……apparently without any legislative changes. How nice, euthanasia by administrative fiat. What could go wrong?

To some degree, mental illness is in the eye of the beholder. It can be quite subjective and has historically been used as a tool to advance totalitarian political agendas. Hence, the gulags and “re-education camps.” Don’t believe in global warming? Are you an anti-vaxxer? Trump supporter?! Didn’t vote for Xi jinping Justin Trudeau? Driving an 18-wheeler in a “Freedom Convoy?” Then you are, sadly, mentally ill.

But, someday soon, in Canada at least, the nice people in the white smocks may be able to help you.

In fact, you may not have a choice.

 

 

Wednesday, July 20, 2022

AOC Heckled, Blasts Capitol Police After Laughing Off Reports Of SCOTUS Judges Being Harassed

 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) lashed out at U.S. Capitol Police after a man heckled her on the Capitol steps Wednesday-- and the police did not try to intervene. Ocasio-Cortez later lambasted the police in comments she made to a reporter.

The man, apparently teasingly-- but maybe lovingly-- called out to AOC, saying: “My favorite big-booty Latina. I love you AOC, you’re my favorite.” And, “Whoo! Look how sexy she looks in that dress. I love it, AOC! Hot, hot, hot like a tamale.”

At least he didn’t call her a “breakfast taco.”

Ocasio-Cortez posted about the incident (after deleting her initial false account), writing: “I posted about a deeply disgusting incident that happened today on the Capitol steps, but took it down bc it’s clearly someone seeking extremist fame. It’s just a bummer to work in an institution that openly allowed this, but talking about it only invites more. Just really sad…Here is a video he posted of the incident. I was actually walking over to deck him because if no one will protect us then I’ll do it myself but I needed to catch a vote more than a case today.” Right. Whatever you say, AOC.

Occasional-Cortex Ocasio-Cortez is supportive of BLM rioters. She literally scoffed at reports of Brett Kavanaugh getting screamed at, harassed and chased out of a restaurant by rabid pro-abortion activists. But, if you dare to mock her, even gently, you should be taken into custody—and perhaps beheaded. Insurrections must be defeated and punished! For the sake of our democracy!

 To the likes of AOC, Don Lemon, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, and Malcolm Nance, as well as most other leftists, opposing their Marxist viewpoints is equivalent to treason…and should be dealt with as such. Ergo, they can laugh off-- or even fully and publicly support—all-out attacks on those with whom they disagree while simultaneously characterizing any and all chastising of themselves as an attack on democracy itself.

 

Tuesday, July 19, 2022

Law Professor Smears Supreme Court Justices As "Lawless Actors"

 

Professor Heidi Li Feldman recently posted a 15-tweet thread that was as breathtaking in its ignorance as it was shoddily written.

Feldman stated: “Regardless of our areas of legal speciality [sic] any ethical study, teaching, or practice of law in the U.S. must now start from the problem of developing and implementing law when so many of legal institutions are in the grips of lawless actors.”

She continued: “In more ordinary times, we can study and teach U.S. law against a background that presidents, governors, state and federal legislators, and judges on all courts have a basic commitment and aspiration to rule of law and to justice.”

And added: “With the rise of the Trump-Republican Party, this traction — the ability to argue within a shared expectation of commitment to rule of law and justice — has completely evaporated. Last term’s Supreme Court decisions are just the most recent high-profile evidence for this.”

Saying that the U.S. Supreme Court-- whose duty is to interpret the law to make certain it is in compliance with the Constitution-- is composed of “lawless actors” because you didn’t like a decision it made is ludicrous and childish.

But apparently not to other “professors.”

To wit: St. John’s University Law Professor John Barrett replied to Professor Feldman’s tweet by tweeting: “Lawyers are servants—butlers. But we get to choose whom and what we will serve. Rules of thumb: serve truth; assist people, not powers that hurt them; don’t do it for the money; don’t become Hitler’s butler.”   

 

So, Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh are “Hitler’s Butlers” for helping strike down an unconstitutional law and returning power to the states? Doesn’t seem like something Hitler would do. And they certainly didn’t reach their decision “for the money.” Rather, they did it to foster the rule of law and promote justice. And to serve truth, assist people, and not the powers that hurt them. But none of that serves the interest of the nutty professors, so the SCOTUS must be slammed. Or packed. Or eliminated. You know, “to save our democracy.”

The day after the Supreme Court voted to overturn Roe v. Wade, Harvard Law clinical instructor Alejandra Caraballo took to Twitter to call for the public harassment of the six Justices who voted in the majority. 

Caraballo wrote: “The 6 justices who overturned Roe should never know peace again. It is our civic duty to accost them every time they are in public.”

They should “never know peace again?”

“It is our civic duty to accost them every time they are in public?” Breaking the law is our civic duty? That’s a non-sequitur. This from people who believe in hate speech and that words can be “violence?” Where are the judges’safe spaces” like the ones you provide on your schools’ campuses for your pseudo-scholarly snowflakes, professors?

But, sadly, these kinds of inane and hypocritical threats are made routinely by radical leftist academics like Feldman and Caraballo. And by dangerous Democratic clowns like Maxine Waters and Chuck Schumer. And Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez literally laughs about Supreme Court justices being harassed and accosted, but comes totally unglued when someone dares to heckle or mock her, even in a non-threatening way.

 

 

Monday, July 18, 2022

New York To Require Concealed-Carry Applicants To Turn Over Social Media History

 

As modern life continues to unfold as if from the pages of a dystopian novel, it is harder and harder to be shocked—or appalled. Or one would think it should be. Nonetheless, it happens.

For example, New York state will soon require applicants for permits to carry handguns to hand over lists of their social media accounts. For a review of their “character and conduct.”

This Chinese-like new requirement will take effect in September and was included in a recently passed law that Empire State legislators passed in a huff after the U.S. Supreme Court had the audacity to rule that the Second Amendment to the Constitution actually means what it says-- and therefore law-abiding citizens of legal age have a right to carry a handgun for personal protection.

The creepily intrusive-- and unconstitutional-- new law was promptly signed by tyrannical New York Governor Kathy Hochul, who, like Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the Biden Crime Family, appear to be big fans of the Chinese Communist Party and its social credit system.

I hope you aren’t naïve enough to believe that our rulers and their bureaucrat toadies will just look to see if you ever tweeted that you were thinking of shooting up a high school. No, they will pore through your search history to see if you ever checked out Chick-fil-A’s menu or tried to locate the next Trump rally. They will examine every tweet, blog, and Facebook post you ever made to see if you ever disparaged a member of the LGBTQIIA+ community or a prominent progressive politician.

Are you a “climate change denier?” “Anti-vaxxer?” “Forced-birther?” Then you have no rights, whether “inalienably” God-given (giggle) or government granted, including the right to protect and defend yourself, ignorant neanderthal!

Tragically, Western nations are rapidly becoming hyper-secular, shedding all ties with Christianity in general and Biblical precepts in particular. And, in the long run, a decay of morality always leads to a reduction of liberty, freedom…and prosperity. Always. There is no historical exception to this observation. And often to outright tyranny.

At the same time-- and as both a symptom and result of this-- we are succumbing to an unprecedented societal Alzheimer’s disease of memory loss and impaired thinking. Consequently, we are tearing down statues and excusing—or supporting—“mostly peaceful” riots causing billions of dollars in damage and dozens of lives even as we decry those who wear “MAGA” hats or who believe in certain Biblical passages.  

One shudders to think what is next, what other freedoms we will blithely give up, in the puerile, misguided, futile quest for security. Privacy will soon be an entirely antiquated notion.

If we wish to purchase a knife, will we soon have to list all the books we own? To purchase a bow and arrow set, if still legal to do so, will it be necessary for us to bring in pictures of any/all our medications? If we wish to buy a taser or pepper spray, will we be forced to present the sleeves of all the CDs and DVDs that we own? Explain why we listened to a Joe Rogan podcast last week?

Talk about a slippery slope.

Memo to Hochul: who the hell do you think you are, lady?

In truth, it doesn’t matter. Self-evidently, NO ONE has the “right” to deprive us of our natural rights.

And no one can. Unless we let them.

 

 

 

Sunday, July 17, 2022

Sen. Warren Says Crisis Pregnancy Centers Must Be Shut Down

 

Pro-abortion groups have vandalized and set fire to crisis pregnancy centers throughout the U.S. recently. However, they have much more work to do, according to Democratic Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren.

Warren told NBC10 Boston: “In Massachusetts right now, those crisis pregnancy centers that are there to fool people who are looking for pregnancy termination help outnumber true abortion clinics by three to one. We need to shut them down here in Massachusetts and we need to shut them down all around the country.” She added, “You should not be able to torture a pregnant person like that.”

Where to start? Crisis pregnancy centers are there to “fool” people while abortion clinics are there to “help” people? (Excuse me, I guess the preferred term is now not abortion, but “pregnancy termination.”) Pregnancy centers “torture” the “pregnant persons” that visit them so “we need to shut them down all around the country?” It is abortion providers that routinely torture babies in the womb, in many cases dismembering them and/or sucking their brains out.

No, Warren-- and the vast majority of “progressive” Democrats-- aren’t pro-choice. They are simply pro-whatever it is they want. They are pro-sloth, pro-personal convenience…pro-evil. When you look at the facts, they are more like “no-choicers” than “pro-choicers.”

They are pro-choice when it comes to:

*whether or not to smoke pot

*Whether or not to smoke crack cocaine

*whether or not to imbibe magic mushrooms and assorted other drugs

*whether or not to have a job/gainful employment

*whether or not to chase Supreme Court Justices and Republican politicians out of restaurants and other public places

*whether or not to be a boy, girl, or other gender

*whether or not to bathe

*whether or not to use the restrooms and locker rooms of your non-birth-assigned sex

*whether or not to burn and loot cities in protest of some/any thing

*whether or not to kill your kid

 

Yet they are fanatically anti-choice as regards their proscriptive commandments:

*thou shalt not say things we don’t like

*thou shalt not be allowed to own a firearm

*thou shalt not be allowed to pray in public

*thou shalt not be allowed to wear furs

*thou shalt not be allowed to eat red meat

*thou shalt not be allowed to walk unarmed through the Capitol building in protest of anything

*thou shalt not be allowed to “misgender” a trans person

*thou shalt not be allowed to question election results, processes, equipment, or those involved in tabulating and reporting the results, as this is a danger to our democracy

*thou shalt not say “All Lives Matter”

*thou must accept emergency-use, experimental gene-therapy vaccines into one’s body if the government and “experts,” in their benevolence and wisdom, say you should

 

The Left loves to use euphemisms, misinformation, outright lies, and projection to fool people who are underinformed.

“Hypocrisy termination” would be far better for society than “pregnancy termination.”