Monday, May 31, 2021

A Tale Of Two University Clubs-- Communism Good, Liberty Bad


A Columbia University student group recently launched the “Columbia Communism Club,” an organization utilizing the school’s well-known crown as a symbol, albeit enhanced with the Communist hammer and sickle. The Ivy League bastion of higher learning’s newly formed club recently held its first meeting. The club even has an Instagram page, a post on which read: “Do you want to be a part of leftist discussion, engage in mutual aid, and better understand leftist theory? Join us today and be apart [sic] of the movement!” (Cut them some slack, they’re teaching leftist theory, not English grammar.) In ironically capitalist fashion, the club already is establishing its “brand,” with a social media tagline stating: “Bringing accessible theory to Columbia students – Workers of the world, unite!”


Communist theory—and practice-- has been quite “accessible” in the 100-plus years of its existence, too much so for the more than 100 million people who were exterminated by it in the 20th Century alone.


By contrast, Skidmore College’s student government denied official approval to a Young Americans for Liberty chapter and student leader Hannah Davis, calling the views of the group bigoted and hateful. Liberty is apparently deemed hateful by many, judging by their steadfast determination to impose or submit to mask mandates, vaccination decrees, lockdowns, and various other preposterous violations of personal liberty and autonomy.


A recent petition cleverly titled “Stop Skidmore College from Approving the Young Americans for Liberty Club” baselessly smeared YAL, saying it has a “proclivity to spread hatred” that “cannot be tolerated.” The petition also claimed, utterly without evidence, that YAL’s group application is a “reactionary response to students of color voicing their experiences and is an attempt to silence our voices.” No, the only attempt to silence voices is obviously coming from those behind the petition and the Skidmore College student government.


Skidmore officials hilariously claimed that free speech is protected on campus, except for “hate speech.” Speech that everyone loves and agrees with probably doesn’t need protection, does it? The right to free speech is specifically focused on speech which some could find offensive.


YAL’s Davis appealed the private liberal arts college’s student government’s denial in March, but the Student Government Association comrades remained heroically firm and inflexible in their opposition to the First Amendment, liberty, and the concept of dissenting viewpoints.  


The stark contrast between the ease with which the Columbia Communist Club came into existence and the trials the Young Americans for Liberty club has had to endure to get a Skidmore chapter approved is perfectly illustrative of the current culture in the U.S. under the Biden administration.

100 million non-Communists slaughtered? No problem! Believe in limited government and the existence of two sexes? Off to the Gulags you sick, Trump-supporting, cis-gendered, patriotic freaks!



Sunday, May 30, 2021

First Annual Fundraiser To Make Mask Mandates Permanent And Legalize Abortion At All Stages


A Meeting Hall Somewhere in A Deep Blue State

June 8, 2021


“Welcome, all, to the First Annual Fundraiser to Make Mask Mandates Permanent and Legalize Abortion at All Stages. (Much applause and a few muffled ‘here, heres’ ring out.) We’re here tonight to support the pro-choice movement in all its forms (much applause and more muffled ‘here heres’ ring out), whether that choice be to terminate a pregnancy or to be free from worry about possibly getting sick! Everyone, say it with me now: MY BODY, MY CHOICE…MY BODY, MY CHOICE…MY BODY, MY CHOICE…MY BODY, MY CHOICE! Good, but let’s try it one more time and see if we can be so loud that even crazy Tucker Carlson can hear us. All of you take your masks off—just for a moment—and shout it with me at the top of your lungs: MY BODY, MY CHOICE…MY BODY, MY CHOICE…MY BODY, MY CHOICE…MY BODY, MY CHOICE!!  Yeah, that’s what I’m talkin’ about! Great job! I bet the doofuses heard us all the way over in ‘Cisgenderedville’ and ‘Christianburgh!’

“Anyway, a little about tonight’s agenda. Cocktail hour—or should I say non-binarygenitaliatail hour (giggles)—is from 6:00 PM until 7:00 PM. After that, we have a fabulous dinner prepared for you. You can select from—I mean you have the choice of—continuing the pro-choice theme: a delicious tofu burger with bean sprouts, complete with a side of rice noodles, or the Vegan Chinese Kung Pao Tofu, served with rice noodles, cucumber slices and a dollop of hummus. Our featured speaker this evening is none other than Joy Behar, the renowned writer, actress, comedian and co-host of ABC’s fabulously successful daytime talk show, “The View.” Joy will be giving a presentation on how truth does not always ‘set you free,’ and can, in fact, chain one to outmoded notions born of a reactionary, white, patriarchal society— now discredited notions such as integrity, honor, decency, courage, selflessness, and honesty. We have two raffles going on simultaneously tonight. In both cases, tickets are $2 apiece. In each case, money raised from you good people will be used to lobby Congresspeople. One to lobby for permanent mask mandates—in perpetuity-- for all 50 states and all American territories and protectorates, and the other to lobby for the right to unfettered abortion from conception until a fetus who has inadvertently escaped a womb and is breathing on its own is no older than 18 months of age.

“There are three bathrooms in the building, two at the front and one to the rear. Screw the ridiculous ‘male and female’ designations of times past, know that each of these are open to any and all genders tonight. That said, if any menstruating member or birthing person here tonight is concerned that they may be pregnant with a non-viable tissue mass, ushers at each end of the hall will be passing out free abortion pills until everyone has left the building.

“Remember, we should all have the choice to not be affected by the blind callousness and disregard others have for some people’s autonomy, safety, health, and life! This is why abortion must be legal, safe and ubiquitous, and why science deniers—and anyone else who disdains facial masks-- must be forced to wear them. Have a great evening, folks! Enjoy the program! And remember to drive carefully if you aren’t taking public transportation!”  



Saturday, May 29, 2021

Professor Punished For Stating There Are Only Two Sexes


The American Psychological Association (APA) recently removed John Staddon, an emeritus professor of psychology and neuroscience at Duke University, from the Society for Behavioral Neuroscience and Comparative Psychology (SBNCP) Division 6 listserv, an email discussion group. What prompted his ouster? Staddon was notified of his removal from the list in an email from the presidential trio of the APA division. He believes he was expunged for stating his belief that there are only two sexes, in particular this post: “Hmm… Binary view of sex false? What is the evidence? Is there a Z chromosome?”


 Apparently, the APA troika somehow believed this violated the division’s code of conduct, adopted in 2019, which states: “Treat everyone with respect and consideration. It is acceptable in a scientific organization and at scientific meetings for members to have strong differences of opinion or different theoretical perspectives on aspects of psychological science. However, those differences and disagreements can be conveyed in ways that do not make other people feel threatened, demeaned, discriminated against, or harassed.”

You know dark days have arrived when stating an obvious scientific fact can be considered threatening, demeaning, or discriminatory. (Or can engender strong differences of opinion.) The APA has also clearly removed “logical” from psychological.

The suggestion that there are really only two genders (remember binary is bad) might not have been the only one of Staddon’s posts to have run afoul of the APA. Jonathon Crystal, an Indiana University provost and professor of psychological and brain sciences, wrote to Staddon on behalf of the division’s executive committee: “The division leadership has received complaints about some of the posts that you have sent to the division listserv. I do not want to get into the particulars of the range of complaints over the years, but I will note that a number of members of the executive committee and others have voiced concerns publicly on the listserv in an attempt to make you aware of how readers of the list might view some of the posts.” Did Professor Staddon previously infer that the Earth was round? Did he promote heliocentrism? Did he question bloodletting the sick?


Staddon told The College Fix, “This incident just illustrates the current inability of some scientific communities to tolerate dissent about issues related to sex and race. Psychology and sociology seem to be especially flawed in this respect.” Tragically, psychology and sociology are now just two more disciplines that have been captured and co-opted by the left. Though the left claims to be all about the science (as opposed, say, to those dogmatic, religion-crazed Republicans), it really disdains science—or anything else that could possibly question its beliefs. For example, the six steps comprising the classic scientific method designed to acquire knowledge are: observation, question, hypothesis, experiment, results, conclusion. Leftists have neither the patience nor the integrity to carry out this process. They have long-since determined that inverting and shortening this process is the best way to enhance and consolidate their power, the only thing that matters to them. Hence, they: state a conclusion first, then either tell the rest of us about the supposed result, experiment, hypothesis, question, and observation that allegedly back this conclusion up…or skip the latter five steps altogether and dare anyone to question them on their conclusion because, after all, “the science is settled.” So there!


Soon we will learn of a math teacher being suspended/fired/shot for claiming that “0” means “none” and/or the numeral “2” represents two-- and only two-- items or things. Remember, binary is bad!


Here is the definition of “two”:

1)      a group or unit of two people or things. Pair, duo, duet, dyad, duplet, tandem, twain.

2)      Equivalent to the sum of one and one; one less than three.


But definitions themselves are racist! And so are dictionaries! They are part and parcel of the white patriarchal society! I mean, Noah Webster was a white male!  James Murray was a Scotsman…and is there anything more obnoxiously and snobbishly patrician than the “Oxford English Dictionary?”




Everything Is Now Spam


I have been receiving far too many incoming phone calls lately arriving simultaneously with the warning, “Spam Risk.” The vast majority of these are spam. I am likewise bombarded by spam emails and text messages. The sheer volume of these attempted messages is staggering, and irritating, in that, even unanswered, they take up precious time to dismiss or delete.

Yet, this type of spam is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg, and similar in that it is the most obvious and therefore the least dangerous. We are now assaulted by spam 24/7/365.

Every minute of every day, other more insidious forms of “spam” are hurled at us in the guise of “news,” “education,” “entertainment,” “information,” and “public service announcements.” The likes of Brian Stelter, Brian Williams, Chris Cuomo, and Jake Tapper expectorate what should be universally seen as comically biased propaganda in a manner befitting the Sermon on the Mount. Social media sites are largely composed of spam, whether their users/consumers know it or not. Late night “comedians,” talk show hosts, Hollywood stars, movies, television shows, and leading sports figures continuously push banal woke messages on those who look to them solely for a brief escape from the workaday world. Nearly every message emanating from Big Tech, Big Business and Big government is now designed to shame the little people in flyover country into giving up ever more of their freedom. They do this while virtue-signaling, holding themselves up as the natural moral arbiters needed to control a bigoted, racist populace…snickering all the while as they consolidate their power. And our educational institutions, whether grade schools, middle schools, high schools, or colleges and universities, now hand out “lessons” in revisionist history, perverted science, and several other falsified and weaponized subjects like a giant institutional Pez dispenser on meth and steroids.

Every time Brian Williams speaks, a disclaimer should flash across our television screens stating, “SPAM RISK!” Every movie and television show should be made to warn viewers of the “SPAM RISK” with the opening credits. Every time a Big Tech CEO or a member of the Biden administration opens his or her (or “they”) mouth to speak, potential listeners should be forewarned of the imminent “SPAM RISK.” And every new textbook, education guide, or website used to instruct our children should be mandated to display, in large block letters, “SPAM RISK.” Yet the opposite is the case. Twitter, Snopes, et. al., always warn us that a Trump tweet or Fox News report is “unverified” and possibly misleading, but never even suggest we be a tad skeptical of an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweet or a CNN report. This is proof positive of their preposterous bias…and the dire need for the “SPAM RISK” disclaimer.

One of the sad realities of modern life is that truth is considered by many, especially elite “opinion shapers,” to be at least as dangerous as the coronavirus.

And it is. To them.


Thursday, May 27, 2021

Sports Illustrated Now Only Illustrating Wokeness


The Left ruins everything.

Television. Movies. Economies. Cities. Lives. Religion. Comedy. Sports. Everything. Literally everything.

 It does so in many insidious ways. It divides us with multiculturalism and critical race theory. It makes some groups bitter, envious, and indolent by telling them they are victims of other groups’ bigotry…and that there is nothing any of the groups can do about it. It revises history, changes language and restricts speech, all in an effort to restrict thought. It brandishes “wokeism” as a weapon and “cancels” those it dislikes. All of this has led to a more ignorant—and less fun—America.

The Left has recently rendered sports less a form of entertainment that can bring all of us together and more another vehicle to lecture and hector fans, in an attempt to hammer them into strict conformity of thought. We have all seen this with anthem protests, BLM messages, boycotts, etc., etc.

And now, even a once nearly revered sports publication, Sports Illustrated, has completely given in to the mendacious minority mob that demands all things be seen exclusively through the prism of race/class/gender/politics. Sports Illustrated, like nearly all mainstream media, has leaned left for many years, but has just recently completely abandoned all balance and objectivity in an apparently desperate—if puzzling-- attempt at virtue-signaling.

The June edition of the magazine featured stories on the WNBA, the NBA, the NFL (about a player who left the league), the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics (and its effect on women’s sports), and basketball again, with reference to Prince and his song “Purple Rain.”

I have nothing against basketball and nothing against Prince, who was talented and hailed from my home state. I think “Purple Rain” is a very good and emotional song.

But, for the second straight issue, there was no mention of the National Hockey League, though these issues came out just prior to and during the Stanley Cup Playoffs, one of sports most grueling and exhilarating events. This could not possibly be a simple oversight. Nor could it be a calculated Capitalistic reflection of relative popularity and therefore its effect on the magazine’s all important bottom line. Is the league too white?

Moreover, there was no article on Major League Baseball. Really? A June issue with not one feature on the erstwhile “America’s Past-time?” Will the magazine be banning references to apple pie and Chevrolet, too? I’m a Ford guy, but, as a prominent politician might say, “C’mon, man!”

The hyper-woke corporate heads of the New Oligarchy are pathetic sheep in politically correct clothing, far more afraid of what a vocal but vicious minority could potentially do to their companies profits than they are about the efficacy of the products they are ostensibly paid to produce.

Sports Illustrated used to have interesting special issues, including the “Sportsman of the Year” issue and the iconic if notorious “Swimsuit Issue.” “Sportsman of the Year” is, of course, right out, and has essentially been replaced by “Wokesperson of the Year.” The swimsuit issue now features overweight and “trans women,” and probably will soon sport photos of obese, transvestite, non-binary, genderfluid Communists involved in polyamorous relationships. Maybe there will even by a “Trans Species Issue” someday. We can only hope.

But the worst thing about the latest Sports Illustrated issue that showed up at my home was the cover. It featured three WNBA players, which wasn’t the problem, but also the big bold message: “NO EXCUSES: WHY IT’S TIME TO BUY IN ON THE WNBA (And why the reasons you haven’t are flawed).

Get it? If you don’t tune in to the WNBA, you are flawed. You are wrong if you don’t like watching the WNBA. We know better than you do what you should like and not like. You are probably a racist…and a sexist, as well!

Way to treat your readers, S.I. No wonder there are fewer and fewer of them as time goes by.

Wednesday, May 26, 2021

New York D.O.E., P.B.S. Feature Drag Queen In Show Aimed At 3-8-Year-Olds


               The New York City Department of Education recently teamed up with PBS member station WNET-TV to create and air a series of children’s shows called “let’s Learn.” The series was ostensibly designed to help “children 3-8 with at-home learning,” and features "instruction by educators and virtual fieldtrips."

              What is the collaboration between the NYCDOE and public television helping the kiddies learn? Well, the Daily Caller reported on a recently aired episode hosted by a drag queen known as Little Miss Hot Mess who told the youngsters "I am a drag queen and a children's book author, and you may be wondering to yourself: 'What on earth is a drag queen?'" Yes, I’m sure that question has been keeping them up at night for some time now.

              Little Miss Hot Mess then described drag queens in part as "everyday people who like to play pretend and dress up as often as we can," before going on to say drag queens "also are leaders in our community, and if you ask me, we make pretty good role models."

             After glowingly characterizing drag queens in general, LMHM proclaimed, "Today I'm going to read from my own book, which is 'The Hips on the Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish,'" performing it to the tune of "The Wheels on the Bus." And why do the “hips on the drag queen go swish, swish, swish” Little Miss Hot Mess?

“She” then explained why she plagiarized Verna Hills’ song to draw attention to “her” hips, saying, "I wrote this book because I wanted everyone to get to experience the magic of drag and to get a little practice shaking their hips or shimmying their shoulders to know how we can feel fabulous inside of our own bodies." How would you instruct three-to-eight-year-olds to feel “fabulous” inside of their own bodies, Hot Mess?

At one point the performer/author/transvestite exclaimed, "I think we might have some drag queens in training on our hands." Really? Why might that be, Little Miss Child Abuser?

Kids learn a lot between the ages of three and eight, much of which affects how successful, stable, and happy they will be in their adulthood. The revelation that “The Hips on the Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish” need not be part of their education.



Tuesday, May 25, 2021

U.S. Army To Prioritize "Fight" Against Climate Change


The U.S. Army recently released a bulletin stating that it will henceforth be “prioritizing climate change” in its strategic defense planning. The Defense Department has already established the "Department of Defense Climate Working Group," a new office that will coordinate the DOD’s ongoing response to the allegedly grave threat that climate change poses to the national security of the United States. I wonder if Greta Thunberg will be heading up the DDCWG.

The army’s laser focus on climate change appears to be in response to President Biden’s stated agenda of aggressively addressing climate change across governmental bodies and is occurring simultaneously with the culture change being imposed on the U.S. military from the top down. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, for example, fully supports Biden's emphasis on climate change…as long as it doesn’t take time away from the troops’ mandatory “Diversity, Inclusion and Equity Training,” or their indoctrination into Marxist theory. This past April, Austin asserted that "climate change is making the world more unsafe and we need to act." He added, "Today, no nation can find lasting security without addressing the climate crisis. We face all kinds of threats in our line of work, but few of them truly deserve to be called existential. The climate crisis does.”

Am I the only one concerned that the most important military in the world is frightened by climate change?

Austin also noted that his military is committed to electrifying its vehicle fleets and operating more sustainably. What about cost to build/retrofit, issues with performance and charging time, etc.? All things considered, will these vehicles really be better for the environment? And is that the point of a military?

Shouldn’t we all be more concerned about the “sustainability” of our freedom and way of life?

How will this new emphasis on fighting climate change translate into action? Will we soon witness a woke two-star general (one star for excellence in Diversity, Inclusion and Equity Training, one for unparalleled courage in the War on Climate Change) pointing to a map and boldly stating: “We’re going to attack the warm front here…and here. We will outflank the low-pressure system and surround the mesocyclone here. We are also studying the feasibility of launching nuclear weapons at the sun…”



Monday, May 24, 2021

Pelosi Enforcing Mask Mandates On House Members


Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and her Democratic accomplices instituted a rule several months ago authorizing stiff fines for any representative who refuses to wear a facial mask on the House floor. Members are to be fined $500 for a first offense and $2,500 for a second offense. (No word on if a third offense would require a wayward representative to forfeit his or her life savings, home, or first-born child.)

Despite CDC guidance and studies showing the relative ineffectiveness of masks in general, Pelosi and her aiders and abettors have chosen to ignore the science and keep the mask mandates, and punitive measures for disobeying them, in place. Three Republicans, of that rare breed who possess a spine, have already been fined $500 for defying Speaker Pelosi’s decrees: Reps. Beth Van Duyne (TX), Mariannette Miller-Meeks (IA) and Brian Mast (FL). Mast lost both of his legs-- and a finger as well—while serving as an Army explosive ordnance disposal technician in Afghanistan, and so is probably neither cowed by Pelosi’s threats nor willing to cede control of his face to her.

Other Republicans who have reportedly been issued warnings include Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, and Mary Miller of Illinois. Rep. Van Duyne, Rep. Miller-Meeks, Rep. Boebert, Rep. Taylor Greene, and Rep. Miller are twice the men that, say, Mitt Romney and Mitch McConnell are. And have bigger cajones, too. (Figuratively speaking. Don’t get too excited trans advocates and non-binary devotees.)  

Why do so many vaccinated people still choose to obstruct their breathing apparatus? Why do so many people wish to proudly and publicly tout their fealty to vassaldom and submission? These are not trifling questions. They go to the very heart of a pathetically spoiled and soft society that is increasingly dumbed down and faithless, and therefore increasingly scared and easily misled.

And what of the mask imperialists, the facial fascists, the colonizers of the mouth? What motivates them? (The vaccinated are protected, right?) It should be obvious. Control over the rest of us.

“My body, my choice” should be our motto. And, actually, it is only our bodies we are seeking sovereignty over, not a defenseless innocent inside of us.

But, thanks to the mainstream media, aka the enemy of the people, the tragically woke don’t have to acknowledge reality or truth…or anything but their own awesomeness. So they say to the rest of us: “Tremble at our awesome wokeness, cower at our omnipotent political correctness, genuflect towards our superior morality! Lay down before our righteous virtue-signaling! Give tribute to our godlike demeanor! Succumb to our irresistible authority! Swear a blood oath to diversity, inclusion and equity, all you reactionary worms clinging to your God and your guns!”

Unfortunately, the hypocritical, close-minded, intolerant tyrants who would permanently enslave us have control of every major societal institution.

There is only one way out for the rest of us. We must figuratively, literally—and permanently-- remove our masks, declining ever again to don them. We must laugh in the face of those who would continue to enslave us…even if we can’t see those faces as they are obscured by their owners’ disdain for transparency. And humanity.


Sunday, May 23, 2021

Crocheted Penises Now Available For Parents Who Believe Their Very Young Daughters Are Sons


            Sign of The End Times Number 1,982: A crocheting and lifestyle website is now selling crocheted prosthetic penises for female children whose parents believe they are male. (Translation: wish they were male.)

According to Stitchbug Studio, the “Bitty Bug Soft Packer,” which sells the pattern for the "soft packer,” is "for use by trans and nonbinary folks, or as an anatomical model." (Ya’ packin’ somethin’ soft there, sport?”)

The woman who designed the viral pattern said that she came across the idea for the Bitty Bug — which is especially designed for younger children — when she was looking for a pattern to make a soft packer for herself. Well, what female of any age isn’t desirous of a soft, crocheted penis they could put in their pants?

 Bethany Amborn, the soft penis progenitor, said that she created the soft packer based on a free pattern she discovered on the internet and subsequently shared the final product to a LGBTQ+ crocheting group. She noted, "Immediately I had 2 parents ask me please, could you make one for my little son? After hearing from a mother who was just crying with her son, unsure what to do to ease his pain of dysphoria and there being no options available for children, the very first packers I made were for 10 and 6-year-old little boys." Hmm.

One Twitter user shared a screenshot of the project and captioned it, "A knitted penis for extremely small girls to wear in their pants if their parents believe them to be transgender." (Sounds about right. Nothing creepy or disturbing here.) The tweeter added, "It is intended for girls so young, they demonstrate the product in a diaper." (I don’t know about you, but I just threw up a little in my mouth.)

The Tweeter also noted that "The entire purpose” of a prosthetic penis is “if a trans identified female has some sort of genital anxiety, they can wear it to alleviate that dysphoria,” adding, “WHY would a very small, diaper wearing child have any concerns, anxieties, or even *awareness* of their genitals?????" Good point. Obviously, it’s the parents who bizarrely wish their infant or toddler daughter sported a penis.

Does making soft, crocheted penises for very young girls make sense to you…? Can this in any way be considered a sign of a healthy society?

Or is it simply a sign that some parents-- whether male, female or non-binary—are dicks, and that society is getting ever more cocked up?  


The Tyranny Of The Big


 Big government allies with big business to the detriment of everyone else. This is a simple fact that everyone better start taking to heart. Crony-capitalists, high-powered lawyers, Hollywood studios/moguls, lobbyists, and Big Labor are all solidly and incestuously in this camp of the powerful. Big Education (where there are now more administrators than instructors) and the rest of Big Media sycophantically and symbiotically cuddle with Big Government even as they attempt to persuade, misinform and help regulate the rest of us. Individuals, small businesses and the middle class as a whole get walloped. Bigger isn’t always better, especially for the little guy.

  Worse, Big Labor, through Big Government, takes our taxpayers money and uses it to lobby those in government to give more to…Big Labor, even if it is expressly against our wishes. What’s more, much of the money they take from us goes into often slick but always deceiving/misleading ads and commercials to convince us to vote for those candidates and/or policies that are detrimental to us and the nation as a whole…but good for them in the near-term. Candidates and policies that always expand government’s- and its public-sector unions- power. Their power over us.

 The government responds to these factions that are “sophisticated” and wealthy enough to understand and utilize the government’s complexity for their own gain. Hence Democrats, largely responsible for the immensity and complexity of government, receive over 70% of lawyers’ political contributions, as well as the vast majority of contributions from those in Big Media, Big Education and Big Labor, of course. The largest U.S. companies, particularly the global giants, with no particular or unique love for the U.S. (after all, China, India, etc. are bigger or potentially bigger markets) are more and more flooding the Democratic coffers with cash. They are “too big to fail” and might need a government bailout at some point in the future.

 Starting to see the big picture? Angry yet?

 This is why the former community organizer Obama, not the famously wealthy Romney, carried 8 of America’s 10 wealthiest counties in 2012. And also why Trump’s message and policies resonated so well with working people in both 2016 and 2020.

 It is the Democrats that proclaim their love for the “little guy” that in reality piss all over the working class. It is the coastal elites that look down their noses at the rubes clinging to their God and their guns in fly-over country.

 True conservatives don’t promise everything to everybody outside of the “one percent.” They don’t promise to give everyone “free” healthcare and college educations, “free” birth-control and abortions, “free” breakfast, lunch and dinner, and freedom from responsibility and guilt.  They know that the money has to come from somewhere, and that somewhere is taxpayers’ paychecks.  If the administrators, professors and media-types, et. al., truly dislike the capitalist system and those who make good money, and really believe that education, etc., should be free, why don’t they simply volunteer…refuse to accept a salary?  Or at least take a pay cut? That way everyone could actually get as close to a free education, etc., as is realistically possible.

What a great idea! Right, educators? Well?

Thought so.

All conservatives promise is to give us back some of our freedom.                                                                                         

 And therefore our country.

 They don’t stand a chance against someone promising “free” birth-to-grave healthcare for our pets.

Come to think of it, I hope nobody actually picks up on that idea…they would likely win in a landslide.




Friday, May 21, 2021

Students Kicked Out Of School For Not Wearing Masks...Off Campus


Three female UMass Amherst honor students have been kicked out of school because they were seen in a photo without masks when they were off-campus and outside. The freshmen students will reportedly lose their course credits and tuition over the maskless photo that was posted on social media. The students posed for the photo while at an off-campus party. The photo, posted to Instagram, was then reportedly sent to UMass Amherst officials, who subsequently suspended the three students.

A mother of one of the students said, "There was a photo sent to the administration of these girls outside off-campus on a Saturday.” The father of another suspended student said his daughter "did everything right," adding, "She was valedictorian and class president of her high school."

According to WCBV-TV, the students were promptly forced to move out of on-campus housing and made to return home to attend remote classes while they appealed their case. The parents said the three students lost their appeals.

The students were then kicked out of their distance-learning courses and were prohibited from taking their finals, actions which have major academic and financial ramifications for the families. The students were forced to forfeit the entire semester and $16,000 tuition that was already paid. The parents said the school would not refund the tuition.

One of the parents (who don’t wish to give their last names for fear that it could hurt their daughters’chances of getting accepted to a new school), noted, "These beautiful young ladies who are honors students have had a full academic year stripped away and their paths broken of their higher education for alleged COVID violations.”

Another parent, who termed the situation “heartbreaking,” said, "One little thing happens and you're out? Like not even like a don't do it again, here's some probation.”

UMass Amherst issued a general statement behooving a closed totalitarian society: "Students received a number of public health messages this semester that emphasized the importance of following public health protocols and the consequences for not complying, and those messages were also shared on UMass social media channels. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the public health and safety of the UMass Amherst community has been the university's foremost priority. Expectations regarding students' responsibility to follow public health protocols, and the consequences for failing to do so, were clearly communicated to students before and throughout the spring semester, and students were updated regularly as conditions changed. When positive COVID-19 cases surged within the UMass community in February 2021, the university, in consultation with the state Department of Public Health, promptly imposed severe restrictions on campus activities, including the suspension of in-person classes and a prohibition on student social gatherings. It was made clear to students that those who failed to comply would be subject to discipline, including suspension. A February 7 campus-wide message directed all students, whether residing in campus residence halls or in off-campus housing in the surrounding area, to stay home, except to get meals, undergo twice-weekly COVID testing, or to attend medical appointments.”

The families have hired a lawyer and plan to file a lawsuit against the university.  

This is sick…and terrifying. Taxpayer-funded and tuition funded “bastions of higher learning” have to be put in their place…and soon. No school has the right to tell any student what he, she or “they” can or can’t do while off campus. For that matter, no government entity can arbitrarily strip any citizens Constitutional rights from them. And no group, educational body, bureaucracy…or government… can repeal the natural rights granted to each of us equally by our Creator.

Colleges and universities cheer on their students when they are looting and burning during BLM/Antifa riots but kick them out of school if they refuse to cover their mouths when off campus. No one should put up with this. It is brainless, soulless, heartless, ball-less.

Or, as The Kinks once noted, “Girls will be boys and boys will be girls, it’s a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world…”


Thursday, May 20, 2021

Department Of Homeland Security Issues National Terrorism Alert


The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently issued a National Terrorism Advisory System bulletin warning of an increased risk of attacks by violent extremists taking advantage of the easing of pandemic restrictions. Seriously.

The alert does not cite any specific threats but warns of potential danger from an “increasingly complex and volatile” mix of groups that includes domestic terrorists inspired by various grievances and racial or ethnic hatred. The bulletin cautioned, “Violent extremists may seek to exploit the easing of COVID-19-related restrictions across the United States to conduct attacks against a broader range of targets after previous public capacity limits reduced opportunities for lethal attacks.” The alert noted that extremists motivated by racial and ethnic hatred have historically targeted crowded businesses or gatherings and is an extension of a previous alert issued in the wake of the January 6 “attack” on the U.S. Capitol.

The original bulletin warned of the continuing potential for violence from those evil anti-government types, i.e. Trump supporters, who were upset by their completely unfounded belief that The Orange Man had an election stolen from him. That bulletin suggested the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol could embolden the deranged extremists and set the stage for additional attacks around the country. That warning proved unfounded and those “attacks” never happened. But being a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party means never having to say you’re sorry. Or wrong.

And, honestly, what leftist worth his/her/they salt could resist (!) using the lessening of unconstitutional mask and gathering restrictions to warn against a coming wave of bloody attacks by crazed Trump supporters against the benevolent--- indeed beatific-- governmental institutions we all know and love?

Mark my words: the progressives who believe in the Holy Trinity of facial diapers, social distancing and vaccine mandates will soon be screaming that further easing or eliminating any of these will promptly lead to greatly exacerbated global warming/climate change, rising discrimination against the LGBTQ community and peoples of color, endangered species loss, and rampant Dutch elm disease.

Sadly, many of the same people who believe that MSNBC, CNN, and The New York Times are real news outlets will believe this, too.

Wednesday, May 19, 2021

Love Is Love Incest Advocates Say


Advocates for the legalization of consensual incest are using a recent New York lawsuit demanding the state allow a parent to marry their adult child to further their agenda, the New York Post reported recently. An anonymous resident of the Empire State filed a lawsuit in April seeking to overturn the state’s laws outlawing incestuous marriages because he or she wants to wed his or her adult offspring. This has prompted proponents of legalizing incest to support the suit and use it to advance their agenda. For example, pro-incest advocate Richard Morris of Australia told the Post that he backs the suit, because he believes that sex between any consenting adults "should not be criminalized." Morris claimed he is only lobbying for real “marriage equality,” and added that it is “the right thing to do, isn’t it?”

Keith Pullman, another incest supporter, told the Post: “It is absurd to say that an adult can't consent to marry their parent. That same adult can be sent to war, take on six or seven figures of debt, operate heavy machinery, be sentenced to death by a federal court, and consent to sex with five strangers (and marriage with one of them) but can't consent to marry someone they love?” Pullman added, "It seems to be as unjust as the law that used to imprison gay people, and the law that used to stop people of different races marrying.” His website advocates "for the right of consenting adults to share and enjoy love, sex, residence, and marriage without limits on the gender, number, or relation of participants" and avers that "full marriage equality is a basic human right."

Verbiage on the site opines, "Not everyone is going to want to accept who you are or who you love or how you love. That's okay, as long as they don't try to control you. Sexual, relationship, and marriage rights are arriving for all adults, and as that happens, anyone who hates you or is prejudiced against you will have less and less ability to hurt you.” 

This is the inevitable result of decoupling marriage from the Biblical view of the institution as a God-given, voluntary, sexual and public social union of one man and one woman, from different families, for the purpose of procreation and serving God as an unchangeable foundation for human life. That view of marriage is the firmest foundation for building a family…and therefore a stable, successful society.

The woke mantra “love is love” is both pathetically banal and preposterously absurd. Its meaning, as intended by progressives, is essentially “sex is sex.” This is one of the Great Lies of our time. Sex between one man and one woman in a committed long-term relationship intended to help carry out the Biblical injunction to “go forth and multiply,” is of a different kind, order and worth than sex between a person and his or herself, a person and a donkey or penguin, a person and four others, a person and a sex-bot, or parents and their offspring. That this notion has to be defended is a sign that the end times might not be far off.

It is not, in fact, “a basic human right” to be able to marry three others, a llama, or your sister. The fact that you owe money or operate heavy machinery does not automatically translate to “you have a right to marry your daddy.” No matter one’s sex or sexual orientation, one should have the decency, honesty and integrity to admit that, for example, three brothers’ desire to marry their father should not carry the same ethical-- or evolutionary—weight as that of one man and one woman wishing to wed out of both love and the complimentary and covenantal desire to create offspring in God’s image.

Love is love? Really? Would you say that “war is war,” whether it is engaged in to plunder, subjugate and annex an innocent sovereign nation and people or to protect and defend them? How about stating that “income is income? Is that the case, whether it is earned by working hard to make things and provide services that people need and enjoy or it is obtained by cheating, swindling, deceit, and illegal and injurious activity such as child sex trafficking, robbery or murder?  

Love is love? Not necessarily.



Tuesday, May 18, 2021

Fights On Flights


The friendly skies aren’t so friendly anymore.

Though the number of flights per day is still far below the daily average of recent years, the FAA recently revealed that the total number of reported incidents of passenger bad behavior on flights so far in 2021 is about 10 times the annual average — through just the first four months of the calendar year.

The FAA says it typically sees between 100 and 150 “formal” cases of bad behavior by passengers in a typical year. By contrast, the agency said there have already been 1,300 such cases reported this year, even with significantly lower passenger miles flown. These instances have involved verbal and physical assault and “political intimidation,” frequently over mask mandates.

This simply reflects what is happening on the ground, as well. Standards of behavior have been altered for the worse, possibly forever. Obstruction, looting, burning, rioting, and violence are everywhere on the increase. This is the inevitable result of ignoring cheating, letting crime go unchecked and unpunished, supporting rioting, sowing racial, class and intersectional hatred, dispensing with long -held cultural norms, eschewing the Judeo-Christian work ethic, attacking, mocking and defunding the police, and attempting to dispense with the traditional nuclear family. Throw in the affects of endless—and pointless—lockdowns and mask mandates and you have effectively mandated bad behavior, hopelessness, despair…and mass unrest.

In other words, Democrats have deliberately, carefully and painstakingly created the perfect conditions for societal collapse. Many of today’s Democrats hate the country as founded and believe they will be there in the end to pick up the pieces and consolidate their power.

Screw the coronavirus vaccine, these Democrats should have been forced to be proactively vaccinated against Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) and the Anti-American Insanity Virus (AAIV).


Monday, May 17, 2021

Real News Nuggets You Can Use!


Real News Nuggets You Can Use!

*Democrats have put forth a bill that would make the District of Columbia the 51st state in the union, the Constitution be damned. This would automatically give them two more Senate seats. Moreover, it would change the entity’s name from Washington, D.C., to…the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth. Democrats voted to cancel the reference to Christopher Columbus in naming the potential new state. For them, it’s a twofer! You’ve got to hand it to Democrats, they are always scheming, always pushing, always advocating, always trying to do away with any vestige of the country’s past. Republicans, on the other hand, are always 12 steps behind, contemplating their cheese plates, afraid to make a move that could upset someone, and hoping against hope that the mainstream media will like them some day.

*Chicago Mayor Lori “I’m the Public Face of This City Lightweight Lightfoot recently came up with yet another idea for police reform: requiring cops to get permission to chase suspects on foot. No, I am not plagiarizing the Babylon Bee. What a great idea! Let’s say a cop sees a beefy young man steal an elderly lady’s purse on the sidewalk in front of him and start to walk away. Proper etiquette demands that the officer inquire of the perp, “May I chase you?” This only stands to reason. Moreover, this idea should be expanded to all areas of policing. If, for example, a policeperson sees a criminal rob a retail outlet, he should be required to address the burglar thusly: “Excuse me…may I attempt to apprehend you?” And, if said policeperson witnesses a mass shooting event and wants to stop the carnage, turning to the agitated gunman and clearly annunciating “May I fire at you, or at least in your general direction?” seems the ethical thing to do.  

*A Maggie Valley, North Carolina, motel and RV park recently used its roadside sign to display the Message "All Cops Are Bastards.” The clever message, becoming ever more common, is typically represented by its acronym, ACAB, but the motel/trailer park apparently had letters—and time—to spare. I want to see signs popping up all over the ever more fruited plain stating “All Leftists Are Stupid,” or ALAS, and All Progressives Are Lying Losers,” or APALL.

*Dylan Long, a Georgetown University student, recently began a petition to rename Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport for “Dance Moms” star JoJo Siwa. The petition’s statement reads: “Why on earth is there an airport named after this war criminal?” Well, Dylan, Reagan did not get the U.S. into any wars, he just won the Cold War…without firing a shot. He also oversaw the rise of freedom around the world, negotiated unprecedented nuclear arms reduction treaties with the Soviet Union, resuscitated the moribund Carter economy, and restored respect for America abroad and pride in America at home. But, other than that…

 Long told the student paper The Hoya he was just “messing around” and “decided to create a petition.” He was surprised when it took off and neared the requested 7,500 signatures. He said Siwa is a “good choice” for the airport’s name because of her “recent rise as a new LGBT figure.” Indeed. Hard for a nearly heroic American president whose tenure benefitted the world as a whole to compete with a lesbian who can dance.