Wednesday, July 31, 2019

Polyamory, The New Gay Marriage


            Psychologists based at California universities are leading the American Psychological Association (APA) in putting together a task force to study “consensual non-monogamy,” in order to reduce the stigma attached to those who practice it. The Golden State shrinks hope to promote “awareness and inclusivity about consensual non-monogamy and ‘diverse expressions of intimate relationships.’” (Well, I personally start with a goat, two dildos, eggnog, a turkey baster, and a can of spam…”). 
            The APA’s task force Division 44 website proclaims: "Finding love and/or sexual intimacy is a central part of most people’s life experience. However, the ability to engage in desired intimacy without social and medical stigmatization is not a liberty for all. This task force seeks to address the needs of people who practice consensual non-monogamy, including their intersecting marginalized identities. The APA Division 44 Consensual Non-monogamy Task Force promotes awareness and inclusivity about consensual non-monogamy and diverse expressions of intimate relationships. These include but are not limited to: people who practice polyamory, open relationships, swinging, relationship anarchy and other types of ethical non-monogamous relationships." Relationship anarchy? Sounds like what people with more than two kids experience.
            Division 44 also sports a Religion and Spirituality Task Force, with the professed desire to “reduce theological barriers often separating sexual minorities from the sources of their beliefs." (I hate to be an old fuddy-duddy, but sometimes those barriers were placed there for a good reason). Those wishing to become task force members are asked whether they agree with a series of statements such as: “I support generating research and promoting awareness of issues facing individuals engaged in consensual non-monogamy with multiple marginalized identities,” and “I support including consensual non-monogamy as a legally protected class.” Multiple marginalized identities? MMI?
            Heath Schechinger is a psychologist at the University of California-Berkeley and co-chair of the APA’s Division 44 Consensual Non-monogamy Task Force (DFFCN-MTF). His website says he “specializes in providing sex therapy and working with alternative relationships and lifestyles, diverse sexualities, couples/partners, and infidelity,” and adds that he “has considerable experience in working with concerns related to polyamory/open relationships, kink, TGNC/NB, and LGBQIA.” Kink? Do we have to add a ‘K’ to LGBTQIIA?” I honestly did not know what TGNC/NB stood for. Sadly, after a little research, that is no longer the case. It stands for the “Transgender, Non-Conforming, Non-Binary” community. “LGBTGNC/NBQIIA+?”
            Reactionary, stick-in-the-mud, old curmudgeons like myself have long warned that the legalization of same-sex marriage would render marriage meaningless. After all, if marriage has naught to do with procreation, then why shouldn’t three men or four girls and a horse be able to legally marry? “Love is love,” right? There’s no more to it than that.
In an email to LifeSiteNews, psychologist Daniel Boland, an APA member for over 50 years, said of the polyamory taskforce: “The APA has abandoned all respect for fact-based research and scientific tradition. It has capitulated to the most unstable, most radical elements in our society.” He added, “Its abandonment of its original professionalism renders it no longer credible to the public or to its members.”
            As others have noted, this is what happens when ideology replaces science. And it is happening ever more frequently across multiple disciplines.
            Much as with gay marriage in years past, polyamory is gaining acceptance in popular culture. Willow Smith, singer-- and daughter of actor Will Smith and Jada Pinkett-Smith-- recently declared herself polyamorous. The 18-year-old said she is equally attracted to men and women and averred that she would find fulfillment in a relationship with two other people. That particular arrangement is apparently known as a “throuple.” (As in, “Nobody knows the throuples I’ve seen!”). Willow recently told something called Red Table Talk, “I love men and women equally, and so I would definitely want one man, one woman. I feel like I could be polyfidelitous with those two people." How charmingly old-fashioned.
            And polyridiculous.




Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Girl Scouts Award Scout For Promoting Abortion


                The Girl Scouts of America granted a high school sophomore its prestigious Girl Scouts Gold Award for promoting access to abortion. The sophomore told Tucson Life she’s “planning on hosting an event to educate people about and de-stigmatize access to ‘women’s healthcare.’” Access to “women’s healthcare” has never been stigmatized. Unfortunately, usage of preposterous euphemisms hasn’t been effectively stigmatized.
                The award-winning sophomore also joined the Women’s March in protest of President Trump and his policies. The Girl Scouts have often been accused of promoting a left-wing worldview in recent years, with good reason. Many feel that significant evidence proves the organization has essentially become a tactical arm of Planned Parenthood, and sexualizes young girls through its influence. In fact, Planned Parenthood instructional materials are part of the core curriculum at Girl Scouts training seminars.
                The GSA has recently changed the name of several of its most popular cookies, maybe because they’re made in different bakeries, maybe for politically-correct reasons. Do-si-dos have become trefoil cookies, tagalongs peanut butter patties and samosas caramel delites. (I mean, think about it: square dancing is so yesterday, no one wants to think of someone who isn’t really wanted on the journey, and cultural appropriation is a crime, right)?
                More changes are imminent, now that progressives and Socialists are unabashedly ruling the day. One person close to the organization told me that the group will be introducing several new cookies for 2021. Thin Mints will go the way of the dinosaur due to the name’s implicit body-shaming. The cookie will henceforth be known as Healthy Yet Realistic Body Weight Mints. Venezuela Vanilla will join the line-up, as will Russian Teacakes, Planned Parenthood Peanut Butter Patties, Transgender Toffee Biscuits, Queer Wafers, Lesbian Lemonade Scones, and “Better Red Cake Than Dead Cookies.”
                I don’t know about you, but my mouth is watering already. Put me down for two boxes of each!



Monday, July 29, 2019

Great News, Americans!


                Great news, Americans! Not only is the stock market at an all-time high, so is support for polygamy! A recent Gallup poll on American values and beliefs found acceptance of multiple spouses is now the highest on record, with 17% of respondents saying the practice is “morally acceptable.” Experts caution that determining the exact cause of the trend is difficult. There has, of course, been a rapid and general increase in “liberal” views on social issues such as same-sex relationships and premarital sex. However, one Gallup analyst notes that support for polygamy in the U.S. has risen by nearly 10 percentage points in just the seven years the TLC show “Sister Wives” has been on the air. (If that pace continues, by our tricentennial, everyone in America will declare polygamy to be a right granted to us by our Creator).
                It wouldn’t be the first time that the boob tube has helped change American values. The NBC sitcom Will & Grace featured several gay characters and is often credited with shifting American’s attitudes on gay rights. And there are numerous other examples.
                The unprecedented general increase in progressive views on social issues in America has been proceeding apace for over 50 years now. While television has certainly played its part, so has academia, the mainstream media, Hollywood in general, and the ever-emboldened special-interest groups themselves.
    I have no doubt that if Americans were now more thoroughly polled, their acceptance of pedophilia, frotteurisme, zoophilia, necrophilia, urophilia, klismaphilia, coprophilia, incest, and auto-erotic asphyxia would be the highest ever on record, as well.
   Tolerance, diversity, and inclusiveness good! Judgement, values, and virtues bad! 

               

Sunday, July 28, 2019

Wisconsin Woman Named "Marijuana Pepsi" Receives PhD


                A Wisconsin woman, who works full-time at Beloit College, has the real given name of Marijuana Pepsi Vandyck. And, according to a recent report in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, she earned a doctorate degree this past May, so is now officially Dr. Marijuana Pepsi…Vandyck.
                Vandyck, 46, said she’s been teased all her life by classmates, teachers and bosses because of her name. She told the Journal-Sentinel, “Regardless of what they do, say or what they’re trying to put in place, you still have to move forward and succeed.” She noted that some people simply refused to call her by her real name, often opting for “Mary,” which she dismissed. She admitted, however, that she went by the initials MP when she worked as a real estate agent—so stoners wouldn’t steal her business signs.
                Marijuana Pepsi’s mother, Maggie Johnson (!), bestowed the unusual name on her daughter. Despite the fact that she named Marijuana Pepsi’s sisters “Kimberly” and “Robin.” Despite her success, Vandyck, who neither smokes weed nor drinks pop, advises against naming kids after pot or illicit drugs.
                Not surprisingly, she left her unstable home when she was 15 and has spent her life trying to prove herself. She vowed to earn her PhD soon thereafter, telling others “I’m going to be called Dr. Marijuana Pepsi.” Everybody has a dream. Though many go Up In Smoke.
                So it was with great pride that she presented her dissertation, titled “Black names in white classrooms: Teacher behaviors and student perceptions,” to her instructors at Cardinal Stritch University. (For her dissertation, Vandyck interviewed other students whose teachers and classmates had focused on their names, according to the Journal-Sentinel report).
                Happily—if ironically—Marijuana Pepsi has achieved her dream of getting a PhD in higher education leadership. She asserted: “I’ve grown into my name because I am a strong woman. I’ve had to be.”
                Let’s hope this story doesn’t prompt others to give ridiculous names to their offspring. We’ll have enough problems in the near future without having to deal with a Dr. Magic Mushrooms Mountain Dew, a Dr. Opioid Sprite, a Dr. Cigarettes Fanta, a Dr. Downer Mello Yello, or a Dr. Heroin Coca-Cola. (Almost sounds redundant).
                As for me, well, I prefer to be called Dr. Beer Dr. Pepper.
               
               




Saturday, July 27, 2019

University Fellow Equates Air Travel With Random Gun Violence


                Eric Holthaus, a meteorologist and fellow at the University of Minnesota’s Institute on the Environment, launched a preposterous and profane Twitter attack on Jason Rabinowitz recently, over the latter’s decision to fly to Madrid for no critically important reason. Rabinowitz, who hosts a podcast about airline travel, had found inexpensive round-trip tickets to Madrid-- from New York’s JFK International Airport—and was unafraid to use them. He apparently noted on his podcast that he was only making the trip because of the relatively low price of the tickets. This did not sit well with Holthaus (which in German translates into “brings the house”), who brought the house down on top of Rabinowitz, saying: “We are in a climate emergency. What the f**k are you thinking, you selfish, entitled asshole? People are literally dying because of this kind of shit.” He said “unnecessary” air travel should be illegal and cited “unexamined privilege” for creating the “biggest existential threat we’ve ever faced as a species.” Yes. Quite.
    According to thecollegefix.com, Holthaus added: “This kind of behavior is the same as taking a gun and just firing blindly into the air towards a crowd just because you think it’s fun to shoot a gun. You don’t care who you’re hurting. You just care about yourself.”
                In fact, hopping on an airplane is in no way like “taking a gun and just firing blindly into the air towards a crowd.” When you step onto a plane, none of the people around you will be harmed or killed. Attempting to make that analogy is akin to saying, “mowing your lawn is the same as randomly lobbing tactical nuclear missiles into neighboring territories just for your personal amusement.” Or that “eating beef is the same as murder. You don’t care who you’re hurting. You just care about yourself.”
    And, what are the odds that Holthaus is untroubled by abortion?
                Rabinowitz did not respond to Holthaus’s tweets. Holthaus later apologized, saying: “I believe in giving people the benefit of the doubt. I shouldn’t have used that word to describe a person and I apologize for it and will work on doing better.” However, he could not help adding that it’s the system as a whole that needs to change, and savaged civic leaders and the airline industry for their role in the “outrageous” and “permanent” destruction of the biosphere on “the only planet in the known universe that can harbor life.”
                So, you’re saying we are unique, Mr. Holthaus? Possibly even derived from our Creator? I thought scientists believed life must be common around the universe? A garden-variety, non-miraculous result of a simple scientific numbers game, no?
                The “biggest existential threat we’ve ever faced as a species” does indeed loom over us today. It isn’t global warming, however. It is our rejection of natural law and refusal to believe in anything greater than ourselves.



Friday, July 26, 2019

NPR Says Babies Are Not Babies Until They Are Born


             National Public Radio’s supervising senior standards and practices editor Mark Memmott recently published a “guidance reminder” instructing the non-profit media organization’s employees in how to frame abortion news. Memmott wrote: “The term ‘unborn’ implies that there is a baby inside a pregnant woman, not a fetus. Babies are not babies until they are born. They're fetuses. Incorrectly calling a fetus a ‘baby’ or ‘the unborn’ is part of the strategy used by antiabortion groups to shift language/legality/public opinion.”
That is simply a bold-faced lie.
Memmott added: “NPR doesn't use the term ‘abortion clinics.’ We say instead, ‘medical or health clinics that perform abortions.’ The point is to not to use abortion before the word clinic. The clinics perform other procedures and not just abortions.” Memmott also cautioned staffers not to use terms such as "fetal heartbeat,” “partial birth” and “late-term abortion,” because they are terms often used by scary, radical, right-wing extremists who somehow oppose abortion.
Incredibly, Memmott claims the memo will help NPR be “precise, accurate and neutral” when discussing abortion. Telling your talent (and that is a relative term here) that they should not use the terms “baby” or “unborn” when referring to what is inside a pregnant woman is not accurate or neutral. It is certifiable. Is it a shoe? No. An amorphous blob? No. Is it alive? Yes. So, is it a duckling? No. A piglet? No. For God’s sake then, stop refusing to call a baby a baby! (Which is much of the reason why the NPRs of the world won’t stop doing just that).
Doctors and nurses describe “how your baby grows and develops” during the first—and each subsequent—trimester for parents who are expecting. They do not typically refer to “your fetus.” During ultra-sounds nurses don’t point to the screen and say, “Look at that thing there, your fetus is a boy!” (Nor do they say, “I’m arbitrarily assigning the gender ‘boy’ to your fetus”).
It is repulsive that taxpayer-funded NPR goes to these extremes to slant their coverage of a “life and death” issue (to quote Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand), and is yet another example of the making of fake news. Leftists have always engaged in the corruption of language to entice, deceive and coerce the dull and unwary. Hence “Illegal immigrant,” a factually correct term, becomes the inane “undocumented alien” (due to their supposed “spark of divinity,” no doubt-- see also, Nancy Pelosi). Those who wish to be a member of the opposite sex simply have to say that they are, and, voilĂ , they are “transgendered.” Yet, pro-abortion progressives attempt to dehumanize small humans by labeling them as “fetuses” or “non-viable tissue masses.”  
A baby is a fetus though it looks like a baby and functions like a baby, has a beating heart (I mean an “embryonic pulsing” to quote a recent article in the New York Times), two arms, two legs and a pair of eyes? Even though it is an inch or two from being outside the womb, and even though as soon as it makes it outside of the womb it magically turns into a…”baby?” If a fetus is born weeks—or even months—early it instantaneously and miraculously morphs into a “baby?” Must be the air.
What if what NPR calls a fetus identifies as a baby? What then? Huh? How do you handle that, Mark Memmott? Memmott’s memo is not just ignorant and irrational, but twisted and deranged.
Those who supported slavery and those who support abortion share the vehement belief in dehumanizing those they don’t consider equals. The Three-Fifths Compromise of the early days of the republic had slaves counted as 3/5 of a human being. Though it sounds horrible, in reality this was done to lessen the power of the slave states and help bring about the abolition of slavery. Should there be a Three-Fifths Compromise with pro-abortion types? If they agree to consider “fetuses” as at least 3/5 of a human being, they’d be closer to a moral position than they are now.
All slaves were babies at one time. Thank God that not all babies grow up to be slaves.



Thursday, July 25, 2019

Berkeley Bans Men


                The city of Berkeley, California, recently adopted an ordinance mandating the removal of words that imply a gender preference from the city’s codes. The non-inclusive, verboten verbiage will be expunged from Berkeley’s municipal codes as quickly and effortlessly as a baby fetus non-viable tissue mass is torn apart and swept from its mother’s womb. Ergo, words such as “manhole” and “manpower” will be sh*t-canned in favor of the much more palatable terms “maintenance hole” and “human effort.” Roll right off the tongue, don’t they? I think we should purify the works of Shakespeare in much the same manner.
                The term “policemen” is out, of course, and even “policewomen” doesn’t make the cut…because it contains the toxically masculine word “men.” The revised city documents will also replace tired old gendered pronouns like “he” and “she” with the more up-to-date and accurate “they.”
                Berkeley City Council member Rigel Robinson was the bill’s primary author. He noted that his bill passed without discussion or comments and was not controversial, according to Sacramento.cbslocal.com. That’s good. Discussion is highly overrated. Group think is not, apparently.
                Robinson added, “There’s power in language. This is a small move, but it matters.” (There is less power in language than there used to be, thanks to actions like Berkeley’s). He also stated: “Having a male-centric municipal code is inaccurate and not reflective of our reality. Women and non-binary individuals are just as entitled to accurate representation. Our laws are for everyone, and our municipal code should reflect that.”
                Berkeley has historically been a hotbed of progressive thought—and action. We can count on the town to lead the rest of America the United States out of the Dark Ages and into the light of wokeness.
                Take a moment to reflect, if you dare, on the following patently offensive, patriarchy-promoting words and phrases: “Mansion:” Like anything big and expensive has to be male. As if. “Manage:” Females and non-binary individuals can make it on their own, thank you very much, Pirates of the Patriarchy. “Manicure:” This is doubly bad. Men are the problem, not the cure. “Man-child:” Also doubly bad. We should say instead, “person-after-birth abortion candidate.” “Menopause:” Do I even have to address this one? Men should pause, but they don’t. Females have no choice. Only women bleed. Until they don’t.
                In progressive’s perfect world, Menards, the giant home-improvement chain, would be forced to rebrand as “Theyards.” Mankato, Minnesota and Menomonie, Wisconsin, would be renamed Personkato and Neutrally-Genderedomonie respectively.

                The city of Berkeley’s actions are nothing if not manic insane.

Wednesday, July 24, 2019

Colorado State University Says "America" Non-Inclusive Word


                Colorado State University’s online Inclusive Language Guide lists a plethora of words and phrases that should never be used by decent, tolerant, woke folk. Better still, it provides substitute words and phrases to help “communicators practice inclusive language” while ensuring everyone on its campus feels “welcomed, respected and valued.”
                The list includes the always problematic “male,” “female,” and “ladies and gentlemen,” as well as “Mr./Mrs./Ms.” (Time flies. It wasn’t all that long ago that “Ms.” was a hip, progressive, feminist term. Ms. was woke before woke was cool). The guide helpfully points out that “male and female refers to biological sex and not gender,” and proceeds to haughtily lecture readers that, “In terms of communication methods (articles, social media, etc.), we very rarely need to identify or know a person’s biological sex and more often are referring to gender.” Call me old-fashioned, but, whether “in terms of communication methods” or otherwise, I have found it helpful at times in my life to “identify or know” a person’s biological sex. This has been especially true when trying to reproduce.
                Sex is a biological reality based on the differences in physical characteristics such as external and internal genitalia and hormones into which humans and most other living things are divided.  Gender refers to either of the two sexes, especially when considered with respect to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. Sex is a fact. Gender is a notion.
                CSU also urges us to avoid the word “straight,” claiming that “when used to describe heterosexuals, the term straight implies that anyone LGBT is ‘crooked’ or not normal.” Speaking of which, the term “normal person” is verboten because it “implies that ‘other’ people… are not whole or regular people.” The Guide apparently considers this term so toxic and unspeakable that it doesn’t even suggest a substitute, stating that “it is never appropriate to use this phrase to describe a person.”
                To avoid offending those who truly are addicts, we are not to utter the terms “addicted” or “like crack,” but are cautioned to go with “I’m a devoted fan of” or “I’m hooked,” instead. (Yet “I’m hooked” is offensive to fish, is it not)? In lieu of “no can do,” which is patently offensive to Asians, we are to state “I can’t do it.” (Which may be patently offensive to Nike). The Guide avers that “Crazy” and “nuts” are entirely inappropriate and are to be replaced by “surprising” and “wild.” I think that is… “surprising”  and “wild.”
                Even the modern phrase “’preferred’ pronouns,” thrust upon us by the transgender movement, is considered insufficiently inclusive by CSU. You see, “Using the word ‘preferred’ in front of pronouns suggests that gender identity, especially outside of the binary, is a choice and that the pronouns don’t really belong to the person, they are just ‘preferring’ them over their ‘true’ pronouns.” Alrighty then.
                A few of the other terms deemed derogatory and/or non-inclusive by Colorado State are: “War,” “hold down the fort,” “starving,” “hip hip hooray!” “cake walk,” and “eenie, meenie, miny, moe.” Not kidding.   
               The pinnacle of preposterousness, however, is The Guide’s insistence that “America” and “American” are non-inclusive words and therefore should be avoided. It notes: “The Americas encompass a lot more than the United States. There is South America, Central America, Mexico, Canada, and the Caribbean just to name a few of 42 countries in total.” It adds, “Yet, when we talk about ‘Americans’ in the United States, we’re usually just referring to people from the United States. This erases other cultures and depicts the United States as the dominant American country.” Yes, this foolish mischaracterization needs to be corrected. I think we all know Grenada and Suriname are the real ‘American’ powers. CSU instructs Deplorables to use “U.S. citizen” or “person from the U.S.” in place of the detestable terms “America” and “Americans.” But what of undocumented immigrants?
              CSU’s online moralizing culminates in its insistence that, “The guide is not about political-correctness or policing grammar, but rather helping communicators practice inclusive language and helping everyone on our campus feel welcomed, respected, and valued.” In other words, it’s about political-correctness and policing grammar.
 I wonder how “welcomed, respected and valued” conservative students and speakers are on CSU’s campus.
 I’ll give it to you straight, normal Americans, the left is addicted to telling you what to do-- and how to act, think and behave. We are in a culture war whether we wish to be or not. And, I promise you, it won’t be a cake walk.



Tuesday, July 23, 2019

British Woman Suing Hospital, NHS


                Edyta Mordel, an English woman, is suing a hospital for failing to screen her unborn son for Down Syndrome. According to The Mirror, Mordel says had she known of the condition she would have simply had an abortion. The Mirror reported that she is trying to hold England’s National Health Service accountable for the “wrongful birth,” and is asking for £200,000 to defray the “increased financial costs of caring for her son and for the impact on her own ability to work.”

                Mordel claims that doctors failed to administer the testing even though she insisted on it. She apparently believed the evaluation was performed at her 12-week appointment, though medical documentation clearly indicates this was not the case.

                Mordel’s attorney avers that both she and her son’s father would’ve “terminated the pregnancy” had they known the child had the affliction. However, legal representatives for the National Health Service flatly state that Mordel declined the test and later regretted it. NHS lawyer Michael de Navarro stated: “Not only did her copy of the handheld notes contain the scan report saying that Down’s screening had been declined, but she must have realized that she had never had the result of screening which she had been told to expect.”

                As a result, four-year-old Aleksander was born in January of 2015 at the Royal Berkshire Hospital in Reading, England. Hospital records reveal his mother was “very angry and upset” when made aware of her son’s condition. (Apparently, the NHS doesn’t perform “after-birth abortions.” Maybe Mordel should have called Virginia governor Ralph Northam).

   Mordel’s “reasoning” is repulsive: “If I had known my son/daughter would develop cancer/asthma/diabetes/mumps/painful rectal itch/the heartbreak of psoriasis at only 2/4/6/8/27/42 years old, I would’ve just had him/her/it/they aborted. I know, I’ll sue the hospital and the NHS and see if I can at least get some cash!”

  This is akin to thinking, “Had I known my child would’ve been mugged/murdered by Antifa, I would’ve aborted him or her in the first place! Maybe it’s not too late to assign blame and collect money! I think I’ll sue President Trump for creating a hostile environment in which Antifa has no alternative but to engage in murder, violence and intimidation!”

 Suing a hospital for not performing an abortion, or at least the tests that could well lead to one, even though you yourself refused said tests, risks putting us on a slippery slope towards “rejecting” (read “terminating”) a fetus for any undesirable maladies, flaws or traits.

 There are no guarantees in life, or in birth. Not all babies can be born in perfect health, with blond hair and blue eyes. That doesn’t make them any less precious. Just more vulnerable to the abhorrent policies of progressives.



Monday, July 22, 2019

News Items


                                                    News Items

*Joe Biden recently appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” (a show not named for him). The former vice-president and current Democratic front-runner for the 2020 nomination was asked if he was tough enough to stand up to President Trump should he prevail over his Democratic counterparts, a pertinent question given his feeble performance in the first democratic debate. Sleepy Joe replied, “I’d say, ‘C’mon Donald, c’mon man. How many push-ups do you want to do here, pal?’”  Ooh, challenging Trump to a push-up contest! That’s telling off the doubters! That’s firing a shot over The Donald’s bow!

Let’s hope this inspires other candidates to new heights of competitiveness. Who wouldn’t love to see Bernie Sanders challenge Elizabeth Warren to a shot-putting contest? Or Pete Buttigieg challenge Kamala Harris to a game of “Quarters?”

*Replying to President Trump’s recent tweets about radical, young, female, Democratic Congresspersons like Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Rep. Alexandria Occasional-Cortex (D-N.Y.) exclaimed that America “belongs to everyone.” If her open-borders policies were implemented, that would literally be true.

What if everyone in the world had the “right” to live in Albania, Peru, Norway, Indonesia, Kenya, Japan, Australia, China, or Iceland?

*The pro-abortion panel at this year’s Netroots Nation conference attempted to demonstrate an abortion onstage-- using a watermelon-- in order to make the case that non-physicians should be allowed to perform them. The annual gathering of progressive activists was moderated by Daily Show co-creator Lizz Winstead, who is also the head of the Abortion Access Front, previously known as the Lady Parts Justice League. (Can’t say ‘lady parts’ anymore. Insufficiently inclusive). Jen Moore, an abortion facility consultant, used a cannula and manual vacuum aspirator to extract the core from a watermelon, with the core supposedly representing a baby and the melon a uterus. One panelist said the demonstration showed that abortion is “not surgery” and is “easy to do,” and thus proved that advanced-practice clinicians, nurse practitioners, and physician’s assistants should be allowed to perform them in addition to OB/GYNs. Why not let janitors sanitation engineers perform abortions, as well? Or a barista? The pizza delivery guy? A bus driver? Uncle Phil?

What happened to liberal’s traditional demands that abortion be taken out of the hands of those unqualified and be made safe and rare?

*A recent study by researchers from Johns Hopkins University, Stony Brook University, the University of California-Berkeley, and the University of California-San Francisco “found the risk of premature birth was higher than expected” among Latinas since President Trump’s election in 2016, according to the Washington Post. Alison Gemmill, the survey’s lead researcher, said the inquiry “follows other studies that suggest a link to Trump.” Trump is responsible for Latina’s premature births? Maybe the little ones are so inspired by the country’s all-time-low rate of Hispanic unemployment that they just can’t wait to get started in life. Or maybe university researchers are full of the stuff that fills a baby’s diapers.


Sunday, July 21, 2019

"We The People Will Fund The Wall"


                Brian Kolfage started a GoFundMe campaign called “We the People Will Fund the Wall.” As of this writing over 20 million dollars has been raised-- from over 350,000 donors—to help fund a wall on the southern border of the United States. That is a little less than $60 per donation. It is “We the People,” not George Soros-level coercion by cash.
                Kolfage’s endeavor spurred Charlotte Clymer, a trans “woman” and leftist activist, to launch a countervailing GoFundMe campaign titled “Ladders to Get Over Trump’s Wall.” Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, I guess, at least according to Newton. However, “her” effort to aid and abet criminals trying to enter the U.S., involving as it does the material help of many others, could well be considered a criminal conspiracy under 18 U.S. Code §371, which refers, in part, to “two or more persons” conspiring to “commit any offense against the United States.”
                But what the hell, no one cares. If Ms. Clymer and Mr. Kolfage had been around a few decades earlier, the former might be raising money to help build the Berlin Wall, while the latter would be trying to help those enslaved by Marxism-Socialism get over, under or through it.
                Clymer is obviously not a big fan of the rule of law. “She” is unlikely to be a big fan of Natural Law, either.
                Governments’ only legitimate purpose is to provide for the common defense, ensure domestic tranquility, and promote the general welfare… of its citizens. Leftists don’t like any of these endeavors, but do believe government should do almost everything else.
                Those such as Clymer don’t want a wall on our border. They want open borders. Moreover, they want to abolish I.C.E. They want to take guns away from law-abiding citizens and then force them to pay for various services for illegal aliens. They don’t much care for the police, often deriding them and calling for them to stay away from certain venues.
                Why stop there, leftists? Let’s abolish fire departments, too. And get rid of first responders, EMTs and ambulances. Hell, let’s also do away with life-guards while we’re at it.
                The result of all this insanity will be utter chaos. At that point, no GoFundMe page will be able to help any of us.

Saturday, July 20, 2019

Bernie Sanders' Campaign Workers Demand $15 An Hour


                “Do as I say, not as I do.”

                That appears to be the message Bernie Sanders, the wizened old commie, has given his own campaign workers. That is not atypical of leftists. In fact, it is closer to a modus operandi.
                In an amusing irony, the Washington Post reports that some members of Sanders’ campaign team have been lobbying to raise their wages so that they can make the same $15 hourly wage rate that the Vermont Senator has so frequently and fervently called for. The Post obtained a draft of a letter the campaign’s union intended to send to Sanders’ campaign manager, Faiz Shakir. The letter stated that the workers “cannot be expected to build the largest grassroots organizing program in American history while making poverty wages. Given our campaign's commitment to fighting for a living wage of at least $15.00 an hour, we believe it is only fair that the campaign would carry through this commitment to its own field team." It added: "Many field staffers are barely managing to survive financially, which is severely impacting our team's productivity and morale. Some field organizers have already left the campaign as a result.” The letter notes that since field organizers are working a minimum of 60 hours a week, their average hourly pay equates to only $13 an hour. Negotiations between the union and Shakir are apparently taking place.
                Reports of the negotiations came after the House of Representatives passed a bill to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, prompting Sanders to take to Twitter to praise the House for its action.
                Senator Sanders seems to be living in a glass House at the moment.
                                                        **************************
                (Update: it appears Sanders has decided to grant his campaign workers their $15 an hour request by cutting the number of hours they work).


Friday, July 19, 2019

Pride! Night At The Zoo


                It’s a good bet that when God told Noah to gather up the animals-- two by two-- and take them on the Ark, He was hoping that one of each kind would be a male and the other a female. Otherwise, the whole endeavor would likely have been for naught. None-the-less, the LGBTQIIA+ community would not allow God to get away with this kind of heteronormative, cis-gendered command today. Gayness is celebrated everywhere, all the time. And woe to anyone who isn’t “down” with that.                 
                Even in the animal kingdom. Case in point: The ZSL London Zoo gave itself a thorough “Pride makeover” for its special July 5th “Zoo Night” touting same-sex animal pairings…and all things gay. The zoo issued a press release stating: “On top of Zoo Nights’ packed schedule of activities, visitors will be able to learn about gender and mating in the animal kingdom at a Pride-themed talk, where they’ll discover just how common same-sex pairings are – from penguins and pandas to goats and giraffes.” The release also invited attendees to “score a hole-in-one at the Zoo’s new mini-golf course.” (I bet some of the gay animal couples would also like to score a hole-in-one. Just sayin’).
                 The zoo proudly claims it’s the home of a gay penguin “couple” named Ronnie and Reggie. It even designed a special banner for “Penguin Beach”—home of the allegedly queer penguin pair—in advance of the July 5 extravaganza. The banner read in part: “Next week’s #ZSLZooNights will be getting a #Pride makeover and our #penguins ae joining in on the celebrations! Learn more about our Pride-themed activities at the zoo & how you can join in: https://t.co/G62kM4oKGA.  #PrideInLondon #ZooLife@PrideInLondon  pic.twitter.com/zIFBFurnuR—ZSL London Zoo.” I don’t want to know how I “can join in.” There is another, smaller banner in the penguins’ habitat that aggressively states: “Some penguins are gay. Get over it.” Note to the ZSL zoo: “I am not. Get over it.” And I don’t advertise how proud I am to be heterosexual. Or spray-paint “Cis Power!” across progressive message boards and banners. Or demand cities grant my kind carte blanche for parade routes. Etc.
                 The zoo claims Ronnie and Reggie first got together in 2014 and adopted an abandoned egg a year later, sharing parenting duties until the chick left the nest. The zoo’s website states that the bond between the two literal lovebirds “remains as strong as ever” and notes that they are “often found snuggled up in their next box together.” What’s more, the zoo says there are other same-sex couples among its 91 other penguin residents.                

                  I bet there are lesbian lynx, gay gophers, bisexual bunnies, transgender turtles and questioning koalas, too. And, it’s no wonder a group of lions is called a PRIDE! What inspirational thoughts!                 
                  Alas, The Telegraph reported on a new study, published in the journal Ethology, that found homosexual behavior in the animal kingdom only amounts to “same sex flirting” until the individuals find a mate. The study, conducted by France’s Centre for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, found that high levels of testosterone and a relative lack of females in the colony drives “lonely” males into simulated mating displays. One of the study’s authors, Professor F. Stephen Dobson, said that the number of same sex penguin pairs was actually lower than expected. He noted that, when the colony was studied over time, all the “gay” penguins chose a heterosexual partner.    
            
                  What a downer. 

                  Oh well. We shall overcome.   

Thursday, July 18, 2019

Oreo Cookie Pronoun Packs


                Oreo, the iconic cookie brand, recently partnered with the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) to give away “pronoun packs,” in celebration of those who identify as transgender, at PrideFest/WorldPride in New York City. Oreo took to Twitter to exclaim, “We’re proud to celebrate inclusivity for all gender identities and expressions,” adding that it was “encouraging everybody to share their pronouns with pride today and every day.” Oreo also shared a photograph of the packaging, which featured gender symbols and the message, “Share your pronouns with pride.” The company gave away Oreo-like pins at the event urging people to “Ask me my pronouns.”
                Oreo representatives reinforced the message via a Facebook post saying: “We are proud to support the LGBTQIA+ community, celebrate all forms of identity and encourage inclusivity at WorldPride 2019 and beyond. Oreo is proud to partner with the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) for this activation and will be making a donation to NCTE to further a shared commitment to promote inclusivity, empathy and opportunity for everyone.”
                The pronoun packs consisted of three different sets of cookies, each with pronouns written on the cookies themselves. One set came with “she/her” on the cookies, one with “he/him,” and an extra-special one with “they/them.” These new super-woke biscuits came in pink, blue and purple packaging, mimicking the transgender flag. Some folks were so excited about the pronoun packs, they queried Nabisco (Oreo’s parent company) as to where they could be purchased. Alas, the company had to inform them that the remarkably inclusive baked goods were only available at PrideFest, though it did point out that it would “continue to offer new products that respond to the preferences of our customers.” I can’t wait for the “polyamory pack” and the “bestiality bag” to come out!
                Some reactionary sticks-in-the-mud weren’t supportive of Oreo’s fantastically virtue-signaling marketing campaign. One tweeted: “Just stick with making cookies! Good grief! Not everything has to have a message!” (Well, actually, that’s not true anymore). Another remarked: “Can we have some for schizophrenia and depression? Since we’re catering to mental health issues now.” Yet another noted: “Fun fact: Archaeologists can only determine whether skeletal remains are male or female.”
                And, much like Oreos, that is black and white. Sorry, progressives, that’s just how the cookie crumbles.

Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Mascot Madness


                Universities across the ever-fruitier plain are changing their team names and mascots in a doomed attempt to avoid offending those “wokest” of progressives who are steadfastly determined to be offended by virtually everything. Native American mascots have been disappearing faster than moderates in the Democratic Party. The North Dakota “Fighting Sioux” became the North Dakota “Fighting Hawks,” for example. The latter nickname just doesn’t sound right, doesn’t convey the same feel. Stanford morphed from the “Indians” to the “Cardinal.” Miami University went from the “Redskins” to the “Redhawks.” (Why is it Hawks seem to replace Indians)? Wright State used to be represented by “Rowdy Raider,” a red-bearded Viking. The pillaging and plundering Norseman has been replaced by a wolf, who, apparently, is not as intimidating or macho. More recently, students at George Washington University have seen to the demise of that school’s mascot, “George the Colonial.” Apparently, the obvious depiction of the great Revolutionary War general, first president and Father of His Country was deemed insufficiently inclusive and possibly hurtful to African-Americans. It’s just a matter of time before the university itself is fundamentally transformed from George Washington University to “Barack Obama University.”
                Campus Reform’s Cabot Phillips traveled to the University of Miami to see just how far students are willing to take the mascot reform movement. Phillips carried a petition and a letter to the school’s administrators to the campus. The letter outlined his deep concern that the college teams’ nickname, (the) “Hurricanes,” could be scary and offensive to some students. When he asked students to support his petition to do away with the name, many jumped at the chance.
                When asked to sign the petition, one student remarked: “It’s not a huge deal, but it’s something, and it’ll make a difference.” In what? One thanked Phillips and said, “I totally get this. I think it’s super respectful.” And one stated, “Awesome! Good for you.” Another opined, “There’s gonna be people who have PTSD and this could f—k them up.” Say what? How? (“Hurricanes” could eff them up-- or getting rid of “Hurricanes” could eff them up)? Yet another simply exclaimed: “F—k yeah!”

Stick it to the man! Or something.

I did some research, as I am wont to do, and uncovered other potentially offensive mascots and/or team names. If we are to ban “Hurricanes,” we must obviously ban “Cyclones,” too. As in the Iowa State Cyclones. The university of Mississippi is referred to as “Ole Miss.” This is problematic enough without even considering the nickname “Rebels.” As in those who fought for the Confederacy. The school should immediately be forced to change its name to the “Resistance,” in honor of those bravely fighting back against President Donald Trump and his strong-armed attempts to make America Great Again. Alabama should henceforth be prevented from calling itself the “Crimson Tide,” no matter how many national championships it can claim. The red tide found off the state’s Gulf shores is a tragic reminder of man’s blatant disregard for the planet’s fragile ecosystems, not something of which to be proud. The University of Virginia’s use of the nickname “Cavaliers” is another egregious example of the white, Christian, ableist patriarchy reigning roughshod over the marginalized. Look up “Cavaliers” in any dictionary and you will find these definitions: 1) “supporters of King Charles I in the English Civil War.” 2) “Man of arms.” 3) “Not considering other people’s feelings or safety.” See what I mean?
The University of Georgia should rid itself of its bulldog mascot in favor of a bulldyke mascot, a moniker much better suited to the times. And, can anyone tell me why Notre Dame is still allowed to call its sports teams (and players) the “Fighting Irish?” After all, the “Fighting Sioux” was forcibly retired. Would anyone countenance, say, the “Fighting Germans” or the “Fighting Iranians?”
On the other hand, at least one school has a name befitting the times, a name that speaks to Millennial Humanists: The University of Southern California Trojans. Thank you, USC! The nickname Trojans is an important reminder that one should always wear protection. Particularly when playing the Beavers of Oregon State, as they do nearly every year, and especially when pushing deep into Beaver territory.
But I digress.
What we really need to see is a university completely throwing off the shackles of tradition and conformity. There is no law stipulating that a school’s sports teams must be named after a fierce animal or a group of humans known for their martial spirit. Why not the Pittsburgh Pangenders, the Iowa Intersectionalists, the Minnesota Golden Gayboys, the Alabama Crimson PRIDE!,  or the California Queer?



Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Boston Refuses To Fly Christian Flag


                 The city of Boston, the home of Faneuil Hall, Bunker Hill, Paul Revere, and the U.S.S. Constitution, is being sued for religious discrimination for refusing to fly a Christian flag—for one hour-- as part of Constitution Day observances on September 17th, 2017. The director of Camp Constitution, Hal Shurtleff, had asked the city to fly the inter-denominational symbol for 60 minutes to mark the 230th anniversary of the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, the preeminent document in the history of world governance. The modern-day Beantown Bureaucracy flatly refused, saying no non-secular flags could be flown, so Shurtleff recently filed a federal lawsuit, claiming the city’s act was unconstitutional, and in contravention to the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause. The event was to feature pastors encouraging racial reconciliation and to celebrate freedom and the Christian heritage of the United States, culminating in the presentation of the “Christian” flag. It was cancelled after the city rejected the request to fly the flag for 1/24th of one day.
                Matthew Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, a religious freedom law firm representing Shurtleff, issued a statement saying: “Censoring religious viewpoints in a public forum where secular viewpoints are permitted violates the First Amendment. Boston city officials may not ban the Christian flag as part of a privately sponsored event when they allow any other flag by numerous private organizations. It’s time for the court to stop the city’s unconstitutional censorship.” Quite.
                Boston has permitted almost every other flag in existence—284 at last count…literally-- to be proudly raised on its city hall flagpoles. The suit claims that the Turkish flag—sporting the Islamic star and crescent—has flown from city hall flagpoles on 13 separate occasions just since 2005. The city flew the Chinese Communist flag to commemorate the anniversary of the Chinese Communist revolution. It has allowed the Cuban flag to grace its flagpoles. LGBTQ and transgender flags have also been raised above city property, flapping gaily in the Beantown breeze, without legal challenge. But a Christian flag? Well, that’s beyond the pale.
                In today’s perverted, inverted America, freak flags fly high. Red communist flags are fine, too. But Christian flags? They trigger the raising of a red flag of a different sort, one not sanctioned by coastal elite “public servants.” The merest hint of the nation’s Christian heritage sends Deep State Swamp Creatures into paroxysms of revulsion, hatred and anger.
                Boston was once the scene of a revolution that inspired the world. It is now a sad reminder of our…devolution.
    It is almost enough to make one wave a white flag in surrender. But we owe it to ourselves and those yet to come to find the spirit, courage and character that the founders possessed. We must shake off our malaise-- and overweening desire to be seen as unjudgementally hyper-tolerant-- and do all in our power to usher in a new birth of freedom. With liberty and justice for all. Including Christians.



Monday, July 15, 2019

U.S. Army War College Disinvites Speaker Critical Of Islam


                 The United States Army War College recently disinvited Raymond Ibrahim, a scholar and clear-eyed observer of Islam, from a speaking event at the Pennsylvania-based school that trains senior military officers and civilians. A spokesperson for the school claims the event is just postponed while officials attempt to locate another speaker who would “counterbalance” Ibrahim’s talk, according to The College Fix. The decision to pull the rug out from under Ibrahim, a Coptic Christian from Egypt whose family has faced persecution, was made after the Center on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) strongly urged the college to do so. Ibrahim was scheduled to give a lecture on June 19th, on themes from his latest book, Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War Between Islam and the West.
                 “CAIR,” an absurdly offensive acronym to anyone aware of its actions, is an Islamist organization that has long been linked to terrorist activities. Several U.S. allies consider it a “terrorist organization” in its own right and some of its board members and staff have been accused of terrorism. The U.S. considers CAIR an “unindicted co-conspirator and/or joint venturer” with Hamas. CAIR almost never denounces the sponsors of Hamas and Hezbollah, or the two terrorist groups themselves.
                 The public affairs director of the National Association of Scholars, Glenn Ricketts, told The College Fix via email: “For me, the disinvitation illustrates the depth to which political correctness and the outrage/grievance industry have saturated American educational and corporate institutions, with no apparent thought of the injustice done, the negative influence on the morale of the institution or, in this case, to the training of future defenders and military strategists. Good PR in the short term seems to me the paramount consideration.” No doubt. He added: “NAS will be following this closely, and we certainly hope that the Army War College will reconsider this monumentally bad decision. Perhaps it will recall that its mission is to train warriors, not social activists.” Good luck with that wish, Glenn.
                 If the U.S. military is so willing to lay down and capitulate to a single foreign-focused and supported entity such as CAIR, the end is indeed nigh. If politically correct bullshit and lies can induce it to change its plans and agenda, the proverbial jig is up. If the United States Army War College ceases fighting for American values such as free speech, who will?
                 Imagine if the U.S. Army War College, founded in 1901, had disinvited a speaker critical of Germany’s actions in the lead up to World War II…because of pressure from the Nazis or the Waffen SS. Imagine if the Air Force Academy disinvited a speaker who wished to give a lecture on the Cold War machinations of the Soviet Union due to pressure from the KGB. Or if the Naval Academy was persuaded not to allow a speech by an expert on North Vietnam at the behest of the Viet Cong. What if speeches by Samuel Adams, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, et. al., had been nixed in Colonial times because the British didn’t want to hear them?
The War College’s decision was insane. You can’t win a real war if you won’t even fight a cultural one.




Sunday, July 14, 2019

Pride In America Tanks As Gay PRIDE! Soars


                The percentage of Americans who say they are “extremely” proud of their country is the lowest on record…since Gallup’s first measurement in 2001. Last year, 47% of U.S. adults surveyed said they were extremely proud to be an American. This year that figure dropped to 45%. The number has been steadily dropping in recent years, and this year’s reading, from a Gallup poll conducted June 3rd thru 16th, is the lowest ever. The highest percentages of those surveyed saying they were extremely proud to be an American, 69% and 70%, came in the two years following the 9/11 terrorist attacks when the public rallied around the government and the flag.
                Democrats, whose pride in the United States has historically been lower than Republicans, have driven the recent decline in patriotism. Only 22% of Democrats polled said they were extremely proud of America, the lowest such result ever, and just half as many as in the months prior to Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory. Democrat’s pride in their nation fluctuates much more than does Republican’s, increasing when one of their own is in office, and decreasing dramatically when a member of the opposing party occupies the Oval Office. By contrast, Republican’s pride in their country never fell below 68%, even when Barack Hussein Obama was president. As might be expected, Independents fell between those in the two major parties in this survey, with 41% saying they were extremely proud to be Americans.
                A mere 32% of all those polled admitted to being very proud of America’s political system, while only 37% felt likewise about its healthcare and welfare programs. Yet 85% purported to be proud of American culture and arts, a clear sign to me that most people perceive things ass-backwards while looking thru the wrong end of a telescope.
                Various subgroups of the Democratic constituency expressed even lower levels of pride in the U.S. than their peers…women, progressives, and younger adults among them.
                The precipitous decline in American patriotism is, of course, a direct result of a number of factors. Among them are the virtually total control progressives and leftists have on American Academia, mainstream media, the “entertainment” industry, mainline churches, the giant social media and tech companies, and corporate boardrooms in general, among other entities.
                There exists another factor, as well. Progressives have been largely successful in their insistence that identity politics must take precedence over assimilation and the “melting pot,” particularly with regard to the LGBTQIA+ community. These groups are now so proud—so extremely PROUD!—so damn incredibly PROUD!—of their own particular proclivities and perversions, that they have no more room left to be proud to be an American…or anything else.


Saturday, July 13, 2019

Miley Cyrus Won't Procreate Because Of Global Warming


                Miley Cyrus recently released a video for her new feminist “fight song,” called “Mother’s Daughter,” in which she struts around in a vagina catsuit and sings “don’t f*ck with my freedom.” (The suit makes her look like nothing so much as a large, red Penis Flytrap). The pop star and Planned Parenthood propagandist also recently announced that she won’t reproduce due to global warming.
                A grateful world breathed a sigh of relief.
                The ditzy diva said of the Earth: “We just take and take and expect it to keep producing. And it’s exhausted. It can’t produce. We’re getting handed a piece-of-shit planet, and I refuse to hand that down to my child. Until I feel like my kid would live on an earth with fish in the water, I’m not bringing in another person to deal with that.” Say what? So, you’re not “handing down” this “piece-of-shit” planet to your child? Well, good for you, but Africans, Middle-Easterners, South Americans and Asians are handing this Hell-hole down to their children like their lives depended on it. And, Miley, there are fish in the water. All over the world. Just not in your chlorinated, vagina-shaped pool in Franklin, Tennessee, you ignorant skank.
Then the oddball offspring of Billy Ray Cyrus and Letitia Finley decided the Earth identifies as female, stating: “When she’s angry, don’t f*ck with her. That’s the way that I feel women are like right now. The earth is angry.” (Maybe Mother Earth shouldn’t have reproduced so effectively all these years. Maybe she wouldn’t be so tired now if she had used protection). Ms. Cyrus added, “We’ve been doing the same thing to the earth that we do to women.” Really? Giving her subsidized abortions? Taking her to Macey’s to go shopping? Plying her with alcohol? Telling her that her butt doesn’t look too big? 
Cyrus claims that most Millennials feel the same way she does about (not) having babies. “We don’t want to reproduce because we know that the earth can’t handle it,” she said. I picture her staring at the Earth and bellowing, “You can’t handle my youth!” ala Jack Nicholson in “A Few Good Men.” (A movie title which probably wouldn’t be allowed today).
The erstwhile Hannah Montana cast member has expounded on her sexuality and her marriage to actor Liam Hemsworth in recent days, as well. She noted: “I like the way being sexual makes me feel, but I’m never performing for men. They shouldn’t compliment themselves to think that the decisions I’m making in my career would have anything to do with them getting pleasure.” She’s an American treasure, isn’t she?
Cyrus admitted, “I think it’s very confusing to people that I’m married.” (It certainly baffles me). She explained: “But my relationship is unique. And I don’t know that I would ever publicly allow people in there because it’s so complex, and modern, and new that I don’t think we’re in a place where people would get it. I mean, do people really think that I’m at home in a f*cking apron cooking dinner?”
Probably not.
She added: “I’m in a hetero relationship, but I still am very sexually attracted to women. People become vegetarian for health reasons, but bacon is still f*cking good, and I know that.”
 Is she comparing women’s bodies to pig meat? Oh well, leftists aren’t known for their intellect.
Maybe Billy Ray and Letitia should’ve visited Planned Parenthood before having Miley. Before she f*cked with their freedom.

Had they done so, there wouldn’t have been a “Mother’s Daughter.”