A Maryland
fifth-grader got a visit from the police after his teacher called to report
that she had seen a BB gun on the wall behind the student during a class video
call. The boy’s mother, Courtney Lancaster Sperry, a navy veteran, wrote a
Facebook post stating: “While
my son was on a Zoom call, a ‘concerned parent’ and subsequently two teachers
saw his properly stowed and mounted Red Ryder BB gun and one other BB gun in
the background. He was not holding them and never intentionally showed them on
video. In fact, he was oblivious that they could even be seen in the
background.”
One of the teachers told the
school’s principal, who decided to call the police to report the guns and ask that the home be
searched. Hmm…have a warrant? Probable cause? Do teachers and principals now
have the power of judges, juries, the FBI? (Ever notice that progressives
disdain and eschew the police unless and until they want to use them to
oppress those with whom they disagree?) When this country was lapping the world
economically and defeating supposedly invincible foes like Hitler’s Germany and
Tojo’s Japan—at the same time—nearly every kid had a Red Ryder BB gun and/or a
.22 rifle…and a lot of them in rural areas brought them to school. That
is when Uncle Sam had balls and was not “non-binary,” and when American
citizens were unafraid of being disliked for…the right reasons.
Since her son was targeted by
an “educator” who thought there was a scary-looking gun on her son’s
bedroom wall, Sperry has been warning other parents about the lack of privacy
during virtual classes. She stated that the principal and the teacher cited a
rule stating that students may not bring guns to school and claimed it extended
to virtual classes as well. She said that the school handbook does not address
rules for virtual learning at all, and added, “he did not BRING anything to this
meeting, and he is in his own home,” and noted (of the ‘guns’), “They were
simply in the background in our home, safely stowed in a room behind a closed
door, with no ammunition (if you can even call it that).”
Sperry’s son did not “bring
anything to school.” Rather, the school was brought into their private
home. It is offensive-- and scary-- to me that A Zoom-conveyed image of
government academicians can invade the space where a perfectly innocent child,
mother-- and firearm-- reside. Firearms, like mama Sperry’s navy, have been
tireless defenders of freedom and underdogs for many decades now.
The same can not be said of
government schools.
Would the teacher or
principal have sicced the cops on Sperry and her son if they had spotted a
vibrator, adult movie or a Planned Parenthood flyer in their house? A
screenshot of the upcoming Netflix movie “Cuties?” A copy of “Heather Has Two
Mommies?” A bong or spliff? A brochure from the Church of Satan? Of course not.
But, to “progressives,” a BB
gun or a Swiss Army knife is a bridge too far, a relic from a time when the
government feared—and therefore honored-- its citizens, unlike today, when the
citizens fear the government…whether they honor it or not.
No comments:
Post a Comment