Pope Francis proclaimed that “Muslim terrorism
does not exist” to a world meeting of populist movements recently. Remarkably,
in the same address in which he denied
the existence of Muslim terrorism, he condemned those who deny the existence of
man-caused global warming: “A very solid scientific
consensus indicates that we are presently witnessing a disturbing warming of
the climatic system. Let us not fall into denial. Time is running out. Let us
act.”
Those last three short sentences would have better
applied to…Islamic terrorism. He’s not the most astute pontiff in the Holy See.
“No people is criminal or drug-trafficking or
violent,” Francis said. He went on to reaffirm his belief that all religions
promote peace, before stating: “There are fundamentalist and violent
individuals in all peoples and religions—and with intolerant generalizations
they become stronger because they feed on hate and xenophobia.”
I’m confused. Which is it? Are no people criminal and do all
religions promote peace? Or are there fundamentalist
and violent individuals in all peoples and religions?
The Pope and the Holy See are concerned with the
growing populist movements in Europe and the United States. Yes, you hate to
see citizens of democratic nations try to take back their power from entrenched bureaucracies, don’t you? In my
opinion, Francis, isn’t a great Pope. He might have made a better New York
Times reporter.
In other remarks, the puzzling pontiff denied the
existence of media bias, and, oddly enough, the New England Patriots, but said
he was “inclined to” believe in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy.
No comments:
Post a Comment