Advocates for the legalization of
consensual incest are using a recent New
York lawsuit demanding the state allow a parent to marry their adult child
to further their agenda, the New York Post reported recently. An anonymous
resident of the Empire State filed a lawsuit in April seeking to overturn the
state’s laws outlawing incestuous marriages because he or she wants to wed his
or her adult offspring. This has prompted proponents of legalizing incest to support the suit and use it
to advance their agenda. For example, pro-incest advocate Richard Morris of Australia told the Post
that he backs the suit, because he believes that sex between any consenting
adults "should not be criminalized." Morris claimed he is only
lobbying for real “marriage equality,” and added that it is “the right thing to
do, isn’t it?”
Keith Pullman, another incest supporter,
told the Post: “It is absurd to say that an adult can't consent to
marry their parent. That same adult can be sent to war, take on six or seven
figures of debt, operate heavy machinery, be sentenced to death by a federal
court, and consent to sex with five strangers (and marriage with one of them)
but can't consent to marry someone they love?” Pullman added, "It seems to be as unjust
as the law that used to imprison gay people, and the law that used to stop
people of different races marrying.” His
website advocates "for the right of consenting adults
to share and enjoy love, sex, residence, and marriage without limits on the gender,
number, or relation of participants" and avers
that "full marriage equality is a basic human right."
Verbiage
on the site opines, "Not everyone is going to want to accept who you are
or who you love or how you love. That's okay, as
long as they don't try to control you. Sexual, relationship, and marriage
rights are arriving for all adults, and as that happens, anyone who hates you
or is prejudiced against you will have less and less ability to hurt you.”
This
is the inevitable result of decoupling marriage from the Biblical view of the
institution as a God-given, voluntary, sexual and public social union of one
man and one woman, from different families, for the purpose of
procreation and serving God as an unchangeable foundation for human life. That
view of marriage is the firmest foundation for building a family…and therefore
a stable, successful society.
The
woke mantra “love is love” is both pathetically banal and preposterously absurd.
Its meaning, as intended by progressives, is essentially “sex is sex.” This is
one of the Great Lies of our time. Sex between one man and one woman in a committed
long-term relationship intended to help carry out the Biblical injunction to
“go forth and multiply,” is of a different kind, order and worth than sex
between a person and his or herself, a person and a donkey or penguin, a person
and four others, a person and a sex-bot, or parents and their offspring. That
this notion has to be defended is a sign that the end times might not be far
off.
It
is not, in fact, “a basic human right” to be able to marry three others, a
llama, or your sister. The fact that you owe money or operate heavy machinery
does not automatically translate to “you have a right to marry your daddy.” No
matter one’s sex or sexual orientation, one should have the decency, honesty
and integrity to admit that, for example, three brothers’ desire to marry their
father should not carry the same ethical-- or evolutionary—weight as that of
one man and one woman wishing to wed out of both love and the complimentary and
covenantal desire to create offspring in God’s image.
Love is
love? Really? Would you say that “war is war,” whether
it is engaged in to plunder, subjugate and annex an innocent sovereign nation
and people or to protect and defend them? How about stating that “income is income?
Is that the case, whether it is earned by working hard to make things and
provide services that people need and enjoy or it is obtained by cheating,
swindling, deceit, and illegal and injurious activity such as child sex
trafficking, robbery or murder?
Love
is love? Not necessarily.
No comments:
Post a Comment