You probably believe that women have breasts for a reason
and that that reason is so that they can nurture their children as nature
intended and is the norm for all mammals.
You would
be wrong.
At least,
according to a pair of female academicians. A recent edition of the journal Pediatrics
contained an article written by Jessica Martucci of the University of
Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Anne Barnhill of Johns Hopkins
University. They wrote, “We are concerned about breastfeeding promotion that
praises breastfeeding as the ‘natural’ way to feed infants. Promoting
breastfeeding as ‘natural’ may be ethically problematic, and, even more
troublingly, it may bolster this belief that ‘natural’ approaches are
presumptively healthier."
I
confess I thought breastfeeding was “natural” in the same way that breeding or
breathing is “natural.” In fact, I thought females of many species had breasts specifically
so they could nourish their offspring. I thought the science was settled. Silly
me.
Martucci
and Barnhill “explained” that in the 1950s and 1960s, some women sought to
promote breastfeeding in the wake of advances in artificial baby formulas — an
action that the researchers find “ethically
problematic” because it may “support biologically deterministic
arguments about the roles of men and women in the family.” You know, like women
should be the ones to breastfeed the children that came out of their wombs. Is
supporting “natural” childbirth “ethically problematic” too? The nutty
professors claim that those who suggest there are any “natural” roles for males
and females or any norms of family life or organization possess a “controversial
set of values.”
Martucci and Barnhill
also purport to be concerned that such rhetoric “may ultimately challenge
public health’s aims in other contexts, particularly childhood vaccination.”
Huh?
The times, they are a
changin’, and quicker and quicker at that. As recently as 2012, the American
Academy of Pediatrics reaffirmed its stance that “breastfeeding and human
milk are the normative standards for infant feeding and nutrition.” The AAP
added, “Given the documented short- and long-term medical and
neurodevelopmental advantages of breastfeeding, infant nutrition should be
considered a public health issue and not only a lifestyle choice.”
That is, like, so
2012! We know better now. Screw the children! What really matters is that we
don’t offend transgender “women” or arbitrarily confine real women to a life of
mammary exploitation! And, anyway, dad, mom, mad, dom…it’s all the same.
The important thing is
that we continue to deny
reality at all costs. What could be more
“woke” than that?
*********************************************************
Talk
about “Deniers!” Claiming that breastfeeding is not necessarily natural or
women-specific is bizarre, anti-science, and…anti-woman. How have less than 1%
of the population been afforded this much power?
No comments:
Post a Comment