The transgender rights movement, like bowel movements,
appears to be unstoppable. This is due to the sheer ignorance, overwhelming desire
to be liked, inexhaustible tolerance, and remarkable cowardliness on the part
of most of the roughly 99.5% of the population that does not identify as
“non-binary.”
Many in
the trans community are demanding to be called by their own “preferred
pronouns.” If a trans person doesn’t wish to identify as either gender, the person
often doesn’t want to be referred to as “him,” or “her,” preferring to be
called “xim” or “zer” for example. Many of these individuals prefer to be addressed
as “they.”
Card-carrying
progressive that I am, I don’t think that goes far enough. I don’t think that’s
forcing others to be “woke” enough, either. Therefore, I am
henceforth demanding to be referred to not just by my preferred pronouns,
but by my preferred nouns, adjectives, verbs, and adverbs, as well. I would
encourage everyone to do the same. There are too many words and terms out there
that are pushed on us by the patriarchy and foisted upon us by the feminists.
Nouns
that begin with “man,” such as mane, manual, manure and maniac could—and should--
easily be converted to the gender neutral “xane,” “zanual,” “personure,” and
“individualiac,” for example. Similarly, a non-inclusive adjective like “many”
could be rendered less offensive if converted to “xany.” Alternately, less
gender-specific terms like “lots” or “a shitload” could be employed. Verbs such
as “mandated” and “manage” could be eschewed in favor of “required” and “deal
with.” Even an adverb the likes of “manifestly” could be made trans-friendly by
substituting “person” for “man.” “Personifestly” is self-evidently more
welcoming…and sounds softer and less toxically masculine.
On the
other hand, words that start with the cis-gendered “her” or “gal” should also
be phased out. “Herbal” could be replaced by “flowery,” for instance. “Gallon,”
“gallery,” “galaxy,” and “gallstone” could all be modified in the service of
transgenderism, perhaps by simply swapping the beginning “g” with a “z” or a
“q.” “Herpes” could become “xerpes.” “Hermaphrodite,” however, is such a great
word with such an important meaning, that it should be allowed to remain in our
lexicon.
Clearly
derogatory words like “womanizer” and “maneater” should be expunged from the
English language altogether, to be replaced by less accusatory and more
inclusive terms such as “personizer” and “beingeater.”
In
conclusion, if a typically bigoted, cis-gendered rube was going to say to me, “You
are a pile of manure, you maniac. One who has many problems, and probably
herpes,” I would ask that they use my preferred parts of speech. If they
complied, their previously defamatory and cis-gender-biased, non-inclusive
insult would read, “They are a pile of personure, they individualiac. One who
has xany problems, and probably xerpes.” And if they didn’t, they would be
fined, fired or jailed. Crazy enough for you?
When we
render language meaningless, we diminish what it means to be human. When we
“fundamentally transform” the language, we “fundamentally transform”
ourselves.
And we will all be…transfixed.
No comments:
Post a Comment