Someone needs to do a study to determine why movie-villains
have almost always been portrayed as white people. Whether it be The Joker, The
Penguin, The Riddler, Poison Ivy, or Egghead from the Batman series, or Max
Zorin (Arayan superman!), Dr. No, Auric Goldfinger, Alec Trevelyan, or
Francisco Scaramanga in the James Bond flicks, it’s always the same: the bad
dude- or dudette in the case of Poison Ivy- is white. What’s up with that?
The
Master, Rassilon, and other unsavory characters in Britain’s Dr. Who series are
also Caucasian. Hell, its “Black Guardian” character is even white!
Then
there is the “Wolf of Wall Street.” Okay, that movie is based on a real person, but still…you get the
picture, right?
As for
television…well, almost every evil character is a white man, often a
businessman. And pretty much all the dumb ones, too. Even on television
commercials men are continually made to look like incompetent, bumbling,
ignorant fools, people who couldn’t possibly figure out how to properly scrub a
toilet even if they could be made to do so.
Furthermore,
how come when anyone wants to convey their opinion that someone is intolerant
or evil, they automatically brand that person a Hitler? Why not label them a
Dada, after the notorious Butcher of Uganda, Idi Amin Dada? “Dada” is more fun
to say than “Hitler,” anyway. Or they could smear them as a Pot, ala Pol Pot,
the brutal Cambodian Commie who saw to the slaughter of 25% of his country’s
citizens in the Cambodian Killing Fields. “Pot” is easier to say than “Hitler,”
and takes less time to utter, as it’s just one syllable. (Plus, it’s more
versatile, too. No one says, “That’s like the Hitler calling the kettle black!” just as no one likes to smoke
“Hitler” either. Dude, just sayin’).
We
should be more inclusive in terms of our villains. Or maybe just trash
Hollywood.
But no,
it’s always “whitey” that takes it on the chin. And who determined that, if one
wants to surrender, one should wave a white
flag? I don’t recall having any input on that decision. Are all white people
cowards, is that what’s being implied? That must
be the case, as when we are scared we “white
knuckle” it.
Not convinced of the conspiracy
yet? Why do we tell little white
lies, hmmm? Is it only white people that are dishonest? If something is overly
costly and not worth keeping around, why is it called a white elephant? Talk about
triggering!
Are you starting to get it now? No?
Is the term “white trash” affirming
and welcoming? No, it’s a vile epithet. And finally, if a person is
particularly pale, why do we call them “ghastly white?!” No one has ever labeled anyone else “ghastly black,” or “ghastly” brown, yellow, or red, for that
matter.
What to make of these ramblings? There’s
no whitewashing it: if you choose to think of yourself as a victim, you are
one.
Of yourself.
And that, my friends, is black and
white.
No comments:
Post a Comment