Top DNC Donor "Occupation" For 2025 Was "Unemployed"

 

An analysis of the most recent federal election filing found that the top “occupation” of donors to the Democratic National Committee was “not employed.” The unemployed donated more than $12 million to the DNC in 2025. Other top DNC donating occupations included “retired,” “attorney,” “physician,” and “professor,” none of which are surprising.

But how in hell are those without gainful employment donating so much cash to the DNC? It’s almost as if those receiving any of the vast panoply of government handouts to the indigent feel obligated to aid, abet, and vote for Democrats. Which makes a sentient being wonder if perhaps that is why Democrats are so adamant about continuing to give these handouts to the large number of unemployed, entitled, and shiftless persons, as well as the staggering number of illegal aliens. Pay-for-play? Quid pro quo? Bribery? Vote buying? The Great Replacement Theory wasn’t a theory…it was all too real, and Democrats used taxpayer’s money in an all-out effort to neutralize, counteract, or render these taxpayer’s votes meaningless. (Of course, these diabolical leftists also used taxpayer’s money to fund the SPLC’s effort to generate fake racism so that the SPLC could berate taxpaying Americans as being irredeemably racist so that it could demand more money from taxpayers to fight racism.)

In contrast, top occupations donating to the RNC included “entrepreneur,” “self-employed,” “founder,” and “homemaker.” Visionaries, builders, creators, doers…and those who manage home and hearth for the benefit of their families. (And society.)

Who knew that the unemployed had so much disposable income? But, wait, all of that “income” came from us taxpayers, right?! Is that kosher? Legal? Should it be?

This opinion will be controversial, but folks who do not pay any federal or state income taxes should not be able to vote. That is the quickest, simplest, and most ethical and efficacious way of preventing masses of people from essentially voting themselves others’ money. And that is one of the things the founders were most concerned about when they stated, as John Adams famously did, that the Constitution was only suited to a moral people. It is also why they did not give us a pure democracy, where 51% of the people could decide to do whatever the hell they wanted to do to the other 49%.

Quite simply, if you are living off of the largess of others, you should not get to tell them what to do.

Or to label them greedy bigots if they question how their money is being used.

But don’t worry, Democrats will do that for you.