The
article in the New York Times was headlined, “Provocative flag
flown at second Alito home.” The “provocative” flag that Justice Alito
allegedly flew? It has a pine tree on it…and the words “An Appeal To Heaven.”
By God they oughta fry him! A pine tree? “Appeal to heaven?!” What kind
of sick S.O.B. would support a pine tree and an appeal to heaven, right?
Those
at The Times are always busybodies when it comes to anything that anyone they
deem conservative does, implies, eats, wears, or is in the vicinity of. On the
other hand, they are utterly uninterested in even the most bizarre and shocking—indeed
criminal-- behavior of anyone on the left. (See also Hillary Clinton, Hunter
Biden, Joe Biden, etc., etc.)
The
Times article professed to be concerned that the flying of this particular flag
could be evidence that Justice Alito is prejudiced in his decisions-- and would
perhaps even lend himself to a “push to remake American government in Christian
terms.” Memo to the old Gray Lady: though the founders would not countenance an
official government-sponsored religion, America was founded
entirely on Judeo-Christian values and was expected to live up to them for the
foreseeable future. (That it didn’t in terms of equal opportunity for Black
folks led to, among other things, the Civil War-- and 620,000 dead.)
The
article goes on to state, “photographs obtained by the New York Times, along
with accounts from a half-dozen neighbors and passersby, show the Appeal to Heaven
flag was aloft at the Alito home on Long Beach Island in July and September
2023. A Google street-view image from late August also shows the flag.” It
adds, “It is not clear whether the flag was displayed continuously during those
months or how long it was flown overall.” Um, who cares? “Passersby?” Really?
Later,
the article blithely implied that Trump tried to “overturn the last
presidential election.” It continued: “The disclosure about the new flag is
troubling, several ethics experts said in interviews, because it ties Alito
more closely to symbols associated with the attempted election subversion on
January 6.” The article also noted “the flag could be seen as telegraphing the Alitos’
views."
And
more: “Until about a decade ago, the Appeal to Heaven flag was mostly a
historical relic. But since then it has been revived to represent ‘a
theological vision of what the United states should be and how it should be
governed,’ said Matthew Taylor, a religion scholar at the institute of Islamic
Christian Jewish studies.”
The
article closed thusly: “When the times visited the house Wednesday, the
flagpole was bare.” Whew. Ugh.
The
appeal to heaven flag is a founders era banner. The pine tree represented
strength and resilience, while “appeal to heaven” was a plea to God to be
delivered from tyranny. In these times of high inflation and crime rates, escalating
drug use, crumbling families, and nearly world-wide conflict, strength and
resilience are needed now more than ever. Perhaps the only thing more
needed—and apropos—would be a heartfelt appeal to heaven. We have fallen under
the tyranny, not of the British, but of The Left here in this country. And
their cravenly sycophantic friends in the Deep State, Big Government, Big Academia,
Big Media, Big Tech, and Big Business.
We
all know the progressive justices are completely given over to their ideology,
whether they fly flags or not. Does
the Times routinely check their car bumpers to see if they sport “Coexist”
bumper stickers-- or ones stating, “You can’t hug your kids with nuclear arms?” And no one, especially those in the
mainstream media, complains about anyone in any position flying an LGBTQ flag.
They probably wouldn’t mind—might even be pleased—if it was a Palestinian
banner that had been hoisted. The “Jolly Roger” flag is nearly as ubiquitous as
the LGBTQ banners. Over the centuries they have variously symbolized piracy,
death, or even “the devil at sea.” No one is bothered by this.
Alito
didn’t fly a Nazi flag. Or the Hammer & Sickle. If people get upset seeing banners
that represent American Heritage, such as the Gadsden Flag, it won’t be long
until “Old Glory” is deemed offensive, as well. Soon it, too, will be called a
symbol of the “far-right.”
If
we are ever to extricate ourselves from the soft but growing tyranny in which
we are currently ensnared, “An Appeal To Heaven” would be a necessary first
step.
Maybe
that is why they despise it so.
No comments:
Post a Comment