The Democratic National Committee
recently passed a resolution extolling the values and virtues of “religiously
unaffiliated” Americans, noting that they comprise the “largest religious group
within the Democratic Party.” Ironically, most of those in the “largest
religious group” in the Democratic Party are utterly irreligious except for
their belief in big government-- and their own infallibility.
The resolution praising the ungodly
was passed unanimously at the DNC’s August 24 meeting, appropriately
held in San Francisco, California. This elated the Secular Coalition of
America, an organization that lobbies for public policy benefitting agnostics, atheists
and humanists. The SCA touted the DNC’s action as the first time a major party
“embraced American nonbelievers.” It is easy to believe the Democratic Party is
now formally wooing nonbelievers, embracing non-embracers. In 2012, Democratic
National Convention attendees actually booed the mention of “God.” At their
2016 Convention, a preacher was heckled while giving the opening prayer. And,
earlier this year, Democrats reintroduced the “Equality Act,” which if passed
would effectively repeal the First Amendment to the Constitution, destroy the
concept of religious liberty and force the devout to ignore their consciences. (The
freshly radicalized Taylor
Swift, on tour promoting her new album “Lover,” recently opened a concert
by performing “You Need to Calm Down,” an LGBTQ anthem she co-wrote mocking
Christians as uneducated, unsophisticated, homophobic rubes. Large gold letters
on the stage spelled out “Equality Act”).
The DNC’s resolution unironically
states: “Religiously
unaffiliated Americans overwhelmingly share the Democratic Party’s values,”
and notes the need to advocate for “rational public policy based on sound
science and universal humanistic values.” Satanists almost universally share
humanistic values and almost universally vote for Democrats. When will the
party officially seek the Church of Satan’s endorsement? Fittingly, the
“church” of Satan was established in San Francisco in 1966. The circle is unbroken!
SCA’s director of governmental
affairs, Sarah Levin, lauded the resolution as a way “to ensure that policy is
driven by science and evidence, not sectarian beliefs.” Because we know
scientists are unbiased and more trustworthy than God.
The Democrats are targeting
nonreligious voters as part of their strategy to beat President Trump, in part
because Trump appears to have the evangelical vote locked up, and in part
because it is who they are. Levin also said that “America was founded as a
secular government,” an assertion so preposterous it buggers description. For
Levin’s benefit, here is the definition
of ‘secular’: “denoting attitudes, activities, or other things that have no
religious or spiritual basis. Contrasted with sacred.”
Final sentence of the Declaration
of Independence: “We Mutually Pledge To Each Other Our Lives, Our Fortunes And
Our Sacred Honor.” (Italics mine).
John Adams: “Our Constitution was
made only for a moral
and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any
other.”
George Washington, ‘father of his
country,’ in his Farewell
Address: “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political
prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports……And let us with
caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without
religion.”
Levin further added, of America’s
supposed secularism, “I am proud to see the Democratic Party take that to heart
by bringing secular Americans into the fold.” Note to Levin: it’s not hard to
bring secular Americans into the fold. All you have to do is eliminate all
standards and promise them free stuff.
The Freedom
from Religion Foundation, on whose website an “unabashed atheist” appears
by the words, “Not Afraid Of Burning In Hell,” released a statement saying it
“is optimistic that the DNC resolution is a sign of bigger and better things to
come for freethinkers and would like to see every party at every level of
government adopt similar resolutions.” Bigger and better things to come for
freethinkers? Doubtful. For free-lovers, freebasers, and freeloaders? Maybe.
No comments:
Post a Comment