The New York Times, a.k.a. “The Truth,” recently “quoted”
unnamed scientists who supposedly told the paper they were afraid President
Trump would try to suppress an extensive new federal climate change report. The
Times stated that this “directly contradicts claims by President Trump and
members of his cabinet.” The paper went so far as to assert it had “exclusively
obtained” the report, and was the first to report on it.
Unfortunately
for the Times, it turns out the government never
held the report in an unreleased status, and that the report has been available
on the internet since at least January.
Scientists who wrote the report pointed out this slight oversight, with one
posting this message on social media: “Important to point out that this report
was already accessible to anyone who cared to read it during public review
& comment time. Few did.” Ouch.
This
prompted the Times to add a correction to the bottom of its story: “An article
on Tuesday about a sweeping federal climate change report referred incorrectly
to the availability of the report. While it was not widely publicized, the
report was uploaded by the nonprofit Internet Archive in January; it was not
first made public by The New York Times.” Oddly, the paper didn’t tout its
“exclusive correction.”
We
shouldn’t be too hard on these objective journalists, though. After all, they
were too busy reporting on the Trump-Russia collusion scandal to go online and
fact-check a climate change story. There probably wasn’t any leftover room in
the paper, either.
The
truth is: these are sad Times, indeed.
Look
for the “Newspaper of Record” to soon claim it has exclusively obtained
information pertaining to- and will be the first to report on- the resignation
of President Richard Nixon, the kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby, and the
Gettysburg Address.
No comments:
Post a Comment