So, after all of recorded history,
it has come to this: an (alleged) astrophysicist claims it is odd that we
separate male and female athletes. In a recent (2022) discussion with science
writer and podcaster Michael Shermer, Neil deGrasse Tyson said: “It
is a little weird
that we split people by male and female in this way. I’m imagining a hundred
years from now looking back and saying, ‘Do you know back 100 years ago they
split boys and girls and they couldn’t compete?’ And … that’d just be kind of a
little weird.”
Really? At the rate we’re
going, in 30 years people may not be able to distinguish males from
females.
But do we really want to
have women competing, say, on NFL, NHL, and NBA teams? The injuries would be
horrific. And the majority of both would be extremely uncomfortable in the
locker rooms. Moreover, the few who wouldn’t be uncomfortable would
likely be an even bigger problem.
To his credit, Shermer
didn’t agree with Tyson’s take. Which didn’t set well with Tyson, who likened
Shermer to an “old man on the porch in a rocking chair” for his backward
thinking.
Other clips of
progressives’ favorite scientist have surfaced recently, including one in which
Tyson called the human brain’s need to make categories, even of things that he
says are “not inherently categorizable,” a “failure of evolution.” He added, “Suppose
no matter my chromosomes, today I feel 80 percent female, 20 percent male. I’m
gonna put on makeup. Tomorrow, I might feel 80 percent male. I’ll remove the
makeup and I’ll wear a muscle shirt. Why do you care?! What businesses is it of
yours to require that I fulfill your inability to think of gender on a
spectrum?”
Sorry, but that is not science, Neil. It
is quite the opposite. Science categorizes everything. Flora. Fauna. Domain. Kingdom.
Phylum. Class. Order. Family. Genus. Species.
Humans wouldn’t be here if our minds
couldn’t/didn’t incessantly categorize. Dangerous, safe; edible,
inedible; true, false. And yes, good or bad.
It would be more than “weird” if we didn’t
recognize the differences between boys and girls-- and men and women. It would
be bizarre—and a lie—if we refused to do so. We are not paramecium. We don’t
reproduce by cell division.
It is one thing to challenge Neil
deGrasse Tyson. It is quite another to attempt to refute biology, anatomy, history,
evolution…and our Creator.
I hope most of you reading this will categorize
this last statement as true.
No comments:
Post a Comment