New Jersey’s Montclair State University will offer a new
class this coming semester. The school’s Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender,
Queer Studies Department course will consist of a two-and-a-half hour lecture
that will meet once a week. The course is titled: “Queer Identities in a
Transforming World: The Trouble With Normal.” The course description states
that students will: “explore issues such as gender performance, the third sex,
transgender issues, intersex issues, the political underpinnings and the
transgressive nature of ‘queer’, the history of queer politics (from AIDS
activism to the gay marriage issue), schisms within the LGBTQ political
movements, queers and disability, issues of race, class and representation
within the queer community, and non-human
perspectives on queer.” It also notes that participants will “engage
in a critical analysis of gender, sexuality, race, class, and ecology, and
synthesize methodologies from various disciplines in the humanities to gain a
broad intersectional, multicultural and historical understanding of the term
queer, and of queer and transgender studies.”
There’s
a third sex? I know there are more genders than states in the union, but I
was not aware that we’ve identified additional sexes. And what, pray tell, is
gender “performance?” Is this a measure of a person’s bedroom capabilities or
does it denote, say, a two-spirited person portraying a nanogendered individual
on stage at the campus theater? Does anyone really know precisely what
“synthesizing methodologies” means? From
what I can tell, this is a term so broad, vague and ultimately meaningless that
it is only used by those who have no idea what the hell else to say.
Of
course, the most preposterous phrase in the course description is “non-human
perspectives on queer.” Has the instructor asked a goat its opinion of gay
marriage? Has she polled a thousand beavers to see what they think of dental
dams? Has she surveyed a herd of ruminating ruminants?
The
most telling phrase, however, is in the course title itself: “The Trouble With
Normal.”
You
see, when what was once considered normal is mocked, marginalized and deemed
strange, abnormality becomes normal. And where do we go from there?
No comments:
Post a Comment