A University of Kansas student housing department employee
recently wrote to a resident advisor, informing him that he cannot use an image
of a gorilla for a jungle-themed floor decoration. According to Campus Reform, which had obtained
the email, Assistant Complex Director Dale Morrow explained to the RA that: “First,
gorillas represent a very masculine image, and I feel that this would not be
inclusive to all of our residents on that floor.” (Feminine,
neuter…masculine…doesn’t masculine have its own place in diversity?).
In the
missive, sent at the start of the current academic year, he further advised the
wayward RA: “I think it would be best if your floor chose a different theme
animal to be more inclusive.”
This
from a school whose own mascot could be seen as a tribute to the “jayhawkers,”
a group of 2,000 Kansans that raided Osceola, Missouri on September 22, 1861,
laying it to waste and killing many residents.
And what
kind of theme animal would be totally inclusive, Dale? A cat? They are the very
symbol of femininity. That’s not
inclusive. But I bet you’d be fine with that, wouldn’t you? How about an
elephant? Just kidding. Buck up old boy, and put down the glycerin pills…I know
that’s the symbol of the evil Republicans. Bald Eagle? I know, I know, I’m
incorrigible! Just my zesty sense of humor run amok, Dale!
How
about a slug? There are slugs in the
jungle, Dale.
And we know there are slugs on campus.
No comments:
Post a Comment