An
indigenous woman in Calgary, Canada, recently yelled “I hate white people” before punching
a white woman in the face, knocking one of her teeth out. The prosecutor
reasonably argued that the unprovoked November, 2015 assault on a woman the attacker
had never met was a “hate crime.”
Judge Harry Van Harten would have
none of that argument. Remarkably, Van Harten’s written decision in the case
stated that the motivation of the perpetrator, Tamara Crowchief, in the attack
on the victim, Lydia White, was not
related to racial bias. The judge said there wasn’t enough evidence to
establish the claim that Crowchief attacked White (you can’t make it up) because of her skin color, according to
HeatStreet.com.
The law is loonier then it used to
be. Hillary doesn’t get indicted, even for lying
under oath, something even Richard Nixon never did. Nixon resigned in
disgrace before he could be impeached, yet Hillary is going to be the
Democratic Party’s 2016 presidential candidate, and likely the new
Commander-in-Chief!
If a white man says something along
the lines of, “not all blacks are great swimmers,” it’s a hate crime, but
Crowchief can yell “I hate white people” in public before cold-cocking a White
person she’s never even seen before, and a sitting judge is completely baffled
as to her motivation?
Utilizing critical thinking
skills, exercising reason and courage, and speaking the truth are all hate
crimes now.
No comments:
Post a Comment