a 13-year-old girl was called “despicable” by her
progressive, tolerant, inclusive, and nonjudgmental teacher at a Church of
England school in the United Kingdom after asking a classmate how she could
identify as a cat.
schoolgirl-- and her friend-- were reprimanded by the Rye College teacher near
the end of an eighth grade “life education” class, in which they were told: “Be
who you want to be and how you identify is up to you,” according to The Telegraph.
the “lesson,” one of the students asked a classmate: “How can you identify as a
cat when you’re a girl?” Good question. Inquiring minds want to know.
the teacher’s, who then informed the students they were being reported to
school administrators and would no longer be welcome at the school if
they continued to express radical beliefs such as that one can’t become another
sex-- or species—simply by claiming to be one.
clip, taken by one of the students, shows the teacher remarking, “How dare you, you’ve
just really upset someone” by “questioning their identity.”
the student replies: “If they want to identify as a cat or something then they
are genuinely unwell – crazy.” The teacher then proceeds to ask the young girls
where they got the preposterous notion that there are only two genders. The
educator avers: “Gender is not linked to the parts that you were born with,
gender is how you identify, which is what I said right from the very beginning
of the lesson.” Right. Gender in no way correlates to the “parts that you were
born with,” which are randomly distributed-- for some reason. Or, more likely, no
reason at all.
teacher stated: “There is actually three biological sexes because you can be
born with male and female body parts or hormones,” and added, “there are lots
of genders – there is transgender, there is a gender who are people who don’t
believe that they have a gender at all.” There “is” three biological sexes? Good
thing the English teacher isn’t an English teacher. As for “male and female
body parts,” she just got through saying that body parts have no relevance to one’s
sex, so she promptly—if accidentally—contradicted herself.
students, far wiser, disagreed, telling the teacher, “If you have a vagina
you’re a girl and if you have a penis you’re a boy.”
predictably, caused the teacher to wig out. She/they/it/kitty exclaimed: “You
are talking about the fact that cisgender is the norm, that you identify with
the sexual organ you were born with. That’s basically what you’re saying, which
is really despicable.” It is “despicable” to identify with the sexual organ you
were born with?! That view is rigid, intolerant, hateful, unscientific…and
teacher, referring to the girl’s stubborn adherence to reality, also told the
students that they “need to have a proper educational conversation about
equality, diversity and inclusion because I’m not having that expressed in my
lesson.” Because a “proper” education means no debate, no dialogue, and no
dissent! Or else! “Sieg Heil!”
anything can hurt a progressive’s feelings and cause them to run for a “safe
space.” Microaggressions and hate speech allegedly abound. “Misgender” somebody
or “dead name” them and you are deemed to be a monster. Words are now
frequently construed as “literally violence” by those on the left. Yet, the unimpeachably
progressive “educator” finds it okay—necessary even—to label a young
student “despicable” for her failure to believe a person who claims to be a
cat…actually is one. Wow.
one question: Just how much intolerance (disguised as tolerance),
authoritarianism, amorality-- and insanity --are you willing to put up
fellow Americans, perhaps it is time we listened to our founding fathers……rather
than obeying the Marxist/Fascist whackos who would be our masters.