As the world comes to a whimpering halt, some of us
increasingly believe that the effects of the coronavirus crisis will be
far-reaching and perhaps even permanent. There will be both positive and
negative effects, to be sure, but, tragically, I’m afraid the negatives may far
outweigh the positives. I have never more fervently wished to be wrong. I shall
endeavor to list some of each to follow.
First, on the bright side, people
may continue to practice better hygiene and be more diligent about cleanliness.
Those in the mainstream media have again been shown to be amoral,
fear-mongering hypocrites who couldn’t care less about non-elites…or the truth.
Their credibility will be gone, their approval ratings at an all-time low.
Maybe, just maybe, a few aspiring journalists may learn from this. With
university classes going online only, many professors have already
stated they are nervous about having everything they say, teach and promulgate
be recorded for posterity. Roaches don’t like exposure to sunlight and fresh
air. The most radical and dangerous of these instructors will have nowhere to
hide. Colleges will likely be seen as unnecessary in their current guise and
shown to be outrageously and needlessly expensive. When people realize they can
get much the same education online, it will be much harder for the schools to
justify their staggering administrative and social-justice compliance
expenditures, as well as their profligate spending on physical fixtures and
amenities. Moreover, there will be a concurrent rise in home schooling and a
greater respect for those so educated. This will help loosen the grip the
government has on indoctrination…I mean education.
Hopefully, American (and other free
market capitalist nation’s) businesses will be recognized as the most
responsive, creative, efficient, productive and successful in fighting the
COVID-19 outbreak and creating vaccines to prevent its continued spread. At the
same time, perhaps the Iranian mullahs will be further weakened, and China
recognized as the problem it is on many levels. Could the Chinese
Communist government also lose any credibility it somehow heretofore
possessed?
Now for the negatives, which are
many and pernicious. Many small businesses will likely be unable to reopen. We
will be saddled with massive, potentially world-economy destroying debt.
Unemployment rates will likely stay higher than before the crisis, as not
working is being incentivized and subsidized while businesses,
employment, productivity, and success are being disincentivized or outright
punished. There will be a concurrent increase in dependence and loss
of creativity and entrepreneurial spirit. There has already been increased
acceptance of government control of every aspect of our lives: when and if
we can work, where we are “allowed” to go and who we can see among them.
America was already flirting with Socialism. It may be ready to consummate the
relationship…and make it permanent. There have been calls for a one-world
government to most effectively deal with pandemics such as this. Those
calls will only grow louder and more frequent. (If you think this is a good
idea, reflect on how effective the U.N. is at solving the world’s woes.)
One aftereffect I haven’t heard
mentioned is the likelihood that large scale or even global shutdowns and
lockdowns will become more frequent, and for ever-less dire threats. Look at
how this crisis was handled by world governing bodies as opposed to SARS, H1N1
(Swine Flu) and other previous viral outbreaks.
Then there are the social
repercussions. Already articles have pointed out that there is less pollution
because of the lack of manufacturing and business activity. Animals are
comparatively thriving. Why, the planet is better off! This idea that humans
are bad for the Earth will gain more traction. Then, there is likely to be
continued social avoidance, a lingering leeriness to human interaction of every
kind. You may see a diminution of handshakes, hugging, kissing and
person-to-person affection in general. There may even be less human intercourse
and a falling birth rate. Sex-bots and dolls will increasingly replace real
humans as preferred—and safer—partners for intimacy, though whatever transpires
between a human and a robot cannot truly be “intimate.” Some experts say that a
measurable percentage of the population may “marry” these advanced, fleshy
robots. Sexting
and internet porn have gotten even more prevalent and will probably continue to
do so. Masturbation will become the main form of human sexual expression.
Finally, there will be ever more
reliance on artificial intelligence (A.I.) in all things. And people will have
real difficulty in discerning between virtual reality and…reality.
Ironically, though the Chinese
Communist government has threatened to cast the U.S. “into
the mighty Sea of Coronavirus,” we are, in reality, being rapidly carried
down the River of Doubt, past Cape Fear, and are about to be deposited into the
Dirty Delta of Socialism.
No comments:
Post a Comment