To judge from the signs at various transgender events, it is
becoming conventional wisdom that “Not all women have vaginas,” and that “Not all people with vaginas
are women.”
Still…in
moments of especial candor, can we not agree that having a vagina is a
particularly excellent and accurate indicator that one may be female? I mean,
as opposed to say, opposable thumbs. Or red hair.
If
possessing a vagina bears no relation to one’s gender, what does? Oh, I see.
Gender, like truth, is unknowable. In
which case, “Not all bipeds have two feet,” much as “Not all vertebrates have a
spine.” Some vagina-sporting horses may, in fact, be male water-buffaloes.
Who’s to say? What if “Not all people are people?”
To most
college-educated millennials and others of a leftist bent, everything is up for
equivocation, everything is relative, everything
is tolerated or celebrated, except
standards and the concept of knowable truth.
Sorry, progressives, but it is a knowable truth that this dogma
eventually leads to the absolute breakdown of society…to the needless and
tragic detriment of everyone. (Run for your safe spaces now!).
It’s funny that the same people who
don’t believe in religion, who instead worship at the altar of Darwin and
possess an unshakeable belief in evolution, dismiss sexual complementarity as
utterly irrelevant and meaningless.
It’s enough to make one think that
all leftists are bereft of reason.
No comments:
Post a Comment