A British court has awarded a man with Down Syndrome almost
$13,000 because the government banned his wife from having sex
with him after alleging that he wasn’t competent enough to give consent to
sexual relations. Yet, prior to the ban, the man had a healthy sexual
relationship with his wife of five years, court documents show.
According
to Fox News, the buggering ban was instituted after “a psychologist for a local
government entity- which was not
identified to shield it from criticism- assessed the 38-year-old man and
found him to lack the mental competence to willfully engage in conjugal
relations, the court documents say.”
Lacked
the competence? They’d been doing it for at least five years! And they were
legally married! Clearly, it’s the
government that lacked the effing competence, yet simultaneously possessed an
overabundance of tyrannical tendencies! The government should get its
prodigious nose out of their bedroom- and genitalia- and get back to doing what
it does best, devising Machiavellian ways of fleecing its citizens out of their
hard-earned cash.
It gets
worse. A court council warned the man’s wife that having sex with her husband would make her guilty
of a serious crime. And the man was ordered to attend a sex education course
before he would be allowed to resume
relations with his wife. (What the hell did they think they needed to teach
him)? Of course, if she had simply gone outside the marriage for her sexual
needs, it would have been no big deal.
Sadly,
the course was delayed for over a year.
The case had its inception after the man’s sister took her concerns about the
delay to the Court of Protection. What’s more, “the man” had to take two courses, because, though his
“therapist” said he made “sufficient progress” in the first one, the therapist
averred he hadn’t yet demonstrated an adequate understanding of sexually
transmitted diseases.
I say again, the man had been in an exclusive relationship with his wife for five
years.
The judge, Sir Mark Headley,
admitted in a court document that the man earned damages due to the
“deprivation for at least 12 months of normal conjugal relations with his
wife.” Headley also stated: “The impact at the time must have been profound,
not only for the loss of sexual relations, but for two other matters peculiar
to him. First, he would have been unable to understand why what was happening
should be so. And secondly, in order as she put it, ‘not to lead him on,’ the
wife understandably and foreseeably withdrew to another bedroom and withheld
much physical affection.”
The court document itself stated
that the case was highly unusual because it pertained to a “settled, monogamous
and exclusive married relationship,” and tacitly admitted that cases that touch
on competence to decide to engage in sex normally involve people seen as
vulnerable to exploitation or abuse.
This is a sick and shocking case of
government abuse and nannyism. Today’s Western governments see to it that
minors can have a federally funded abortion without notifying their parents.
They continually prostrate themselves before the LGBTQIA “community,” and
unequivocally state their support for transgender rights and gay marriage. They
do everything in their power- and many things that aren’t supposed to be- to
reward out of marriage sex and perversions of every kind. They also purport to
care more about those with disabilities than the “average Joe.” Yet, they now
claim the right to tell a heterosexual married couple they can’t have intimate relations, under penalty of law?
If the British government had attempted
to tax Colonists’ intercourse, or had banned- or interfered with- their conjugal
relations in this manner, history would have recorded the Boston Sex Party.
Puritans not excluded. And the British would’ve been even more royally screwed.
My advice to “the man” who was
essentially mentally and physically assaulted by the “local government entity?”
As you Brits say, “Keep your pecker
up, old boy!”
And
f**k the government.
No comments:
Post a Comment