“CIA MISLED THE NATION ABOUT FUTILE CRUELTY”
Thus
screamed the headline on the front page of today’s Star & Tribune
newspaper- above the fold- in ‘Pearl Harbor Attacked!’ fashion. Notice the
absence of any qualifier, modifier or caution. This is absolutism. No gray area
here. No journalistic skepticism. No allegedly
misled, allegedly futile, or alleged cruelty. Things aren’t usually
so black and white at the esteemed bastion of journalistic integrity.
We know
the newspapers are always utterly transparent
with their readers, just by a
careful, skeptical reading of this vey headline, in fact. Surely nothing
misleading ever appears in newsprint. (And even if it did, what are the
consequences? Congressional hearings and dismissals?).
This
alleged ‘mother of all scandals’ kind of falls a bit flat to me. Torture is not
something that should be countenanced lightly, if at all. On that we can all
agree. We can certainly debate the issues raised by the Senate Intelligence
Committee’s report. We do not want to be known as a nation that conducts or
condones real torture.
That
said, we can’t strip away or banish or completely neuter a vital piece of our
nation’s security apparatus. We have the aftermath of the Church Committee
hearings of the 1970’s to remind us of that. The simple, hard truth is, all
nations need some sort of clandestine service. The more nations know about each
other and potential adversaries intentions the less likely one is to make a
tragic miscalculation.
This
report was commissioned and led by Democrats. The CIA contested most of the
report’s findings, as one would expect.
Former CIA officials who were actually involved in the program wrote that the
Senate report, “represents the single worst example of congressional oversight
in our many years of government service.” Todd Ebitz, a CIA spokesman, issued a
statement late Tuesday saying the report was, “like doing a crossword puzzle on
Tuesday with Wednesday’s answer key” and did not reflect “how counterterrorism
operations work in the real world.” I don't know, I wasn't there.
We have
to define what is ‘cruel’ and ‘futile’ against thousands of dead men, women and
children in attacks such as 9/11. And also at our embassies and in malls, on
trains, etc., around the world.
Remember
that in the days and weeks after 9/11 we didn’t know what was coming. It is
easy to criticize now that we think we are relatively safe. We literally
thought there could be a dirty- or suitcase- bomb. Nuclear material was
unaccounted for. Then there was the anthrax scare and the hideous thought of
biological or chemical weapons being used against us.
If
solitary confinement, sleep deprivation, water-boarding and/or forcing a
terrorist mastermind to listen to Barbara Streisand songs 24-hours a day were
honestly thought necessary to protect thousands of innocent lives, I’m okay with that.
Moreover,
the report states that a total of three
detainees were water-boarded! There has been so much talk about the
controversial procedure for years and so many demonstrations and portrayals on
television that I was given the impression (misleading?) that we were randomly
water-boarding anyone with an olive-complexion
and a beard.
No comments:
Post a Comment