“Why it was inevitable that Ferguson
officer walks free: Those seeking accountability for Michael Brown won’t find
it in our criminal justice system.”
There
you have it. The headline of an article from that bastion of rationality,
SLHATE. I mean, Slate. Yes, much better to be in the criminal justice systems
of other countries. Well o.k., many
other countries don’t have criminal
justice systems. Some other countries just randomly imprison people. Many
imprison- or worse- those that disagree with or challenge the system or any
member of that system's government, enforcement agents, etc.
This is
the unique country founded on limited
government of , by and for the people and on the rule of law. Miranda rights.
Jury of your peers. Innocent until proven guilty, etc.
The
article continues, “Unfortunately, we don’t live in a society that gives
dignity and respect to people like Michael Brown. Instead, we’ve organized our
country to deny it wherever possible, through
negative stereotypes of criminality,
…”
Our
society not only doesn’t afford proper
dignity and respect to criminals, but we
actually have negative ‘stereotypes’ of criminality? Holy crap, where will
that lead us? If we tolerated, let alone celebrated, criminality, we’d be in a
chaotic downward spiral from which we could not escape. Oh.
Ironically,
the whole article was an exercise in
negative ‘stereotypes’ of criminality, criminality they thought was perpetrated
by the police.
No comments:
Post a Comment