The Democratic Party of today bears
little or no resemblance to the party as it was just a couple of generations
ago. Contrary to popular belief, the establishment of both major
U.S. parties have moved to the left over the years, but the Democratic Party
has traversed the most ground. It is no exaggeration to say that there is a
greater difference between the modern-day Democratic Party and the party as it
stood in, say, 1961, then there was between the Democratic Party pre-Obama and
the Republican Party of the same time. The Democratic Party is now essentially
a Socialist-Marxist pastiche of special interest groups, the aggrieved, and the
coastal, big-city elites-- all cheered on, aided and abetted by their
mainstream media collaborators. The party’s views and platforms haven’t just
evolved or been fine-tuned over time, the old ones have been tossed out,
expunged, and excommunicated, replaced by radical new ones that in some cases are
literally the antithesis of the old.
Not convinced? Let’s revisit John F.
Kennedy’s inaugural
address of 1960 and compare his remarks then
to those of today’s Democratic leaders. If we pay close attention, we might
discern some subtle differences in values, policies, and outlook. He opens:
“Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President
Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, reverend clergy, fellow
citizens:
“We observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of
freedom -- symbolizing an end, as well as a beginning -- signifying renewal, as
well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn
oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three-quarters ago.”
(Almighty God? The same solemn oath our forebears prescribed? This
Christian nut-bag is mixing church and state! And we must distance ourselves
from what the old, white “fathers” believed!)
“The world is very different now.
For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human
poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for
which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe -- the belief
that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the
hand of God.”
(Natural rights?! Seriously?! The God thing again? The state gives us
our benefits! Ever tried to get “God” to pay for anything?!)
“We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first
revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe
alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans -- born
in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud
of our ancient heritage, and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of
those human rights to which this nation has always been committed, and to which
we are committed today at home and around the world.”
(Proud of our ancient heritage?! Like slavery, for example?)
“Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall
pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose
any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty. This much we pledge
-- and more.”
(That doesn’t sound very inclusive and hospitable! This guy is a
xenophobic, nationalistic warmonger! He is reckless and racist,
intolerant and unstable! He’ll say anything. Who knows what he is capable of?)
“We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are
sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be
employed.”
(He wants to pay for tons of weapons so that we never have to use
them? Couldn’t we spend that money on something more important, like making
sure all bathrooms are transgender-friendly, Muslim outreach, or making sure
that preschoolers have adequate access to free contraception? And isn’t showing
your weakness and vulnerability a good thing? I mean it opens you up to more
real and raw relationships, right? I mean, we’re all the same at heart. Let’s
just talk to our “enemies” and we can meet in the middle, right? Right?)
“In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than mine, will rest the final
success or failure of our course. Since this country was founded, each
generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national
loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service
surround the globe.”
(National loyalty? What about appeasing Iran, China and Russia? God
Damn America!)
“In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been
granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not
shrink from this responsibility -- I welcome it. I do not believe that any of
us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The
energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our
country and all who serve it. And the glow from that fire can truly light the world.”
(This clown thinks that the U.S is exceptional. Obama was right when
he said that all nations believe they are exceptional.)
“And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your
country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.”
(What? How would I know who to vote for? Who would
pay for my college tuition? How could this guy ever have been elected
President?)
Camelot? The notion itself evokes images of
royalty and privilege. JFK would literally be considered a “right-wing
extremist” by most in the mainstream of his party today. His
frequent references to Christianity and respect and reverence for
the Founders would have troubled many modern “Democrats.” His belief in a
massive, unconquerable defense and the principles and values that founded this
nation, his fondness for freedom and America’s “mission,” natural
rights and the rule of law would have marked him as a xenophobic,
intolerant “Alt-right” threat to progressivism. Throw in a massive tax cut and
belief in American exceptionalism and he would have been anathema to the
Democrats core constituency/special interest groups of today.
JFK, Truman—hell even Adlai Stevenson
and Hubert Humphrey—were more classical liberal than today’s “liberal.” Compare,
for example, Sam Nunn and Daniel Patrick Moynihan to Cori
Bush, Rashida Tlaib-- and most other members of today’s
“Democratic” party, inside The Squad, or out. The difference is the former were
patriots who had policy disagreements with Republicans…or at least conservative
ones, while the latter openly hate them… and the nation they were sworn to serve. And anyone who supports
or thinks like them. Such as most of the readers of American Thinker. Back then
it was liberal versus conservative. Today it is them versus us, Marxists versus
those who believe in free markets and personal freedoms, the arrogant elite
versus the rest of us. This dichotomy is simply and sadly unbridgeable.
And so we have Occupy Wall Street, Bernie
Sanders, Antifa, BLM, revisionist history, The 1619 Project, vast restrictions
on speech, assembly, and religion, gun control, and transgender rights superseding
parental ones.
Barack Obama succeeded in
“fundamentally transforming” the United States. And, as I’ve stated before, one
doesn’t fundamentally transform anything that one loves, likes, or even
respects.
Americans, we are living through trying
times, in part because we have forgotten or eschewed history. Perhaps more correctly
put, the progressive elites that control academia and government refuse to teach
our young people the truth. If we don’t learn the lessons of ancient Rome and
other once great societies, we will soon face the same tragic outcome.
We don’t want to repeat the French
Revolution that led to bloodletting and chaos. Nor do we want a repeat of the
Second October Revolution, in which Marxists took power from nobles. Rather, we
need a Restorative Revolution, a Second American Revolution, a
conservative one which will re-enshrine our God given rights and lead us back
to greatness.
No comments:
Post a Comment