Tom Hanks has a long track record
of social justice activism. He has a long history of donating to Democratic
candidates and causes. One might logically believe that he would be a hero to self-proclaimed
progressives everywhere. One, apparently, would be wrong.
Tax-payer-funded National
Public Radio recently published a piece titled "Tom Hanks Is A
Non-Racist. It's Time For Him To Be Anti-Racist,” by 55-year-old Eric Deggans,
a Black man. Deggans opined: "The toughest thing for some white Americans
… is to admit how they were personally and specifically connected to the
elevation of white culture over other cultures. Baby boomer filmmakers have
made fortunes amplifying ideas of white American exceptionalism and heroism …
[Hanks] has built his career on stories about American white men 'doing the
right thing' …It is time for folks like Hanks to be anti-racist." He then claimed
that work that focuses on the achievements of “virtuous white, male Americans” may
well “have made it tougher” for tales of white “atrocities” to “find space.”
Deggans went on to note
how successful white filmmakers like Ron Howard and Steven Spielberg,
themselves both liberal, have made it difficult if not impossible for anyone to
make films about Black people facing discrimination because their movies didn’t
feature Black people facing discrimination. Huh? Almost every current movie,
television show, commercial, or pop song has at least a reference to Black
people facing discrimination.
Deggans added, "Hanks
and other stars need to talk specifically about how their work has contributed
to these problems and how they will change. They need to make specific
commitments to changing the conversation in story subjects, casting and
execution. That is the truly hard work of building change."
The passive-aggressive NPR
hit piece then suggested that part of the “truly hard work of building change” is
to “dismantle” the idea, notion or concept of any white American males—past or
present-- being heroes.
If Hanks truly is a
“non-racist,” as NPR snarkily labeled him-- he is not racist. To say he needs
to become an “anti-racist” in this context means he must actually become a
racist…in the preferred manner of today’s race baiters and grievance traffickers.
Does Deggans believe that
no white American males were/are heroes? Not one? Hanks played the roles of
Captain Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger, an airline pilot who saved countless
lives with his actions. He has played Abraham Lincoln, Walt Disney, Fred
(“Mr.”) Rogers, Sheriff “Woody”…and himself. Does NPR believe all these “white
American males” were racist scum unworthy of being celebrated in any way?
The idea that, since some
movies don’t feature a particular group of people facing discrimination, they
make it impossible for all other movies to feature that group of people facing
discrimination is truly preposterous. Just because somebody may have made
successful movies that didn’t feature Jews getting abused and exterminated
by Nazis, that does not necessarily make it impossible for anyone else to make
films depicting Jews getting abused and exterminated by Nazis.
In 2016 Hanks was awarded the Presidential
Medal of Freedom from that notorious racist Barack Hussein
Obama. Tom Hanks is not a racist. He may even be an anti-racist.
And what else was Hanks supposed to
do? If he didn’t play white people, if he routinely took roles of peoples of
color, different nationalities, or women, he would have been savaged for
inexcusable appropriation. Should he be limited to playing the parts of evil
white tyrants? Ignorant Caucasian a**holes?
I guess he could just play the roles
of mainstream media types like Brian Stelter, Brian Williams, Chris Cuomo, Jake
Tapper…and assorted NPR hacks.
No comments:
Post a Comment