During a recent episode of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” co-host Mika
Brzezinski claimed that, during the latest presidential election campaign, Team
Clinton tried to get her removed from the airwaves. Brzezinski said the incident took place after she implied that
Clinton didn’t necessarily have the presidential election wrapped up, as many
thought.
“I was concerned the campaign was not understanding that perhaps
there was an arrogance. They needed to sort of get off their high horse and
understand that this isn’t over,” Brzezinski recalled recently.
“I’ll just say it: NBC got a call from the [Clinton]
campaign. Like I had done something that was journalistically inappropriate or
something and needed to be pulled off the air.”
Brzezinski professed shock at the reaction from the Democratic
nominee’s camp. “I mean, think about that. That’s just… shooting the wrong
messenger.”
Reflecting on Donald Trump’s win, Brzezinski added,
“And here we are.”
Brzezinski
was actually empathetic toward
Clinton’s campaign, and was, as she worded it, “concerned” that her campaign team, like many experts, might be
taking her victory for granted. And people think Trump is thin-skinned? Okay, Trump is thin-skinned, but this
is taking thin-skinnedness to an entirely different level.
Think
about this act and its potential ramifications. The American Moses and her
staff apparently tried to get someone yanked from her broadcast, even though
she was trying to help them by giving
them a heads up. Ms. Brzezinski never called them names, publicly disagreed
with them or called into question any
of her policy positions. She didn’t bring up the email controversy or any past
or current Clinton scandal, nor did she touch on Hillary’s health issues.
Compare that to the near-constant vitriol
hurled Donald Trump’s way from all quarters of the Fourth Estate.
It’s
not enough to not cross these progressives in any way. It’s not enough, in
fact, to agree with their policy provisions, treat them nice, and even vote for
them (I don’t know if Brzezinski voted
for Hillary). At least in the case of Clinton, one must believe everything she and her team says, no
matter how trivial the matter, or risk having them subtly attempt to take your
reputation and livelihood away. So next time, Mika, just keep your mouth shut,
smile prettily, and nod your head.
The
incestuous relationship the Clinton campaign had with the media in the latest
American presidential election season was repulsive and unprecedented. Their
disdain for the First Amendment is palpable. Their attempts to mold, cow and
control anyone in the media who had the temerity to not simply parrot
everything their camp wanted people to believe, would have been more fitting
had they occurred in the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany.
And
they are scarily antithetical to the continued existence of a free and
representative republic.
No comments:
Post a Comment