Both men and women
treat women as sex objects as is proven by women’s actions in posing for nude
pictures, calendars, etc., and in walking down runways scantily attired for
fashion shows…and in men’s unending desire to look at and watch them. Women now
treat men as sex objects, a fact obvious in our culture. Also, judging by the
stupefying success of books and movies such as “Fifty Shades of Grey,” women
desperately want to be thought of and treated as sex objects. From a biological
standpoint this not only makes sense, but is basically the whole point, at
least as far as silly little matters like the survival of the species is
concerned.
What is odd is that gay men treat men as sex
objects and lesbians treat each other as sex objects, yet those officially sanctioned
groups typically march in lockstep with the progressive movement in general, which vilifies and decries the
objectification of women, while at
the same time giving a pass to the Muslim religion that effectively treats
women as chattel.
Despite
what some feminists would have us believe, men and women are different. That’s
a simple, scientific fact, unlike global warming. If they weren’t, there would
be neither men nor women, or any human beings of any race, creed or religion,
peaceful or not. Amoebas and mollusks
did not require an Adam or Eve. People who attempt to refute that are the real
“Deniers” and are truly anti-science.
It is more than ironic, in this era of celebrating diversity and tolerating all
things, that the existence of two distinct sexes is diminished, denigrated and
even denied. It should be celebrated, revered and reveled in, appreciated by
both sexes as the divine gift that it is. When a one-celled organism just
splits into two (it’s not half the cell it used to be?) it derives no pleasure
from the occurrence. When a man and a woman become one through commitment and
love, they share fulfillment, a moment of bliss, and the ability to produce not
another one-celled organism, but a unique child, yet one in God’s image.It
isn’t one entity simply splitting into two halves, it is two halves becoming
one and producing another. The difference to some may seem subtle or even
specious, but it is deeply profound.
This
angry obsession with “objectification” is bizarre in itself.
Here is
the definition of an object according to Webster’s New Universal Unabridged
Dictionary: 1. Anything that is visible or tangible and is relatively stable in
form. 2. A thing, person, or matter to which
thought or action is directed.
Perhaps
as in, “I see your outer beauty, but adore your inner beauty, my love.”
It
isn’t objectification women should abhor. It is abuse, neglect, disdain and
nullification.
No comments:
Post a Comment