As I’ve previously noted, science
isn’t what it used to be…and probably never was. Here is yet another case in
point:
Recently, Dr. Rajendra Gupta, a theoretical
physicist from the University of Ottawa, put forth a stunning proposition. He
claimed that new data suggests that the universe is almost twice
as old as previously believed. Experts have
told us that the universe is nearly 14-billion-years-old for decades now. Gupta
says it may instead be 26.7 billion-years-old. And, if that's the case,
he asserts that there is no need for dark matter to exist as everything in the
cosmos is therefore explicable and functioning
tickety-boo, thank you.
I can almost hear scientists saying, “Our
bad. We may have gotten the age of our universe wrong by 13 or 14 billion years, and goofed on the whole dark
matter thing by believing it to be the most common element in the universe when
actually it may not exist at all. But, hey, despite all the wild historical
fluctuations, we are certain we can predict what the average temperature
of the planet will be in say, 100 years! So please get rid of your gas stoves
and lawnmowers with all due haste. Peace out.”
No comments:
Post a Comment