Isn't it
ironic that the most power-hungry politicians in the most power-hungry party
constantly accuse their opponents of wanting to destroy our democracy? If
projection was an Olympic competition, they would win the gold medal in
perpetuity.
To wit:
New York Governor Kathy Hochul recently spoke at a rally for Democrat
congressional candidate Pat Ryan. Naturally, she seized the opportunity to
smear Marc Molinaro, Ryan’s opponent, and Lee Zeldin, her own gubernatorial
opponent, as well as Donald J.
Trump.
Hochul exclaimed to those in attendance: “We’re here to say
that the era of Trump and Zeldin and Molinaro – just jump on a bus
and head down to Florida where you belong. OK? Get out of town. Because you
don’t represent our values.”
Because nothing screams
“democracy” like chasing your political opponents out of town. Yay tolerance!
Yay diversity!
But the Wicked Witch of the
East wasn’t done yet. She told New York’s conservatives, if in absentia, “You’re not New Yorkers, because we
come from a long line of people who fought for women’s rights that happened
here first.” This raises the timeless question, “Huh?” A person is only a New
Yorker if they agree with Governor Hochul and her radically progressive
globalist agenda? And the fight for women’s rights first occurred in New York? London,
Amsterdam, Montreal, Boston, Philadelphia…all were diametrically opposed to women
coming out of the bedroom or kitchen?
To wit, again: Colorado’s Secretary
of State, Jena Griswold (no relation to Clark), granted an interview to England’s
far left newspaper The Guardian in which she intimated that, if
Americans don't vote for Democrats, they will lose their democracy.
Well, duh.
Griswold said, “What we can expect from the extreme Republicans running across
this country is to undermine free and fair elections for the American people,
strip Americans of the right to vote, refuse to address security
breaches and, unfortunately, be more beholden to Mar-a-Lago than the American
people.” (To the extent Americans are beholden to Mar-a-Lago, its because
its owner is beholden to them. As for “security breaches,” see the open
southern border.)
She then humbly added, “For us, we are trying to
save democracy.”
Of course they are. But
leftists don’t believe you and I are “fighting for democracy”
unless we agree with them. On everything. Always.
It is rich that the party that has routinely
contested elections-- and lied, cheated, bribed, and stolen in an attempt to
win them—is accusing Republicans of being anti-freedom.
If these radical left Democrats
believed in God, they would believe He put them on this earth not to have
dominion over the animals, but to have dominion over all other humans,
especially those that believe they have inherent natural rights granted by
their Creator.
Ironic or insane? That’s an easy
one: either or both are correct.
And yet we conservatives don’t
demand that all those with whom we disagree move to Massachusetts, Minnesota,
Illinois, California, Oregon…or New York.
It takes a special kind of chutzpah
for a political party to dramatically expand the powers of the executive when
it is in power, wish to add two new states (Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico)
that would be certain to vote for its candidates, and threaten to pack the
court and eliminate the filibuster—all while accusing its lone political rival
of being anti-democratic.
It would be best for the nation—and
the majority of Americans—if these progressive Democrats would “get out of
town.”
Especially Washington, D.C.
No comments:
Post a Comment