The
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU),
which has in the past vociferously opposed the administration of a drug to
chemically castrate convicted sex offenders, is now staunchly advocating
the use of drugs as puberty blockers to chemically castrate “trans” children.
These positions are, of course, precisely the opposite of those any sane person
would hold.
Not too long ago, Randall Marshall, former Executive Director
of the ACLU of Alabama, called the practice of chemical castration “medical
experimentation,” adding that it “has no basis in the medical community.”
Period.
Nonetheless, today, the ACLU-- and many Democrats-- purport
to believe that chemically castrating convicted criminal sex offenders is
cruel and that not chemically castrating young kids is also cruel.
Try and wrap your mind around that.
This
tracks with the progressive view of the death penalty vis-à-vis abortion. The
late, great writer and “investigative humorist” P.J. O’Rourke put it best: “…consider
how much you’d have to hate free will to come up with a political platform that
advocates killing unborn babies but not convicted murderers. A callous pragmatist
might favor abortion and capital punishment. A devout Christian would sanction
neither. But it takes years of therapy to arrive at the liberal view.”
No comments:
Post a Comment