Maryland Senate Bill 669, a.k.a.
the “Pregnant Person’s Freedom Act of 2022,” could effectively allow
babies to be left to die for as long as the first 28 days
after birth, according to analysis from a pro-life
attorney. Senator William Smith, a Democrat, sponsored the repulsive legislation,
which is slated to have a hearing on March 15.
American Center for Law
and Justice attorney Olivia Summers stated in her analysis of the bill that it
“proposes a revision of the fetal murder/manslaughter statute that would serve
to handcuff the investigation of infant deaths unrelated to abortion.”
This is due to the fact that the legislation would
prohibit investigations and criminal prosecutions for women and medical
professionals for a “failure to act” in relation to a “perinatal death.”
Summers added, “In other words, a baby born alive and
well could be abandoned and left to starve or freeze to death, and nothing
could be done to punish those who participated in that cruel death.”
She noted that the bill’s language is unclear, allowing
for the possibility that the law could be interpreted to “prevent
investigations into the death of infants at least seven days AFTER their birth,
and may extend to infants as old as four weeks!”
Whereas The Maryland Code does not define “perinatal,”
a law passed in 2020 defines “perinatal care” as the “provision of care during
pregnancy, labor, delivery, and postpartum and neonatal periods.”
A definition on MedicineNet, a website owned by
WebMD, defines it as “the 20th to 28th week of gestation” to “1 to 4 weeks
after birth.” And the Merriam-Webster definition of neonatal is: “of, relating to, or affecting the newborn and especially the
human infant during the first month after birth.” The first month after
birth.
This proposed bill is not only revolting and inhuman,
but entirely unnecessary. According to the Maryland Department of Human
Resources: “Under the [state’s] Safe Haven law, a distressed parent who is
unable or unwilling to care for their infant can safely give up custody of
their baby, no questions asked. Newborns can be left at hospitals or law
enforcement stations.”
Nah. Let’s just let them die, alone and unwanted.
Seems like a better option.
It
has never been clearer that the terms “pro-choice” and “abortion advocates” are
really euphemisms for “infanticide supporters” and “holocaust proponents.” The “Pregnant
Person’s Freedom Act of 2022” is such an abhorrent moniker that it defies
description. Its preposterous insinuation that it is not just females who can
get pregnant pales in comparison to its vilely implied assertion that abortion
equals freedom.
Leftists
claim those seeking real freedom from government tyranny—such as those
comprising the Canadian truckers’ Freedom Convoy—are terrorists, but that those
wishing to exterminate innocent young human beings for their own convenience
are freedom fighters.
This
is nothing short of a crime against humanity. And sanity.
Democrats
are always pushing to broaden the scope of legal abortion. First trimester?
Check. Second trimester? Check. Into the third trimester? You bet. Up until the
moment of birth? Damn straight! Maybe a little after? Yes! 7 days after
birth? Hell, yeah! 28 days after the kid was born? Now that’s what I’m talkin’
about! It’s just “after-birth abortion.”
28 days? 28 weeks? 28
months? What’s the difference?
In an appeal to “their base,” Democrats should just blend
two of their favorite causes together
into one truly progressive bill (666), which would simultaneously raise the age
to which children could be aborted and lower the age at which a person could
vote. “Logically,” they should be one and
the same. A twofer! Say, maybe, at 6-years-old.
No comments:
Post a Comment