During a recent Eau Claire Area School District
(Wisconsin) staff development training session, a slide informed teachers
that parents are “not entitled” to know their kids’ gender identity.
The slide was obtained by Empower Wisconsin, and purportedly
reads as follows:
Slide
56- Talk amongst yourselves!
Facilitators, guide
this discussion. Remember, parents are not entitled to know their kids’ identities. That knowledge must be
earned. Teachers are often straddling this complex situation. In ECASD,
our priority is supporting the student.
“Parents are not entitled to know their kids’
identities?!” That is one of the most ridiculous and disturbing sentences ever
uttered in the English language. First off, teachers are not entitled to
determine what the parents who pay their salaries are “entitled to know.” Secondly,
parents typically know what sex/gender their kids are from before they are
born. Some of the ECASD teachers may have heard of ultrasounds and gender
reveal parties. And, note to educators, parents create their kids, raise
them, pay for everything they need—and are responsible for them and to them. On
one hand, this is like saying parents are not entitled to know what their kids
are wearing. Um, it’s kind of obvious. On the other, it’s like saying taxpayers
are not entitled to know what the government is using their money for, or
saying car owners aren’t entitled to know what the repair shop is doing to
their vehicles. It is akin to dentists saying you are not entitled to know what
they are doing in your mouth.
In
a related story, the editors of St. Joseph University’s student newspaper, The
Hawk, recently reminded everyone to watch their language during this ongoing
Women’s History Month. They weren’t talking about swearing, as nowadays many
women swear like drunken sailors—and some are drunken sailors. No, instead they urged us all to avoid using two
terms for women which The Hawk editors find deplorable. The first, a
term they dubbed “particularly problematic,” is “female.”
This “f” word, they say, is “generally used to preface negative attributes
about women,” and is a way “to strip [them] of their personhood” and “reduce
them to a biological name.” Worse yet, say The Hawk’s editors, the term
reinforces outdated notions of gender, such as the “traditional binary.” Egads!
Words
such as “female” may seem trivial and inoffensive to many of us say the
editors, but it is crucial — absolutely crucial! — that
people monitor their own language and “consistently check [their] implicit
biases.”
This is exactly
wrong, 180-degrees from the truth. Female, woman, lady, girl…all are
descriptions of a sacred being, a sex that used to be placed on a pedestal, the
only one capable of bearing a child. Erasing, denying and cancelling anything
representing the female gender strips them of their personhood, their
distinction and uniqueness, and reduces them to a bland and unsacred sameness,
a robotic non-identity identity as a non-gendered personage. This happens because
of progressives’ remarkable blend of implicit biases, intolerance of
scientific fact, disdain of religion, general ignorance, and total embrace of
insanity.
So, to recap: 1) according to progressives, parents aren’t entitled to know their children’s gender, and 2) decent folk don’t use the term “female” to describe a……woman.
The former assertion is patently
absurd, the latter utterly preposterous. If we shouldn’t use “female” to
describe a woman, why should we use “woman” to describe a woman? If gender
cannot be assumed or even determined, and is non-binary, then how is the term
“woman” any different or less offensive than “female?”
Gender
blending, gender denial, gender
cancelling, gender inflation, gender confusion…it’s all part of The Great
Gender Reset to destabilize society and help pave the way for the broader Great
Reset to condemn capitalism and Judeo-Christian values to the ash heap of
history.
But, fellow parents and patriots, the
leftist aspiring puppet-masters controlling so much of our lives lately don’t
believe we are entitled to know that, either.
No comments:
Post a Comment