Two psychologists from Lancaster University
suggested in a recent Newsweek article that it might be time for humans
to rethink their aversion to cannibalism. Though consuming human flesh—or
anthropophagy—is considered the “ultimate
taboo,” they note that it is found throughout the animal
kingdom, even among some mammals, and is therefore something natural. The
authors aver that there is nothing inherently evil about eating human flesh,
but that careful reasoning over the merits of cannibalism is usually
“overridden by our feelings of repulsion and disgust.” While not condoning the
practice, they note that this revulsion is not based on reason and may even contradict
reason. They cite the 1972 Andes plane crash, after which the survivors waited
until they were near starvation before “succumbing to reason and eating those
who had already died” as supporting evidence of this claim.
The psychologists say that even if
we could shed the taboo against eating human flesh, “we can’t silence our
thoughts about the person it came from,” ergo the “bias” against cannibalism
still persists. If only we were more progressive.
They
also note that “philosophers have argued that burying the dead could be
wasteful in the context of the fight against world hunger.” This is not the
type of recycling I want to think about. It is taking the concept of “waste
not, want not” way too far. Let’s just all agree to make a lot more Ramen
noodles instead of eating Bob and Betty, okay?
Bizarrely,
I’m sure that eating human flesh is the one form of meat ingestion that vegans
would support. Whereas “meat is murder” when referring to the consumption of
animals, eating humans would help animals and reduce man-caused global warming.
“Cannibalism is caring!” That’s a perfect progressive slogan if I’ve ever heard
one.
While
the authors make it clear they are not actually advocating cannibalism, it is
still creepy to think and talk about-- even in a purely academic and
“reasonable” sense. Almost every other taboo one can think of has fallen by the
wayside or is on the brink of doing so…often in a remarkably short period of
time.
I don’t want to wake up one day soon to find
that cannibalism is now a mere faux pas. Or even something considered slightly
more egregious than jaywalking, but not nearly as bad as failing to use
someone’s preferred pronoun.
No comments:
Post a Comment