Leftists apparently believe there are good mass murders and
bad mass murders. Perhaps even good mass murderers and bad mass murderers. How
can I make such a sick suggestion? Easy.
Just look at the difference in coverage the two recent heinous tragedies have
received from the mainstream (fake) media. The El Paso shooting has been given
wall-to-wall, around-the-clock coverage, the perpetrator’s background and
motives discussed ad nauseum. The Dayton disaster is primarily given play as
regards the necessity of gun control in an America made violent almost solely by
President Donald Trump, the shooter’s background and motives glossed over. So,
if this is the case, how do progressives differentiate between them?
Also easy. “Good” tragedies, those worthy of continuous airplay and thorough
explanation, are those that are politically useful to them, whereas “bad” ones
are those that tend to discredit their talking points.
The El
Paso madman was apparently looking for Mexicans to shoot, and, despite the fact
that he explicitly stated Trump had nothing to do with his sick agenda, was
easily thrust into the “violent, white, right-wing extremist” mold. The Dayton
madman was apparently a leftist himself, and, ironically, a believer in gun
control. Ergo, El Paso tragedy good, Dayton calamity not so good. The former is
emphasized, the latter de-emphasized.
No comments:
Post a Comment