President Obama often seems oddly nonchalant and sanguine
when addressing the problem of Islamic terrorism. At times he seems completely
out-of-touch with his fellow American’s concerns in this regard. Aides say that
his “approach” reflects his belief that “overreacting” to a terrorist attack
only “elevates” extremist groups and exaggerates their influence.
More to
the point, however, the President actually appears to believe that the
terrorist threat is overstated and that the focus on it could become self-paralyzing
and an excuse to adopt “misguided” policies. Yes, such as those that would protect Americans at the expense of
terrorists.
Obama’s
aides take every opportunity to note that more Americans are killed by gun
violence than terrorist attacks. This would be a good argument…for a
seven-year-old. Terrorists themselves have used guns to kill many of their
victims. Most crimes, whether committed by guns or other weapons, have
historically been stopped by guns, and
only guns, or the threat of their use. No precise statistics are available
to support this fact, however, and the media is utterly disinterested in
reporting on anything positive pertaining to firearms.
While
nearly all gun crimes are quickly or eventually ended by the brandishing and/or
use of guns, no acts of terrorism are
deliberately ended or prevented by terrorists.
Talk
about dis-ingenuousness. It is not the
NRA that is purely agenda-driven.
It is
stupefying how many people are too biased or ignorant to admit these obvious
facts.
Its an incredible delight perusing your post.Its brimming with data I am searching for and I want to post a remark that "The substance of your post is wonderful" Great work. Combat Firearms Training
ReplyDeleteThanks, Gamer. I appreciate the comment!
Delete