Hillary Clinton recently stated, “The unborn person doesn’t have Constitutional rights.”
But illegal aliens and convicted spies should? Progressives like the idea of felons being able to vote, as the vast majority of felons will vote for progressives. In sum, modern-day liberals want criminals to be protected by the Constitution, but don’t want to “grant” that protection to the innocent. In fact, they want the “right” to kill the innocent. So, those who have never sinned can be exterminated, while criminals are given amnesty. That doesn’t seem very validating or inclusive. In fact it seems judgmental and unfair. The baby hasn’t judged anyone or “disrespected” anyone, yet he or she is being excluded. And not just from a club or group, but from planet earth… and life itself. Moreover, the baby isn’t responsible for the situation she is in. The baby is utterly powerless. If we in the lowly “99%” think we’re being screwed by those cold- hearted bastards in the dastardly “one-percent,” what of the unborn person who has summarily been stripped of his right to exist?
But, what-the-hell, let’s coddle the criminals. Let’s let them vote…for Hillary in the upcoming 2016 presidential election, in fact. Criminals voting for a criminal (“takes one to vote for one…”) who will ensure that babies can still be legally murdered in the good old U.S. of A, just as the founders intended. Who could be against that? And, if you are, you are an intolerant, racist, sexist, homophobic bigot who should be shut up, shouted down and maybe thrown in jail. (And, if you are, time will tell if they let you vote).
One humorous note: Progressives themselves were upset at Hillary’s statement because she referred to an “unborn person” rather than a “fetus,” thereby conferring, they said, an unwarranted sense of humanity to the fetal tissue mass.
A humanity they do not admit to…nor possess.
Post a Comment