Why can’t the second
largest nation on earth ever get control of its wildfires? Canada should have
had enough practice by now. Hundreds of fires raged out of control for months
in the summer of 2023. And 2024. For that matter, why can’t the most populous
state in the union (California) do the same? Maybe for the same reason. Progressive
asshats in both places seem to be unable to do literally anything except
aggressively police “Islamophobia,” “homophobia,” and “transphobia.”
From an NPR report: “Thick,
billowing clouds of smoke are sweeping south from wildfires ravaging the
central Canadian province of Manitoba into parts of the United States,
compromising air quality for millions of Americans across several northern
states.” Of course, the NPR report was sure to mention climate change,
stating: “The U.S. has also battled increasingly devastating wildfires over
recent years as climate change has made larger wildfires more likely and more
intense.”
Regarding Canadian
wildfires, a
CNN article from 2023 stated: “Scientists from the World
Weather Attribution initiative – which calculates the role of climate
change in extreme weather events – found human-caused climate change more than
doubled the likelihood of hot, dry and windy conditions that drove the Quebec
fires between May and July, and made this fire-prone weather at
least 20% more intense.” Made this fire-prone weather at least 20% more
intense? How does fire-prone weather get made (at least 20%) more intense?
How is this measured…and by whom? For that matter, how much more intense can a
raging, out of control fire consuming hundreds of thousands of acres of forest
get?
Friederike Otto,
co-founder of something called the World Weather Attribution initiative (and
senior lecturer at the Grantham Institute in the UK!) issued a statement
saying, “Until we stop burning fossil fuels the number of wildfires will
continue to increase, burning larger areas for longer periods of time.”
Ah, there it is! Fossil
fuels bad.
The
CNN piece referenced Kira Hoffman, a fire ecologist at the University of
British Columbia and the Bulkley
Valley Research Centre, who averred that there are many
factors that contribute to extreme wildfire seasons, including logging and
abandoning Indigenous fire stewardship techniques. (Guess we have to capitalize
the ‘I’ in Indigenous.)
Sorry,
Kira, not buying that one. Logging removes trees. Oddly enough, things that
aren’t there don’t burn. And what the hell is “Indigenous fire stewardship?”
I have respect for Indigenous peoples and a love for trees, but, seriously,
come on!
As I
wrote in a
2023 blog post, “Many of the fires are at least
partially the result of leaving too much deadwood and flammable material on
forest floors, usually due to ‘environmentalists’ wishes. Of course, more folks
live in more areas, and fire detection and reporting are better than in prior
eras, too. And, at least in the case of Canada, one gets the impression that an
all-out effort to contain these conflagrations hasn’t been made…possibly to
drive home the point that global warming is going to be the death of us all,
and sooner rather than later. (It wouldn’t stun me if some of the fires
were set by those with an agenda.) A recent study by Danish author
and academic Bjorn Lomborg, published in the Wall Street Journal,
illustrated a vast disparity between the actual number of wildfires and the
attention given them by the mainstream media and politicians. Lomborg
asserted: ‘Climate change hasn’t set the world on fire. It turns out the
percentage of the globe that burns each year has been declining since
2001.’ Yet, despite that inconvenient truth, the mainstream media-- and
many politicians—insist that there are ever more fires as a direct result
of ‘climate change.’ In furtherance of their agenda, reporting on ‘climate
change’ has increased by 400% between 2010 and 2020.”
We
know for a fact that many of the previous Canadian wildfires were deliberately
set by arsonists. So, instead of reflexively blaming logging—and oil & gas
companies-- for the fires, let’s seek the truth.
I am
on vacation in a remote, undisclosed location in northern Minnesota as I write
this. The smoke is noticeable, tangible. And I have asthma, so, to use a
favorite phrase of progressives, I may be ‘disproportionately affected’ by
these wildfires.
I am
not a fan of blowing smoke, whether it comes from Canada…or progressive
politicians with an agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment