Sunday, August 20, 2017

Pets Damaging The Climate, Too, Study Says

                It seems your pets are peeving off some liberals these days. According to a new study, dogs’ and cats’ eating patterns have as much of an effect on the U.S.’s carbon footprint as does driving 13.6 million cars for a year.
                Fifi, say it isn’t so!
                The findings were published in the journal PLOS ONE (Get your subscription now! Operators are standing by!) and illustrate how these pets’ consumption of meat and other animal products has a massive and adverse- if largely unrecognized- effect on the climate. A 2014 study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Buy one subscription, get the second for 50% off!) found that meat is the villain. (Imagine that). Apparently, cat’s and dogs’ meat-filled diets are responsible for 25 to 30 percent of the impact of meat production in the U.S. Experts aver that, compared to a plant-based diet, meat production requires more energy, land, and water, and has greater environmental consequences in terms of erosion, pesticides, and waste. Additionally, simply feeding American pets leads to approximately 5.1 million tons of feces every year, roughly equivalent to the total trash production of Massachusetts, and fully twice the fecal matter annually generated by Rosie O’Donnell.
According to the study, producing one kilogram of chicken results in roughly 3.7 kilograms of carbon dioxide, while generating one kilogram of pork produces 24 kilograms of carbon dioxide. The scientists real beef, however, is, of course, with beef. They claim that producing one kilogram of beef can generate up to 1,000 kilograms of carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas thought to be largely responsible for the supposed warming of the Earth’s climate.
                The Los Angeles Times reports that UCLA geographer Gregory Orkin calculated that the 163 million dogs and cats living in the United States accounted for an “overall caloric consumption” of “about 19 percent that of humans in the U.S,” approximately the same amount of calories that the country of France consumes. Moreover, American doggies and kitties “eat enough animal product to account for about 64 million tons of methane and nitrous oxide, two other powerful greenhouse gases.”
                The climate change alarmists (CCA) are concerned that not only do developed countries such as the U.S. consume so much meat, but that developing countries are increasing their meat consumption, too.
                “Dad, stop buying Fido that meat-centric dog food…and put own that f!#%*ng burger and pick up some arugula for Christ’s sake.”
                The Times article helpfully explains that dogs can readily digest starches, so they could get much more of their required protein from non-animal sources than their owners may realize.
                Orkin adds: “I certainly hope these kinds of numbers will encourage the market to consider adding those as market choices, and I also think that individuals can make choices.” Individuals can make choices? Really? Not if leftists have their way.
                To a committed progressive, the planet would be far better off if humans, their pets, and their livestock would simply cease to be.
                Other humans, that is.

                It may indeed be hard to teach an old dog new tricks. But this is just another dog and pony show.

               

Saturday, August 19, 2017

Sex No Longer Needed In Future, Professor Says

                Hank Greely, the director of Stanford University Law School’s Center for Law and the Bio-sciences, believes that- within three decades- people will no longer be having sex to procreate. Instead, Professor Greely thinks that parents will simply choose from a range of embryos created in a lab from their DNA.
                This is already feasible, and Mr. Greely believes it will become dramatically cheaper in the near future. This option would give the parents more control of their potential offspring as well as allowing them to prevent diseases. The process currently involves taking a skin sample from the female to create stem cells, which are then used in the creation of eggs. The eggs are then fertilized with the male’s sperm cells, resulting in an array of embryos from which to select.
                The embryos would be screened to identify any potential diseases, and professor Greely believes the process will soon get to a point where parents will have the ability to select their child’s hair and eye color. Britain’s Telegraph reported that the Stanford professor, speaking at the Aspen Ideas Festival, opined: “I think one of the hardest things about this will be all the divorces that come about when she wants embryo number 15 and he wants embryo number 64.” He added: “I think the decision making will be a real challenge for people. How do you weigh a slightly higher chance of diabetes with slightly lower risk of schizophrenia against better musical ability and a much lower risk of colon cancer? Good luck.”
                Looking to the future no longer holds the allure that it once did for me. Robots taking our jobs. Artificial intelligence aiding Big Government and Big Tech in knowing our every thought and action- and telling us what beliefs are acceptable and which ones aren’t. Sexbots. Designer babies. A remake of Roseanne.
                Furthermore, experts are telling us that people won’t own their own vehicles anymore, that we’ll all just send for a ride as needed. Where is the romance in any of this? Where is the adventure. Where is the humanity?
                We won’t be “parking” with our sweeties anymore, a practice that all but defined a good chunk of the latter 20th century in America. We won’t “have to” drive to a nice resort, either, for a romantic tryst.

    “Honey, whaddya say you and I…you know (winks).”
                “You mean (bats her eyes)?!”
                “You know I do (in a low voice). Let’s call for a car and have it take us to the lab to pick out an embryo!”
                “Oh, Henry, can we?!”
    “Hell, yeah! That’s what I’m I’m talkin’ 'bout!”

                 Paging Aldous Huxley. Your Brave New World is here.




Friday, August 18, 2017

Planned Parenthood Issues New Guidelines For Parents

                Planned Parenthood (Euphemism of the Year award winner in 2004, 2006, and 2016!), apparently not content to just slaughter over 300,000 babies every year, has now decided to lecture those who didn’t opt to abort their children.
                The organization has laid out its new Planned Parenthood Guidelines for Parents on a page of its website titled, “How do I talk with my preschooler about their body?” In a nutshell, the helpful advice boils down to: Your genitals have nothing to do with your gender! That’s right boys and girls very young people, your genitalia are completely irrelevant! So, parents, the next time you’re talking to your three or four-year-old about sex or gender, make sure to let them know that the one has absolutely nothing to do with the other! That shouldn’t confuse the little tykes in any way, and should set them on course to have a stable, healthy, rewarding life!
                If a child should inquire why boys and girls have different bodies, the world’s favorite abortion provider recommends immediately introducing the little one to the concept of transgender identity: “While the most simple answer is that girls have vulvas and boys have penises/testicles, that answer isn’t true for every boy and girl. Boy, girl, man and woman are words that describe gender identity, and some people with the gender identities ‘boy’ or ‘man’ have vulvas, and some with the gender identity ‘girl’ or ‘woman’ have penises/testicles. Your genitals don’t make you a boy or a girl.”
                Tim Wildmon, the president of the American Family Association, an organization dedicated to conservative values that has recently been labeled a “hate group’ by some media outlets, disagrees, stating that encouraging parents to discuss gender identity with children who “haven’t yet learned the alphabet” is “preposterous.” Wildmon added, “What Planned Parenthood is promoting here is just stupidity masked as sensitivity. If you’re an adult and trying to talk to a child about whether they’re really a boy or girl, you’re at risk of harming them psychologically. Unless a boy or girl is exhibiting behavior or says that they’re messed up about what they are, there’s no reason to bring something like that up (at such a young age).”
                I wish that what Planned Parenthood (whose supporters often state: “I’m standing with PP!”)  was doing in this regard was just the result of stupidity or hyper-sensitivity, but, as in their treatment of babies- and their parts- there is something much darker behind its “guidelines.” It is a (non-lethal) form of child-molestation. One that could be lethal to society.
                Anyway, I’m sure that, once the wee ones do master the alphabet, they will soon find updated beginning readers to instruct them.
                “See Dick’s vagina. See Jane’s dick. See spot run.” And run. And run.

                As for me? Well, call me old-fashioned, but I’m standing with my “Pee-Pee!” 





Thursday, August 17, 2017

Progressives Attempt To Topple Statues, America

                Progressives are in a rush to erase history and topple America, one statue at a time.
               College professors are leading the attacks by “fomenting at the mouth.” They have been routinely spewing crazed, violent, depraved- and stupendously ignorant and hypocritical- comments about President Trump and his supporters since the time of his election. These leftist thugs brook no argument, tolerate no dissent, and openly advocate killing those they disagree with even as they purport to be sickened by white supremacists and the “alt-right” assembling at rallies.
                There are so many examples of this it makes it difficult to choose just one for illustrative purposes, but California (no!) State University at Fresno professor Lars Miaschak has several contenders for vilest utterance. This past February he tweeted: “To save American democracy, Trump must hang. The sooner and the higher, the better.” Might this have gotten a bit more media coverage if a university professor had tweeted that about President Obama? Miaschak must hate white people. But it doesn’t matter, only Black Lives Matter, and the media only focus on Trump’s tweets.
                Maischak teaches American history, with a focus on the 19th century, including the history and tenets of Karl Marx. Why doesn’t any of this surprise me? And, speaking of statues, in another February tweet the professor wonders if money is being collected to erect a monument honoring “the Trump assassin.”
                Down goes Thomas Jefferson, who essentially freed the entire human race from countless centuries of bondage to kings and despotic governments, and up goes a presidential assassin. Say, that is “fundamental change!”
                But the Tweedy One was just getting started. He called for the Republican Party to be banned in the United States. Yes! It’s always good for a democracy to go from a two-party system to a single party one! Prof. Maischak stated that he defines “justice” as being two Republicans murdered for every illegal immigrant deported. Who could argue with that?
                Miaschak also said that Mary, mother of Jesus Christ, should have aborted Jesus so he could be “spared this clerical-fascist crap.” Say what?
These statements alone should tell sentient beings everything they need to know about the “soul” of leftists- or the lack thereof- and their ultimate goals.  
                What is even more chilling is the fact that- at least in slightly milder forms- this type of leftist dogma has spread throughout Silicon Valley, Hollywood, academia, the mainstream media, and has permeated “Big Business” in general to a significant degree.
                A California State University at Fresno spokesperson issued the following statement to the Daily Caller: “Lars Maischak is employed as a lecturer at Fresno State. Statements made on his personal social media accounts are his alone and are not endorsed by or reflect the position of the University.”
                What a bold and thorough denunciation of repeated, explicit incitements to violent crime, murder and insurrection! Cal-State Fresno doesn’t endorse the mass-murder of those with opposing viewpoints? Yay!

The school also claimed Maischak was only a “lecturer” …and eventually placed him on paid leave. It recently said, however, that it will not be bringing him back this fall.

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Mount Rushmore Announcement: Less Is More

Washington, D.C.
July 4, 2018
National Park Service (U.S. Department of the Interior)
Office of The Director of The National Park Service (DNPS)

DNPS: “Welcome, esteemed members of the press- and people of all genders- to this historic announcement. As you all know, for some time now there has been a growing awareness of white privilege, and the attendant celebration thereof via hurtful and triggering statues, paintings, orchestral pieces, movies and television shows, holidays, phrases, sports team nicknames, town and lake names, jokes, gibes, insinuations, innuendos, anecdotes, and a long list of other evils that I won’t enumerate now.
“This is why I am so pleased to be able to share with you today the news that, in the spirit of inclusivity, tolerance and healing, two of the likenesses on Mount Rushmore will be eviscerated from their erstwhile places of honor. The countenances of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, former slave owners both, will be blasted from the face of the rock outcropping- and thus, literally, from the face of the Earth- as soon as circumstances permit. Yes, thank you! Calm down, please! Though these faces were made of stone, our hearts are not! While it’s true these two men accomplished some great things, such as defeating the British, establishing the most successful democratic republic in the history of the world, setting the precedent for all presidents to come, and declaring that all men are created equal and are granted certain unalienable rights by their Creator, they were also deeply flawed and unworthy of adoration such as Gutzon Borglum bestowed upon them. Additionally, the National Park Service, in conjunction with the U.S. Department of the Interior, will re-scrutinize the bios of Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln in an attempt to determine their continuing merit to adorn this rocky shrine.
“Moreover, the Park Service is conducting a study to determine the feasibility of constructing a ‘Black Mount Rushmore’ in the nearby hills. After all, these are the ‘Black Hills,’ and should reflect that in who we honor there. In fact, we are already accepting nominations for figures to be potentially ensconced on the possible future shrine. So far, President (and Michelle) Obama, Muhammed Ali, Prince, Oprah, Maxine Waters, the Reverend Al Sharpton, Rahm Emanuel, Keith Ellison, Redd Foxx, Dennis Rodman, Lebron James, O.J. Simpson, and Malcolm X have been suggested as candidates, but none of these are set in stone…ha, ha, ha! A little Park Service humor, there. Anyway, keep the suggestions coming!
“I am similarly elated to bring closure to the confusion regarding the images on Stone Mountain, in Georgia. While the depictions of Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee and ‘Stonewall’ Jackson have all been removed, we have decided that those of their horses, ‘Blackjack,’ ‘Traveler,’ and ‘Little Sorrel,’ respectively, can stay, as they were also oppressed victims of the white (humanoid) patriarchy.
“Thank you all for coming. I can take a few questions if there are any.”

                                                     [fade]

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

First Annual Fundraiser For Invasive Species Prevention And Illegal Immigration Advocacy

Edison Ballroom
New York City
September 11, 2017

Chester E. Dogooder, host: “I’d like to welcome you all to the first annual Fundraiser for Planned Diversity. We are honored to have representatives from the Alterity Administration (AA), Contrariety Committee (CC), and the Directorate of Diversity and Dissimilitude (DDD) attending tonight’s gathering!
                “We meet here this evening with dual purposes. First, I am thrilled to say that tonight we’ll have a chance to make a difference in the fight against invasive species. I’m sure I don’t have to tell any of you how much these invasives- terrestrial and aquatic alike- have cost us in terms of almost unimaginable and inalterable damage to ecosystems and infrastructure, to say nothing about the loss of domestic flora and fauna. From Africanized (“killer”) bees and Asian carp to zebra mussels, the United States is under a sustained assault from alien invaders that is literally changing our landscape and altering our way of life.
                “Sadly, once these invasive species are established, they tend to crowd out native species, and there is almost no way to reverse this, or even reach an equilibrium. Estimates of the cost of fighting this war on invasives run as high as $137 billion a year. And, experts say, this is a drop in the bucket compared to what it will take to seriously deal with the problem. The Alien Species Prevention and Enforcement Act of 1992 makes it illegal to transport a plant or animal deemed injurious to the U.S. through the mail, but this is, of course, just a band-aid on a problem requiring tourniquets and a full-body wrap. Currently, mechanical removal, chemical control, biological control and interference with reproduction are also tools being used to beat back the alien invaders, the list of which is long and growing. For example, Kudzu is called “The Vine That Ate the South.” The brown tree snake has caused the extinction of at least 12 bird species on Guam alone. European starlings were introduced to America via the depositing of just 100 birds in New York City’s Central Park, and now are found everywhere in the U.S., often to the detriment of native species. The emerald ash borer is on the verge of wiping out the entire $25.1 billion dollar a year ash lumber industry. Zebra mussels and spiny water fleas have permanently changed the character of thousands of lakes and rivers. The litany of damage caused by non-native species goes on and on. You all will have an opportunity, through silent auctions, sweepstakes, lottery tickets, and, of course, straight-up donations, to help raise some serious money to help prevent any further spread- or introduction- of invasive species.
                “With that said, I am equally excited to talk about the second part of tonight’s fundraiser, our goal to raise five million dollars…that’s right…$5 million…to help illegal immigrants get into this country, and sanctuary cities to defeat the fascistic attempts of the Trump administration to deport those that are already here. These blatantly racist and xenophobic attempts to prevent those that are different from us from having a chance to thrive in this country are as appalling as they are shocking and counterproductive. We know how much immigrants add to our society. The richness, flavor and diversity they bring with them can only reinvigorate America, and add another priceless multicultural mosaic to the vast and ever-changing tapestry of the New World. Whether engaging in female genital mutilation, lobbying for Sharia Law, or just denouncing Uncle Sam while taking his entitlement monies, these immigrants are vital to the long-term health and viability of the United States of America. 
                “I encourage you all to bid in our silent auctions. Peruse the tables around the perimeter of the ballroom for fantastic opportunities to bid on items such as aquatic weed removal systems and illegal-immigrant aid kits! Sweepstakes and lottery information can be found just to the left of the ‘Don’t Build a Wall Around Your Heart’ booth, located next to the all-gender bathroom facilities. Secure donation boxes can be found next to the food and drink kiosk, featuring locally-sourced foods and beverages. ‘Coexist’ bumper stickers are available for just $5 each, or five for $20 at the kiosk. All right folks, thank you for coming, and let’s get this party started, shall we?! That’s what I like to hear! With that, I’ll turn it over to tonight’s featured speaker, the mayor of Berkeley, California, Jesse Arreguin!”
                                                                    (fade)

                

Monday, August 14, 2017

Donald Trump Versus Kim Jong-un: A War Of Words

                Remarkably, many in the media, both In the U.S. and around the world, are portraying President Trump as a bigger threat to the planet than Kim Jong-un. And it’s not just many in the media that are mad. Politicians and entertainment types have jumped on the Raving Train, too. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) recently said of Trump: “North Korea is a serious thing. You have this guy making bellicose threats against somebody else who has very little to lose over there. Kim Jong Un, the world always thought he was not a responsible leader; well, he’s acting more responsible than this guy is.” This guy?
                Not to be outdone, 62 House Democrats wrote a letter to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, expressing their “profound concern” over statements by Trump they purport to believe have “dramatically increased tensions with North Korea and raised the specter of nuclear war.” They called Trump’s “fire and fury” speech “irresponsible and dangerous.”
                In the interest of fairness, let’s examine what each of the two leaders have said regarding the current crisis. First, here are some verifiable (and certifiable) quotes from the Dear Leader, Kim Jong-un, and his official government mouthpieces:
                After overseeing the launch of a Hwasong-14 missile in early July, the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reported that Kim Jong-un exclaimed: “American bastards would not be very happy with this gift sent on the July 4 anniversary.” Then, breaking into peals of laughter, he said: “We should send them gifts once in a while to help break their boredom.” The Dear Leader then added that the missile looked “as handsome as a good-looking boy.” Alrighty then.
                Several weeks before that statement, Jong-un averred that his country “can tip new-type intercontinental ballistic rockets with more powerful nuclear warheads and keep any cesspool of evils in the earth, including the U.S. mainland, within our striking range.”
                Then there is this nugget: “If the American imperialists provoke us a bit, we will not hesitate to slap them with a pre-emptive nuclear strike. The United States must choose! It’s up to you whether the nation called the United States exists on this planet or not.” 
Speaking of pre-emptive strikes: "The KPA Strategic Force is now carefully examining the operational plan for making an enveloping fire at the areas around Guam with medium-to-long-range strategic ballistic rocket Hwasong-12 in order to contain the U.S. major military bases on Guam including the Anderson Air Force Base.”
KCNA reported: “The Trump administration should not run riot, thinking twice about the catastrophic consequences to be entailed by its foolhardy military moves. It should properly understand the spirit and will of the Korean army and people to annihilate the enemy and finally conclude the standoff with the U.S.”
                And: “The Korean People’s Army will reduce the bases of aggression and provocation to ashes with its invincible Hwasong rockets tipped with nuclear warheads and reliably defend the security of the country and its people’s happiness in case the US and the South Korean puppet forces fire even a single bullet at the territory of the DPRK.”

            Also, in a statement distributed through state-run media: "If the Trump administration does not want the American empire to meet its tragic doom in its tenure, they had better talk and act properly.”
                Then there was the recent statement boasting that the North Korean military is "capable of fighting any war the U.S. wants is now on the standby to launch fire into its mainland, waiting for an order of final attack.”
And my personal favorite, from the KCNA again: "We consider the U.S. no more than a lump which we can beat to a jelly any time.”
Since taking power, Jong-un has executed scores of his generals and party officials, some via anti-aircraft missile fire, for such crimes as falling asleep during a meeting with the Dear Leader. The regime has referred to defectors from the starving nation as the “burlesque of human scum.” Kim Jong-un had his uncle and mentor, Jang Song-thaek, executed in December 2013, accusing him of plotting a coup. He labeled Song-thaek “worse than a dog,” and said he had “lost his mind due to his greed for power.” Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
                Yet, on the bright side, upon the successful launch of a long-range missile at the end of 2012, the then newly-ensconced leader said, “Suddenly, the whole country is engulfed with happiness and the people endlessly inspired.”
                Contrast these “statements” with president Trump’s craziest and most “belligerent” utterances:
"North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States. They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen... he has been very threatening beyond a normal state. They will be met with fire, fury and frankly power the likes of which this world has never seen before.” Trump followed that up by saying, “if anything, maybe that statement wasn’t tough enough.”
He has also said of Jong-un, “He will not get away with what he’s doing,” and that, if he attacks the United States, “He will regret it fast.”
Trump also stated that the U.S. is “locked and loaded” if a military solution is required, and most recently remarked: “We will see what happens. We think that lots of good things can happen and we can also have a bad solution.”
It is decades of “diplomacy,” patience, and un-seriousness that got us into the situation we- and the world- now find ourselves in, and that allowed the Hermit Kingdom to become an existential threat to most of the rest of the planet.
One of North Korea’s military leaders recently called Trump "bereft of reason," and said he was "extremely getting on the nerves" of its armed forces.
Bingo.
That’s exactly what Trump wants, and exactly what’s required to eventually put an end to this ridiculous Mexican standoff. For over 241 years, the world has been better off with a confident and ascendant America, whether it chooses to recognize that fact or not. Theodore Roosevelt famously said, “Speak softly and carry a big stick.” After Pearl Harbor, F.D.R. proclaimed: “With confidence in our armed forces, with the unbounding determination of our people, we will gain the inevitable triumph -- so help us God.” Later in that same war, Harry Truman was very clear on the potential consequences of the hydrogen bomb.
 J.F.K. stated: “Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, and oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty.”
And Ronald Reagan went to Berlin and stood outside of the Brandenburg gate and said: “Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!”
A madman repeatedly threatens to unleash a pre-emptive nuclear strike on America, and yet many major American newspapers recently published headlines like the one that adorned the front page of my big city rag: “Trump amps up his bellicose threats.” That is truly crazy.
The press, academia, Hollywood, et. al., are without question, “bereft of reason.”
Twenty-odd years of “sanity” in dealing with the Kim clan has proven to be in vain- and therefore insane. Continuing to do the same thing and expecting different results is one definition of insanity. It is time that we got the attention of the Dear Leader by acting “worse than a dog.” Like a rabid junkyard dog, to be precise.  Perhaps then he will realize that this big dog will once again fight if you rattle its cage.
Newsflash to snowflakes: North Korea is the world’s anus, and only a bad-ass can stop it from crapping on him.




Sunday, August 13, 2017

Drag Queen Story Hour

                It’s a “thing,” as kids might say. More and more public libraries around the country are inviting drag queens to read story books to young children. Three of them, in fact, recently read to the kiddies at the Indianapolis Central Library, while bedecked in their scurrilous garb.
                Heather Pugh, a parent attending the “recital” with her children, told USA Today: “Some parents choose to expose their children to religion, some parents choose to expose their children to culture, the arts. I’m working to teach my children to be open-minded, loving, accepting people.”
                That would be the perfect modern defense for the 38-year-old teacher who is caught having sex with a 15-year-old student. “You wish to condemn me? I’m just more open-minded, loving, and accepting than most are.”
                Another parent, Stephen Lane, said, “I want kids to experience just the fun of being around drag queens, the creativity, their style, their expression of their individuality.” Lane is the library’s “indispensable man” when it comes to planning programs for children, according to the newspaper.
                Not to be outdone, the Brooklyn Public Library held a similar taxpayer-funded event in May. They touted the event by stating: “What do drag queens and children have in common? They love dressing up and all things sparkly and fancy! Drag Queen Story Hour captures the imagination and play of the gender fluidity in childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models.” That is unabashedly queer and nonsensical indoctrination.
                An Indianapolis library spokesperson told Todd Starnes of Fox News that there is nothing wrong with teaching wee little ones about gender fluidity, saying: “Young children often exhibit gender fluidity in their play, and Drag Queen Story Hour reinforces for them that there is nothing wrong with that.”
                Starnes himself admits that the Brooklyn library said the response to Drag Queen Story Hour has been “overwhelmingly positive.” This in itself is evidence of a nearly complete breakdown in societal morality and sanity. He says he asked the library if they would “ever allow ministers to dress up in clerical garb and read Bible stories to the children.”
                I think we all know the answer to that question. But really, who in their right mind would expect God’s word, as told in Genesis and other books in the Old and New Testaments, to compare with plump, gay guys reading children’s stories in lispy voice, whilst clad in cheeky, colorful, frilly women’s apparel…with all that implies?


Saturday, August 12, 2017

Bad Coup Rising

I see a bad coup a-rising
I see leftists holding sway
I see overreach and lyin’
I see the New York Times today

Don’t tweet out tonight
They’re bound to take your rights
There’s a bad coup on the rise

I hear hypocrites a-blowin’
I know the end is coming soon
They’ll say the ocean’s overflowin’
I hear the voice of rage and ruin

Don’t tweet out tonight
They’re bound to pick a fight
There’s a bad coup on the rise

I hope you got your things together
I hope you’re quite prepared for lies
Looks like we’re in for nasty weather
You know they’re planning your demise

Oh don’t tweet out tonight
They’re bound to take your rights
There’s a bad coup on the rise
There’s a bad coup on the rise

(Sing to the cadence of “Bad Moon Rising” by John Fogerty/Creedence Clearwater Revival)




Friday, August 11, 2017

Have You Hugged A Terrorist Today?

                Police in Denmark have instituted a bold new program to stop the spread of Islamic radicalization and its resultant terror attacks. Authorities in Aarhus, the country’s second largest city, are trying to change the minds and hearts of potential Islamic extremists by supporting them and showing them kindness rather than treating them as outcasts and criminals.
                Many refer to this nascent jihadi behavior-modification model as the “Have you hugged your terrorist today” approach. This is exactly the tack we need to take! In fact, we need to extend the program! Instead of shaming murderers, rapists and pedophiles, we should all take turns giving them big hugs! If we in the arbitrarily privileged community of those who haven’t committed a heinous crime can’t even find it in ourselves to take a Charles Manson into our arms and make him feel accepted via a warm embrace, then we bear full responsibility for his actions.
                Who knows what might have happened had someone given Pol Pot a peck on the cheek? Countless lives may have been saved. Idi Amin Dada might have become a ballet dancer, poet, or first responder if someone had taken him in their arms early on in his rule. I bet if we’d just talked sweetly to Tojo, he wouldn’t have okayed the bombing of Pearl Harbor. If Mussolini hadn’t missed out on an all-over massage, maybe he’d have sided with the allies.

                And we can only imagine the carnage, strife and pain that could have been avoided had someone from the U.S. or England given Hitler a hummer.