California Gov. Gavin “French Laundry” Newsome and other
prominent progressive politicians recently gathered in support of an aggressive
“new” gerrymandering campaign. If voters subsequently
approve the proposed new political map, half a dozen California Republicans
would be thrown out of office.
This endeavor is supposedly to “combat” redistricting in
Texas that would see several Democrats lose their seats. But nothing could be
further from the truth. Democrats have redistricted and gerrymandered much of
the United States, to the point that states like New jersey, New York, and
California itself have significantly more Democrats in Congress than would
comport with the actual statewide percentage of folks who vote Democrat. In
fact, Democrats have historically been the ones gerrymandering, incessantly and
preposterously, to increase their representation over what it otherwise
would—and probably should—be.
With a straight face Newsome stated: “We can’t stand back
and watch this democracy disappear, district by district, all across this
country.” Others said much the same thing in support of the Golden State’s gerrymander campaign. Which is hard to do given the fact
that many Blue States’ congressional district maps look like they were drawn by
Kamala Harris after closing time on 2-for-1 night at the local bar.
Gerrymandering makes fewer districts competitive, whether
done by Democrats or Republicans…and tends to drive both parties towards the
fringes/extremes. Yet, once again, it is the staggering hypocrisy, gaslighting,
and projection of Democrats that is objectively repulsive.
Gavin Newsome’s name should be Gerry Mander!
He is all over the map, whether it be redistricting or as regards policy
prescriptions. The Democrat Party either needs to change its name or at
least have the decency to put an asterisk and/or disclaimer after it to comply
with truth-in-advertising laws. The party blathers on about “saving democracy”
while they do everything conceivable to destroy it. Democrats lie, cheat,
steal, wish to pack the court, embrace lawfare and hoaxes, dismiss the rule of
law, foster judicial tyranny, eschew the Constitution, disregard citizen’s
rights but welcome illegals, and utterly reject the wishes of the majority.
“Autocrats” would be a more accurate term for them. Or
perhaps “Despotcrats.”
“Nastycrats?” The “Prevaricator Party?” “Corruptocrats?”
“Asshatocrats?”
I’m sure readers can come up with their own updated terms
for the erstwhile DFL. I might even reference the best one or two in a future
column.
No comments:
Post a Comment