According to LifeSiteNews: “A Christian doctor in
Australia was found guilty of professional misconduct, not for substandard
patient care, but because he had previously shared social media posts critical of abortion, LGBT ideology,
and COVID-19 policies. Dr. Jereth Kok was suspended over six years ago and
lost his career.”
His suspension was recently upheld by something called ‘the
Victorian Civil and Administration Tribunal’ (VCAT), which decided that many of
his online social media posts over a 12-year period were examples of
“misconduct” under the National Law. Not fond of the mass murder of the
unborn? What kind of ‘doctor’ are you? That’s misconduct! Remember doctors’
creed: “first, do grievous harm!” Wait, that might not be it. Anyway, I think
it is summed up in the Hypocritical Hippocratic Oath, whatever that is.
Question: do we really think the good doctor would have
been suspended for lauding Obama Care or criticizing President Trump? Trump’s
tariffs? Would he have lost his career if he had used social media to, say,
pick a bone with Christians?
In a similar vein, Michael Weitzel, a Trump supporter,
was recently made to leave a professional soccer game in St.
Louis due to his "Make America Great Again" baseball cap. You see,
the venue touts itself as “nonpolitical” and supposedly eschews political
messages of any kind. At the time, the stadium was flying gay pride flags.
Would Weitzel-- or anyone else-- have been booted from
the stadium for wearing an “I’m with her” tee-shirt? For sporting a “Biden
2024” button? Or even for wearing a hat stating, “Globalize the intifada?”
(Perhaps in PRIDE! colors!) Odds are there was a Palestinian flag or two in the
crowd, as well.
A two-tier justice system sadly prevails in the U.S.
today. Meaning there is often no justice for those on the bottom tier: whites,
males, heterosexuals, Christians, conservatives. Check all of those boxes? You
are obviously a fascist…and proud of it. And probably wear American Eagle
jeans. Intersectionality!
Speaking of the so-called ‘justice’ system, federal district
court judges continue to rule against the Trump administration’s agenda—and,
ironically and hypocritically, in stark defiance of United States Supreme Court
orders. This is nothing short of illogical, and lawless, tyranny.
The founders were deeply concerned about the possibility
of judicial tyranny. Thomas Jefferson stated: "The opinion which gives
to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not,
not only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but for the legislative
and executive also in their spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic
branch.”
Jefferson also noted that "…judges should be
withdrawn from the bench whose erroneous biases are leading to dissolution. It
may, indeed, injure them in fame or fortune; but it saves the Republic…"
Indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment