Democrat-led movement to lower the legal voting age to 16 — or in some cases even younger — appears to be gaining
momentum as some teenagers and activists seek to achieve local victories while
winning the support of some in the media. To wit, the "Vote 16"
campaign recently picked up a victory in Vermont, where the Democrat-controlled
state legislature recently overrode Republican Gov. Phil Scott's veto of just
such a measure allowing 16-year-olds to vote in municipal elections…and
hold the highest elected offices.
Democrats are fond of aborting kids, sometimes even after birth.
They are also big fans of providing minors with hormone blockers and mutilating
the genitals of those they didn’t abort. And, of course, they are engaged in an
all-out effort to groom our children—sexually and politically. For many
of unfettered abortionand gender dysphoria
combine with their unshakeable belief in man-caused climate change to become a surpassingly
odd —and perverse—religion. One in which doubters or dissenters, or even the
insufficiently devout, are dealt with particularly harshly.
As previously mentioned, Democrats seem
to have an unquenchable desire to sexualize children, and in the past week have
been attacking opponents of child sex trafficking and calling us “conspiracy
theorists.” The California Assembly Public Safety Committee actually initially voted down a bill, on a party-line vote, that would have enhanced
penalties for child sex trafficking by making it a “serious felony,” a step up
from merely being illegal. Hard to believe. Yet, progressives also spent time trashing a movie chronicling and attacking child sex trafficking,
even though audiences loved it.
They do, however, wish to garner kids’ votes by…offering to let
them vote. And hold high office. But do we really want 14-year-olds to
vote, and 16-year-old governors? What would this mean? Well, first off, that few
Democrats would ever again be defeated. And we would have “state of the state”
speeches, broadcast on Instagram, where the Honorable Governor would not look
up at the camera and would start off the oration by stating his or her
preferred pronouns and saying, “Like, you know, dudes…everything’s all effed up;
and that’s why it’s, like, time to party!”
In all seriousness, “after-birth abortion” may well be the most horrifying euphemism ever constructed.
In a previous article I opined that Democrats may want to lower the voting age
to coincide with their preferred maximum age of legal “after-birth abortions,” also
suggesting that age may be 9. I now believe that age may be 6, with their
insatiable desire for utter and permanent power and control superseding even their
lust for infanticide.
It is no surprise that Democrats, who
are now also in favor of “after-vote corrections,” as evidenced by the 2020
Presidential election, should want the very young to vote. 6-year-olds are easy
to bribe. And tend to have the equivalent intellectual—and moral—capacity of
those that would grant them suffrage.