A new study, published in the journal
Sustainable Development (don’t miss the centerfolds!), suggests that the
world’s population should be brought down to 4 billion by the year 2200. That’s right, these
“experts” believe the world would be much better off if we cut our population
in half by getting rid of about 4 billion people in less than two
centuries. Ironically, the journal is published by the Canadian Center for
Science and Education (CCSE). Canada has fewer people than my yard has ants,
with almost no one living farther than 150 miles from the U.S. border.
This reminds me of a chapter title
about overpopulation from the late great P.J. O’Rourke’s fantastic book, “All
The Trouble In The world.” The title is, “Just Enough of Me, Way Too Much of You.”
Gets to the crux of the matter in nine words, doesn’t it? Who the hell gets to
determine who is still allowed to reproduce and when? We’re talking about a
global issue, and white folks are already being wildly outbred by “Peoples of
Color” around the planet.
Governments will have to be the
arbiters and determinators, of course. Does that make you feel all warm and
cozy? Not me. It brings to mind another nine-word phrase, once uttered by President
Reagan: “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” Who should be gotten
rid of? The half of folks (in this country) who don’t pay any taxes, for
example? A Democrat-Socialist government would probably get rid of the half
that do pay taxes. Those remaining would be really screwed. (Actually,
more than half of Americans receive some form of government
assistance. That is only possible because of deficit spending and the largesse
of the rich, the top 1% of whom pay about 40% of all federal income taxes.)
The Third Reich thought it knew who
should be dispensed with: the Jews. This belief is coming around again, with
the influx of Muslims into the West. Stalin slaughtered countless millions of political
opponents, ethnic minorities, and assorted others he didn’t much care for. All
in the name of Socialism. Chairman Mao was responsible for the deaths of
up to 80 million folks, more than any other world leader, at least in “peace
time.” He dubbed this the “Great Leap Forward.” Very progressive,
indeed. After abolishing private property, Pol Pot utilized the Killing Fields
of Cambodia to off a couple million of his political opponents, the
better to create a classless society. Sounds a lot like today’s
Democrat-Socialists.
Population collapse is likely going to
happen anyway, given fertility rate trends. The number of white people will
almost surely drop significantly, which is unfortunate for white people as they
already only constitute about 16% of the Earth’s inhabitants.
Should girl babies be figuratively
catapulted into a swamp as has been the case in China for decades now? Should
babies exhibiting even the slightest “imperfections” remain “unborn?” Should
the few actual “white supremacists” have their say? What if Finland wants to
restrict the number of Russians, Canadians the number of Americans, Muslims the
number of Christians (that’s already the case), or Sagittarians the number of
Capricorns?
If every ethnic or intersectional
group lobbies for reducing the numbers of everyone else…what then?
Me? Per the aftermath of the plandemic,
I’d start by reducing the number of experts… and studies.
No comments:
Post a Comment