Per Front Page Magazine:
“On June 10,
2026, the Minnesota Clemency Review Commission voted to grant a pardon for Tou
Lue Vang, a criminal illegal alien from Laos. Vang had been convicted in 2006
of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. According to court filings, Vang
repeatedly sexually assaulted a girl between 2002 and 2004. On one occasion, he
tried to offer his victim $10 to keep quiet about the sexual assaults. While
being interviewed by police, he tried to justify his actions by saying that for
him ‘it is a cultural thing…to marry and have sex with girls as young as 12.’
He also claimed that the victim was just as guilty as him and should also be
arrested.”
Minnesota
Gov. Tim Walz signed off on the pardon. The girl was 10-years-old when
Vang first raped her. Twelve-years-old when he last did. (Perhaps not even old
enough to need a Tampon, Tim.) The Trump administration was ultimately able to
deport him anyway. He should not have been pardoned. Or even deported. He
should have been executed. Molesting little girls is not a “cultural” thing, it
is an evil thing, regardless of what Vang’s alleged “culture” promotes
or “tolerates.” Asserting that a 10-year-old girl is as responsible for what
transpired as he is…is also evil.
Pardoning
a refugee who sexually
abused a 10-year-old girl, to prevent him
from being deported seems almost unimaginably despicable, even for Walz. But
apparently not. Walz subsequently attacked the Trump administration for
deporting the heinous immigrant, saying, “I guess the question I would ask is,
‘Did that make us any safer?’” I guess the reply with which I would answer the
governor is, “Of course it does, asshat. Whenever serial violent criminals and
pedophiles are removed from society it always makes us safer. It cannot be
otherwise.”
Incredibly,
Walz also said this: “Did it improve the idea that we can’t all be judged by
our worst day?” Stop right there! He raped
a 10-year-old girl…and then continued to do so for months and
years! One rape of a 10-year-old is more than enough to judge
someone. But continuing to rape that child over time?
Were Walz
and his ilk so nonjudgemental and tolerant of the Jan. 6ers who strolled
through the People’s House without raping anyone? No, basically they
said “fry ‘em!”
Should the Nazis
have been judged by their worst day, when they came up with the idea of
incinerating the Jews? And continued doing so for years, much as Vang continued
assaulting his prepubescent victim?
It wouldn’t matter
what day, month, or year you picked to peek in on Walz-- by his words and
actions you’d find he’s a monster. And, for all of that, his worst—and
most illuminating-- day might have been the one during which he uttered that
disgusting sentence. And you’re damn sure right I judged him for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment