Someone
apparently named Randy Rannow, apparently writing an opinion piece published in
the Idaho Statesman, wrote:
“As a scientist working in
industry, I'm deeply concerned about the infiltration of PragerU content into
public education. Despite its name, PragerU is not a university, it's a media
outlet pushing politically charged narratives disguised as educational material.
Its videos routinely distort history, deny climate science and promote
ideologically driven misinformation.
In states like Florida and
Oklahoma, PragerU Kids content is now being approved for classroom use. This
includes videos that downplay slavery, dismiss Indigenous history and question
the reality of climate change. These are not "alternative perspectives";
they are deliberate attempts to rewrite facts and manipulate young minds.
Science and history are not
partisan. They are disciplines built on evidence, inquiry, and integrity.
Allowing PragerU into our classrooms undermines the very foundation of
education and threatens our children's ability to think critically and engage
with the world honestly.
I urge educators, parents
and policymakers to reject PragerU's materials and demand transparency in
curriculum decisions. We must protect our schools from ideological intrusion
and ensure that students receive a rigorous, fact-based education.
Truth should never be
optional.”
This
is a classic case—correction-- the classic case of projection. I have
followed PragerU since its inception, viewed most of its videos. They are
uniformly fact-based, anything but radical. They are put forth in a calm and
balanced manner and are specifically meant to be a corrective for the “ideologically
driven misinformation” and indoctrination that universities preposterously
attempt to pass off as “education.” Universities routinely, systemically,
grotesquely distort history and proffer hoaxes as “settled science.”
PragerU
videos do not-- in any way— “downplay slavery” or “dismiss indigenous
history.” A couple do, correctly, challenge the man-caused global
warming/climate change as religion attempt to manipulate minds young and old.
Education
is not supposed to instruct students what to think. It is supposed to teach
them how to think. Colleges and universities were, until recently, explicitly
instituted to challenge modes of thinking and expose students to diverse
viewpoints, not tell them that “alternative perspectives” are invalid and not
allowed.
As
for the author’s assertion that “science and history are not partisan?” Well,
that is a preposterous and a priori lie on its face. One needs only look at Mr.
Science himself, Dr. Fauci, to see that that is untrue. It is, in fact, today’s
colleges and universities themselves that threaten our children's ability to
think critically and engage with the world honestly. Parents got a glimpse
of transparency into their children’s education during the plandemic. And they
didn’t like what they saw.
It
is PragerU whose self-imposed mission is to protect our schools from
ideological intrusion and ensure that students receive a rigorous, fact-based
education.
Truth
should never be optional. It should never be obscured, obfuscated,
covered up, hidden, distorted, or denied.
And
that is precisely what public education does today. And precisely what PragerU
is trying to counteract.
No comments:
Post a Comment